$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
AS has been widely used in C. elegans to model IR injury. Some key points should be highlighted for this protocol: C. elegans are resistant to a wide array of injuries, justifying the need for 3 concomitant insults (heat, starvation and anoxia) to achieve death using this system. Anoxia alone does not kill the worms in this window of time14. Furthermore, temperature increase is an additional stress, so it is important to monitor closely. Strictly speaking, starvation does not contribute significantly to the degree of mortality observed7, per se, but it appears to reduce variability among experimental replicates. Given that there can be significant variability from day-to-day, it is extremely important to compare samples run directly in parallel, and to repeat experiments over multiple days. In general, outcomes are measured for three separate plates of 50-100 worms/experimental condition and these are then averaged and considered as a single experimental replicate. Generally, between seven and nine replicates appear to be sufficient to achieve or rule out statistical significance.
The developmental stage of the worms used in the experiment also needs to be carefully monitored as the susceptibility of different stages to AS damage varies significantly15,16. The use of young adults is standard, and larval stage (L3 and L4) worms appear to be more resistant to the damaging effects of AS (unpublished data).
This protocol presents two ways to perform the experiments, one using a lab-made apparatus (using Tupperware-type containers and gas input11) and other using a commercial hypoxic chamber4,6. Anoxia can be achieved by other means that consume the oxygen, as described elsewhere13,17. The use of alternate techniques to create a hypoxic environment may change the AS incubation time necessary to create the desired amount of death. Targeting ~20% survival is an ideal starting point for studying protective interventions, while 80% is similarly ideal for interventions that exacerbate the detrimental effects of AS. Another important caveat is the time at which the observer scores dead/alive worms. If the time for analysis is extended beyond 24 hr, the data may be misleading since dead worms become increasingly difficult to identify. This may be due to worm carcasses becoming relatively transparent over time, but also to the fact that fertilized embryos can develop into progeny post-mortem inside of the carcasses and disrupt them as they emerge.
The analysis of neuronal morphology can be modified to look at protein expression patterns18, nuclear fragmentation4 and other parameters19 by substituting a worm strain that expresses the appropriate genetically encoded marker. One final caveat is that the visualization of the neuronal processes should be done less than 30 min after placing the worms on the slide. Animals kept under anesthesia on slides for longer periods can exhibit AS-independent damage. Adjust the amount of animals per slide according to the time needed to track and analyze them.