A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Folding and Characterization of a Bio-responsive Robot from DNA Origami

14.4K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/51272

⸱

December 3rd, 2015

In This Article

Summary

DNA origami is a powerful method for fabricating precise nanoscale objects by programming the self-assembly of DNA molecules. Here we describe a protocol for the folding of a bio-responsive robot from DNA origami, its purification and negative staining for transmission electron microscopic imaging (TEM).

Abstract

The DNA nanorobot is a hollow hexagonal nanometric device, designed to open in response to specific stimuli and present cargo sequestered inside. Both stimuli and cargo can be tailored according to specific needs. Here we describe the DNA nanorobot fabrication protocol, with the use of the DNA origami technique. The procedure initiates by mixing short single-strand DNA staples into a stock mixture which is then added to a long, circular, single-strand DNA scaffold in presence of a folding buffer. A standard thermo cycler is programmed to gradually lower the mixing reaction temperature to facilitate the staples-to-scaffold annealing, which is the guiding force behind the folding of the nanorobot. Once the 60 hr folding reaction is complete, excess staples are discarded using a centrifugal filter, followed by visualization via agarose-gel electrophoresis (AGE). Finally, successful fabrication of the nanorobot is verified by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), with the use of uranyl-formate as negative stain.

Introduction

The uses for nucleic acids nanotechnology are astounding. The tractability of the Watson-Crick base pairing as well as the ease and relative low-cost of large-scale synthesis of custom-made oligos2 has generated an explosion of applications3 and research in the field of DNA nanotechnology. Structural DNA nanotechnology, based on the immobile Seeman junction4,5 as a fundamental building block makes use of DNA as a self-assembling elementary unit for the construction of arbitrary shapes6-8.

The recent development of the scaffolded DNA origami9 technique allows for the construction of comp....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Preparation of Staples Pool Mixture

  1. Order lyophilized DNA nanorobot staples on 96-well plates as listed in Table 1 (see Materials) and normalize to 10 nmol. For a detailed description of the design and architecture of the DNA nanorobot see Ben-Ishay et al.14 and Douglas et al.15).
  2. Reconstitute each staple well with DNase/RNase-free ultrapure to a concentration of 100 µM. For staples normalized to 10 nmol, reconstitute with 100 µl of ultrapure water.
  3. Pool together 20 µl of each staple using a multichannel pipettor and a sterile 55 ml solution basi....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Representative results are shown in Figure 2A. All lanes contain 1 µg of total DNA, measured via spectrophotometer (OD260). Compared with the circular single-strand DNA scaffold (Lane 2), nanorobots are hindered in the gel due to their higher molecular weight, the result of staples hybridization to the scaffold DNA (Lane 3. Red arrow). The low molecular weight band in Lane 3 represents excess staples which did not bind to the scaffold DNA (Green arrow). After purification via centrifugal filtr.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

We described the fabrication, purification, and visualization of the DNA nanorobot. Following fabrication of the hexagonal chassis of the device, the function of the nanorobot is programmed with the simple introduction of specific cargo and sensing strands to the robot which readily find their designated position due to hydrogen-bonding complementarity with available single-strand docking sites14,15,22.

The fabrication protocol described uses a slow annealing ramp, which is generall.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank S. Douglas for extremely valuable discussions and advice, and all the members of the Bachelet lab for helpful discussions and work. This work is supported by grants from the Faculty of Life Sciences and Institute of Nanotechnology & Advanced Materials at Bar-Ilan University.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
DNase/RNase free distilled waterGibco10977
M13mp18 ssDNA scaffoldNEBN4040S
10x TAEGibco15558-042
1 M MgCl2AmbionAM9530G
Amicon Ultra 0.5 ml centrifugal filter 100K MWCOAmiconUFC510024
AgarosePromegaV3125
TBE bufferPromegaV4251
Ethidium bromide 10 mg/ml solutionSigma AldrichE1510
1 kb DNA markerNEBN3232S
Loading DyeNEBB7021S
uranyl formatepolysciences24762
carbon-coated TEM grids Science servicesEFCF400-Cu-50
Thermal Cycler c1000 TouchBio-Rad
Glow Discharge K100XEmitech
UV table Gel Doc EZ ImagerBio-Rad
NanoDrop 2000cThermo Scientific
TEM FEI-G12Tecnai

References

  1. Watson, J. D., Crick, F. H. Genetical implications of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature. 171, 964-967 (1953).
  2. Kosuri, S., Church, G. M. Large-Scale de novo. DNA synthesis: technologies and applications. Nature Meth. 11 (5), 499-507 (2014).
  3. P....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

DNA NanorobotAgarose Gel ElectrophoresisTransmission Electron MicroscopyStaple-Scaffold AnnealingCentrifugal Filter PurificationFolding BufferUranyl-formate StainHexagonal NanostructureStimuli-responsive Device