Method Article

Exfoliation of Egyptian Blue and Han Blue, Two Alkali Earth Copper Silicate-based Pigments

17.6K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/51686

⸱

April 24th, 2014

 , 
1Department of Chemistry, The University of Georgia

In This Article

Summary

The preparation and exfoliation of CaCuSi4O10 and BaCuSi4O10 are described. Upon stirring in hot water, CaCuSi4O10 spontaneously exfoliates into monolayers, whereas BaCuSi4O10 requires ultrasonication in organic solvents. Near infrared (NIR) imaging illustrates the NIR emission properties of these materials, and aqueous dispersions of these nanomaterials are useful for solution processing.

Abstract

In a visualized example of the ancient past connecting with modern times, we describe the preparation and exfoliation of CaCuSi4O10 and BaCuSi4O10, the colored components of the historic Egyptian blue and Han blue pigments. The bulk forms of these materials are synthesized by both melt flux and solid-state routes, which provide some control over the crystallite size of the product. The melt flux process is time intensive, but it produces relatively large crystals at lower reaction temperatures. In comparison, the solid-state method is quicker yet requires higher reaction temperatures and yields smaller crystallites. Upon stirring in hot water, CaCuSi4O10 spontaneously exfoliates into monolayer nanosheets, which are characterized by TEM and PXRD. BaCuSi4O10 on the other hand requires ultrasonication in organic solvents to achieve exfoliation. Near infrared imaging illustrates that both the bulk and nanosheet forms of CaCuSi4O10 and BaCuSi4O10 are strong near infrared emitters. Aqueous CaCuSi4O10 and BaCuSi4O10 nanosheet dispersions are useful because they provide a new way to handle, characterize, and process these materials in colloidal form.

Introduction

Vibrant colors were prized throughout the ancient world. Even today, we can still see the remains of pigments and dyes created by every major culture. Remarkably, two of the most famous synthetic blue pigments share a similar chemical composition and structure, despite having been developed at widely different times and places. The colored components of both Egyptian blue, CaCuSi4O10, and Han blue, BaCuSi4O10, belong to the alkali earth copper tetrasilicate series, ACuSi4O10 (A = Ca, Sr, Ba)1, as well as the larger gillespite group, ABSi4O10 (B = Fe, Cu, Cr)2,3.

Beyond traditional pigment applications, current scientific interest in these materials centers on their strong near infrared (NIR) emission properties. This emission originates from the Cu2+ in square planar coordination; these ions are linked by tetrahedral silicate moieties within the three-dimensional crystal structure, and the resulting layers alternate with alkali earth ions4-6. Recent technical highlights include NIR imaging to identify Egyptian and Han blue pigments on cultural heritage artifacts7,8, lanthanide doping of ACuSi4O10 to enhance NIR reflectance properties and open new energy transfer pathways9,10, the use of ACuSi4O10 as the active material for optical sensors11, and the exfoliation of CaCuSi4O10 into monolayer nanosheets12.

In particular, this last example provides a way to nanostructure CaCuSi4O10 so that it can be handled as a colloidal dispersion rather than as a particulate solid12. Because colloidal dispersions are compatible with solution-processing techniques (e.g. spin coating, ink jet printing, layer-by-layer deposition), this advance opens new application areas that range from security inks to biomedical imaging. The experimental protocols illustrated in this contribution will enable researchers from diverse backgrounds to prepare, characterize, and use CaCuSi4O10 and BaCuSi4O10 nanosheets in their work.

Protocol

1. Preparation of CaCuSi4O10

  1. Melt Flux Synthesis of CaCuSi4O10
    1. Weigh out CaCO3, SiO2, and Cu2CO3(OH)2 in a 2:8:1 molar ratio: 0.1331 g (1.330 mmol) of CaCO3, 0.3196 g (5.319 mmol) of SiO2, 0.1470 g (0.6648 mmol) of Cu2CO3(OH)2. In addition, weigh out the flux components (12.5% by weight): 0.0375 g of Na2CO3, 0.0125 g of NaCl, and 0.0250 g of Na2B4O7.10H2O. Add these materials to a clean agate mortar.
    2. Hand grind for ~5 min with an agate pestle until the mixture becomes a homogeneous light green powder (Figures 1a and 2a). Transfer this mixture to a clean, dry platinum crucible.
    3. Heat the crucible in a furnace to 875 °C (ramp rate of 2 °C/min), hold at 875 °C for 16 hr, and then cool down to room temperature (rate of 0.8 °C/min).
    4. Remove the crystals from the crucible and gently crush them using a pestle.
    5. Allow the crystals to soak in 50 ml of 1 M aqueous HCl overnight to remove the melt flux.
    6. Filter the crystals and wash with deionized water to fully remove any remaining melt flux.
      Note: This material should be ground into a finer powder for powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analysis (Figure 5). It also can be characterized by optical microscopy (Figure 3), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Figure 4), and NIR photography (Figure 8).
  2. Solid State Synthesis of CaCuSi4O10
    1. Weigh out CaCO3, SiO2, and CuO in a 1:4:1 molar ratio: 0.1331 g (1.330 mmol) of CaCO3, 0.3196 g (5.319 mmol) of SiO2, and 0.1058 g CuO (1.330 mmol) and add to a clean agate mortar.
    2. Dampen the powder mixture with 1-2 ml acetone and hand grind with an agate pestle for ~5 min. Transfer the resulting light gray powder (Figures 1b and 2b) into a platinum crucible.
    3. Heat the crucible in a box furnace to 1,020 °C at a ramp rate of 5 °C/min, hold for 16 hr, and then cool down to room temperature
    4. Scrape out the loose, light blue-gray powder using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) spatula.
      Note: The product can be characterized by optical microscopy (Figure 3), SEM (Figure 4), PXRD (Figure 5), and NIR photography (Figure 8).

2. Synthesis of BaCuSi4O10

  1. Melt Flux Synthesis of BaCuSi4O10
    1. Weigh out BaCO3, SiO2, and CuO in a 1:4:1 molar ratio: 0.2085 g BaCO3 (1.057 mmol), 0.2539 g SiO2 (4.226 mmol), and 0.0840 g CuO (1.056 mmol). In addition, weigh out the flux component (12.5% by weight): 0.0765 g of PbO. Add these materials to a clean agate mortar.
    2. Hand grind for ~5 min with an agate pestle until the mixture becomes a homogeneous light gray powder (Figures 1c and 2c). Transfer this mixture to a clean, dry platinum crucible.
    3. Heat the crucible in a furnace to 950 °C (ramp rate of 2 °C/min), hold at 950 °C for 24 hr, then slowly cool down to 700 °C (rate of 0.1 °C/min), and finally cool to room temperature.
    4. Remove the crystals from the crucible and gently crush them using a pestle.
    5. Allow the crystals to soak in 50 ml of 1 M aqueous HNO3 overnight to remove the melt flux.
    6. Filter the crystals and wash with deionized water to fully remove the remainder of the melt flux. Note: This material should be ground into a finer powder for PXRD analysis (Figure 6). It also can be characterized by optical microscopy (Figure 3) and NIR photography (Figure 8).
  2. Solid State Synthesis of BaCuSi4O10
    1. Weigh out BaCO3, SiO2, and CuO in a 1:4:1 molar ratio: 0.2085 g BaCO3 (1.057 mmol), 0.2539 g SiO2 (4.226 mmol), and 0.0840 g CuO (1.056 mmol) and add to a clean agate mortar.
    2. Dampen the powder mixture with 1-2 ml acetone and hand grind with an agate pestle for ~5 min. Transfer the resulting light gray powder (Figures 1d and 2d) into a platinum crucible.
    3. Heat the crucible in a box furnace to 960 °C at a ramp rate of 5 °C/min and hold for 16 hr, then cool to room temperature.
    4. Scrape out the loose blue powder using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) spatula. Note: The product can be characterized by optical microscopy (Figure 3), PXRD (Figure 6), and NIR photography (Figure 8).

3. Exfoliation of CaCuSi4O10

  1. Charge a 50 ml round bottom flask with 0.50 g of CaCuSi4O10, 40 ml of deionized water, and a glass-coated magnetic stir bar.
  2. Attach a water-cooled condenser to the flask. Heat the reaction to 85 °C with magnetic stirring at 400 rpm for two weeks.
  3. Remove from the heat source, allow the solution to settle undisturbed overnight, and then filter the supernatant through a 0.4 µm membrane filter. Vacuum dry the solids. Note: The product is a light blue powder that can be characterized by optical microscopy (Figure 3), PXRD (Figure 5), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure 7), and NIR photography (Figure 8).

4. Exfoliation of BaCuSi4O10

  1. Charge a 50 ml plastic centrifuge tube with 0.14 g of BaCuSi4O10 and 20 ml of N-vinyl pyrrolidone.
  2. With the centrifuge tube immersed in an ice/water bath, sonicate with a probe ultrasonicator at 40% amplitude (17 W) for 1 hr.
  3. Let the dispersion settle undisturbed overnight, and then decant the supernatant into a new centrifuge tube.
  4. Spin down at 10,286 x g using a centrifuge. Decant the supernatant, leaving the nanosheets at the bottom of the centrifuge tube.
  5. Resuspend this material in 20 ml of water with a few minutes of bath sonication. To isolate a powder, filter through a 0.4 µm membrane filter and vacuum dry the solids. Note: The product is a light blue powder that can be characterized by optical microscopy (Figure 3), PXRD (Figure 6), TEM (Figure 7), and NIR photography (Figure 8).

5. Ink Preparation

  1. Disperse ~0.10 g of CaCuSi4O10 nanosheets in 5 ml of deionized water using bath sonication for ~10 min. Note: This ink (Figure 9) can be used for painting, printing, etc. See Figure 10 for a representative example where the ink was applied to paper with a brush.

6. Near Infrared Photographic Imaging

  1. Irradiate the samples using red light (e.g. with a red light-emitting diode array), taking care to eliminate any other sources of light.
  2. Photograph using a camera modified to image in the near infrared region. Use f stop setting f/22 and an exposure time of 0.5 sec.

Results

The described syntheses of CaCuSi4O10 and BaCuSi4O10 provide approximately 0.5 g of product per batch. Isolated yields of CaCuSi4O10 from the melt flux and solid-state syntheses typically range from 70-75% and 90-95%, respectively. For BaCuSi4O10, the isolated yields from the melt flux and solid-state syntheses typically range from 65-70% and 95-99%, respectively.

The textures of all of the prepared materials, as well as differences in the intensity of their blue color due to varying crystallite sizes, are visible by low magnification optical microscopy (Figures 3a-h). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images confirm that the solid-state method of synthesizing CaCuSi4O10 produces ~1-15 µm primary crystallites (Figure 4b) whereas melt flux conditions lead to ~5-50 µm crystallites (Figure 4a). Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns for CaCuSi4O10 (Figures 5a and 5c) and BaCuSi4O10 (Figures 6a and 6c) showcase the composition and phase purity of these products.

Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images show the nanosheet morphology of the exfoliated products (Figure 7). In addition, NIR photographic imaging shows the strong luminescence of both the bulk and exfoliated materials (Figure 8). A simple way to illustrate the solution processability of CaCuSi4O10 nanosheets is to prepare an aqueous ink (Figure 9) suitable for painting (Figure 10).

Powder analysis, four samples in trays, experiment on material properties comparison, lab study.
Figure 1. Photographs of the hand-ground starting materials. (a) CaCuSi4O10 melt flux, (b) CaCuSi4O10 solid-state, (c) BaCuSi4O10 melt flux, and (d) BaCuSi4O10 solid-state syntheses. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Scanning electron microscopy analysis of microscale aggregates for material structure study.
Figure 2. Scanning Electron Microscopy. Images of the hand-ground starting materials for the (a) CaCuSi4O10 melt flux, (b) CaCuSi4O10 solid-state, (c) BaCuSi4O10 melt flux, and (d) BaCuSi4O10 solid-state syntheses. All samples were coated with gold prior to imaging. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Calcium-Barium silicate exfoliation comparison, CaCuSi₄O₁₀ vs BaCuSi₄O₁₀ samples.
Figure 3. Optical Microscopy. Bulk CaCuSi4O10 prepared by melt flux (a) and solid state (b) procedures. Bulk BaCuSi4O10 prepared by melt flux (c) and solid state (d) procedures. Exfoliated products (e-h) of (a-d), respectively. All images share the 1 mm scale bar show in panel (a). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Scanning electron microscopy, SEM micrographs compare particle aggregation, 50 µm scale.
Figure 4. Scanning Electron Microscopy. Images of bulk CaCuSi4O10 made by melt flux (a) and solid state (b) methods. Samples were coated with gold prior to imaging. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

XRD patterns; diffraction angles (2θ) vs. intensity; material phase analysis; comparative graph.
Figure 5. Powder X-Ray Diffraction: CaCuSi4O10. Patterns for bulk CaCuSi4O10 prepared by melt flux (a) and solid state (c) methods. Asterisks denote a silica impurity. Patterns for exfoliated CaCuSi4O10, (b) and (d), prepared from (a) and (c), respectively. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

X-ray diffraction pattern, intensity vs. 2θ, showing multiple reflections; spectral analysis chart.
Figure 6. Powder X-Ray Diffraction: BaCuSi4O10. Patterns for bulk BaCuSi4O10 prepared by melt flux (a) and solid state (c) methods. Asterisk denotes a silica impurity. Patterns for exfoliated BaCuSi4O10, (b) and (d), prepared from (a) and (c), respectively. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

TEM images of graphene oxide sheets; nanoscale structure analysis; 100 nm scale bars.
Figure 7. Transmission Electron Microscopy. Representative images of exfoliated CaCuSi4O10 derived from bulk CaCuSi4O10 made by melt flux (a) or solid state (b) methods. Representative images of exfoliated BaCuSi4O10 derived from bulk BaCuSi4O10 made by melt flux (c) or solid state (d) methods. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Test tube fluorescence comparison; experiment in optical emission analysis; result visualization.
Figure 8. Near Infrared Imaging. Luminescence of bulk CaCuSi4O10 prepared by melt flux (a) and solid state (b) procedures. Luminescence of bulk BaCuSi4O10 prepared by melt flux (c) and solid state (d) procedures. Luminescence of the exfoliated products (e-h) of (a-d), respectively. Powder samples are contained within glass vials, and the entire set of samples was imaged at once. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Chemical solution in vial, experiment setup for spectroscopic analysis, University of Georgia.
Figure 9. Photograph of a CaCuSi4O10 nanosheet ink in a vial.

Fluorescence microscopy, glowing text "UGA" with a smiley face, dark background.
Figure 10. Near Infrared Imaging. A rudimentary painting with the CaCuSi4O10 nanosheet ink that illustrates both its simple application and its luminescence properties.

Discussion

The preparation of Egyptian blue pigment, a mixture of mostly CaCuSi4O10 and SiO2, is a well-studied process4,13-21. The numerous reported procedures may be categorized as either melt flux or solid-state reactions. Two major advantages of the melt flux approach are that it permits lower reaction temperatures (<900 °C) and allows CaCuSi4O10 crystals to nucleate and grow from a molten glass phase20. The flux component is typically an alkali salt (e.g. Na2CO3) or borate compound (e.g. borax). In comparison, the solid-state syntheses omit the flux but require higher temperatures (~1,000 °C) for the reaction between Ca, CuO, and SiO2 sources to reach completion.

Although the synthesis of Han blue pigment is not as well studied as that of Egyptian blue4,22-25, the preparation of BaCuSi4O10 follows similar melt flux and solid-state routes with two differences: (1) a PbO flux should be used, and (2) the reaction temperatures must be more closely controlled because of alternative Ba-Cu-Si-O phases that can form (e.g. BaCuSi2O6).

These points are illustrated by the detailed procedures and results described in this paper. First, for all methods, the starting materials should be ground to a smooth powder (Figures 1a-d) consisting of 5-20 µm particles (characterized by SEM; Figures 2a-d). Next, the use of a significant amount of flux (12.5% by weight) in the preparation of CaCuSi4O10 and BaCuSi4O10 leads to highly crystalline products, which are characterized by intense blue coloration (Figures 3a and 3c), relatively large particle sizes (Figure 4a), and strong PXRD patterns (Figures 5a and 6a). The diminished isolated yields (~70%) from these preparations are caused by adhesion of the melted reaction mixtures to the crucible. In comparison, CaCuSi4O10 and BaCuSi4O10 prepared by the solid-state route exhibit less intense coloration (Figures 3b and 3d) and smaller particle sizes (Figure 4b). As synthesized, these products are powders that can be isolated in near-quantitative yields. Thus, for both CaCuSi4O10 and BaCuSi4O10, the advantages of flux and the importance of reaction temperature cannot be overstated.

Remarkably, the exfoliation of CaCuSi4O10 and BaCuSi4O10 occurs under simple aqueous conditions. In the case of CaCuSi4O10, this reaction is quite slow at room temperature (≥6 weeks to see any appreciable exfoliation), but it becomes synthetically useful at 80 °C (substantial exfoliation after 2 weeks). In comparison, the exfoliation of BaCuSi4O10 is sluggish even at 80 °C, and so we apply an even greater energy input in the form of ultrasonication. These reactions are highly reliable with two caveats. For CaCuSi4O10, it is important to use a glass-coated stir bar; if a standard PTFE-coated stir bar is used, we find that PTFE byproducts contaminate the CaCuSi4O10 nanosheet product. For BaCuSi4O10, it is important to control the ultrasonication power and time so that the reaction is stopped before the nanosheets become degraded.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the nanosheet products shows that these very thin materials have lateral dimensions ranging from hundreds of nanometers to several microns. In general these lateral dimensions correlate with the crystallite size of the three-dimensional starting material. In prior work, atomic force microscopy provided topographic mapping that demonstrated the single-layer thicknesses (~1.2 nm) of these nanosheets12. Photographs of powder CaCuSi4O10 and BaCuSi4O10 nanosheet samples (Figures 3e-h) show that their color is less intense than that of the starting materials, a direct result of nanostructuring.

Additional information is provided by PXRD (Figures 5 and 6), which reveals basal cleavage along the (001) plane and preferred orientation along the {00l} series for all nanosheet samples. These features reflect the stacked alignment of these highly anisotropic nanomaterials when drop-cast onto a substrate. Furthermore, the characteristic NIR emission of CaCuSi4O10 at ~910 nm and BaCuSi4O10 at ~950 nm is illustrated in a NIR photograph of all eight samples (Figure 8).

The solution processing of CaCuSi4O10 can be accomplished by simply preparing a colloidal dispersion of CaCuSi4O10 nanosheets (Figure 9) to use as an ink. This ink then can be applied to a substrate via spin coating, spray coating, ink jet printing12, or simply brushing (Figure 10). Importantly, the NIR emission properties of CaCuSi4O10 are retained at all stages of this process. These new possibilities highlight the contrast between CaCuSi4O10 nanosheets and the traditional use of Egyptian blue pigment, a highly granular material that is challenging to incorporate into a smooth paint.

Disclosures

The authors have no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Mark Abbe (UGA) for providing the NIR imaging equipment and Dr. Rasik Raythatha (Solvay Performance Chemicals) for the barium carbonate used in this work. We acknowledge the efforts of Isaiah Norris (UGA undergraduate) and Terra Blevins (North Oconee High School), who helped test the synthetic methods.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Sodium carbonate (Na2CO3)Sigma AldrichS7795bioXtra, ≥99.0%
Calcium carbonate (CaCO3)Sigma AldrichC4830bioXtra, ≥99.0%
Barium carbonate (BaCO3)Solvay Performance ChemicalsResearch sample: Electronic-grade purity, nanocrystalline
Copper (II) carbonate basic [Cu2CO3(OH)2]Sigma Aldrich207896Reagent grade
Copper(II) oxide (CuO) Sigma Aldrich45081299.99% trace metals base
Silicon dioxide (SiO2)Sigma AldrichS5631~99%, particle size 0.5-10 μm (approximately 80% between 1-5 μm)
Sodium tetraborate decahydrate (Na4B4O7.10H2O)Sigma AldrichS9640ACS ≥ 99.5%
Sodium chloride (NaCl) Sigma AldrichS9888ACS ≥ 99.0%
Lead(II) oxide (PbO) Sigma Aldrich402982ACS ≥ 99.0%
N-Vinylpyrrolidinone (C6H9NO)Sigma AldrichV3409contains sodium hydroxide as inhibitor, ACS ≥ 99.0%
Box FurnaceThermo ScientificLindberg Blue M
Box FurnaceCarboliteCWF 12/5 1200C
Bath SonicatorBranson
UltrasonicatorQsonicaMisonix S-4000
Cameracustom modification of Nikon D3000 camera by LDP LLC MaxMax.comn/aXnite Nikon D3000 camera with a Nikkor 18-200 mm lens and a Xnite 830 filter 
Light SourceExcled Ltd.PAR64LED Colour Beamer
Light MicroscopeLeicamz6 Stereomicroscope with Spot Idea camera and Software
Powder X-Ray DiffractometerBrukerD8-Advance diffractometer (Co-Kα radiation source)
Transmission Electron MicroscopeFEITechnai 20
Scanning Electron MicroscopeFEIInspect F
Membrane filtersMilliporeHTTP04700Isopore Membrane filter with 0.4 µm pore size

References

  1. Berke, H. The Invention of Blue and Purple Pigments in Ancient Times. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 15-30 (2007).
  2. Hazen, R. M., Burnham, C. W. The Crystal Structure of Gillespite I and II: A Structure Determination at High Pressure. Am. Min. 59, 1166-1176 (1974).
  3. Miletich, R., Allan, D. R., Angel, R. J. The Synthetic Cr2+ Silicates BaCrSi4O10 and SrCrSi4O10: The Missing Links in the Gillespite-Type ABSi4O10. 82, 697-707 (1997).
  4. Pabst, A. Structures of Some Tetragonal Sheet Silicates. Acta Cryst. 12, 733-739 (1959).
  5. Chakoumakos, B. C., Fernandez-Baca, J. A., Boatner, L. A. Refinement of the Structures of the Layer Silicates MCuSi4O10 (M = Ca, Sr, Ba) by Rietveld Analysis of Neutron Powder Diffraction Data. J. Solid State Chem. 103, 105-113 (1993).
  6. Hughes, E. M., Pack, M. J., Dann, S. E., Weller, M. T. Preparation and Structural Characterisation of Alkaline Earth Sheet Silicates Containing Copper by Powder Neutron Diffraction, EXAFS and UV-Visible Spectroscopy. Anales de Quimica Int Ed. 93, 233-236 (1997).
  7. Accorsi, G., et al. The Exceptional Near-Infrared Luminescence Properties of Cuprorivaite. Egyptian Blue). Chem. Comm. , 3392-3394 (2009).
  8. Verri, G. The Spatially Resolved Characterization of Egyptian Blue, Han Blue and Han Purple by Photo-Induced Luminescence Digital Imaging. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 394, 1011-1021 (2009).
  9. Jose, S., Reddy, M. L. Lanthanum-Strontium Copper Silicates as Intense Blue Inorganic Pigments with High Near-Infrared Reflectance. Dyes Pigm. 98, 540-546 (2013).
  10. Zhuang, Y., Tanabe, S. Forward and Back Energy Transfer Between Cu2+ and Yb3+ in Ca1-xCuSi4O10:Ybx Crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 112, (2012).
  11. Borisov, S. M., Würth, C., Resch-Genger, U., Klimant, I. New Life of Ancient Pigments: Application in High-Performance Optical Sensing Materials. Anal. Chem. 85, 9371-9377 (2013).
  12. Johnson-McDaniel, D., Barrett, C. A., Sharafi, A., Salguero, T. T. Nanoscience of an Ancient Pigment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1677-1679 (2013).
  13. Laurie, A. P., McLintock, W. F. P., Miles, F. D. Egyptian Blue. Proc R Soc London A. 89, 418-429 (1914).
  14. Chase, W. T. Egyptian Blue as a Pigment and Ceramic Material. Science in Archaeology. Brill, R. H. , MIT Press. Cambridge, MA. 80-90 (1971).
  15. Tite, M. S., Bimson, M., Cowell, M. R. Chapter 11: Technological Examination of Egyptian Blue. Archaeological Chemistry III, Advances in Chemistry Series. Lambert, J. B. 205, American Chemical Society. Washington, DC. 215-242 (1984).
  16. Ullrich, D. Egyptian Blue and Green Frit: Characterization, History and Occurrence, Synthesis. Datation-Charactérisation des Peintures Pariétales et Murales. Delamare, F., Hackens, T., Helly, B. 17, È. Ollefe, Rixensart, Belgium. 323-332 (1987).
  17. Riederer, J. Chapter 1: Egyptian Blue. Artist' Pigments: A Handbook of Their History and Characteristics. Fitzhugh, E. W. 3, National Gallery of Art. Washington, DC. 23-45 (1997).
  18. Delamare, F. Sur les Processus Physiques Intervenant Lors de la Synthèse du Bleu Égyptien: Réflexion à Propos de la Composition de Pigments Bleus Gallo-Romains. Revue d'Archéométrie. 21, 103-119 (1997).
  19. Canti, M. G., Heathcote, J. L. Microscopic Egyptian Blue (Synthetic Cuprorivaite) from Sediments at Two Archaeological Sites in West Central. 29, 831-836 (2002).
  20. Pradell, T., Salvado, N., Hatton, G. D., Tite, M. S. Physical Processes Involved in Production of the Ancient Pigment, Egyptian Blue. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89, 1426-1431 (2006).
  21. Warner, T. E. Synthesis, Properties and Mineralogy of Important Inorganic Materials. , Wiley: Hoboken, NJ. 26-47 (2011).
  22. Lin, H. C., Liao, F. L., Wang, S. L. Structure of BaCuSi4O10. Acta Cryst. 48, 1297-1299 (1992).
  23. Janczak, J., Kubiak, R. Refinement of the Structure of Barium Copper Silicate BaCu[Si4O10] at 300. K. Acta Cryst. 48, 1299-1301 (1992).
  24. Wiedemann, H. G., Bayer, G. Formation and Stability of Chinese Barium Copper-Silicate Pigments. Conservation of Ancient Sites on the Silk Road: Proceedings of an International Conference on the Conservation of Grotto. Agnew, N. , Getty Conservation Institute. Los Angeles. 379-387 (1997).
  25. Berke, H., Wiedemann, H. G. The Chemistry and Fabrication of the Anthropogenic Pigments Chinese Blue and Purple in Ancient China. East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine. 17, 94-120 (2000).

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Melt FluxSolid StateTEM ImagingNear InfraredNanosheet DispersionUltrasonicationWater Exfoliation
Exfoliation of Egyptian Blue and Han Blue, Two Alkali Earth Copper Silicate-based Pigments
Contact Us
Recommend to Library

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved.