A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Protocol for Biofilm Streamer Formation in a Microfluidic Device with Micro-pillars

11.4K views

DOI:

10.3791/51732

August 20th, 2014

In This Article

Summary

Protocols for the study of biofilm formation in a microfluidic device that mimics porous media are discussed. The microfluidic device consists of an array of micro-pillars and biofilm formation by Pseudomonas fluorescens in this device is investigated.

Abstract

Several bacterial species possess the ability to attach to surfaces and colonize them in the form of thin films called biofilms. Biofilms that grow in porous media are relevant to several industrial and environmental processes such as wastewater treatment and CO2 sequestration. We used Pseudomonas fluorescens, a Gram-negative aerobic bacterium, to investigate biofilm formation in a microfluidic device that mimics porous media. The microfluidic device consists of an array of micro-posts, which were fabricated using soft-lithography. Subsequently, biofilm formation in these devices with flow was investigated and we demonstrate the formation of filamentous biofilms known as streamers in our device. The detailed protocols for fabrication and assembly of microfluidic device are provided here along with the bacterial culture protocols. Detailed procedures for experimentation with the microfluidic device are also presented along with representative results.

Introduction

Recently, we demonstrated bacterial biofilm formation dynamics in a microfluidic device that mimics porous media1. Bacterial biofilms are essentially colonies of surface aggregated bacteria that are encased by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS)2-4. These thin films of bacteria can form in almost every conceivable niche ranging from smooth surfaces to the much more complex habitat of porous media. Valiei et al.1 used a microfluidic device with an array of micro-pillars to simulate a porous media structure and studied biofilm formation in this device as a function of fluid flow rate. They found that in a certain flow regim....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Perform the experimental protocols here in the order described below. Microfabrication protocols for creating the microfluidic platform are discussed in Step 1. Step 2 describes the bacterial culture protocol (Figure 2), and Step 3 pertains to assembly of the experimental setup (Figure 3). Finally, the actual experimental step is described in Step 4.

1. Chip Fabrication Procedure

NOTE: Proper safety procedures must be followed for the processes described below. Consult the institutional safety officer for details.

  1. Design the mask with an appropriate software (e.g.....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Using the above mentioned microfabrication protocol, a PDMS based microfluidic device was constructed. Figure 1 shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the PDMS device. Figure 1a shows the entrance section of the device. A fork-like entrance is created to equalize pressure head across the device. Further SEM imaging also showed that the pillar walls are almost vertical (Figure 1b). The cultured bacterial solution (Figure 2) was diluted and.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

We demonstrated a simple microfluidic device that mimics porous media for studying biofilm development in complex habitats. There are several critical steps that dictate the outcome of the experiments. They include device geometry. While the post geometry can vary, adequate pore-space for streamers to form is necessary. Moreover, Valiei et al.1 have demonstrated that streamer formation occurs only in a certain flow rate range. At flow rates lower than a threshold value, deformation of biofilms into st.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Howard Ceri from the Biological Sciences Department of the University of Calgary for providing bacterial strains. A. Kumar acknowledges support from NSERC. T. Thundat acknowledges financial support from the Canada Excellence Research Chair (CERC) program. The authors would also like to acknowledge help from Ms. Zahra Nikakhtari for help with videography.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Flourescent MicroscopeNikon
LB agarFisherBP1425-500suspend 40 g in 1 L of purified water
LB brothFisherBP1427-500suspend 20 g in 1 L of purified water
Biosafety hoodMicrozone corporation
Petri dishFisher875712sterile 100 mm x 15 mm polystyrene Petri dish
Incubator shakerNew Brunswick ScientificExcella E24 incubator shaker series
50 ml sterilized centrifuge tubeCorning430828Polypropylene RNase-/DNase-free
Tetracycline free baseMP Biomedicals10301250 μg/ml
SYLGARD 184 siliconeDow Corning Corporation68037-59-2Elastomer Base and curing agent
Positive photoresist (AZ4620)
Plastic tubeCole-Parmer

References

  1. Valiei, A., Kumar, A., Mukherjee, P. P., Liu, Y., Thundat, T. A web of streamers: biofilm formation in a porous microfluidic device. Lab Chip. 12, 5133-5137 (2012).
  2. Costerton, J. W. Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections. Science. 284, 1318-13....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Micro pillars ArrayPseudomonas FluorescensSoft LithographyPDMS StampOxygen Plasma BondingBacterial CultureFluorescence MicroscopyFlow Rate Control