A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Taking Advantage of Reduced Droplet-surface Interaction to Optimize Transport of Bioanalytes in Digital Microfluidics

7.5K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/52091

⸱

November 10th, 2014

 ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

The protocol for fabrication and operation of field dewetting devices (Field-DW) is described, as well as the preliminary studies of the effects of electric fields on droplet contents.

Abstract

Digital microfluidics (DMF), a technique for manipulation of droplets, is a promising alternative for the development of “lab-on-a-chip” platforms. Often, droplet motion relies on the wetting of a surface, directly associated with the application of an electric field; surface interactions, however, make motion dependent on droplet contents, limiting the breadth of applications of the technique.

Some alternatives have been presented to minimize this dependence. However, they rely on the addition of extra chemical species to the droplet or its surroundings, which could potentially interact with droplet moieties. Addressing this challenge, our group recently developed Field-DW devices to allow the transport of cells and proteins in DMF, without extra additives.

Here, the protocol for device fabrication and operation is provided, including the electronic interface for motion control. We also continue the studies with the devices, showing that multicellular, relatively large, model organisms can also be transported, arguably unaffected by the electric fields required for device operation.

Introduction

The miniaturization of devices that work with liquids is of paramount importance for the development of “lab-on-a-chip” platforms. In this direction, the last two decades have witnessed a significant progress in the field of microfluidics, with a variety of applications.1-5 Contrasting with the transport of fluid in enclosed channels (channel microfluidics), DMF manipulates droplets on arrays of electrodes. One of the most attractive merits of this technique is the absence of movable parts to transport fluids, and motion is instantly stopped by turning off electric signals.

However, droplet motion is dependent on drop....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

NOTE: In the procedures described below, laboratory safety guidelines must always be followed. Of particular importance is the safety when dealing with high voltage (> 500 V) and handling chemicals.

1. Coating of a Conductive Substrate with Candle Soot

  1. Cut copper metal into rectangles (75 x 43 mm, 0.5 mm thick). Clean each copper substrate by immersion in copper etchant for about 30 sec, wash with tap water for about 20 sec, and dry with paper.
    NOTE: If using Method 1 below, change the dimensions to 75 x 25 mm to fit into the machine.
  2. Sweep a lit paraffin candle under the copper substrate for 30–45 sec....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Previously, we have used Field-DW devices to allow the motion of proteins in DMF. In particular, droplets with bovine serum albumin (BSA) could be moved at a concentration 2,000 times higher than previously reported by other authors (without additives). This was due to the reduced interaction between droplet and surface; Figure 4 shows a droplet containing fluorescently-tagged BSA (see Freire et al.9 for more information on the experiments). The first picture on the left shows the dro.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The most critical step of the protocol is the protection of the soot layer, directly associated with the success in moving droplets. Metallizing the soot layer (method 1 above) allows close to 100% of fabrication success. However, the maximum operation time is about 10 min; possibly, droplet fractions are wetting the soot through holes in the metal layer. Coating the soot layer with the fluorinated liquid is the easiest and fastest alternative, and requires minimum resources, but only 40–50% of the fabricated subst.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Lindback Foundation for financial support, and Dr. Alexander Sidorenko and Elza Chu for fruitful discussions and technical assistance, and Professor Robert Smith for assistance with the C. elegans assays.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Paraffin candleAny paraffin candle
Sputtering systemDenton Vacuum, Moorestown, NJSputter coater Desk V HP equipped with an Au target. 
1-dodecanethiolSigma-Aldrich471364
TeflonDupontAF-1600
Fluorinert FC-40Sigma-AldrichF9755Fluorinated liquid: Prepare Teflon-AF resin in Fluorinert FC-40, 1:100 (w/w), to create the hydrophobic coating.
Graphic design software -Adobe IllustratorAdobe SystemsOther softwares might be used as well.
Copper laminateDupontLF9110
Laser PrinterXeroxPhaser 6360 or similarCheck for the compatibility with "rich black" or "registration black" (see text).
Copper EtchantTranseneCE-100
Perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) filmMcMaster-Carr84955K22
BreadboardAllied Electronics70012450 or similarLarge enough to allow the assemble of 10 drivers.
Universal circuit boardAllied Electronics70219535 or similar
ConnectorAllied Electronics5145154-8 or similar
Control board and control program (LabView software)National InstrumentsNI-6229 or similar
High-voltage amplifierTrekPZD700
Capacitors C and C1, 100 nF, 60 VAllied 8817183
Transistor T, NPNAllied 9350289
Diode D, 1N4007Allied 2660007
Relay Allied 8862527
Visualization systemEdmund OpticsVZM 200i or similarSystem magnification 24X – 96X. It is combined with a Hitachi KP-D20B 1/2 in CCD Color Camera.
RecorderSonyGV-D1000 NTSC or similarIt is connected to the camera by an S-video cable.
SimulationsCOMSOL MultiphysicsV. 4.4

References

  1. Fair, R. B. Digital microfluidics: is a true lab-on-a-chip possible. Microfluid Nanofluid. 3 (3), 245-281 (2007).
  2. Gupta, S., Alargova, R. G., Kilpatrick, P. K., Velev, O. D. On-Chip Dielectrophoretic Coassembly of Live Cells and Particles into Responsive Biomater....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Droplet TransportField De WettingElectrode FabricationSoot CoatingFluoro Polymer ApplicationC Elegans TransportBSA Interaction AnalysisElectronic Interface ControlLab On Chip