$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Sternal fractures are rare and occur in about 3-8% of all trauma victims1. Usually, these fractures are caused by blunt trauma. Most can be treated conservatively with a sufficient consolidation of the fracture. Some fractures show prolonged healing or even a lack of consolidation with the consecutive development of a pseudarthrosis and persistent painful instability2,3. In these cases surgical stabilization has to be considered. Respecting the different trauma-mechanisms responsible for sternal fractures such as the direct impact to the anterior chest wall or the flexion-compression injury of the trunk, a primarily stabilization of the fractures should be considered4-6. Possible indications for surgical treatment are: severe or persistent pain; respiratory failure or dependency on mechanical ventilation; shifted, overlapping or impacted fractures, as well as deformity or instability of the sternum; hunched posture and restricted movement of the trunk7.
There is a need to retain each sternal fragment in the correct position while neutralizing shearing forces to the sternum in order to restore anatomical shape and normal function of the anterior chest wall. In this context anterior sternal plating provides the best stability and is therefore increasingly used in the majority of cases. The advantage in stability by using a plate instead of wires has already been described in sternum closure after median sternotomy8. The use of locked plates gains importance due to their advantages in biological internal fixation. The principle of a locked plate is the fixation between the threaded screw head and the threaded screw hole of the plate. Thereby the locked plate acts as an internal fixator with the advantage of a minimized plate-bone contact preserving the periosteal blood supply below the plate9.
However, many surgeons are reluctant to perform sternal osteosynthesis due to possible complications. Difficulties in preoperative planning, severe injuries to mediastinal organs or failure of the performed method may be possible reasons10. Only case reports or small series are described for each procedure. Table 1 shows different surgical methods and a selection of trails describing and analyzing them.
| OP-technique | Year | Author | Study | Number of patients with surgery | Outcome |
| locked plate fixation |
| 3.5/4.0 mm fixed angle plate (LCP) | 2010 | Gloyer et al. [10] | Osteosynthesis of traumatic manubriosternal dislocations and sternal fractures with a 3.5/4.0 fixed angle plate (LCP) | 3 | no functional restrictions, no pain |
| locked plate (TiFix) | 2010 | Queitsch et al. [3] | Treatment of posttraumatic sternal non-union with a locked sternum-osteosynthesis plate (TiFix). | 12 | consolidation in all cases |
| low profile titanium plate (MatrixRib) | 2013 | Schulz-Drost et al. [11] | Surgical fixation of sternal fractures: locked plate fixation by low-profile titanium plates - surgical safety through depth limited drilling | 10 | after 12 weeks consolidation in all cases, no dislocation, patient satisfaction 1.4, no complications in follow up |
| SternaLock | 2005 | Wu et al. [12] | Sternal nonunion: a review of current treatments and a new method of rigid fixation | 2 | good functional outcome |
| Steel wires |
| Stainless steel wires | 2002 | Athanassiadi et al. [1] | Sternal fractures: retrospective analysis of 100 cases | 2 | good functional outcome |
| Stainless steel wires | 2002 | Potaris et al. [13] | Management of sternal fractures of 239 cases | 4 | good functional outcome |
| Sternal wire, bone graft | 2002 | Coons et al. [15] | Sternal non union: Case report | 2 | one patient with non union |
| Steel wires | 2009 | Abdul Rahman et al. [16] | Comminutes sternal fracture - a sternotomy wire fixation: report of 2 cases | 2 | good functional outcome |
| Steel wires | 2009 | Celik et al. [17] | Sternum fractures and effects of associated injuries | 2 | good functional outcome |
| non locking plate |
| Ant. 6 hole plate, bone graft | 2004 | Bonney et al. [18] | Sternal fractures: anterior plating rationale | 3 | plate removal after 12 months for personal resons |
| Ant. Cervical plates with 4 holes | 2009 | Ciriaco et al. [6] | Early repair of isolated traumatic sternal fractures unsing a plate system | 6 | one plate removed for sternal pain |
| Plate with 3 screws on eachs side of fracture | 1993 | Kitchensens and Richardson [19] | Open fixation of sternal fractures | 2 | good functional outcome |
| T-shaped compression steel plate, non-locking screws | 2006 | Al-Qudah [20] | Operative treatment of sternal fractures | 4 | 2 plates removed no reasons named |
| two 8 hole one-third tubular plates; H-plate | 2006 | Kälicke et al. [21] | Traumatic manubriosternal dislocation | 2 | no functional restrictions, no pain |
| other devices |
| 2 threaded Steinmann pins, sternal wires | 2005 | Molina [22] | Evaluation and operative technique to repair isolated sternal fractures | 12 | pin migration in one patient |
| Blount staples | 2011 | Abdelhalim El Ibrahimi et al. [23] | Traumatic manubriosternal dislocation: A new method of stabilization postreduction | 1 | good functional outcome |
| Titanium mandibular plates | 2007 | Richardson et al. [24] | Operative fixation of chest wall fractures: an understood prcedure? | 35 | 3 plates removed (1 cardiac surgery, 1 clicking sensation, 1 insurance reasons) |
Table 1: Fixation options – a selection of trails. Modified from HARSTON7.
Recently published surveys usually describe the successful anterior plating with a good outcome11.
The use of low-profile-locked titanium plates guarantees a proper stabilization with high patient comfort. Furthermore the fixing of those plates provides surgical safety, as depth limited drilling is used12.
Hence, this manuscript describes one option to stabilize different types of sternal fractures in a step-by-step guidance for anterior sternal plating using low profile locking titanium plates. In addition, preoperative planning is described step by step.
Diagnosis, Assessment, and Plan:
Any patient admitted to the emergency department primarily is managed by performing the ABCDE-rules, known from the Advanced Trauma Life Support, ATLS25. Thereby life-threatening injuries should be detected and immediately treated or ruled out. Afterwards, a detailed survey of the whole patient needs to be performed to detect any injury. If the patient suffers from pain in the chest or even shows an unstable chest wall with paradox respiratory movements, a sternal fracture needs to be ruled out.
Any patient with suspected sternal fracture receives helical computed tomography of the thorax. In context with suspected concomitant injuries, all patients are examined by a whole body multi-slice CT. A three-dimensional reconstruction of CT data can describe the fracture’s morphology in detail6. The affected region needs to be described as well as the fracture’s direction and possible dislocation of the fragments.
As indications for surgical treatment the unstable anterior chest wall needs to be considered as well as fracture displacement and a persistent, painful instability of more than seven days7,12. Once the decision for surgery of the sternal fracture is made, a reassessment of any concomitant injury should be performed, in order to put the treatment of multiple injuries in an appropriate sequence.
The following protocol shows one possible standard for surgical treatment of (isolated) sternal fractures whereby the possibility of a conservative treatment in most types of fractures needs to be emphasized at this point. In case of concomitant rib fractures additional considerations, which are not shown here, become necessary.