$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition leading to significant impairment in motor, sensory and autonomous functions. To date, no therapy has demonstrated its efficiency in patients. For such reason, it is important to identify new techniques that will improve the assessment of potential treatments and can further elucidate injury pathiophysiology1.
SCI is divided into two sequential phases, referred to as primary and secondary injuries. The primary injury corresponds to the initial mechanical insult. Whereas the secondary injury groups a cascade of various biological events (such as inflammation, oxidative stress and hypoxia) that further contribute to the progressive expansion of the initial lesion, tissue damage and therefore neurological deficit2,3.
At the acute phase of SCI, neuroprotective therapies are aimed at reducing the secondary injury pathology and should accordingly improve neurological outcomes. Among the many secondary injury events, ischemia plays a crucial role 4,5. At the level of the SCI epicenter, the damaged parenchymal microvessels impede effective spinal cord blood flow (SCBF). Moreover, SCBF is also significantly reduced in the region surrounding the injury epicenter, an area specifically known as the “ischemic penumbra zone”. If SCBF cannot be quickly restored within these regions, ischemia can lead to supplementary parenchymal necrosis and further nervous tissue damage. As even the slightest tissue preservation can have substantial effects of function, it is of major interest to develop drugs and therapies that can reduce ischemia post-SCI. To highlight this phenomenon, previous work has shown that preservation of only 10% of myelinated axons was enough to permit walking in cats post-SCI 6.
Although several techniques have been described to assess SCBF, they all have significant limitations. For example, the use of radioactive microspheres7,8 and C14-iodopyrine autoradiography9 requires subsequent animal sacrifice and cannot be repeated at later time-points. The hydrogen clearance technique10 depends on the insertion of intraspinal electrodes, which may further damage the spinal cord. While laser Doppler imaging, photoplethysmography14,15 and in-vivo light microscopy16 have a very limited depth/area of measurement11-13.
Our team has previously shown that contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEU) imaging can be used to assess real time and in-vivo the SCBF changes in the rat spinal cord parenchyma17. It is important to note that a similar technique was applied by Huang et al. in a porcine model of SCI18. CEU applies a specific mode of ultrasound imaging which allows to associate grayscale morphological images (obtained by the conventional B-mode) with spatial distribution of blood flow 19. The SCBF imaging and quantification relies on intravascular injection of echo-contrast agents. The contrast agent is made up of sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles (mean diameter of about 2.5 μm and 90% having a diameter less than 6 μm) stabilized by phospholipids. The microbubbles reflect the ultrasound beam emitted by the probe thus enhancing blood echogenicity and increasing contrast of the tissues according to their blood flow. It is therefore possible to assess the blood flow in a given region of interest according to the intensity of the reflected signal. The microbubbles are also safe and they have been clinically applied in humans. The sulphur hexafluoride is quickly cleared (mean terminal half-life is 12 min) and more than 80% of the administered sulphur hexafluoride is recovered in exhaled air within 2 min after injection. This protocol provides a simple way to use CEU imaging to assess SCBF changes in rat.