$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The monolayer neural differentiation protocol has been in use for over a decade6. The protocol is highly efficient, composed of defined medium, and done in a monolayer system which makes the system more applicable for preclinical (e.g., drug screening) uses. However, there are some critical factors that determine differentiation efficiency. This article points out those factors and the solution for each obstacle.
Density of the cells after plating in the differentiation condition is perhaps the most critical factor. Plating the cells at too high density reduces differentiation efficiency, while plating at too low density leads to cell death. This phenomenon is likely due to autocrine growth factor signaling. Fgf4 is an autocrine growth factor that activates the MAPK cascade and drives ESC differentiation11. LIF is another cytokine produced by ESC. It activates the STAT3 pathway and promotes self-renewal15. This protocol makes use of N2B27 to make neural cells. N2B27 contains various factors which permit ESC survival and promotes neural cell growth, and does not contain either LIF or BMP4 which inhibit neural differentiation6. At the proper density, a suitable balance of Fgf4 and LIF signaling is maintained that allows ESC to differentiate. At high density, excess amount of autocrine LIF and BMP inhibit differentiation. In contrast, the cells at too low density have impaired survival in these fairly minimal media. Thus, when large numbers of cells without differentiation appear the plating number should be reduced, whereas an increase of the plating cell number is required if significant cell death is observed.
In addition to the cell number there are some other factors that indirectly affect plating density. The first factor is the local cell concentration, dependent on the technique used to evenly distribute the cells over the surface area. We found that swirling the well is not ideal, since it concentrates the cells to the center of the well and makes the density at the center too high, while at the periphery the density becomes too low. Other mixing techniques, for example, mixing the media with the cells before plating, or rocking the plate side-to-side are recommended. Moreover, when a vessel is placed in the incubator, uneven heating of the medium causes a convection force that draws the cells to the center of the well, resulting in distribution of the cells in a concentric ring pattern. A lower media volume on the plating day is recommended to reduce this effect. Leaving the plate outside the incubator for 30 min to let the cells attach, as well as warming up the medium before mixing can also help achieve a homogeneous plating density.
Secondly, the vessel type also affects plating density. Figure 1 clearly shows that the number of cells/well cannot be linearly scaled to the surface area of different vessels (in other words, the same number of cells/surface area cannot be applied to every vessel type). A smaller vessel (with greater volume/area ratio) is affected more by the media surface tension which makes a concave surface of medium, the so-called meniscus. The surface tension pushes the cells to the edge of the well and decreases density at the center. In addition, since media volume in the small vessel is low, media warm up fast, reducing the convection force. Therefore, the cells in a small vessel will move to the edge by the meniscus effect, and will not move to the center by convection forces. Thus, the smaller the vessel, the higher the plating density required to get the optimal density at the center.
Thirdly, the condition of the cells prior to plating also indirectly affects plating density and differentiation efficiency. We found a variation of the optimal density in some experiments. The experiments with higher death rate on the first day needed higher density for efficient differentiation. ESC cultures in serum and LIF are composed of a heterogeneous population of naïve pluripotent cells, primed pluripotent cells, and even a small number of differentiated cells16. Cells of these types have different ability to survive and differentiate under differentiation conditions. Since the protocol dictates on the number, but not the state of the cells, some experiments might start with more differentiated cells which will die on the first few days, leading to a lower density than expected. To avoid this variation, consistent culture of ESC is required to make sure that the constant proportion between each state is maintained.
Apart from density, timing is another factor to achieve efficient differentiation. In this publication, we describe the generation of neural progenitors within 6 days. However, the time can be different depending on the state of the starting ESC culture. As described above, ESC cultures are mixed populations that can respond differently to the differentiation condition. Not only the cell survival but also the timing of differentiation will be affected by the culture composition. This protocol can be applied to most ESC culture conditions e.g., in N2B27 media containing LIF and BMP4, or 2i and LIF. However, if there are more naïve cells in the culture, a longer period might be required for efficient differentiation. This is because naïve cells will need more time to switch to a primed state and then differentiate to neural progenitors.