$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent cells derived from the early embryo with the capacity to proliferate indefinitely in vitro while retaining the ability to differentiate into all adult cell types following reintroduction into an appropriate stage embryo (by forming a chimaera), injection into syngeneic or immunocompromised hosts (by forming a teratoma) or in vitro subject to appropriate cues1. The in vitro differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into neural lineages was first described in 1995 and involved the formation of multicellular suspension aggregates (embryoid bodies, EBs) in serum-containing media supplemented with the morphogen retinoic acid2-4. Since then a variety of protocols have been developed to allow neural differentiation5. Many still utilize aggregation, others co-culture with inducing cell types and several involve the use of serum-free media. All protocols have advantages and disadvantages and the precise nature of neural or neuronal cells produced also varies according to the protocol used.
The ideal protocol would be robust, scalable and make use of fully defined media and substrates, be amenable to non-invasive monitoring of the differentiation process and result in the generation of pure populations of neural progenitors able to be patterned by external cues and to differentiate into all neuronal and glial subtypes with high efficiency and yield in a relatively short time. In the last dozen years we have been using a method for generating neural progenitors and neurons from mouse ESC in a low density, serum-free adherent monolayer culture6-10. This protocol fulfils many of the criteria set out above: in our hands the efficiency of differentiation has been quite consistent over many years and a variety of cell lines, it can be scaled up or down (we successfully use vessels from 96-well plates to 15 cm diameter dishes) and the media used are well-defined. The process is amenable to timelapse microscopy for the monitoring of the differentiation and a variety of patterning cues can be added to induce the generation of distinct types of neuronal subtypes (e.g., Shh and Fgf8 for dopaminergic neurons6).
Nevertheless, there are some challenges to the successful application of this protocol. One of the key aspects is careful preparation of the media. We always prepare the media in-house despite the availability of commercial alternatives. One of the supplements used (N2; see Protocol) has modifications over the standard commercially available versions. Finally, one of the most important steps for successful application of this method is the optimal cell density at plating. This is mainly because while the autocrine nature of one of the inducing signals (Fgf411) requires that sufficient cells are present to allow optimal viability and differentiation, at too high densities differentiation is impaired (possibly in part due to autocrine production of LIF12). It is therefore important that both media preparation and cell plating are performed carefully and consistently to ensure optimal results.