$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Synthesis of glycomonomer
Lactobionic acid was used herein as an example for the preparation of glycomonomers. Using methods in the initial report on the synthesis of LAEMA11, varied yields in the preparation with unsatisfactory purity were observed. The modified purification method using cation and anion exchange resins to remove unreacted starting material offered stable product yield and high purity, which is confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy (Figure 1).
RAFT glycopolymer synthesis and post-modification of glycopolymers with fluorophores
In contrast to the block-glycopolymers prepared through stepped RAFT polymerizations, this one-step copolymerization protocol provides a uniform glycomonomer distribution throughout the polymer backbone. The glycopolymers shown here contain 20 mol% of glycomonomer, 77 mol% of HEAA as a spacer, and 3 mol% of AEMA as a target for post-modifications (see Figure 2). 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopy confirmed the structures of PMA-LAEMA and PMA-GAEMA (Figures 3 and 4). As shown in Figure 5, when plotted against the GPC elution profiles of the glycopolymer synthesized without RAFT, both PMA-LAEMA and PMA-GAEMA have low dispersities, proving the efficacy of the RAFT approach. As expected, PMA-GAEMA has a Mn smaller than that of PMA-LAEMA due to PMA-GAEMA’s lack of a pendant sugar. Analysis of the carbohydrates and primary amine functional groups content of the RAFT glycopolymers revealed that the ratio of monomers in the product glycopolymers is consistent with the stoichiometric ratio of starting monomers employed in the RAFT-mediated polymerization reaction (Table 1). This signifies a tight control of the monomer compositions in the synthesized glycopolymers, as designed.
Reaction of primary amine functional groups with activated fluorophores is a widely-used technique in protein labeling. This technique was employed here to label purified glycopolymers with carboxyfluorescein. Following post-modification, fluorescent polymers were obtained (Figure 6). No degradation of the fluorescein-labeled polymers in the reaction was detected by GPC analysis (data not shown).
Binding tests of the synthetic glycopolymers with lectin-coated agarose beads
To assess the lectin-binding specificity of the synthesized glycopolymers, lectin-coated agarose beads with known carbohydrate binding specificity was used. Erythrina crista-galli lectin (ECL), employed in the experiments, has a binding specificity towards β-D-galactoside. Figure 7A clearly demonstrates that PMA-LAEMA-Fluorescein, which contains β-D-galactoside as a pendant carbohydrate, exhibited strong binding with the ECL lectin. In contrast, the negative binding to the ECL of the glycopolymer PMA-GAEMA-Fluorescein, which does not possess a pendant sugar, is shown in Figure 7B. This result exemplifies the binding effectiveness and affinity of the synthesized fluorescent glycopolymer.

Figure 1. Assigned 1H- (a) and 13C-NMR (b) spectra (D2O) for LAEMA. (This figure has been modified from Wang et al.14) Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2. Schematic illustration of the synthesis of fluorescent glycopolymer PMA-LAEMA containing β-galactoside as the pendant sugar. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3. Assigned 1H- (A) and 13C-NMR (B) spectra (D2O) for PMA-LAEMA glycopolymer. (This figure has been modified from Wang et al.14) Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4. Assigned 1H- (A) and 13C-NMR (B) spectra (D2O) for PMA-GAEMA. (This figure has been modified from Wang et al.14) Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5. Gel permeation chromatography traces of RAFT-based PMA-GAEMA and PMA-LAEMA prepared with and without using RAFT agent. In contrast to the PMA-LAEMA prepared without RAFT agent (blue), RAFT-based PMA-LAEMA (green) has a much lower dispersity (Mw/Mn). RAFT-based PMA-GAEMA (red) and PMA-LAEMA have similar GPC profiles, but the former has a smaller Mn due to the absence of any pendant sugars. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6. PMA-LAEMA before and after post-modification with fluorophore. (A) Compared with white non-labeled glycopolymer (left tube), fluorescein-labeled PMA-LAEMA shows a strong yellow color (right tube). (B) Under UV, non-labeled PMA-LAEMA (left tube, 1 mg/ml in PBS) is dark and presents with no fluorescence, whereas fluorescein-labeled PMA-LAEMA (right tube, 1 mg/ml in PBS) shows strong green fluorescence. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7. Erythrina crista-galli lectin (ECL)-coated agarose beads bind β-D-galactoside containing glycopolymers, and not those not possessing a pendant sugar. (A) PMA-LAEMA-Fluorescein (3 µg) demonstrated strong binding with ECL, whereas in (B) PMA-GAEMA-Fluorescein, which possesses no pendant β-D-galactoside residue, showed no binding with the lectin-coated beads. Scale bar = 100 µm.
Table 1. Targeting valuesa of synthetic parameters and actual compositions of the glycopolymers. a) Targeting values, values that are desired of the products; b) DP, degree of polymerization; c) NA, not available. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| DPb | Dispersity | Actual content of glycomonomers
mol % | Actual content of primary amine
mol % |
| Targeting values | 100 | < 1.3 | 20 | 3 |
| PMA-LAEMA | 99 | 1.26 | 19 | 3.2 |
| PMA-GAEMA | 89 | 1.32 | NAc | 2.7 |