$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Traditionally, cell culture has been carried out on bi-dimensional (2D) substrates, though most of the in vivo cellular microenvironments have a three-dimensional (3D) nature. This unnatural 2D environment triggers changes in cell behavior as a way of self-adaptation to a flat world, which directly impacts cell fate1,2. Hence, results obtained on 2D cell cultures are not always reproducible in vivo. This has encouraged the development of new relevant culture systems seeking to provide more physiological-like conditions to get further insights into any dimension-dependent biological mechanism3,4.
One of the main differences between 2D culture and the 3D in vivo environment is the distribution of cell receptors anchored to the extracellular matrix (ECM): whereas on 2D substrates cells adhere ventrally, the majority of cells in vivo are completely surrounded by the ECM and thus cell adhesion occurs through a 3D distribution of receptors. This triggers different cell adhesion signaling pathways thereby modulating important processes such as cell growth, cell differentiation and gene expression. During the last decades, many different 3D culture systems have been established5-8, though their variability and complexity hinder their standardization in common cell culture procedures. Moreover 3D systems are usually not easy to handle and current experimental procedures on 2D substrates cannot be easily established for 3D cultures. In addition, literature rarely compares 3D cultures with the equivalent 2D condition or other 3D systems, hindering the proper understanding of cell behavior in these models.
Once having the cells adhered on a 2D substrate, the excitation of the dorsal receptors — by overlaying a film of a new material (sandwich-like culture) — can trigger cell responses alike 3D environments. The reason behind this is the simultaneous activation of both dorsal and ventral receptors to adhere and spread within the sandwich environment (Figure 1)9,10. As a consequence, cells undergo important changes with respect to 2D cultures11,12. Thus, cell fate is determined during assembly because of the sandwich culture, since the dorsal stimulation triggers changes in key cellular pathways. Therefore, the cell fate is highly determined by the time when the sandwich-like culture is assembled11.
Due to the nature of the system, a sandwich-like culture is a simple and versatile tool that allows the study of different parameters in cell/material interactions such as chemistry, topography, stiffness and protein coatings at both the ventral and dorsal sides. This offers a higher degree of versatility compared to other 3D systems (Figure 2) due to the independent dorsal and ventral combination of a wide variety of surface conditions. Additionally, different cell lines and different times to assemble the sandwich-like culture can be studied, increasing the wide spectra of possibilities.
A standard protocol of the sandwich-like culture is detailed below using either poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) electrospun fibers or films as dorsal substrates, glass coverslip as ventral substrate and fibronectin as protein coating. Sandwich-like cultures were assembled just after cell seeding or after 3 hr of 2D culture. However, note that other material systems and proteins could be used; likewise the sandwich-like culture can be assembled at different time points.