Method Article

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

DOI:

10.3791/53101

November 19th, 2015

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Previous research on the social dimension of stress has focused on two important variables: social identity and social support. This protocol introduces an effective experimental manipulation of these two social variables and describes their implementation in a standard stress induction paradigm (Trier Social Stress Test).

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

In many situations humans are influenced by the behavior of other people and their relationships with them. For example, in stressful situations supportive behavior of other people as well as positive social relationships can act as powerful resources to cope with stress. In order to study the interplay between these variables, this protocol describes two effective experimental manipulations of social relationships and supportive behavior in the laboratory. In the present article, these two manipulations are implemented in the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST)—a standard stress induction paradigm in which participants are subjected to a simulated job interview. More precisely, we propose (a) a manipulation of the relationship between different protagonists in the TSST by making a shared social identity salient and (b) a manipulation of the behavior of the TSST-selection committee, which acts either supportively or unsupportively. These two experimental manipulations are designed in a modular fashion and can be applied independently of each other but can also be combined. Moreover, these two manipulations can also be integrated into other stress protocols and into other standardized social interactions such as trust games, negotiation tasks, or other group tasks.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

As social animals1, humans strive for belongingness2. Hence, for humans the behavior of significant others as well as their relationships with them are of great importance, especially in unfamiliar and challenging situations. For example, in stressful situations supportive behavior of other people as well as positive social relationships can act as powerful resources to cope with stress3,4. These social resources, however, interact in a complex way and are sometimes not effective stress buffers5 per se . In order to study the conditions under which supportive behavior and social relationships have an effect on stres....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Two studies11,12 that applied the described procedures have been approved by the ethics committee of the University of Hildesheim and were in line with the declaration of Helsinki.

1. Set-up

Social and personal identity experiment diagram; showing table, box layout, TSST setup with cameras.

Figure 1. Sketch of the set-up in the two experimental rooms. P = real participant, C1/C2 = confederates, mic = microphone, cam = camera <....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Two studies (Häusser et al.11 and Frisch et al.12) showed the effectiveness of the identity manipulation on 186 healthy students (97 females, age range 18 to 35 years, mean (M) age = 22.40 years, standard deviation (SD) = 2.83 years). Moreover, Frisch et al.12 tested the effectiveness of the committee behavior manipulation on 90 healthy students (49 females, age range 18 to 29, M = 22.00 years, SD = 2.31 years).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This protocol describes two effective manipulations of (a) the relationship between different protagonists in the TSST (i.e., between participants in the TSST-G11 or between the TSST-committee and the participant12) and (b) the behavior of the TSST-committee12.

The proposed manipulation of social identity has several strengths. First, it can be easily implemented before commencing the TSST. Hence, it does not alter the standard TSST protocol, whic.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This research was supported by a grant (AZ: 76202-29-3/11) from the Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony (Germany) to Andreas Mojzisch and Jan Häusser.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
9 T-shirts in 3 colors (i.e., 3 in each color)any brand/manufacturer is suitableSocial/personal identity manipulation.
3 stick-on labelsany brand/manufacturer is suitableSocial/personal identity manipulation.
3 boxes (e.g., made of cardboard)any brand/manufacturer is suitableSocial/personal identity manipulation (task 1).
a little pouch any brand/manufacturer is suitableBogus lot drawing procedure (entails three lots: two neatly folded lots labeled with with “committee” and one crumpled-up lot labeled with “applicant”).
2 stopwatchesany brand/manufacturer is suitablePlace them on the table in Room 2 (for the TSST-committee).
2 video camerasany brand/manufacturer is suitablePlace in Room 2 (one for allegedly filming the participant, one for filming the behavior of the committee).
2 tripodsany brand/manufacturer is suitablePlace in Room 2.
1 microphoneany brand/manufacturer is suitablePlace in Room 2 (for allegedly recording the speech and the answers of the participant).
1 microphone standany brand/manufacturer is suitablePlace in Room 2.
several pensany brand/manufacturer is suitable
Furniture
3 chairsany brand/manufacturer is suitableRoom 1 A and B (social/ personal identity manipulation).
1 big tableany brand/manufacturer is suitableRoom 1A (social identity manipulation).
3 small tablesany brand/manufacturer is suitableRoom 1B (personal identity manipulation).
1 big tableany brand/manufacturer is suitableRoom 2 (TSST-committee).
2 chairsany brand/manufacturer is suitableRoom 2 (TSST-committee).
Questionnaires/ instructions
3 informed consentsUse the  informed consent of your institution (for all participants, i.e., the two confederates and the real participant).
3 manipulation checks of identity salienceItems of Frisch et al. (2014), Häusser et al. (2012) or Doosje et al. (1995)Hand out after the identity salience manipulation (for all participants, i.e., the two confederates and the real participant). 
2 "instructions" for the TSST-committeeHand out to the committee members (i.e., the confederates) at the end of the bogus lot drawing procedure. These "instructions" are part of the cover story so that the real participant believes that the two confederates are real participants as well and need to be informed about their roles in the TSST. However, since the confederates are of course already familiar with the TSST procedure, it is not important what these instructions actually entail (e.g., as a reminder for the confederates they may entail the exact wording of the verbal instructions of the committee).
2 solutions to the mental arithmetic taskPlace them on the table in Room 2 (for the TSST-committee).
1 (or 3) manipulation check(s) of committee behaviorItems of Frisch et al. (2014)Hand out after the TSST (for the real participant only). (However, in order to keep up the role of the confederates as real participants, a similar questionnaire can be handed out to the confederates asking them how they evaluate their own behavior during the TSST.) 
several sheets of blank paperany brand/manufacturer is suitableHand out for task 1, task 2, preparation time of TSST (for the real participant), notes during the TSST (for the TSST-committee).

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Jowett, B., Davis, H. W. C. Aristotle's Politics. , Clarendon Press. Oxford. (1920).
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Leary, M. R. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117 (3), 497-529 (1995).
  3. Thorsteinsson, E. B., James, J. E.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Social Support ManipulationSocial Identity SalienceSalivary Cortisol MeasurementCommittee Behavior ManipulationJob Interview StressGroup Identity InductionPersonal Identity ControlStress Response AnalysisSocial Stress Research

Related Articles