$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Here, we describe the purification of specific genomic regions using engineered DNA-binding molecules such as the CRISPR system and TAL proteins, and the identification of proteins and RNAs bound to these genomic regions. Binding of engineered DNA-binding molecules to the genome may affect chromatin structure, including nucleosome positioning, and may abrogate genomic functions, as described in CRISPR interference experiments21. To avoid these potential aberrant effects, we propose specific guidelines for choosing target genomic regions. First, to avoid potential inhibition of the recruitment of RNA polymerases and transcription factors, as well as disruption of nucleosome positioning around the transcription start site, the target regions for analyses of promoter regions should be several hundred base pairs upstream of (5' to) the transcription start site. By contrast, when analyzing genomic regions with distinct boundaries, such as enhancers and silencers, genomic regions that are directly juxtaposed to these regions can be targeted because it is less likely that the binding of engineered DNA-binding molecules will affect their functions. Furthermore, it is best to avoid using target regions that are conserved among different species, because important DNA-binding molecules often bind to evolutionarily conserved regions and inhibition of their binding might disrupt the functions of the target genomic regions. In this regard, it is always necessary to check that the function of the target genomic region is maintained in the established cells used for enChIP analyses. Because multiple gRNAs can be tested easily and it is tedious and expensive to generate multiple versions of TAL or zinc-finger proteins recognizing different target genomic regions, enChIP using CRISPR is more advantageous than enChIP using other proteins.
It has been shown that dCas9 binds to off-target sites although affinity to those sites might be weaker than that to the target sites22-25. There are several ways to manage contamination of molecules bound to those off-target sites. First, the use of several, at least two, different gRNAs would be recommended. Those molecules commonly observed in enChIP using distinct gRNAs would be true positives. Second, comparison of different conditions for enChIP would be effective in cancelling contamination of non-specific molecules and molecules bound to off-target sites. Examples of those comparison sets would be (i) stimulation (-) and (+), or (ii) different cell types such as T cells vs. B cells. Finally, quantitative analysis of binding of candidate molecules should be performed to confirm their specific binding to the target sites. It is preferable to prepare cells expressing only dCas9 but not gRNA as a negative control.
Using enChIP analyses, we were able to successfully identify a number of known and novel molecules interacting with specific genomic regions (Tables 1-3)14-17. However, this technique failed to detect some other known proteins interacting with these regions. For example, STAT1 reportedly associates with the IRF-1 promoter upon IFNγ stimulation8, but our enChIP-SILAC analysis did not detect STAT1 as a protein induced to interact with this genomic region16. In addition, in the enChIP-MS analysis of telomeres, we did not detect shelterin proteins consisting of TRF-1 and TRF-215, which have been shown to interact with telomeres26. There are a few potential reasons for these discrepancies. First, the stoichiometry of binding of Stat1 to the IRF-1 promoter might be very low. It is reasonable that enChIP-MS, including enChIP-SILAC, detects proteins that are more abundantly associated with target genomic regions; hence, the analysis of more cells might be necessary to detect these proteins. Increases in the sensitivities of MS instruments would also contribute to the efficient detection of proteins with low stoichiometric binding. Second, some proteins, possibly including Stat1 and shelterins, might be difficult targets for MS analyses. Third, in our analysis of telomere-binding proteins15, the 3×FLAG-TAL proteins recognizing telomeres (3×FN-Tel-TAL) might have blocked the binding of shelterins to telomeres in a competitive fashion.
In contrast to the relative difficulty of detecting transcription factors binding to specific genomic regions using enChIP, we successfully identified epigenetic regulators such as histone modification enzymes using enChIP analyses. The success of this technique may be due to the fact that epigenetic regulators bind to a broad range of genomic regions; hence, more proteins per genomic region are available for MS. Because epigenetic regulators are increasingly recognized as important targets for drugs against intractable diseases such as cancer, enChIP would be a useful tool for the identification of epigenetic drug targets.