Method Article

Cooling Rate Dependent Ellipsometry Measurements to Determine the Dynamics of Thin Glassy Films

DOI:

10.3791/53499

January 26th, 2016

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Here, we present a protocol for cooling rate dependent ellipsometry experiments, which can determine the glass transition temperature (Tg), average dynamics, fragility and the expansion coefficient of the super-cooled liquid and glass for a variety of glassy materials.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This report aims to fully describe the experimental technique of using ellipsometry for cooling rate dependent Tg (CR-Tg) experiments. These measurements are simple high-throughput characterization experiments, which can determine the glass transition temperature (Tg), average dynamics, fragility and the expansion coefficient of the super-cooled liquid and glassy states for a variety of glassy materials. This technique allows for these parameters to be measured in a single experiment, while other methods must combine a variety of different techniques to investigate all of these properties. Measurements of dynamics close to Tg are particularly challenging. The advantage of cooling rate dependent Tg measurements over other methods which directly probe bulk and surface relaxation dynamics is that they are relatively quick and simple experiments, which do not utilize fluorophores or other complicated experimental techniques. Furthermore, this technique probes the average dynamics of technologically relevant thin films in temperature and relaxation time (τα) regimes relevant to the glass transition (τα > 100 sec). The limitation to using ellipsometry for cooling rate dependent Tg experiments is that it cannot probe relaxation times relevant to measurements of viscosity (τα << 1 sec). Other cooling rate dependent Tg measurement techniques, however, can extend the CR-Tg method to faster relaxation times. Furthermore, this technique can be used for any glassy system so long as the integrity of the film remains throughout the experiment.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The seminal work of Keddie Jones and Corey1 showed that the glass transition temperature (Tg) of ultra-thin polystyrene films decreases with respect to the bulk value at thicknesses lower than 60 nm. Ever since, many experimental studies2-11 have supported the hypothesis that the observed reductions in Tg are caused by a layer of enhanced mobility near the free surface of these films. However, these experiments are indirect measures of a single relaxation time, and thus there is a debate12-18 centered on a direct correlation between average thin film dynamics and the dynamics at the air/polymer interface.

To answer this debate, many studies have directly measured the dynamics of the free surface (τsurface). Nanoparticle embedding,19,20 nanohole relaxation,21 and fluorescence22 studies show that the air/polymer interface has dynamics orders of magnitude faster than the bulk alpha relaxation time (τα) with a much weaker temperature dependence than that of τα. Because of its weak temperature dependence, the τsurface of these films,19-22 and enhanced dynamics of thin polystyrene films,23,24 intersects the bulk alpha relaxation (τα) at a single point T*, which is a few degrees above Tg, and at a τα of ≈ 1 sec. The presence of T* could explain why experiments which probe relaxation times faster than * fail to see any thickness dependence on the Tg of ultra-thin Polystyrene films.13-18 Lastly, while direct measurements of the enhanced mobile layer show that it has a thickness of 4-8 nm,20-22 there is evidence that the propagation length of the dynamics at the air/polymer interface is much larger than the thickness of the mobile surface layer.5,25,26

This report aims to fully describe a protocol for using ellipsometry for cooling rate dependent Tg (CR-Tg) experiments. CR-Tg have been previously used to describe the average dynamics of ultra-thin films of polystyrene.23,24,27,28 Furthermore, This technique was recently used to show a direct correlation between the average dynamics in ultra-thin polystyrene films, and the dynamics at the free surface.23 The advantage of CR-Tg measurements over other types of measurements such as fluorescence, nanoparticle embedding, nanohole relaxation, nanocalorimetry, dielectric spectroscopy, and Brillouin light scattering, studies is that they are relatively quick and simple experiments that do not utilize fluorophores or other complicated experimental techniques. Recent advances in spectroscopic ellipsometry allow this technique to be used to efficiently determine the optical properties of ultra-thin films of polymers and other types of hybrid materials with exceptional accuracy. As such, this technique probes the average dynamics of technologically applicable thin films in temperature and time regimes relevant to the glass transition (T ≤ Tg, τα ≥ 100 sec). Furthermore, this technique will provide information on the expansion coefficients of the glassy and supper cooled liquid states as well as the fragility of the system, which can then be compared with data for bulk films. Lastly, CR- Tg experiments can be used for any glassy system so long as the integrity of the film remains throughout the experiment.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

1. Film Preparation

  1. Weigh 0.04 g of polystyrene, and place into a 30 ml vial.
  2. Weigh 2 g of toluene into the vial. A 2% by weight solution of polystyrene in toluene yields a film of approximately 100 nm.
  3. Let the solution sit O/N to fully dissolve the polystyrene and let the solutions settle.
  4. Place a 1 cm x 1 cm Silicon (Si) wafer onto a Spin Coater.
  5. Spin the wafer at 8,000 rpm for 45 sec. While it is spinning, drop approximately 1 ml of toluene on the spinning wafer.
    Note: All steps involving spin coating are performed in a fume hood.
  6. On the now stationary Si wafer, add the solution from step 1.3 drop-wise onto the Si wafer until the entire surface of the Si wafer is covered.
  7. Before the solution dries on the wafer, spin the Si wafer at 4,000 rpm for 20 sec.
  8. Determine the thickness of the film using ellipsometry (see step 2).
  9. If the film is the desired thickness, anneal the film in a vacuum oven at 393 K for 15 hr.

2. Determining Film Thickness

  1. Place the spun cast film onto the ellipsometer stage and measure the ellipsometric angles Ψ(λ) and Δ(λ) at an incident light angle of 70° with a 1 sec acquisition time and the zone averaging setting turned on.
  2. Using the ellipsometer software, fit the resulting Ψ (λ) and Δ (λ) data to a three-layer model according to manufacturer's protocol. There are no additional user inputs. The first layer is a substrate layer of Si, the second layer is a native oxide layer with a thickness of 1.5 nm, and the third layer is a Cauchy model (n=A+B/λ2 , k=0), which corresponds to the optical properties of the polystyrene film. In this model, A and B are fit parameters, and n and k are the real and imaginary components of the index of the refraction, respectively.
  3. For the Cauchy layer, fit the thickness and A and B parameters if the film is above 10 nm. If the film is below 10 nm, only fit A.
    Note: This will be discussed further in the Representative results section.

3. Cooling Rate Dependent Tg Measurements

  1. Coat the surface of the heating element of the variable temperature ellipsometer stage with thermal paste.
  2. Place the annealed polystyrene film onto the heating element.
  3. Clamp the film tightly onto the heating element.
  4. Flow 100% dry Nitrogen gas through the temperature stage at a pressure of <69 KPa.
  5. Using the temperature stage software, create a temperature profile. This temperature profile begins with a heating ramp to 393 K at 150 K/min. Hold the film at 393K for 20 min.
    1. Then, alternate cooling ramps to 293 K at rates of 150, 120, 90, 60, 30, 10, 7, 3, and 1 K/min with heating ramps to 393 K at 150 K/min. Place a 5 min temperature hold after each ramp.
  6. In the ellipsometer software, make a temperature dependent ellipsometry model similar to that in section 2. All three layers are the same, except that the substrate is changed to a temperature dependent Si model.
  7. In the layer for the temperature dependent Si model, turn on the "Use Ext Temp from Parm Log" Parameter.
  8. Using laboratory equipment controlling software, have the ellipsometer software read the temperature values from temperature stage.
  9. Align the ellipsometer such that the signal reaches maximum intensity.
  10. Under "Edit Hardware Configurations", set the fast acquisition time to 1 sec with high-accuracy zone averaging. Set the normal acquisition time to 3 sec with high-accuracy zone averaging.
  11. Under the "in situ" tab in the ellipsometer software check the "fast acquisition time mode" box, and press "Start Acquisition". Then, start the temperature profile. Before the 3 K/min cooling ramp, uncheck the fast acquisition time box.

4. Determining Values of Tg

  1. Export the temperature and thickness profiles into the preferred graphing and analysis software, and separate the temperature and thickness data for all 9 cooling rates.
  2. In order to account for the effect of zone averaging during acquisition on the temperature, take every temperature value, and average it with the temperature value preceding it, such that T=(Ti + Ti-1)/2, where Ti is a temperature value at a given time, and Ti-1 is the temperature of the preceding time point.
  3. Plot Thickness vs. Temperature for each cooling rate.
  4. Perform a linear fit on a portion of the Super Cooled Liquid regime (the high temperature regime with the larger expansion coefficient). This regime will be approximately from 393 K to 380 K.
  5. Perform a linear fit on a portion of the glassy regime of that same set of data. This regime has a lower expansion coefficient, and will be approximately from 293 K to 340 K.
  6. Find the intersection point of these two lines. The temperature where these lines intersect is the glass transition temperature.
  7. Do this for all nine ramps.

5. Analyzing Average Thin Film Dynamics

  1. For a given film thickness plot Log(Cooling Rate (K/min)) vs. 1/Tg (K-1).
  2. Compare this indirectly to direct measurements of bulk and surface dynamics by the empirical relation: Cooling Rate * τα = 1000.23,24

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Fitting Raw Ellipsometry Data

Polystyrene films are transparent in the wavelength range of the ellipsometer (500-1,600 nm). Thus a Cauchy model is a good model for describing the index of refraction of polystyrene films. Figure 1A shows an example of Ψ(λ) and Δ(λ) for a thick (274 nm) film of polystyrene, and the resulting fit to the Cauchy model

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Cooling-Rate dependent Tg measurements are high throughput characterization experiments that can determine the Tg, the expansion coefficient of the glass and the super-cooled liquid, the temperature dependence of the average dynamics, and the fragility of a particular glassy material in a single experiment. Furthermore, unlike fluorescence, embedding, or nanohole relaxation experiments, CR-Tg experiments are relatively quick and simple because they do not utilize fluorophores or other com...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The Authors would like to acknowledge James A. Forrest for help in the initial idea for this technique.26 This work was supported by funding from the University of Pennsylvania and was partially supported by the MRSEC program of the National Science Foundation under award no. DMR-11- 20901 at the University of Pennsylvania.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
TolueneSigma Aldrich179418-1LThis can be purchased from any chemical company.
Atactic PolystyrenePolymer Source Inc.P-4092-SThis can be purchased from any chemical company.
THMS 600 temperature stageLinkamTHMS 600any temperature stage that can be fit to an ellipsometer could be used.
M2000V Spectroscopic EllipsometerJ.A. WoollamM200VThis procedure should be applicable for any spectroscopic ellipsometer.
Spin CoaterLaurell TechnologiesWS-650-23BThis Procedure is possible with any spin coater
Sample vialsFisher Scientific02-912-379Any sample vials will do
Silicon wafersVirginia semi conductors325S1410694D

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Keddie, J. L., Jones, R. A. L., Cory, R. A. Size-Dependent depression of the glass transition temperature in polymer films. Europhys. Lett. 27 (1), 59-64 (1994).
  2. Forrest, J. A., Veress, K. D., Dutcher, J. R. Interface and chain confinement effects on the glass transition temperature of thin polymer films. Phys. Rev.E. 56 (5), 5705-5716 (1997).
  3. Forrest, J. A., Mattsson, J. Reductions of the glass transition temperature in thin polymer films: Probing the length scale of cooperative dynamics. Phys. Rev.E. 61 (1), R53-R56 (2000).
  4. Sharp, J. S., Forrest, J. A. Free surfaces cause reductions in the glass transition temperature of thin polystyrene films. PRL. 91 (23), 235701(2003).
  5. Ellison, C. J., Torkelson, J. M. The distribution of glass-transition temperatures in nanoscopically confined glass formers. Nat. Mat. 2 (10), 695-700 (2003).
  6. Priestley, R. D., Ellison, C. J., Broadbelt, L. J., Torkelson, J. M. Structural relaxation of polymer glasses at surfaces, interfaces, and in between. Science. 309 (5733), 456-459 (2005).
  7. Ellison, C. J., Kim, S. D., Hall, D. B., Torkelson, J. M. Confinement and processing effects on glass transition temperature and physical aging in ultrathin polymer films: Novel fluorescence measurements. Euro. Phys. J. E. 8 (2), 155-166 (2002).
  8. Ellison, C. J., Mundra, M. K., Torkelson, J. M. Impacts of polystyrene molecular weight and modification to the repeat unit structure on the glass Transition−Nanoconfinement effect and the cooperativity length scale. Macromolecules. 38 (5), 1767-1778 (2005).
  9. Yang, Z., Fujii, Y., Lee, F. K., Lam, C. H., Tsui, O. K. C. Glass transition dynamics and surface layer mobility in unentangled polystyrene films. Science. 328 (5986), 1676-1679 (2010).
  10. Tsui, O. K. C., Zhang, H. F. Effects of chain ends and chain entanglement on the glass transition temperature of polymer thin films. Macromolecules. 34 (26), 9139-9142 (2001).
  11. Roth, C. B., Dutcher, J. R. Glass Transition and Chain Mobility in thin Polymer Films. J. Electroanal. Chem. 584, 13-22 (2005).
  12. Ediger, M. D., Forrest, J. A. Dynamics near Free Surfaces and the Glass Transition in Thin Polymer Films: A View to the Future. Macromolecules. 47 (2), 471-478 (2014).
  13. Serghei, A., Huth, H., Schick, C., Kremer, F. Glassy dynamics in thin polymer layers having a free upper interface. Macromolecules. 41 (10), 3636-3639 (2008).
  14. Huth, H., Minakov, A. A., Schick, C. Differential AC-chip calorimeter for glass transition measurements in ultrathin films. J. Polym. Sci. B. 44 (20), 2996-3005 (2006).
  15. Tress, M., et al. Glassy dynamics in condensed isolated polymer chains. Science. 341 (6152), 1371-1374 (2013).
  16. Boucher, V. M., et al. T g depression and invariant segmental dynamics in polystyrene thin films. Soft Matter. 8 (19), 5119-5122 (2012).
  17. Yu, M., Olson, E. A., Zhang, M., Zhang, Z., Allen, L. H. Glass transition in ultrathin polymer films: Calorimetric study. PRL. 91 (8), 085703(2003).
  18. Kremer, F., Tress, M., Mapesa, E. U. Glassy dynamics and glass transition in nanometric layers and films: A silver lining on the horizon. J. Non-Crys. Solids. 407, 277-283 (2015).
  19. Qi, D., Ilton, M., Forrest, J. Measuring surface and bulk relaxation in glassy polymers. Euro. Phys. J. E. 34 (6), 1-7 (2011).
  20. Teichroeb, J. H., Forrest, J. A. Direct imaging of nanoparticle embedding to probe viscoelasticity of polymer surfaces. PRL. 91 (1), 016104(2003).
  21. Fakhraai, Z., Forrest, J. A. Measuring the surface dynamics of glassy polymers. Science. 319 (5863), 600-604 (2008).
  22. Paeng, K., Swallen, S. F., Ediger, M. D. Direct measurement of molecular motion in freestanding polystyrene thin films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (22), 8444-8447 (2011).
  23. Glor, E. C., Fakhraai, Z. Facilitation of interfacial dynamics in entagled polymer films. JCP. 141 (9), 194505(2014).
  24. Fakhraai, Z., Forrest, J. A. Probing slow dynamics in supported thin polymer films. PRL. 95 (2), 025701(2005).
  25. Roth, C. B., McNerny, K. L., Jager, W. F., Torkelson, J. M. Eliminating the enhanced mobility at the free surface of polystyrene: fluorescence studies of the glass transition temperature in thin bilayer films of immiscible polymers. Macromolecules. 40 (7), 2568-2574 (2007).
  26. Priestley, R. D., Ellison, C. J., Broadbelt, L. J., Torkelson, J. M. Structural relaxation of polymer glasses at surfaces, interfaces, and in between. Science. 309 (5733), 456-459 (2005).
  27. Gao, S., Koh, Y. P., Simon, S. L. Calorimetric Glass Transition of Single Polystyrene Ultrathin Films. Macromolecules. 46 (92), 562-570 (2013).
  28. Tropin, T. V., Schulz, G., Schmelzer, J. W. P., Schick, C. Heat capacity measurements and modeling of polystyrene glass transition in a wide range of cooling rates. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 409, 63-75 (2015).
  29. Kim, S., Hewlett, S. A., Roth, C. B., Torkelson, J. M. Confinement effects of glass transition temperature, transition breadth, and expansivity: Comparison of ellipsometry and fluorescence measurements on polystyrene films. Eur. Phys. J.E. 30, 83-92 (2009).
  30. Schawe, J. E. K. Vitrification in a wide cooling rate range: The relations between cooling rate, relaxation time, transition width and fragility. JCP. 141, 184905(2014).
  31. Donth, E., Korus, J., Hempel, E., Beiner, M. Comparison of DSC heating rate and HCS frequency at the glass transition. Thermochimica Acta. 304-305, 239-249 (1997).
  32. Zhang, C., Guo, Y., Priestley, R. D. Confined glassy properties of polymer nanoparticles. J. Polym. Sci. B. 51 (7), 574-586 (2013).
  33. Koh, Y. P., Grassia, L., Simon, S. L. Structural Recovery of a Single Polystyrene Thin Film Using Nanocalorimetry to Extend the Aging Time and Temperature Range. Thermochimica Acta. 603, 135-141 (2015).
  34. Gao, S., Simon, S. L. Measurement of the limiting fictive temperature over five decades of cooling and heating rates. Thermochimica Acta. 603, 123-127 (2015).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Glass Transition TemperaturePolymer Ultra Thin FilmsVariable Temperature StageHigh Throughput ExperimentCauchy ModelThermal AnnealingEllipsometry SoftwareTemperature Profile

Related Articles