$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Resection of malignant liver tumors is the first choice of treatment for both primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. However, a large proportion of patients are not candidates for surgery because of extended disease or location of the metastases. For patients with unresectable metastases from colorectal carcinoma, systemic therapy is often the preferred treatment. Hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma are often small and diffusely spread throughout the liver. No standard systemic therapy is available for this group of patients. Local therapy can be an alternative to systemic treatment, in case the metastases are confined to the liver.
Because of the specific vascular anatomy of the liver, this organ can be isolated from the systemic circulation. This allows perfusion of the liver with high dose chemotherapy (IHP, isolated hepatic perfusion). Besides, liver malignancies have a dominant or exclusive vascular supply from the hepatic artery, whereas 70-80% of the supply of the non-tumorous liver parenchyma is derived from the portal vein.1,2 This technique was developed over twenty years ago, to treat patients with unresectable metastases from various primary origins.3,4 Especially, uveal melanoma patients with metastases in the liver may be candidates for IHP because the metastases are often small and spread throughout the entire liver, and at present no standard systemic therapy is available.5,6
The principle of IHP is to temporarily isolate the liver from the systemic circulation and perfuse the organ with a high dose of chemotherapy, leading to high local drug exposure with limited systemic side effects.7 This high dose of chemotherapy would be toxic and lead to complications when administered systemically. The majority of IHP studies were performed with melphalan, and have investigated treatment of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer patients, as well as patients with uveal melanoma metastases.8,9 Several studies of IHP during open surgery suggest that this treatment might be effective: 50-59% tumor response rates (partial and complete response) for the treatment of colorectal cancer and a 68% tumor response rate for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma have been reported.8,10,11,12 Despite these treatment results, this procedure never gained wide acceptance, because of the complexity of the procedure, the duration of hospital stay and the associated morbidity and mortality.
Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) offers a minimal invasive alternative to IHP and was first demonstrated in a porcine model in 1993 using doxorubicin13 and the first in human trial was performed by Ravikumar et al. in 1994.14 Due to lack of evidence of efficacy, the technique was largely abandoned until the early 2000's when it was re-evaluated in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in the United States.15 During PHP, a catheter is placed percutaneous into the proper hepatic artery via the femoral artery to infuse the chemotherapeutic agent. A second catheter is placed in the inferior caval vein via the femoral vein to aspirate the hepatic chemosaturated outflow (see the PHP circuit in Figure 1). The isolation aspiration catheter placed in the caval vein is a double balloon catheter, prohibiting leakage into the systemic circulation. The aspirated chemosaturated blood is filtered by a double charcoal filter and returned to the patient by a third catheter placed in the internal jugular vein. The patient is admitted in the hospital with a length of stay of ~3 days. The PHP procedure is performed in an angiography room under general anaesthesia by a well-trained multidisciplinary team consisting of a dedicated interventional radiologist, anaesthesiologist and an extracorporeal perfusionist. A surgical oncologist and medical oncologist are also members of this multidisciplinary team, and especially focus on informing the patient, patient selection and post-operative care.

Figure 1. Schematic image of the PHP circuit. This figure displays the set-up of the PHP circuit. It shows an isolated hepatic perfusion circuit with extra-corporeal bypass line. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
This minimal invasive procedure is associated with less operative morbidity and can be repeated several times (at least up to 4 times). Besides, it only takes approximately 3 to 4 hr and patient recovery is fast. The advantage of PHP is the fact that all sizes of metastases can be treated, and micro metastases are being treated as well. Also the location of the metastases, close to vascular structures and bile ducts, is not a contraindication for PHP. Initial studies were performed with the 1st generation filter, with a 77% (mean) filter extraction efficiency.16 Recently, the results of a phase III trial were published by Hughes et al. showing a significant improvement of hepatic progression free survival in uveal melanoma patients with hepatic metastases treated with PHP compared to best alternative care.17
Since April 2012 a 2nd generation filter is available. In pre-clinical studies the 2nd generation filter is extracting 98% of melphalan. Several studies and case series investigating PHP for multiple indications have been published, but apart from the recent publishing phase III trial, survival has not extensively been analysed.16,18,19,20 In the present investigation, we focus on the interventional radiology procedure, as well as the anaesthetic management and the extra corporeal circulation that is used during this procedure in order to facilitate the use of this treatment in other medical centers.