$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) accounts for about 50% of all heart failure cases, affecting an estimated 1 - 2% of people in the western world1. Its most prevalent cause is acute myocardial infarction (AMI). As acute mortality after AMI has declined significantly due to increased awareness and improved treatment options, emphasis has shifted towards its chronic sequelae; the most prominent being HFrEF2,3. Together with increasing health care costs4, the growing epidemic of heart failure stresses the need for novel diagnostics and therapies, which can be studied in a highly translational porcine model of adverse remodeling after AMI as previously described5.
Both, determinants (e.g., infarct size) and functional assessments (e.g., echocardiography) of adverse remodeling are often used for efficacy testing of new therapeutics, indicating the need for reliable and relatively inexpensive methods. The aim of the current paper is to address this need by introducing important and reliable outcome measures for efficacy testing in a pig model of acute myocardial infarction. These include infarct size (IS) in relation to area at risk (AAR), 3D transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) and detailed admittance-based pressure-volume (PV) loop acquisition.
Infarct size is the main determinant of adverse remodeling and survival after AMI6. Although timely reperfusion of ischemic myocardium may salvage reversibly injured cardiomyocytes and limit infarct size, reperfusion itself causes additional damage through the generation of oxidative stress and a disproportionate inflammatory response (ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI))7. Hence, IRI has been identified as a promising therapeutic target. The ability of novel therapeutics to decrease infarct size is quantified by assessing infarct size in relation to the area at risk (AAR). AAR quantification is mandatory to correct for inter-individual variability in coronary anatomy of animal models, as a larger AAR leads to a larger absolute infarct size. Since infarct size is directly related to cardiac performance and myocardial contractility, variations in AAR can influence study outcome measures irrespective of treatment modalities8.
Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) is a safe, reliable and, most importantly, clinically applicable inexpensive method to measure cardiac function non-invasively. Whereas transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) images are limited to 2D parasternal long- and short-axis views in pigs9, 3D-TEE can be used to obtain complete 3-dimensional images of the left ventricle. Therefore, it does not require mathematical approximations of left ventricular (LV) volumes such as the modified Simpson's rule10. The latter falls short of correctly estimating LV volumes after LV remodeling due to the lack of cylindrical geometry11. Moreover, 3D-TEE is preferable over epicardial echocardiography as it does not require surgical interventions, which have been observed to exert cardioprotective effects in the present model12. Although the use of 2D-TEE for the assessment of myocardial function has been described before13,14, limitations regarding ventricular geometry are similar to those observed in 2D-TTE and depend on the extent of LV remodeling. Hence, the larger the infarct (and thus the higher the probability of heart failure), the more likely 2D measurements become flawed by incorrect geometrical assumptions and the higher the need for 3D techniques.
Nonetheless, most imaging modalities are limited in their ability to assess intrinsic functional properties of the myocardium. PV loops provide such relevant additional information and their acquisition is therefore described in detail below.