Techniques for the Evolution of Robust Pentose-fermenting Yeast for Bioconversion of Lignocellulose to Ethanol

Summary

Adaptive evolution and isolation techniques are described and demonstrated to yield derivatives of Scheffersomyces stipitis strain NRRL Y-7124 that are able to rapidly consume hexose and pentose mixed sugars in enzyme saccharified undetoxified hydrolyzates and to accumulate over 40 g/L ethanol.

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass is an abundant, renewable feedstock useful for production of fuel-grade ethanol and other bio-products. Pretreatment and enzyme saccharification processes release sugars that can be fermented by yeast. Traditional industrial yeasts do not ferment xylose (comprising up to 40% of plant sugars) and are not able to function in concentrated hydrolyzates. Concentrated hydrolyzates are needed to support economical ethanol recovery, but they are laden with toxic byproducts generated during pretreatment. While detoxification methods can render hydrolyzates fermentable, they are costly and generate waste disposal liabilities. Here, adaptive evolution and isolation techniques are described and demonstrated to yield derivatives of the native Scheffersomyces stipitis strain NRRL Y-7124 that are able to efficiently convert hydrolyzates to economically recoverable ethanol despite adverse culture conditions. Improved individuals are enriched in an evolving population using multiple selection pressures reliant on natural genetic diversity of the S. stipitis population and mutations induced by exposures to two diverse hydrolyzates, ethanol or UV radiation. Final evolution cultures are dilution plated to harvest predominant isolates, while intermediate populations, frozen in glycerol at various stages of evolution, are enriched on selective media using appropriate stress gradients to recover most promising isolates through dilution plating. Isolates are screened on various hydrolyzate types and ranked using a novel procedure involving dimensionless relative performance index (RPI) transformations of the xylose uptake rate and ethanol yield data. Using the RPI statistical parameter, an overall relative performance average is calculated to rank isolates based on multiple factors, including culture conditions (varying in nutrients and inhibitors) and kinetic characteristics. Through application of these techniques, derivatives of the parent strain had the following improved features in enzyme saccharified hydrolyzates at pH 5-6: reduced initial lag phase preceding growth, reduced diauxic lag during glucose-xylose transition, significantly enhanced fermentation rates, improved ethanol tolerance and accumulation to 40 g/L.

Introduction

An estimated annual 1.3 billion dry tons of lignocellulosic biomass could support ethanol production and allow the U.S. to reduce its petroleum consumption by 30%.¹ Although plant biomass hydrolysis yields sugar mixtures rich in glucose and xylose, fermentation inhibitors are generated by the chemical pretreatment necessary to break down hemicellulose and expose cellulose for enzymatic attack. Acetic acid, furfural, and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) are thought to be key components among many inhibitors that form during pretreatment. In order to move the lignocellulosic ethanol industry forward, research and procedures to allow the evolution of yeast strains capable of surviving and efficiently functioning to use both hexose and pentose sugars in the presence of such inhibitory compounds are needed. A significant additional weakness of traditional industrial yeast strains, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is the inability to efficiently ferment the xylose available in hydrolyzates of plant biomass.

Pichia stipitis type strain NRRL Y-7124 (CBS 5773), recently renamed Scheffersomyces stipitis, is a native pentose fermenting yeast that is well known to ferment xylose to ethanol.^2,3 The evolution of strain NRRL Y-7124 was pursued here because it has been documented to have the greatest potential of native yeast strains to accumulate economically recoverable ethanol exceeding 40 g/L with little xylitol byproduct.^4,5,6 In optimal media, S. stipitis strain NRRL Y-7124 produces 70 g/L ethanol in 40 hr (1.75 g/L/hr) at a yield of 0.41 ± 0.06 g/g in high cell density cultures (6 g/L cells).^7,8 Resistance to fermentation inhibitors ethanol, furfural, and HMF has also been reported,⁹ and S. stipitis has been ranked among most promising native pentose-fermenting yeasts available for commercial scale ethanol production from lignocellulose.¹⁰ Our objective was to apply diverse undetoxified lignocellulosic hydrolyzates and ethanol selection pressures to force evolution toward a more robust derivative of strain NRRL Y-7124 suitable for industrial applications. Key among improved features sought were faster sugar uptake rates in concentrated hydrolyzates, reduced diauxy for more efficient mixed sugar utilization, and higher tolerances of ethanol and inhibitors. The application of S. stipitis to undetoxified hydrolyzates was a key focus of the research to eliminate the added operating expense associated with hydrolyzate detoxification processes, such as overliming.

Two industrially promising hydrolyzates were applied to force evolution: enzyme saccharified ammonia fiber expansion-pretreated corn stover hydrolyzate (AFEX CSH) and dilute acid-pretreated switchgrass hydrolyzate liquor (PSGHL).^11,12 AFEX pretreatment technology is being developed to minimize the production of fermentation inhibitors, while dilute acid pretreatment represents the current lowest cost technology most commonly practiced to expose cellulosic biomass for enzymatic saccharification. PSGHL is separable from the cellulose remaining after pretreatment and is characteristically rich in xylose from the hydrolyzed hemicellulose, but low in glucose. AFEX CSH and PSGHL compositions differ from one another in key aspects which were exploited to manage the evolution process. AFEX CSH is lower in furan aldehydes and acetic acid inhibitors but higher in amino acids and ammonia nitrogen sources compared with PSGHL (Table 1). PSGHL presents the additional challenge of xylose being the predominant sugar available. Thus PSGHL is appropriate to specifically enrich for improved xylose utilization in hydrolyzates, a weakness preventing commercial use of available yeast. Even among native pentose fermenting yeasts, the reliance on the suboptimal sugar xylose to support cell growth and repair becomes even more challenging in hydrolyzates because of a variety of reasons: nutrient deficiencies, inhibitors causing widespread damage to cell structural integrity, and disruption to metabolism due to redox imbalances.⁹ Nitrogen supplementation, especially in the form of amino acids, can represent a significant operating cost for fermentations. The impact of nitrogen supplementation on isolate screening and ranking was explored with switchgrass hydrolyzates.

Improved individuals were enriched in an evolving population using multiple selection pressures reliant on natural genetic diversity of the S. stipitis population and mutations induced by exposures to two diverse hydrolyzates, ethanol or UV radiation. Selection pressures were applied in parallel and in series to explore the evolution progress of S. stipitis toward desired derivatives able to grow and ferment efficiently in hydrolyzates (Figure 1). The repetitive culturing of functional populations in increasingly challenging hydrolyzates was accomplished in microplates employing a dilution series of either 12% glucan AFEX CSH or else PGSHL prepared at 20% solids loading. The application of ethanol-challenged growth on xylose in continuous culture further improved AFEX CSH adapted populations by enriching for phenotypes demonstrating less susceptibility to ethanol repression of xylose utilization. The latter feature was recently shown problematic to pentose utilization by strain NRRL Y-7124 following glucose fermentation.⁸ Enrichment on PSGHL was next explored to broaden hydrolyzate functionality.

Putative improved derivatives of S. stipitis NRRL Y-7124 were isolated from each phase of the evolution process using targeted enrichment under stress conditions and dilution plating to pick colonies from the most prevalent populations. Dimensionless relative performance indices (RPIs) were used to rank strains based on overall performance, where kinetic behavior was evaluated on the different hydrolyzate types and nutrient supplements applied. Although the successes of various adaptation procedures to improve the functionality of S. stipitis in lignocellulosic hydrolyzates have been previously documented, strains demonstrating economical ethanol production on undetoxified hydrolyzates have not been previously reported.^13-17 Using the evolution procedures to be visualized in more detail here, Slininger et al.¹⁸ developed strains that are significantly improved over the parent strain NRRL Y-7124 and are able to produce >40 g/L ethanol in AFEX CSH and enzyme saccharified switchgrass hydrolyzate (SGH) appropriately supplemented with nitrogen sources. These novel strains are of future interest to the developing lignocellulose to ethanol industry and as subjects of additional genomics studies building on those of previously sequenced strain NRRL Y-11545.¹⁹ A genomics study of top strains produced during various phases of evolution diagramed in Figure 1 would elucidate the history of genetic changes that occurred during development as a prelude to further strain improvement research.

Protocol

1. Prepare Starting Materials and Equipment for Assays

1. Prepare hydrolyzates using 18 to 20% initial biomass dry weight in the pretreatment reaction for use in the evolution, isolation and ranking procedures. See Slininger et al. 2015¹⁸ for the detailed methods to prepare AFEX CSH, PSGHL, and SGH with nitrogen supplements N1 or N2 used in evolution, isolation or ranking. See Table 1 for composition of each hydrolyzate type.
   NOTE: Nitrogen fortifications of SGH were designated as SGH-N1 or SGH-N2 defined as follows: SGH-N1 = SGH fortified to 42:1 molar carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N) with nitrogen sources including urea, vitamin-free amino acids from casein, D,L-tryptophan, L-cysteine, and vitamins from defined sources (such that ~15% of molar nitrogen N is primary amino nitrogen (PAN) and ~85% of N is from urea); SGH-N2 = SGH fortified to 37:1 C:N with urea and soy flour as the lowest cost commercial source of amino acids and vitamins, providing ~12% of N from PAN and 88% as urea.
2. Acquire a lyophilized culture of the parent strain, Scheffersomyces stipitis NRRL Y-7124 (CBS 5773) from the ARS Culture Collection (National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Peoria, Illinois), and prepare glycerol stock cultures as directed. Maintain stock cultures of the parent yeast and its derivatives in 10% glycerol at -80 °C.
   1. Streak glycerol stocks to yeast malt peptone dextrose (YM) agar plates (3 g/L yeast extract, 3 g/L malt extract, 5 g/L peptone, 10 g/L dextrose, 20 g/L agar) and incubate 48-72 hr at 25 °C.⁸ Developed plates can be stored up to a week at 4 °C prior to use as liquid pre-culture inocula.
3. Prepare Optimal Defined Medium (ODM), a synthetic medium compatible with industrial formulation procedures²⁰ that was previously developed for optimal conversion of xylose to ethanol by the parent strain Scheffersomyces (Pichia) stipitis NRRL Y-7124.⁷ Use the defined medium in all precultures and cultures for fermentation performance bioassays and also for ethanol challenged, xylose-fed continuous culture evolution. ODM composition is listed for reference in Table 2.
4. As described previously,¹⁸ analyze cell biomass using a cuvette- or micro-plate reading spectrophotometer, as appropriate, to measure culture absorbance at 620 nm (A₆₂₀). Quantitate sugars, ethanol, furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), and acetic acid in culture samples using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or robotic enzymatic determination of glucose and xylose for higher throughput.

2. Enrich Robust Derivatives during Serial Transfer on AFEX CSH

1. Inoculate a preculture of strain NRRL Y-7124. Transfer cells from YM agar to 75 ml ODM + 150 g/L xylose to maintain the ability to grow under osmotic stress. Incubate precultures in 125 ml flasks closed with silicon sponge plugs 24 hr at 25 °C with shaking (150 rpm, 1" orbit).
2. Thaw frozen aliquots of 6-12% glucan AFEX CSH in cold water for use. Adjust pH to 5 if needed and filter sterilize prior to preparing a dilution series in 96-well microplates.
3. Fill microplates with 50 µl per well and 8 wells per hydrolyzate dilution, then inoculate with a few microliters of preculture per well to allow an initial absorbance (620 nm) A₆₂₀ ≥0.1. Incubate plates statically 24-48 hr at 25 °C in a plastic box with a wet paper towel for humidity.
4. Using the most concentrated hydrolyzate dilution that visibly grew to A₆₂₀ >1, transfer 1-5 µl to each well of a new hydrolyzate dilution series to achieve initial A₆₂₀ ≥0.1.
5. Monitor growth culture A₆₂₀ in microplates with a spectrophotometer. An uninoculated dilution series serves as a control and blank. Plate lids are left on during monitoring to prevent contamination, and the readings adjusted accordingly.
6. Prepare glycerol stocks of adaptation cultures regularly for subsequent isolation of improved strains or for use in reinoculating the continuing hydrolyzate dilution series. To prepare stocks, pool four wells (200 µl) of the greatest hydrolyzate concentration colonized. Mix 1:1 with 20% sterile glycerol in cryovials, to freeze cells in 10% glycerol at -80 °C.
7. Repeat steps 2.3-2.6 until growth in 12% glucan AFEX CSH is consistently visible at 24 hr.

3. Isolate Single Cell Tolerant Derivatives after Enrichment on AFEX CSH

1. Streak selected glycerol stocks of adaptation cultures to YM agar, and use streaks to inoculate 50 µl of 3% or 6% glucan AFEX CSH (pH 5) in each of three microplate wells (initial A₆₂₀ ~0.1). Incubate microplates 24 hr as in step 2.3. Pool replicate colonized wells at the highest hydrolyzate strength with strong growth, and dilution plate to YM or 6% glucan AFEX CSH agar. Prepare the latter as a 1:1 mix of filter sterilized 12% glucan AFEX CSH with warm autoclaved 30 g/L agar solution.
2. Pick 5 single colonies from the highest dilution plate showing growth after 24-48 hr incubation at 25 °C to freeze as glycerol stock cultures. Streak each colony to a YM plate. Incubate 24 hr. With a sterile loop, transfer a developed streak of cells to a small volume of 10% glycerol, mix to suspend cells, and distribute to 2-3 cryovials for freezing at -80 °C.

4. Evaluate Performance of AFEX CSH Tolerant Derivatives Compared to Parent

1. Test Isolates in Simple 6% Glucan AFEX CSH Batch Cultures.
   1. Transfer cells from 48 hr plates streaked from glycerol stocks to pH 7 potassium phosphate buffer (0.4 mM) to prepare cell suspensions with A₆₂₀ = 10. Use 1 µl of each suspension to inoculate each of four wells of 50 µl 3% glucan hydrolyzate to initial A₆₂₀ = 0.2. Incubate microplates 24 hr as in step 2.3. Prepare the 3% glucan AFEX CSH at pH 5 by diluting 12% glucan AFEX CSH 1:3 with sterile water.
   2. Transfer two 24 hr microplate wells to inoculate 25 ml precultures of pH 5 12% glucan AFEX CSH used at 50% of full strength. Incubate precultures in 50 ml flasks with silicon sponge closures for 24 hr at 25 °C, ~150 rpm (1" orbit). Prepare the half-strength 12% glucan AFEX CSH by diluting the hydrolyzate 1:1 with sterile water.
   3. Use half-strength hydrolyzate precultures to inoculate similar 25 ml growth cultures to initial A₆₂₀ = 0.1. Incubate the growth cultures as above (4.1.2) and sample daily (0.2 ml). Monitor accumulations of biomass (A₆₂₀) and concentrations of sugars and fermentation products (HPLC).
2. Alternatively, repitch (i.e., harvest and reuse) populations of 6% glucan AFEX CSH-grown yeast for testing in 8% glucan hydrolyzate batch cultures, as described previously.¹⁸
3. Alternatively, further test populations of repitched 6% glucan AFEX CSH cultures by feeding with 12% glucan hydrolyzate, as described previously.¹⁸
4. Test diauxic lag of isolates in batch cultures of ODM with mixed sugars.
   1. Inoculate precultures of 75 ml ODM with 150 g/L xylose in 125 ml flasks with silicone sponge closures by loop transfer from YM glycerol streaks. Incubate 24 hr as in step 2.1.
   2. Use precultures to inoculate similar 75 ml test cultures with ODM containing 75 g/L of glucose and 75 g/L of xylose at pH 6.5. Shake flasks at 25 °C, 150 rpm. Sample daily.
   3. Alternatively, test the impact of 0-15 g/L acetic acid on diauxy during fermentation of glucose and xylose by using a similar protocol, except initial pH is set at 6.0 ± 0.2 in test cultures to maintain pH 6-7 during acetic acid consumption, as previously described.¹⁸

5. Apply Continuous Culture to Select for Ethanol-challenged Xylose Utilization

1. Prepare ODM as the continuous culture feed medium with 60-100 g/L xylose, 20-50 g/L ethanol at pH 6.3 ± 0.2. Choose combinations of xylose and ethanol to simulate the partial fermentation of 150 g/L xylose, assuming a potential yield of ~0.5 g ethanol/g xylose, and to accommodate the potential for 50-70 g/L ethanol to occur.⁸
2. To prepare the continuous culture inoculum, transfer a representative AFEX CSH-tolerant colony (analogous to Colony 5 in example, Figure 1) by loop from a 48 hr YM plate to 75 ml of the ethanol-free ODM (100 g/L xylose, in this case) in 125 ml flasks. Incubate at 25 °C, 150 rpm (1" orbit) for 24 hr. Choose the preculture ODM xylose concentration to match that of the initial continuous culture holding volume.
3. Inoculate a continuous culture holding volume of ODM at pH 6.3 ± 0.2 having 100 g/L xylose + 20 g/L ethanol with ~5-10 ml of a preculture concentrate of a AFEX CSH-tolerant isolate (analogous to Colony 5, Figure 1) to obtain 100 ml at initial A₆₂₀ ~0.5. Maintain the culture holding volume (V_R), at 25 °C in a jacketed 100 ml spinner flask stirred at 200 rpm and outfitted with sterilizable pH electrode, pH controller and temperature-controlled circulating water bath.
4. Initially, since cell growth will be slow due to the ethanol exposure, set up the feed medium to dose using a pH-actuated pump. Set the pump to feed pH-6.3 ODM with 100 g/L xylose and 50 g/L ethanol when the culture fermentation drops the pH to 5.4, thus stopping further pH drop. Maintain the volume at 100 ml with an effluent pump continuously skimming the culture surface. Consequently, ethanol concentration rises with continued metabolism and feeding.
5. Measure effluent and draw samples (1-2 ml) from continuous cultures every 48-72 hr for analysis of viable cell concentration, products and substrates, as previously described.¹⁸ To find viable cell concentration, make serial 1:10 dilutions of samples in buffer (see 4.1.1) and spread plate the dilutions to YM agar (see 1.2.1). Based on effluent collection rates (Q), calculate the dilution rate (D) (Q/V_R), and, in the example of S. stipitis, it varied from 0 to 0.01 hr^-1.
6. Save glycerol stocks regularly by isolating from viability plates of buffered sample dilutions forming 30-100 colonies, representing most prevalent robust colonists at that time in enrichment. Flood plates with ~5 ml of 10% glycerol to allow preparation of duplicate cryovials. For maintenance or a respite, stop the continuous culture and restart as needed using most current (resistant) glycerol stock(s).
7. To restart, streak the glycerol stock(s) of most resistant populations to YM agar and transfer 24-48 hr cells by loop to a pre-culture of ethanol-free ODM for incubation as above. Inoculate the 100 ml holding volume of ODM to initial A₆₂₀ 0.5 using a concentrate of the precultured yeast, and allow the culture to grow batch-wise to stationary phase before the feed medium flow is restarted.
8. If cultures can grow steadily at >0.01 hr^-1 on xylose in the presence of >25 g/L ethanol, start the continuous culture feed (ODM + 60 g/L xylose + ethanol ranging 30 to 50 g/L) at a low dilution rate ~0.01 hr^-1 to the 100 ml holding volume (initially ODM + 60 g/L xylose + 20 g/L ethanol). Over time, raise the ethanol in the feed toward 50 g/L. Capture advanced populations in glycerol stocks.
   NOTE: Maintaining the low dilution rate allows formation of a high enough cell concentration to reduce oxygen availability and support fermentation.
9. Optionally, apply ultra-violet (UV) irradiation monthly to glycerol stock populations used to reinoculate continuous cultures.
   1. Resuspend colonies from glycerol stock streaks in 10 ml of ODM (as in precultures) with 60 g/L xylose, and pool all stocks in a single sterile flask. Apply the pooled cell suspension at ~5 x 10⁸ viable cells/ml to just cover the bottoms of 4-5 Petri plates with 6 ml/plate. To obtain 6 ml coverage of a standard disposable petri plate, dispense 15 ml to overcome surface tension, and then remove 9 ml.
   2. Expose each open culture plate to UV from the light source in a biological safety cabinet. Adjust the UV exposure time or distance to obtain the desired kill rate >90%. Here, expose for 45 min at around 56 cm from the source.
   3. Dilute plate cell suspensions before and after irradiation. Estimate kill rate based on colony forming units. For the S. stipitis example, the kill rate was ~97%.
   4. Transfer the UV-exposed cultures (24-30 ml) to a foil-covered 50 ml flask, and incubate at 25 °C and 150 rpm for 24 hr to allow the small percentage of viable cells to repopulate to ~1 x 10⁸ viable S. stipitis cells/ml. By preventing photo reactivations, the foil cover preserves mutations while cultures are incubated.
   5. Use the repopulated mutagenized culture to inoculate continuous cultures to ~1 x 10⁷ viable cells/ml. Restart the ethanol-enriched ODM + 60 g/L xylose medium feed to continue the selection process.

6. Evaluate Glycerol Stock Populations and Identify Those with Improved Xylose Fermentation in the Presence of Ethanol

1. Streak selected glycerol stock cultures to YM agar as the first step in the screen for best growth and fermentation of xylose in the presence of ethanol.
2. Transfer each evolved population to be screened from agar streaks to 75 ml precultures in ODM with 150 g/L glucose, and incubate in 125 ml flasks 96 hr prior to use as inocula for test cultures. The large glucose-grown populations will require induction of enzymes for xylose utilization.
   1. To test induction, harvest each culture, suspend cells to 30 ml, initial A₆₂₀ of 40 in ODM +60 g/L xylose + 30-45 g/L ethanol, and incubate at 25 °C, 150 rpm (1" orbit) in 50 ml flasks with silicon sponge closures. Draw samples twice daily for monitoring xylose uptake by HPLC analysis.
3. Alternatively, as described in Slininger et al.,¹⁸ to assess growth on xylose in the presence of ethanol, prepare precultures of each evolved population by loop transfer to 75 ml of ODM with 150 g/L xylose in 125 ml flasks, and incubate 96 hr at 25 °C, 150 rpm (1" orbit). Inoculate test cultures to a low initial A₆₂₀ of 0.1 in 25 ml of ODM + 60 g/L xylose + 30-45 g/L ethanol in 125 ml flasks. Incubate flasks at 25 °C, 300 rpm, 1" orbit and sample.

7. Isolate Single-cell Colonies That Utilize Xylose in PSGHL When Ethanol Is Present

1. Based on results of step 6, select glycerol stock populations showing superior ability to grow on and ferment xylose in the presence of ethanol. Use these to streak plates. The streak plates are used to prepare dense, buffered cell suspensions of A₆₂₀ = 5.  Then cell suspensions are used to inoculate precultures in 96-deep well plates to A₆₂₀ = 0.5. Inoculate 1 ml precultures on PSGHL mixed 1:1 with ODM + 50 g/L xylose (no ethanol). Incubate precultures in 96-well, deep well plates with vented low evaporation covers for 48 hr at 25 °C, 400 rpm, 1" orbit. Separate different glycerol stock populations by empty wells.
2. Using each preculture, inoculate sixteen 1 ml replicate cultures to initial A₆₂₀ ~0.5 in 1:1 PSGHL:ODM+50 g/L xylose with 20, 30, or 40 g/L ethanol to enrich tolerant colonists. Incubate enrichment cultures similarly to precultures.
3. For each different glycerol stock, harvest the culture wells with highest ethanol concentration allowing growth and xylose use. Plate each cell line to YM agar to obtain prevalent single colonies to preserve in glycerol. Pick ten colonies per cell line and streak each to a YM agar plate for glycerol stock preparation.

8. Further Enrich Robust Evolved Strains during Serial Transfer on PSGHL, as for AFEX CSH

1. Prepare pre-cultures of NRRL Y-7124 (parent), AFEX CSH-tolerant evolved isolate, and continuous culture evolved population with enhanced ability to use xylose in the presence of ethanol. Inoculate 75 ml of ODM + 150 g/L xylose by loop from glycerol stock streaks as described above (step 2.1) for the AFEX CSH hydrolyzate adaptation process.
2. Dilute PSGHL with water to provide a series of increasing concentrations. Prepare a 96-well micro-plate for each of the three cell lines by using each PSGHL dilution to fill 8 wells with 50 µl. Use preculture to inoculate each 50 µl micro-culture of the dilution series to initial A₆₂₀ ~0.1-0.5.
   1. Continue the evolution of yeast in increasing strengths of PSGHL using the same procedure as the AFEX CSH hydrolyzate adaptation detailed above (step 2) until cultures are able to grow in the full strength hydrolyzate at a stable 14-d average ratio of ΔA₆₂₀ per Δtime as serial transfers are continued an additional four months.

9. Isolate Single-cell Colonies Using PSGHL Gradients with or without Ethanol Challenge

1. Obtain single-cell isolates directly from full strength PSGHL final adaptation plates by dilution plating to YM agar. Pick ten large colonies for each of the three cell lines and bar streak to YM plates to prepare glycerol stocks as previously described (step 3.2).
2. Optionally, explore earlier time points in the evolution process by isolating from stored glycerol stocks of the three cell lines.
   1. Inoculate a preculture for each cell line by loop from glycerol stock streaks and incubate 24 hr on 30 ml ODM + 50 g/L xylose (50 ml flasks, 25 °C, 150 rpm).
   2. Challenge cells from precultures to growth in hydrolyzate by inoculating 50 µl of 50% PSGHL in microplate wells to an initial A₆₂₀ ~0.2 and incubating statically 48 hr.
   3. Spread 0.1 ml of each enriched culture onto PSGHL gradient agar plates ranging from 0 to 50% strength hydrolyzate (delivering ~300-400 viable cells per plate), and pick 10 single colonies per cell line from the highest possible hydrolyzate concentration area of the gradient.²¹ Streak picked colonies to YM for glycerol stock preparation as in step 3.2.
   4. As an alternative to step 9.2.3, instead of inoculating the gradient agar plates, inoculate wells of 96-well micro-plates to initial A₆₂₀ ~0.2, where the wells are designed to contain a range of hydrolyzate concentrations from 50 to 100% strength and ethanol from 10 to 40 g/L. In this case, develop micro-plates 72-96 hr and otherwise as in step 2.3. Isolate ten single colonies from wells of the harshest hydrolyzate-ethanol combinations showing growth via dilution plating, and prepare glycerol stocks as in step 3.2.

10. In a Primary Screen, Eliminate Inferior Isolates by Comparing and Ranking Performances on PSGHL at Two Nutrient Conditions

1. Apply a high throughput deep well plate screen of PSGHL performance to screen five sets of thirty isolates along with NRRL Y-7124 parent and AFEX CSH-tolerant isolate (analogous to Colony 5 of the Figure 1 evolution example) as controls to choose six top strains (20%) from each set to pass to the secondary screening level (step 12).
2. Carry out the screen in deep well plates filled 1 ml per well and covered with stainless steel lids with black silicone low evaporative seals. Clamp all plates to the board of the incubator/shaker and operate at 25 °C and 400 rpm (1" shaker orbit). Design all deep well plate filling patterns to allow separation of different isolates by open wells.
3. To begin cultivations, pick a bead of cells from glycerol streaks prepared from 30 isolates obtained as above (in steps 3, 7, and 9) to duplicate wells of ODM + 50 g/L xylose and incubate 48 hr.
4. As a challenge medium for preculturing isolates, prepare 50% PSGHL by mixing PSGHL 1:1 with ODM + 10 g/L glucose + 50 g/L xylose. For screening 30 isolates and two control strains, 2 plates with 2 wells per each of 16 isolates are filled, leaving empty wells between the different isolates.
5. For challenge cultures, transfer, a 50 µl volume of ODM pre-cultures (A₆₂₀ ~10) to each of two 50% PSGHL challenge culture wells for each of the isolates and controls to obtain an initial A₆₂₀ ~0.5 and incubate 72 hr.
6. Use two test media of different nutritional richness for screening isolates: 60% PSGHL + ODM nutrients; and 75% PSGHL + ODM + YM nutrients. Add ODM nutrients (excluding sugars) at half of the strength as standard for ODM use with 50 g/L sugar (step 1.3). As designated, add YM nutrients (excluding sugars) at half of the standard strength of 3 g/L yeast extract, 3 g/L malt extract, 5 g/L peptone.
7. Inoculate test cultures by transferring 50 µl of 72 hr 50% PSGHL challenge pre-cultures to inoculate 1,000 µl to initial A₆₂₀ ~0.5 in five deep wells for each of two test media.
8. Sample each isolate daily. Pipette the contents of a well to a microfuge tube and centrifuge (5,533 x g, 15 min) to obtain supernate for ethanol, glucose and xylose high throughput analyses. Measure biomass as A₆₂₀ in 96-well micro-plates (200 µl/well) with a spectrophotometer.
9. Within each set of 30 isolates tested (5 sets for S. stipitis NRRL Y-7124 evolved strains), calculate relative performance indexes (RPI) as described in step 11 below and use to rank each strain based on ethanol yield (maximum ethanol accumulated per initial sugar supplied) and xylose uptake rate (xylose concentration consumed per initial 96 hr) on both test media.

11. Rank Isolates in the Primary PSGHL Screen Using Relative Performance Index (RPI)

1. Following primary screening, calculate dimensionless relative performance indices (RPI) in order to rank the 30 isolates in each of the five different experiments to screen isolates on PSGHL with two different nutrient formulations per experiment, i.e., 60% PSGHL and 75% PSGHL.
2. Calculate the statistical parameter F for use in ranking isolate performance within a group of isolates tested in a given experiment: F = (X-X_avg)/s. Here, X is the performance parameter, such as yield (Y) or rate (R), observed for each individual isolate, while X_avg and s are the average and standard deviation, respectively, of X observed for all isolates within a given experiment. For normal distributions, -2 < F < 2.
3. For each isolate in an experiment, calculate relative performance based on rate, RPI_R = (2+F_R) × 100/4, and similarly calculate relative performance based on yield, RPI_Y = (2+F_Y) × 100/4. The value of RPI ranges from ~0 to 100 percentile (lowest to highest). Then calculate RPI averages for each isolate within a given hydrolyzate experiment as follows: RPI_avg = (RPI_Y +RPI_R)/2, where yield and rate contributions are given equal weighting in this application.
   Note that in general, yield and rate parameters can be weighted if deemed unequal in importance.
4. Compute RPI_overall across the n types of hydrolyzates tested: RPI_overall = Σ_i=1,n[(RPI_Y +RPI_R)/2]_i/n. Consider each isolate in an experimental set of 30 isolates and 2 controls. During primary ranking of the ~150 single-colony isolates adapted to xylose-rich PSGHL, the RPI_overall is calculated for rates and yields across the two PSGHL formulations applied in the screen, i.e., 60% PSGHL and 75% PSGHL, where n = 2.
5. Based on RPI_overall within each experiment, choose the top percentage of isolates to pass to the secondary screen. In this example, the top 20% of strains are chosen to pass through (i.e., 30 of 150 tested).

12. In a Secondary Screen, Compare Top Primary Screen Performers on Multiple Complete Hydrolyzates (>100 g/L Mixed Sugars) to Reveal Highest Functioning Robust Strains

1. Compare top PSGHL performers on 6% glucan AFEX CSH and SGH amended with two levels of nitrogen, SGH-N1 and SGH-N2 (compositions as in Table 1) for final ranking. Screen the 30 isolates that were the top performers in the primary deep well plate screen of PSGHL (steps 10 and 11) and the two controls (parent strain NRRL Y-7124 and AFEX CSH-tolerant isolate (analogous to Colony 5, Figure 1 example).
2. Begin cultivations by picking a bead of cells from glycerol streaks to duplicate deep wells of 1 ml ODM + 50 g/L xylose as before and incubate 48 hr in the deep well plate system (step 10.2). Then transfer 50 µl of ODM precultures to 50% SGH challenge cultures, and incubate in the deep well plate system for 72 hr to obtain A₆₂₀ at ~10). Prepare the 50% SGH by mixing SGH 1:1 with sugarless ODM + 50 g/L xylose (pH 5.6).
3. For each of the isolates, inoculate a 16 ml aliquot of SGH-N1 or SGH-N2 with the cell pellet (15 min, 2,711 x g) from three wells of challenge culture to yield initial test culture A₆₂₀ ~2.0. Incubate test cultures at 25 °C, 180 rpm (1" orbit) in 25 ml flasks with silicone sponge closures. Sample flasks daily and analyze per the PSGHL screen.
4. Similarly, screen isolates as in steps 12.2 and 12.3, but this time substitute SGH-N1 and SGH-N2 with 6% glucan AFEX CSH at pH 5.2 for use in preparing the challenge culture medium and test culture medium. For the 50% strength challenge cultures, use 6% AFEX CSH diluted 1:1 with water since it is nitrogen sufficient without amendment.
5. Repeat steps 12.1-12.4 to duplicate results.

13. Rank the Performances of Isolates in the Secondary Screen Using RPI _overall to Rate Use of Multiple Complete Hydrolyzates

1. Calculate relative performance indices (RPI) in order to rank each of the top 20% of isolates (~30 out of 150) from the primary screen that have been tested in the secondary screen on enzyme saccharified hydrolyzate formulations of varying nutritional richness.
2. Score each isolate tested in the secondary screen based on xylose uptake rate and ethanol yield performed on three enzyme-saccharified pretreated hydrolyzate formulations run in duplicate, including AFEX CSH (i = 1 and 2), SGH-N1 (i = 3  and 4) and SGH-N2 (i = 5 and 6).
3. Calculate the RPI_overall for each isolate, and apply this ranking parameter to further winnow the list of superior isolates: RPI_overall = Σ_i=1,n[(RPI_Y +RPI_R)/2]_i/n, where n = 6.
   NOTE: Demonstrate kinetics of superior isolates in SGH-N2 hydrolyzates in flask cultures by following the procedures in Slininger et al.¹⁸

Results

S. stipitis was evolved using combinations of three selection cultures, which included AFEX CSH, PSGHL, and ethanol-challenged xylose-fed continuous culture. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of the evolution experiments performed along with the isolates found either to perform most effectively overall, or most effectively on one of the hydrolyzates tested. Table 3 shows the NRRL accession numbers of these superior isolates and summarizes the adaptation stresses applied in th...

Discussion

Several steps were critical to the success of the evolution process. First, it is key to choose appropriate selection pressures to drive the population evolution toward the desired phenotypes that are needed for successful application. The following selective stresses were chosen for S. stipitis development and applied at appropriate times to guide enrichment for the desired phenotypes: increasing strengths of 12% glucan AFEX CSH (which forces growth and fermentation of diverse sugars in the presence of acetic a...

Materials

List of materials used in this article

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
Cellic Ctec, Contains Xylanase (endo-1,4-)	Novozymes	No product number	www.novozymes.com, 1-919-494-3000
Cellic Htec, Contains Cellulase and Xyalanase	Novozymes	No product number	www.novozymes.com, 1-919-494-3000
Toasted Nutrisoy Flour	Archer Daniels Midland Co. (ADM)	63160	ADM, 4666 Faries Parkway, Decatur, IL  1800-37-5843
Pluronic F-68 (Surfactant)	Sigma-Aldrich	P1300	Sigma-Aldrich
Difco Vitamin Assay Casamino Acids	Becton Dickinson and Company	228830	multiple suppliers: e.g., Fisher Scientific, VWR, Daigger
D,L-tryptophan	Sigma-Aldrich	T3300	multiple suppliers: e.g., Fisher Scientific, VWR, Daigger
L-cysteine	Sigma-Aldrich	C7352	multiple suppliers: e.g., Fisher Scientific, Sigma-Aldrich
Bacto Agar	Becton Dickinson and Company	214010	multiple suppliers: e.g., Fisher Scientific, VWR, Daigger
Bacto Malt Extract	Becton Dickinson and Company	218630	multiple suppliers: e.g., Fisher Scientific, VWR, Daigger
Bacto Yeast Extract	Becton Dickinson and Company	212750	multiple suppliers: e.g., Fisher Scientific, VWR, Daigger
Peptone Type IV from soybean	Fluka	P0521-500g	multiple suppliers: e.g., Fisher Scientific, VWR, Daigger
Adenine, >99% powder	Sigma-Aldrich	A8626	CAS 73-24-5. Could use other brands. Multiple suppliers: e.g., Sigma-Aldrich, Acros Organics, MP Biomedicals LLC
Cytosine, >99%	Sigma-Aldrich	C3506	CAS 71-30-7. Could use other brands. Multiple suppliers: e.g., Sigma-Aldrich, Acros Organics, MP Biomedicals LLC
Guanine, SigmaUltra	Sigma-Aldrich	G6779	CAS 73-40-5. Could use other brands. Multiple suppliers: e.g., Sigma-Aldrich, Acros Organics, MP Biomedicals LLC
Thymine, 99%	Sigma-Aldrich	T0376	CAS 65-71-4. Could use other brands. Multiple suppliers: e.g., Sigma-Aldrich, Acros Organics, MP Biomedicals LLC
Uracil, 99%	Sigma-Aldrich	U0750	CAS 66-22-8. Could use other brands. Multiple suppliers: e.g., Sigma-Aldrich, Acros Organics, MP Biomedicals LLC
Dextrose (D-Glucose), Anhydrous, Certified ACS	Fisher Chemical	D16-500	CAS 50-99-7. Could use other brands. Multiple suppliers: e.g., Acros Organics, Fisher Scientific, MP Biomedicals, Sigma-Aldrich
D-Xylose, assay >99%	Sigma-Aldrich	X1500	CAS 58-86-6. Could use other brands. Multiple suppliers: e.g., Acros Organics, Fisher Scientific, MP Biomedicals, Sigma-Aldrich
96-well, flat bottom plates	Becton Dickinson Falcon	351172	multiple suppliers: e.g., Thermo-Fisher, VWR, Daigger
Wypall L40 Wiper	Kimberly-Clark		towel in microplate boxes to absorb water for humidification; multiple suppliers e.g., Thermo-Fisher, uline, Daigger
Corning graduated pyrex flask, 125 ml, narrow opening (stopper #5)	Corning Life Science Glass	4980-125	multiple suppliers: e.g., Thermo-Fisher, VWR, Daigger
Innova 42R shaker/incubator, 2.5 cm (1") rotation	New Brunswick Scientific (1-800-631-5417)	M1335-0016	multiple suppliers: e.g., Eppendorf, Thermo-Fisher. Other shaker/incubators with a 2.5 cm (1") throw could be used.
Duetz Cover clamp for 4 deep well MTP plates	Applikon Biotechnology	Z365001700	applikon-biotechnology.com (U.S.), 1-650-578-1396
Duetz System sandwich cover for 96 deep well plates	Applikon Biotechnology	Z365001296	applikon-biotechnology.com (U.S.), 1-650-578-1396
Duetz System silicone seal (0.8 mm black low evap) for 96 deep well plate cover	Applikon Biotechnology	V0W1040027	applikon-biotechnology.com (U.S.), 1-650-578-1396
Blue microfiber layer for Duetz system sandwich cover	Applikon Biotechnology	V0W1040001	applikon-biotechnology.com (U.S.), 1-650-578-1396
96 well, 2 ml square well pyramid bottom plates, natural popypropylene	Applikon Biotechnology	ZC3DXP0240	applikon-biotechnology.com (U.S.), 1-650-578-1396
Bellco 32 mm silicon sponge plug closures, pk of 25 for 125 ml flasks	Bellco	1924-00032	Thomas Scientific, their Catalog number is 1203K27
Bellco Spinner Flask, 1968-Glass Dome, Sealable Flange Type, 100 ml working volume. This design no longer manufactured.	Bellco	1968-00100 (original Cat. No.)	Jacketed vessels have lower inlet & upper outlet ports for temp. control with circulating water bath. Vessels are 75 mm in outer diam and 200 mm in height. There are four side ports at ~45° angles and one top port. Port openings appropriate size for size 0 neoprene stoppers (21-22 mm inner diameters on ports).
Mathis Labomat IR Dryer Oven	MathisAg	Typ-Nbr BFA12 215307	Werner Mathis U.S.A. Inc. usa@mathisag.com, 704-786-6157
Dual Channel Biochemistry Analyzer	YSI Life Sciences	2900D-UP	www.ysi.com, robotic system for rapid sugars assay in 96-well microplate format
PowerWave XS Microplate Spectrophotometer	Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc	MQX200R	www.biotek.com