This protocol describes an osteosynthesis technique using an intramedullary locking nail for standardized fixation of femur osteotomies, which can be used to analyze normal and defective bone healing in mice.
Method Article
This protocol describes an osteosynthesis technique using an intramedullary locking nail for standardized fixation of femur osteotomies, which can be used to analyze normal and defective bone healing in mice.
Bone healing models are essential to the development of new therapeutic strategies for clinical fracture treatment. Furthermore, mouse models are becoming more commonly used in trauma research. They offer a large number of mutant strains and antibodies for the analysis of the molecular mechanisms behind the highly differentiated process of bone healing. To control the biomechanical environment, standardized and well-characterized osteosynthesis techniques are mandatory in mice. Here, we report on the design and use of an intramedullary nail to stabilize open femur osteotomies in mice. The nail, made of medical-grade stainless steel, provides high axial and rotational stiffness. The implant further allows the creation of defined, constant osteotomy gap sizes from 0.00 mm to 2.00 mm. Intramedullary locking nail stabilization of femur osteotomies with gap sizes of 0.00 mm and 0.25 mm result in adequate bone healing through endochondral and intramembranous ossification. Stabilization of femur osteotomies with a gap size of 2.00 mm results in atrophic non-union. Thus, the intramedullary locking nail can be used in healing and non-healing models. A further advantage of the use of the nail compared to other open bone healing models is the possibility to adequately fix bone substitutes and scaffolds in order to study the process of osseous integration. A disadvantage of the use of the intramedullary nail is the more invasive surgical procedure, inherent to all open procedures compared to closed models. A further disadvantage may be the induction of some damage to the intramedullary cavity, inherent to all intramedullary stabilization techniques compared to extramedullary stabilization procedures.
The biology of bone healing may be studied in vitro using cell and spheroid cultures, but it also requires in vivo approaches using animal studies. While large-animal experiments still play an important role in preclinical testing, early stage testing of products or hypotheses has changed during the last 10 years and is nowadays often conducted in small animal models1. This switch was performed for several reasons. Production and maintenance of mice and rats are cheaper compared to pigs and sheep. In addition, small animals have shorter reproduction times and shorter normal healing periods, both of which facilitate the performance of large series of chronic experiments. Finally, the availability of gene-targeted animals and specific antibodies allows for the analysis of molecular mechanisms in bone healing. However, while the previously used osteosynthesis techniques in the larger animal models could be translated with minimal variation from similar procedures used in human or veterinary clinical patient care, the development and application of osteosynthesis techniques in the small-sized rats and mice turned out to be challenging.
It is well known that the biomechanical environment significantly influences the bone healing process2. As known from fracture healing in humans, differences in fracture stabilization result in distinct modes of healing, including intramembranous ossification after rigid fixation and endochondral ossification after less rigid fixation with micromovements. Complete axial or rotational instability may delay the healing process or may result in non-unions3. Accordingly, we feel that it is necessary to develop sophisticated implant systems and osteosynthesis techniques in mice and rats. In this way, the biomechanical conditions can be standardized appropriately, guaranteeing valid results when analyzing the healing process.
Although a considerable number of highly sophisticated murine stabilization techniques have been introduced during the last few years, the most commonly used technique is still the simple intramedullary pin. The major disadvantage of this technique, however, is the lack of rotational and axial stability4. To improve rotational and axial stability, an intramedullary screw was introduced to stabilize femur fractures in mice5. However, the screw fixation cannot be used to analyze bone-defective healing due to the need for contact and compression between the bone fragments in order to maintain rotational stability.
The intramedullary locking nail offers higher axial and rotational stability compared to the simple pin and the intramedullary screw4. A highly reproducible femur osteotomy, possible because of the guide for the Gigli saw and the ability to create defined gap sizes, allows for the analysis of both normal bone healing and bone-defective healing6. Due to the insertion of interlocking pins, the intramedullary locking nail guarantees a constant gap size during the entire healing process, even while bearing full weight. Here, we report on the design and application of the intramedullary locking nail, as well as on its advantages and disadvantages in experimental studies on normal and delayed bone healing.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
All procedures were IACUC-approved and followed institutional guidelines (Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz, Zentralstelle Amtstierärztlicher Dienst, Saarbrücken, Germany). Analgesia and infection prevention should be in agreement with the respective guidelines of the country and institution where the experiments are to be performed.
1. Preparation of Implants and Surgical Instruments
2. Animals, Anesthesia, and Analgesia
3. Surgical Procedure and Nail Implantation
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The overall time for the surgical procedure was about 30 min from skin incision to wound closure. Using the surgical implants provided, surgery can be performed without a stereo-microscope. Postoperatively, the animals were monitored daily. Post-operative analgesia was terminated after 3 days because none of the animals showed evidence of pain (vocalization, restlessness, lack of mobility, failure to groom, abnormal posture, or lack of normal interest in surroundings) after this time peri...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The most critical steps of the surgical technique are the correct positioning of the nail, the aiming device, and the pins. The nail has to be inserted completely to the marked indent at the distal end of the nail, because a protrusion of the nail into the knee joint at the level of the condyles can restrict the movement of the knee (Figure 3 A). Therefore, the size of the femur and, accordingly, the body weight of the animals, must be considered. The surgeon should also pay special attention to the fina...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Romano Matthys is an employee of RISystem AG, Davos, Switzerland, which produces the implants and implant-specific instruments. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.
This work was supported by RISystem AG, Davos, Switzerland.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| MouseNail | RISystem AG | 221,122 | |
| MouseNail aiming device | RISystem AG | 221,201 | |
| MouseNail interlocking pin | RISystem AG | 221,121 | |
| Centering bit | RISystem AG | 592,205 | |
| Drill bit | RISystem AG | 590,200 | |
| Gigli wire saw | RISystem AG | 590,100 | |
| Suture (5-0 Prolene) | Ethicon | 8614H | |
| Forceps | Braun Aesculap AG &CoKG | BD520R | |
| Dressing forceps | Braun Aesculap AG &CoKG | BJ009R | |
| Scissors | Braun Aesculap AG &CoKG | BC100R | |
| Needle holder | Braun Aesculap AG &CoKG | BM024R | |
| 24 G needle | BD Mircolance 3 | 304100 | |
| 27 G needle | Braun Melsungen AG | 9186182 | |
| Scalpel blade size 15 | Braun Aesculap AG &CoKG | 16600525 | |
| Pincers | Knipex | 7932125 | |
| Heat radiator | Sanitas | 605.25 | |
| Depilatory cream | Asid bonz GmbH | NDXZ10 | |
| Eye lubricant | Bayer Vital GmbH | 2182442 | |
| Xylazine | Bayer Vital GmbH | 1320422 | |
| Ketamine | Serumwerke Bernburg | 7005294 | |
| Tramadol | Grünenthal GmbH | 2256241 | |
| Disinfection solution (SoftaseptN) | Braun Melsungen AG | 8505018 | |
| CD-1 mice | Charles River | 22 |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission