Method Article

The Drosophila Imaginal Disc Tumor Model: Visualization and Quantification of Gene Expression and Tumor Invasiveness Using Genetic Mosaics

DOI:

10.3791/54585

October 6th, 2016

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This protocol demonstrates how to generate fluorescently marked, genetically defined clonal tumors in the Drosophila eye/antennal imaginal discs (EAD). It describes how to dissect the EAD and brain from the third instar larvae and how to process them to visualize and quantify gene expression changes and tumor invasiveness.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Drosophila melanogaster has emerged as a powerful experimental system for functional and mechanistic studies of tumor development and progression in the context of a whole organism. Sophisticated techniques to generate genetic mosaics facilitate induction of visually marked, genetically defined clones surrounded by normal tissue. The clones can be analyzed through diverse molecular, cellular and omics approaches. This study describes how to generate fluorescently labeled clonal tumors of varying malignancy in the eye/antennal imaginal discs (EAD) of Drosophila larvae using the Mosaic Analysis with a Repressible Cell Marker (MARCM) technique. It describes procedures how to recover the mosaic EAD and brain from the larvae and how to process them for simultaneous imaging of fluorescent transgenic reporters and antibody staining. To facilitate molecular characterization of the mosaic tissue, we describe a protocol for isolation of total RNA from the EAD. The dissection procedure is suitable to recover EAD and brains from any larval stage. The fixation and staining protocol for imaginal discs works with a number of transgenic reporters and antibodies that recognize Drosophila proteins. The protocol for RNA isolation can be applied to various larval organs, whole larvae, and adult flies. Total RNA can be used for profiling of gene expression changes using candidate or genome-wide approaches. Finally, we detail a method for quantifying invasiveness of the clonal tumors. Although this method has limited use, its underlying concept is broadly applicable to other quantitative studies where cognitive bias must be avoided.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Cancer represents one of the most genetically heterogeneous group of diseases, whose incidence and mortality is dramatically increasing, particularly among the elderly worldwide. Cancer originates clonally from a tumor-initiating cell that escapes inherent tumor suppressor mechanisms and divides out of control. The gradual accumulation of genetic lesions that cooperatively promote growth, proliferation and motility while inhibiting death and differentiation transforms the initial benign overgrowth into a highly malignant, metastatic and deadly tumor. It has become evident that in addition to genetic alterations, tumor progression requires changes in the surrounding stroma and crosstalk between the tumor and multiple cell types (e.g., fibroblasts, immune and endothelial cells) in its microenvironment. Understanding the molecular principles underlying malignant transformation including tumor-stroma interactions is of great importance for developing prevention and early screening strategies, as well as new and effective treatments to combat cancer metastasis and drug resistance.

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has become an attractive system for cancer research 1-4 owing to its fast generation time, remarkable conservation of signaling nodes between flies and humans, limited genetic redundancy and wealth of advanced genetic tools that facilitate manipulation of almost any gene in a temporarily and spatially restricted manner. Genetically defined tumors of varying malignancy can be reproducibly engineered in Drosophila by introducing gain- and loss-of-function mutations in a subset of progenitors in an otherwise wild type tissue using the MARCM technique 5. The MARCM tool combines FLP/FRT (FLP recombinase/FLP Recognition Target)-mediated mitotic recombination 6 with FLP-out 7 and Gal4/UAS (Upstream Activation Sequence) 8 target gene expression systems 9. With this method expression of any UAS-based transgene, including oncogene or fluorescent protein cDNAs or inverted DNA repeats for dsRNA-induced gene silencing, will be restricted to a clone of cells that have lost a specific genetic locus and a Gal4 repressor due to recombination (Figure 1A). Clonal patches marked with green fluorescent (GFP) or red fluorescent proteins (e.g., RFP, DsRed, mCherry) can be easily tracked throughout development, isolated and analyzed. Importantly, their behavior can be directly compared to the adjacent wild type tissue. Thus, questions pertinent to the cell autonomous and non-autonomous effects of genetic lesions can be conveniently studied. Similar to mammals, only clones in which multiple oncogenic lesions are combined become malignant in Drosophila and recapitulate key hallmarks of mammalian cancer. They overproliferate, evade apoptosis, induce inflammation, become immortal and invasive, ultimately killing the host 10-17.

Here, we describe a protocol to generate genetically defined clonal tumors in the eye/antennal and brain tissue of Drosophila larvae using the MARCM technique. The method relies on a MARCM tester stock which expresses the yeast FLP recombinase under the control of the eyeless enhancer (eyFLP) 18,19. In this way, GFP-labeled clones are generated in both peripodial and columnar epithelium of the EAD and the neuroepithelium of the brain throughout embryonic and larval stages (Figure 1A, B and reference 20). Clones can be easily followed until adulthood as the EAD develops into the adult eye, antenna and head capsule while the neuroepithelium gives rise to neuroblasts that produce differentiated optic lobe neurons.

To facilitate extensive molecular, functional and phenotypic characterization of the mosaic tissue, we describe a protocol for dissection of the EAD and brain from the third instar larvae and outline how to process them for three different applications: (i) detection of transgenic fluorescent reporters and immunostaining, (ii) quantification of tumor invasiveness and (iii) analysis of gene expression changes using a quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) or a high-throughput mRNA sequencing (mRNA-seq) (Figure 1C).

The immunostaining protocol can be used to visualize any protein of interest with a specific antibody. Transgenic fluorescent transcriptional reporters provide convenient and precise spatiotemporal information on the activity of a particular signaling pathway. Cell-lineage specific reporters, on the other hand, reflect qualitative and quantitative changes in cell populations within the mosaic tissue and among tumors of distinct genotypes. Quantification of invasive behavior facilitates the comparison of tumor malignancy between genotypes. Finally, the protocol describing collection and processing of mosaic EAD for RNA isolation is suitable for both small and large-scale downstream applications such as reverse transcription followed by qRT-PCR and genome-wide mRNA-seq, respectively. The qualitative and quantitative data obtained from these assays provide novel insights into the social behavior of clonal tumors. Moreover, they produce a solid foundation for functional studies on the role of individual genes, genetic networks and tumor microenvironment in different stages and aspects of tumorigenesis.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

NOTE: This work utilizes the eyFLP1; act>y+>Gal4, UAS-GFP; FRT82B, tub-Gal80 MARCM 82B Green tester line 11. Crossing the MARCM 82B Green tester virgins to males of strains such as w; UAS-a; UAS-bRNAi, FRT82B cmut genotype will yield progeny in which mitotic recombination will occur between the right arms of the 3rd homologous chromosomes. In this way, clones homozygous mutant for gene c located distal to the FRT82B site will be generated within the EAD and brain neuroepithelium. These clones will express GFP, transgene a and dsRNA for gene b (Figure 1A). Various eyFLP-MARCM tester lines for recombination on the X, 2L, 2R, 3L and 3R have been established and are available within the fly community.

1. Fly Handling, Crosses, and Staging

  1. Expand the appropriate MARCM tester stock at room temperature by populating multiple bottles at the same time. Flip the adults into fresh bottles every 2-3 days so that enough virgins can be collected for subsequent crosses.
    NOTE: When collecting virgins, avoid a prolonged exposure to CO2 as this compromises female fecundity.
  2. Depending on the scale of the experiment, set up fly crosses in vials using at least 10 MARCM tester virgins and 4 males (e.g., for imaging of fluorescent reporters and immunostaining) or in bottles with at least 30 virgins and 10 males (e.g., for RNA isolation and quantification of invasiveness).
  3. Raise progeny at 25 °C under a long day 16 hr/8 hr light-dark cycle. Flip parents into new vials/bottles every 24 hr to facilitate reproducible staging of larvae and to prevent overcrowding.
    NOTE: Starting on day 6 after egg laying (AEL), the late third instar control larvae stop feeding, start wandering and enter pupariation. In contrast, the onset of the larval-pupal transition can be delayed or non-existent in larvae with EAD bearing hyperplastic or malignant clonal tumors.

2. Collecting Third Instar Larvae

  1. For immunostaining, collect about 20 late third instar larvae (wandering on the wall and those of a comparable body size from the food). Use forceps to gently pick larvae from the vial or bottle and transfer them into an embryo glass dish filled with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
    1. For RNA isolation and quantification of invasiveness, collect at least 80 late third instar larvae (wandering on the wall and those of a comparable body size from the food). Use a squirt bottle to squirt PBS into a fly bottle containing larvae until the surface is covered.
    2. Soften the top layers of food with a spatula and pour the food mash containing larvae into a Petri dish. Using forceps, gently pick larvae and transfer them into an embryo glass dish filled with PBS.
  2. Wash larvae with PBS until all residual food is removed. Inspect the larvae under the fluorescent stereomicroscope with 8 to 16X magnification to discard all "leopard larvae" that carry random GFP-positive spots throughout the larval body (Figure 2A, 2B and see Discussion Section).
    NOTE: For RNA isolation include a penultimate washing step in 70% EtOH for 1 min.
  3. Place the dish containing selected larvae in PBS on ice until dissection. Process larvae within 30 min to avoid adverse effects of cold and starvation.

3. Dissection of Larvae

  1. To dissect the EAD under a stereomicroscope, use one pair of forceps to gently press the middle part of the larva against the glass dish bottom. With the second forceps, grab the larval mouth hooks and pull them away from the body (Figure 2C).
    NOTE: The pulling force is often sufficient to break the optic stalks connecting the EAD pair to the brain lobes. If the brain or its parts stay attached to EAD and their presence is not desired for further applications, cut the optic stalks with a help of the two pairs of forceps. For invasive tumors (e.g., rasV12scrib1) the connection between EAD and the brain lobes becomes increasingly obscured with time by overgrowing and migrating clonal cells.
    1. To prepare the EAD/brain complex with an intact ventral nerve cord (VNC) (Figure 2D), use forceps to cut a larva in the middle of the body. Discard the posterior half.
    2. Hold the anterior half of the larval body between the tips of one forceps, flip the larva inside-out by pushing in the mouth hooks with the tip of the second forceps and by rolling the cuticle over it with the first forceps pair.
  2. Using forceps carefully remove all extraneous tissues (e.g., salivary glands, fat body, and gut) while leaving the EAD pair or the EAD/brain complex connected to the mouth hooks. Disentangle the mouth hooks from the overlying cuticle. Free the VNC by severing the axonal projections extending to body muscles and epidermis (Figures 1B, 2C, 2D).
    NOTE: The mouth hooks allow for safe manipulation of tissue with forceps and facilitate more efficient sinking and easy recognition of tissue during washing. Dissected EAD change morphology relatively fast when kept unfixed in PBS. Limit the dissection time to 20-30 min.
  3. To transfer the tissue, coat a P20 micropipette tip by pipetting the remaining body carcasses several times up and down. To transfer the larger EAD/brain complexes, cut the P20 micropipette tip with scissors.
    NOTE: The coating procedure is critical to prevent sticking and loss of dissected tissue during transfer. Use of a P20 micropipette minimizes the transfer of PBS into fixative solution, limiting unwanted dilution.
    1. For immunostaining, transfer the dissected EAD into a 0.5 ml tube filled with 400 µl 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) fixative. Use 1.5 ml tube with 1 ml PFA for larger EAD/brain complexes meant for scoring of invasiveness.
      CAUTION: PFA is highly toxic. Wear protective gloves and clothing. Avoid contact with skin, eyes or mucous membranes.
    2. For RNA isolation transfer the dissected EAD into a new glass dish filled with cold PBS. Use forceps to clean EAD from the ring and lymph glands, to minimize sample contaminations.
    3. Detach the EAD from the mouth hooks by severing the connection between the antenna discs and mouth hooks using forceps (Figure 2E). To avoid RNA degradation and gene expression artifacts, limit the dissection time to 30 min. Proceed to step 7.
      NOTE: An experienced researcher can dissect about 60 larvae in 30 min excluding time needed for larvae collection and washing. Total RNA yields depend on the EAD size that vary among genotypes and developmental stages. Dissection of 80-100 control EAD pairs from late third instar larvae should yield 5-8 µg total RNA.

4. Fixing, Immunostaining, and Mounting

  1. Fix samples in PFA fixative for 25 min while nutating at room temperature. The fixation time can be extended up to 60 min without altering tissue morphology and the antigenicity of proteins.
  2. Remove the fixative and wash samples with PBST (PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100) three times for 10 min using a nutator. Use sufficient volume of PBST for each washing step (400 µl/0.5 ml tube).
    NOTE: Fixed EAD/brain complexes meant for scoring of invasiveness do not require immunostaining. GFP signal remains well visible after fixation. Proceed to step 4.4 for the final dissection.
    1. For immunostaining, block tissue in 200 µl of a blocking solution (PBST with 0.3% BSA) for 20 min with gentle agitation at room temperature.
      1. Incubate with primary antibodies diluted in 100 µl of a blocking solution overnight at 4 °C while gently shaking. Refer to primary antibody datasheet or published literature for recommended antibody dilution.
        NOTE: The primary antibody dilution might need to be optimized.
      2. Following five 10 min washes in PBST, stain tissue with the fluorescent secondary antibodies diluted in blocking solution while gently shaking for 2 hr at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C in the dark.
      3. Wash samples three times 10 min in PBST.
  3. Replace PBST with 500 µl of DAPI-staining solution. To label F-actin, add phalloidin conjugated to a fluorescent dye to DAPI-staining solution. After 15 min nutation in the dark, wash tissue once for 10 min with PBST.
    NOTE: F-actin labeling can be carried out independently of DAPI staining.
  4. For the final dissection step, transfer tissue back into a PBS-filled glass dish using a 1 ml pipette. Using the two pairs of forceps clip off the mouth hooks.
    1. Separate the brains that will be used for quantification of invasiveness from the EAD by cutting the optic stalk as overgrown EAD might hamper the analysis.
  5. Place a drop of the mounting medium (15 µl for a 22 mm x 22 mm coverslip) on an objective slide. With the help of forceps tips, distribute the medium into a thin layer. Transfer EAD, brains or the EAD/brain complexes into the mounting medium with a P20 micropipette.
  6. Use the forceps tips or a tungsten rod to distribute tissue and straighten the VNC on the slide.
  7. To avoid formation of bubbles while mounting, first touch one edge of a coverslip to the mounting medium and then slowly lower onto the mounting medium with the help of forceps. Use small pieces of filter paper or tissue wipe to absorb excess mounting medium around the coverslip edges.
    NOTE: DABCO/Poly(vinyl alcohol) 4-88 mounting medium hardens at 4 °C within an hour. Slides can be stored for months at 4 °C.

5. Confocal Imaging

  1. Acquire single confocal sections and stacks using a confocal microscope equipped with 20X, 40X and 60X oil objectives.
  2. Prevent pixel saturation. Use same image acquisition parameters including image resolution, laser input power, gain, offset, frame averaging, a step size in a z-series and maintain these settings for all genotypes to allow for comparisons of pixel intensities between different genotypes 21,22.
    NOTE: For visualization of EAD/brain complex, generate maximum projections and stitch respective, neighboring images. For final image preparation, use post image processing software for panel assembly and to adjust brightness and contrast.

6. Quantification of Tumor Invasiveness

  1. Define a scoring system that will characterize the different levels of tumor invasiveness considering the spatial pattern of invasion and the amount of GFP-positive cells spreading into the brain and VNC. Prepare evaluation sheets for documentation (Figure 3A).
  2. Mount at least 80 fixed intact brains for each genotype on one slide using 40 µl of the mounting medium per 24 mm x 50 mm coverslip.
    1. To allow unbiased scoring, ask a neutral party to anonymize the slides, so that the scoring procedure is unbiased. Evaluate anonymized slides by two lab members independently. Disclose genotypes only after the counting is finished.
  3. Evaluate the degree of malignancy by a blind scoring of mounted brains under a fluorescent stereomicroscope equipped with a GFP filter set. Use a marker to label brains that have been already viewed to avoid double counting (Figure 3B).
  4. Calculate the percentage of brains falling into each of the defined invasive categories per genotype. Determine the statistical significance using a chi-square test (Figure 3C).

7. RNA Isolation, DNase Treatment, and Quality Check

NOTE: All reagents (solutions, plasticware) used in the following steps should be free of RNase activity. Always wear gloves and use a chemical hood for work with organic solvents.

  1. Transfer the clean EAD with a coated P20 micropipette tip into 1.5 ml tube.
  2. Let tissue sink to the bottom of the tube, carefully remove PBS and replace it with 100 µl RNA lysis reagent (sufficient for up to 140 EAD).
  3. Lyse tissue by vortexing. At this point, samples can be deep frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C or directly processed with a standard RNA isolation protocol.
    NOTE: Samples of similar genotypes from multiple dissection rounds can be pooled once in RNA lysis reagent.
  4. Fill the sample volume to 0.9 ml with RNA lysis reagent. Add 0.2 ml of chloroform and mix samples vigorously for 15-20 sec.
  5. Following 2 to 3 min incubation at room temperature, centrifuge the samples at 10,000 x g for 15 min at 4 °C.
  6. Transfer colorless upper aqueous phase containing RNA into a fresh tube without disturbing the interphase. Stay away from the interphase as it contains proteins and genomic DNA.
    NOTE: The recovered volume should be about 60% of the volume of RNA lysis reagent used for homogenization.
  7. Precipitate the RNA by adding 0.5 ml of isopropyl alcohol. Vortex and incubate samples at room temperature for 10 min.
  8. Centrifuge the samples at 10,000 x g for 15 min at 4 °C.
  9. Discard the supernatant and wash the RNA pellet once with 600 µl of 75% ethanol. After a short vortex and centrifugation (10,000 x g for 7 min at 4 °C) discard all ethanol and let the RNA pellet air-dry for 5-10 min placing the open tube on a clean tissue wipe.
    NOTE: The RNA pellet might be visible as a tiny opaque/white stripe at the bottom of the tube or invisible. The remaining ethanol drops can be carefully removed with P10 micropipette tip.
  10. Dissolve RNA in 50 µl of DEPC-treated water by vortexing or passing solution a few times through a pipette tip.
  11. To minimize contamination with genomic DNA, treat total RNA with DNase by adding 50 µl of a mix containing 1 µl of DNase (2 U/µl) and 10 µl of 10x DNase buffer in DEPC-treated water. Vortex and spin down.
  12. Incubate samples at 37 °C in a water bath or a heating block for 30 to 40 min. After incubation, add 100 µl of DEPC-treated water into each sample.
  13. To inactivate the enzymatic activity and clean RNA from DNase, add 200 µl of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) solution, vortex for 1 min and centrifuge the samples at 10,000 x g for 7 min at 4 °C.
  14. Carefully transfer the upper aqueous phase containing RNA into a fresh tube. Add equal volume (200 µl) of chloroform, mix and repeat the centrifugation step from above.
  15. Collect carefully the upper phase and precipitate RNA by adding 1/10 volume of 3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2 prepared in DEPC H2O and 2.5 volumes of 100% ethanol. Mix thoroughly by vortexing.
    NOTE: Adding 0.5 µl glycogen (20 µg/µl) to a precipitation mix helps to visualize the RNA pellet. To minimize RNA loss, use siliconized, low-binding 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes.
  16. Precipitate RNA at -20 °C for at least 1 hr.
    NOTE: The incubation might be carried out overnight. Samples can be placed at -80 °C as well.
  17. Pellet RNA by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 30 min at 4 °C. Wash and dry pellet following the description in 7.9.
  18. Dissolve RNA in 10-15 µl of DEPC-treated water. Store RNA at -80 °C.
  19. Determine quantity and purity of RNA by measuring OD at 230 nm, 260 nm and 280 nm using a spectrophotometer. Calculate RNA concentration by applying the convention that 1 OD at 260 nm equals 40 µg/ml RNA.
    NOTE: The A260/280 ratio of "pure" RNA equals 2.0 while an A260/230 ratio should be in the range of 2.0-2.2. RNA samples with an A260/280 ratio between 1.7 and 2.0 are suitable for downstream applications such as cDNA synthesis. For preparation of mRNA-seq libraries the quality and quantity of RNA should be checked using an automated electrophoresis system. The 28S/18S ratio should be above 1.8.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

To demonstrate the potential of the eyFLP-MARCM technique to generate GFP-marked patches of defined genotypes in Drosophila EAD, three types of clones were induced: (1) control expressing GFP only, (2) malignant tumors expressing an oncogenic form of the small G-protein Ras (RasV12) in a background of homozygous loss of a tumor suppressor gene scribble (scrib1), and (3) overgrowing but non-invasive rasV12scrib1jnk<...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The techniques to generate genetic mosaics in Drosophila are among the most sophisticated tools for analyzing and manipulating gene function 33. The eyFLP-MARCM system has proven powerful and robust as it allows the induction of visually marked, genetically defined clones in a spatially restricted manner, i.e., in tissues where the eyeless enhancer is active 9,18. This is particularly important when multiple genetic lesions are combined in the same cells. While these highl...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

We thank the Bloomington Stock Center (Bloomington, USA), Dirk Bohmann, Katja Brückner and Istvan Ando for fly stocks, and antibodies. We thank Marek Jindra and Colin Donohoe for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Sofja Kovalevskaja Award to M.U. from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and DFG project UH243/1-1 to M.U. from the German Research Foundation.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
AgarGewürzmühle Brecht, Eggenstein, Germany00262-0500Fly food recipe: Prepare 20 L fly food with 160 g agar, 360 g yeast, 200 g soy flour, 1.6 kg yellow cornmeal, 1.2 L malt extract, 300 ml light corn syrup, 130 ml propionic acid and 200 ml 15% nipagin. Fly food should be cooked for 1 hour at 85 °C.
Corn syrupGrafschafter Krautfabrik Josef Schmitz KG, Meckenheim, Germany01939
Propionic acidCarl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany6026.1
CornmealReformKontor GmbH, Zarrentin, Germany4010155063948
Malt extractCSM Deutschland GmbH, Bremen, Germany728985
Soy flourStockmeier Food GmbH, Herford, Germany1000246441010
YeastWerner Ramspeck GmbH, Schwabach, Germany210099K
Methyl-4-benzoate/ NipaginSigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, GermanyH5501Prepare a 15% stock solution with 70% EtOH
Drosophila fly food vialsKisker Biotech, Steinfurt, Germany789008
Vial plugsK-TK e.K., Retzstadt, Germany1002
Drosophila fly food bottlesGreiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany960177
Bottle plugsK-TK e.K., Retzstadt, Germany1002 S
Poly(vinyl alcohol) 4-88/[-CH2CHOH-]nSigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany81381Mounting medium recipe: Dissolve 6 g Poly(vinyl alcohol) 4-88 in 39 ml Millipore H2O, 6 ml 1 M Tris (pH 8.5) and 12.5 ml glycerol. Stir overnight at 50 °C and centrifuge 20 min at 5,000 rpm. Add DABCO to the supernatant to get a final concentration of 2.5%. Store aliquots at -20 °C.
1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane/ DABCO Sigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, GermanyD2522
Triton X-100Sigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany9002-93-1
Phosphate-buffered saline/ PBS137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4 and 1.8 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4 in Millipore H2O
PBST0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS
Paraformaldehyde/ PFASigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany1581274% PFA fixative recipe: Dissolve 4 g PFA in 80 ml Millipore H2O on a magnetic stirrer plate heated to 55 °C. Add 1 M NaOH dropwise until all PFA particles are dissolved. Add 10 ml 10x PBS and adjust the pH to 7.4 with 1 M HCl. Mix in 100 µl Triton X-100 and fill up with Millipore H2O to 100 ml. Store aliquots at -20 °C. Avoid repeated thawing. (CAUTION: PFA is highly toxic. Prepare the PFA fixative in a fume hood. Wear a self-contained breathing apparatus, gloves and clothing. Avoid contact with skin, eyes or mucous membranes.)
Bovine Serum Albumin/ BSASigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, GermanyA3059Blocking solution recipe: Dissolve 0.3% BSA in PBST
Fluorescently labeled phalloidinInvitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany, Molecular ProbesA12379, A22283, A22284Phalloidin stock solution: Dissolve powder (300 U) in 1.5 ml Methanol. Store at -20 °C. For staining, use in dilution 1:250 (A12379, A22283) and 1:100 (A22284) in PBST.
4’,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindol Dihydrochlorid/ DAPICarl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany6335DAPI staining solution: Prepare a stock solution of 5 mg/ml in Millipore H2O and store aliquots at 4 °C. Used in dilution 1:1,000 in PBST.
Mouse anti-H2 antibodyKurucz et al., 2003Used in dilution 1:500 in blocking solution
Cy5 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L)Jackson ImmunoResearch, Suffolk, UK715-175-151Used in dilution 1:500 in blocking solution
Dumont #5 forcepsFine Science Tools, Heidelberg, Germany11295-10
Glass embryo dish (30 mm)Thermo Scientific, Schwerte, GermanyE90
Tungsten needlesFine Science Tools, Heidelberg, Germany10130-20
Nickel Plated Pin HolderFine Science Tools, Heidelberg, Germany26018-17
Microscope slidesVWR, Darmstadt, Germany631-1553
Coverslips 22 x 22 mm (#1 Menzel-Gläser)VWR, Darmstadt, Germany631-1336
Coverslips 24 x 50 mm (0.13-0.16 mm)Thermo Scientific, Schwerte, Germany1076371
Kimtech Science Precision WipesThermo Scientific, Schwerte, Germany06-677-70
Dissecting stereomicroscopeOlympus, Hamburg, GermanySZX7 (DF PLAPO 1X-4 Japan)
Fluorescent stereomicroscopeOlympus, Hamburg, GermanySZX16 (SDF PLAPO 0.8X Japan) with DP72 CCD cameraEquipped with the narrow blue bandpass filter set for excitation of GFP other blue excitable fluorochromes (excitation filter BP460-480 nm, barrier filter BA495-540 nm) and narrow green excitation and longpass barrier filter for RFP and other green excitable fluorochromes (excitation filter BP530-550, barrier filter BA575IF). Software: Olympus cellSens Standard 1.11.
Confocal microscopeOlympus, Hamburg, GermanyFV1000Equipped with inverted IX81 microscope. Objectives: 20× UPlan S-Apo (NA 0.85), 40× UPlanFL (NA 1.30) and 60× UPlanApo (NA 1.35). Lasers: UV laser Diode LD405 (50 mW), Argon laser, multi-line 457/(476)/ 488/515 (40 mW), Yellow/Green laser diode LD560 (15 mW) and Red Laser diode 635 (20 mW). Software: Fluoview 2.1c Software
Drosophila cooled incubatorEwald Innovationstechnik GmbH, Bad Nenndorf, Germany Sanyo MIR553
Squirt bottleVWR, Darmstadt, Germany215-8105
BD Clay Adams Nutator MixerVWR, Darmstadt, Germany15172-203
ELMI Digital Rocking ShakerVWR, Darmstadt, GermanyDRS-12
5 PRIME Isol-RNA Lysis ReagentVWR, Darmstadt, Germany2302700The protocol is compatible with other TRIzol-based reagents, e.g., TRIreagent from Sigma (Cat. Nr.T9424), TRIzol reagent from Thermofisher (Cat. Nr. 15596).
Diethyl pyrocarbonate/ DEPCSigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, GermanyD5758Dilute DEPC 1:1,000 in Millipore H2O, stir overnight and autoclave.
UltraPure Phenol:Chloroform:Isoamyl Alcohol (25:24:1)ThermoFischer Scientific, Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany15593-031
ChloroformMerck, Darmstadt, Germany102445
TURBO DNase (2 U/µl)Thermo Scientific, Schwerte, GermanyAM2238
Invitrogen UltraPure GlycogenThermoFischer Scientific, Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany10-814-010
Sodium acetate trihydrateVWR, Darmstadt, Germany27652.232Prepare a 3 M Sodium acetate solution with DEPC-H2O and adjust the pH to 5.2
2-PropanolMerck, Darmstadt, Germany109634
EthanolMerck, Darmstadt, Germany100983Prepare a 75% EtOH dilution with DEPC-H2O.
UV/Vis-Spectrophotometre NanoDrop ND-8000Thermo Scientific, Schwerte, GermanyND-8000
Eppendorf Microcentrifuge (Refrigerated)Thermo Scientific, Schwerte, Germany5417R
Experion RNA StdSens Analysis KitBio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, München, Germany7007103
Experion Automated Electrophoresis StationBio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, München, Germany7007010
SuperScript III Reverse TranscriptaseThermo Scientific, Schwerte, Germany18080044
Oligo d(T) PrimerIntegrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, BelgiumPrepare 100 µM stock solutions in DEPC-H2O and store at -20 °C
dNTP MixtureTakara Bio Europe/Clonetech, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France4030Store aliquots of 25 µl at -20°C
CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection SystemBio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, München, Germany1855195
iQ SYBR Green SupermixBio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, München, Germany170-8882
Hard-Shell PCR Plates 96-well, thin wallBio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, München, GermanyHSP9601
Microseal 'B' FilmBio-Rad Laboratories GmbH, München, GermanyMSB1001
rp49 Forward primerIntegrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium5' TCC TAC CAG CTT CAA GAT GAC 3'
rp49 Reverse primerIntegrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium5' CAC GTT GTG CAC CAG GAA CT 3'
mmp1 Forward primerIntegrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium5' AGG GCG ACA AGT ACT ACA AGC TGA 3'
mmp1 Reverse primerIntegrated DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium5' ACG TCT TGC CGT TCT TGT AGG TGA 3'

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Miles, W. O., Dyson, N. J., Walker, J. A. Modeling tumor invasion and metastasis in Drosophila. Dis Model Mech. 4 (6), 753-761 (2011).
  2. Stefanatos, R. K. A., Vidal, M. Tumor invasion and metastasis in Drosophila: a bold past, a bright future. J Genet Genomics. 38 (10), 431-438 (2011).
  3. Patel, P. H., Edgar, B. A. Tissue design: How Drosophila tumors remodel their neighborhood. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 28, 86-95 (2014).
  4. Gonzalez, C. Drosophila melanogaster: a model and a tool to investigate malignancy and identify new therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer. 13 (3), 172-183 (2013).
  5. Lee, T., Luo, L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) for Drosophila neural development. Trends Neurosci. 24 (5), 251-254 (2001).
  6. Xu, T., Rubin, G. M. Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development. 117 (4), 1223-1237 (1993).
  7. Struhl, G., Basler, K. Organizing activity of wingless protein in Drosophila. Cell. 72 (4), 527-540 (1993).
  8. Brand, A. H., Perrimon, N. Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 118 (2), 401-415 (1993).
  9. Wu, J. S., Luo, L. A protocol for mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) in Drosophila. Nat Protoc. 1 (6), 2583-2589 (2006).
  10. Brumby, A. M., Richardson, H. E. scribble mutants cooperate with oncogenic Ras or Notch to cause neoplastic overgrowth in Drosophila. EMBO J. 22 (21), 5769-5779 (2003).
  11. Pagliarini, R. A., Xu, T. A genetic screen in Drosophila for metastatic behavior. Science (New York, NY). 302 (5648), 1227-1231 (2003).
  12. Uhlirova, M., Bohmann, D. JNK- and Fos-regulated Mmp1 expression cooperates with Ras to induce invasive tumors in Drosophila. EMBO J. 25 (22), 5294-5304 (2006).
  13. Turkel, N., et al. The BTB-zinc finger transcription factor abrupt acts as an epithelial oncogene in Drosophila melanogaster through maintaining a progenitor-like cell state. PLoS Genet. 9 (7), e1003627(2013).
  14. Cordero, J. B., et al. Oncogenic Ras Diverts a Host TNF Tumor Suppressor Activity into Tumor Promoter. Dev Cell. 18 (6), 999-1011 (2010).
  15. Khoo, P., Allan, K., Willoughby, L., Brumby, A. M., Richardson, H. E. In Drosophila, RhoGEF2 cooperates with activated Ras in tumorigenesis through a pathway involving Rho1-Rok-Myosin-II and JNK signalling. Dis Model Mech. 6, 661-678 (2013).
  16. Jiang, Y., Scott, K. L., Kwak, S. J., Chen, R., Mardon, G. Sds22/PP1 links epithelial integrity and tumor suppression via regulation of myosin II and JNK signaling. Oncogene. 30 (29), 3248-3260 (2011).
  17. Figueroa-Clarevega, A., Bilder, D. Malignant Drosophila Tumors Interrupt Insulin Signaling to Induce Cachexia-like Wasting. Dev Cell. 33 (1), 47-55 (2015).
  18. Newsome, T. P., Asling, B., Dickson, B. J. Analysis of Drosophila photoreceptor axon guidance in eye-specific mosaics. Development. 127 (4), 851-860 (2000).
  19. Quiring, R., Walldorf, U., Kloter, U., Gehring, W. J. Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the Small eye gene in mice and Aniridia in humans. Science. 265 (5173), 785-789 (1994).
  20. Külshammer, E., Uhlirova, M. The actin cross-linker Filamin/Cheerio mediates tumor malignancy downstream of JNK signaling. J Cell Sci. 126 (Pt 4), 927-938 (2013).
  21. North, A. J. Seeing is believing? A beginners' guide to practical pitfalls in image acquisition. J Cell Biol. 172 (1), 9-18 (2006).
  22. Waters, J. C. Accuracy and precision in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. J Cell Biol. 185 (7), 1135-1148 (2009).
  23. Igaki, T., Pagliarini, R. A., Xu, T. Loss of cell polarity drives tumor growth and invasion through JNK activation in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 16 (11), 1139-1146 (2006).
  24. Külshammer, E., et al. Interplay among Drosophila transcription factors Ets21c, Fos and Ftz-F1 drives JNK-mediated tumor malignancy. Dis Model Mech. 8 (10), 1279-1293 (2015).
  25. Pastor-Pareja, J. C., Wu, M., Xu, T. An innate immune response of blood cells to tumors and tissue damage in Drosophila. Dis Model Mech. 1 (2-3), 144-154 (2008).
  26. Chatterjee, N., Bohmann, D. A versatile ΦC31 based reporter system for measuring AP-1 and Nrf2 signaling in Drosophila and in tissue culture. PloS One. 7 (4), e34063(2012).
  27. Petraki, S., Alexander, B., Brückner, K. Assaying Blood Cell Populations of the Drosophila melanogaster Larva. J Vis Exp. (105), (2015).
  28. Makhijani, K., Alexander, B., Tanaka, T., Rulifson, E., Bruckner, K. The peripheral nervous system supports blood cell homing and survival in the Drosophila larva. Development. 138 (24), 5379-5391 (2011).
  29. Kurucz, E., et al. Hemese, a hemocyte-specific transmembrane protein, affects the cellular immune response in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100 (5), 2622-2627 (2003).
  30. Andersen, D. S., et al. The Drosophila TNF receptor Grindelwald couples loss of cell polarity and neoplastic growth. Nature. 522 (7557), 482-486 (2015).
  31. Srivastava, A., Pastor-Pareja, J. C., Igaki, T., Pagliarini, R., Xu, T. Basement membrane remodeling is essential for Drosophila disc eversion and tumor invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104 (8), 2721-2726 (2007).
  32. Larionov, A., Krause, A., Miller, W. A standard curve based method for relative real time PCR data processing. BMC Bioinformatics. 6 (1), (2005).
  33. Blair, S. S. Genetic mosaic techniques for studying Drosophila development. Development. 130 (21), 5065-5072 (2003).
  34. Mirth, C. K., Shingleton, A. W. Integrating body and organ size in Drosophila: recent advances and outstanding problems. Front Endocrinol. 3 (49), (2012).
  35. French, V., Feast, M., Partridge, L. Body size and cell size in Drosophila: the developmental response to temperature. J Insect Physiol. 44 (11), 1081-1089 (1998).
  36. Ashburner, M., Bonner, J. J. The induction of gene activity in drosophila by heat shock. Cell. 17 (2), 241-254 (1979).
  37. Frazier, M. R., Woods, H. A., Harrison, J. F. Interactive effects of rearing temperature and oxygen on the development of Drosophila melanogaster. Physiol Biochem Zool. 74 (5), 641-650 (2001).
  38. Lai, S. L., Lee, T. Genetic mosaic with dual binary transcriptional systems in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci. 9 (5), 703-709 (2006).
  39. Potter, C. J., Tasic, B., Russler, E. V., Liang, L., Luo, L. The Q system: a repressible binary system for transgene expression, lineage tracing, and mosaic analysis. Cell. 141 (3), 536-548 (2010).
  40. del Valle Rodrìguez, A., Didiano, D., Desplan, C. Power tools for gene expression and clonal analysis in Drosophila. Nature Methods. 9 (1), 47-55 (2011).
  41. Rynes, J., et al. Activating Transcription Factor 3 Regulates Immune and Metabolic Homeostasis. Mol Cell Biol. 32 (19), 3949-3962 (2012).
  42. Claudius, A. K., Romani, P., Lamkemeyer, T., Jindra, M., Uhlirova, M. Unexpected role of the steroid-deficiency protein ecdysoneless in pre-mRNA splicing. PLoS Genet. 10 (4), e1004287(2014).
  43. Basu, S., Campbell, H. M., Dittel, B. N., Ray, A. Purification of Specific Cell Population by Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). J Vis Exp. (41), (2010).
  44. Tauc, H. M., Tasdogan, A., Pandur, P. Isolating intestinal stem cells from adult Drosophila midguts by FACS to study stem cell behavior during aging. J Vis Exp. (94), (2014).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Drosophila Imaginal DiscGenetic MosaicsMARCM TechniqueFluorescent MicroscopyConfocal ImagingRNA IsolationTumor InvasivenessJNK SignalingHemocyte InfiltrationMMP1 Expression

Related Articles