A protocol for creating a model fuel-rich combustion exhaust is developed through combustion characterization and is applied for micro-tubular flame-assisted fuel cell testing and research.
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
A protocol for creating a model fuel-rich combustion exhaust is developed through combustion characterization and is applied for micro-tubular flame-assisted fuel cell testing and research.
Combustion based power generation has been accomplished for many years through a number of heat engine systems. Recently, a move towards small scale power generation and micro combustion as well as development in fuel cell research has created new means of power generation that combine solid oxide fuel cells with open flames and combustion exhaust. Instead of relying upon the heat of combustion, these solid oxide fuel cell systems rely on reforming of the fuel via combustion to generate syngas for electrochemical power generation. Procedures were developed to assess the combustion by-products under a wide range of conditions. While theoretical and computational procedures have been developed for assessing fuel-rich combustion exhaust in these applications, experimental techniques have also emerged. The experimental procedures often rely upon a gas chromatograph or mass spectrometer analysis of the flame and exhaust to assess the combustion process as a fuel reformer and means of heat generation. The experimental techniques developed in these areas have been applied anew for the development of the micro-tubular flame-assisted fuel cell. The protocol discussed in this work builds on past techniques to specify a procedure for characterizing fuel-rich combustion exhaust and developing a model fuel-rich combustion exhaust for use in flame-assisted fuel cell testing. The development of the procedure and its applications and limitations are discussed.
Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) innovations have been reported in recent years as the technology continues to develop. Among the many advantages, SOFCs have become known for high fuel efficiency, low emissions and moderate fuel flexibility compared to other combustion based power generation techniques1. Furthermore, SOFCs are scalable allowing for high fuel efficiency even at small scales. Unfortunately, limitations in current hydrogen infrastructure have created a need for fuel reforming systems that are often inefficient. A recent development is the micro-tubular flame-assisted fuel cell (mT-FFC) reported in the author's previous work2. The mT....
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
1. Combustion Calculations

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The combustion characterization chamber should be checked prior to testing at the desired equivalence ratios for back-flow of air into the chamber or other air leakage during testing. Combustion processes in open chambers are known to be nearly isobaric. As a result, pressure within the combustion chamber may not be enough to ensure that no air from the external environment is back-flowing into the combustion chamber from the chamber exhaust port or other leakage points. There are several.......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The protocol discussed here is an important bridge between previous combustion characterization research and fuel cell testing. The use of combustion for fuel reforming and fuel cell testing has been applied for several years in DFFC setups10-15. However, the characterization of the combustion process in DFFCs is primarily concerned with in-situ characterization of the flame composition16 and uses a MS8. As the DFFC is open to the ambient, the exhaust composition consists mostly .......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work is supported by an agreement with Syracuse University awarded by the Syracuse Center of Excellence in Energy and Environmental Systems with funding under prime award number DE-EE0006031 from the US Department of Energy and matching funding under award number 53367 from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), contract 61736 from NYSERDA, and an award from Empire State Development's Division of Science, Technology and Innovation (NYSTAR) through the Syracuse Center of Excellence, under award number #C120183. This work is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. 1247399.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gas chromotograph | SRI Instruments, Inc. | SRI 8610C | |
| K type thermocouples | Omega | KQXL-116G-6 | Custom length |
| K type thermocouple extension wire | Omega | EXTT-K-20-SLE-100 | |
| Mass flow controller | Omega | FMA5427 | 0-40 L/min (N2) Used for methane |
| Mass flow controller | Omega | FMA5443 | 0-200 L/min (N2) Used for air |
| Mass flow controller | Omega | FMA5402A | 0-10 ml/min (N2) Used for CO |
| Mass flow controller | Brooks Instrument | SLA5850 | 200 SCCM (Propane) Used for CO2 |
| Mass flow controller | Brooks Instrument | SLA5850 | 5 L/min (Air) Used for N2 |
| Mass flow controller | Brooks Instrument | SLA5850 | 500 SCCM (N2) Used for H2 |
| Regulator | Harris Products Group | HP721-125-350-F | Methane tank |
| Regulator | Harris Products Group | HP702-050-590-E | Air tank |
| Regulator | Airgas | Y11-SR145B | CO tank |
| Regulator | Harris Products Group | HP702-050-320-E | CO2 tank |
| Regulator | Airgas | Y12-215B | N2 tank |
| Regulator | Harris Products Group | HP702-015-350-D | H2 tank |
| Methane, Compressed, Ultra high purity | Airgas | UN1971 | Extremely Flammable |
| Air, Compressed, Ultra pure | Airgas | UN1002 | Not classified as hazardous to health. |
| CO, Compressed, Ultra high purity | Airgas | UN1016 | Toxic by inhalation, Extremely flammable |
| CO2, Compressed, Research grade | Airgas | UN1013 | Asphyxiant in high concentrations |
| N2, Compressed, Ultra high purity | Airgas | UN1066 | Not classified as hazardous to health. |
| H2, Compressed, Ultra high purity | Airgas | UN1049 | Extremely flammable, burns with invisible flame |
| Source meter | Tektronix, Inc. | Keithley 2420 | Connects to computer via USB |
| Horizontal split tube furnace | MTI Corportation | OTF-1200X | |
| Data acquisition | National Instruments | NI cDAQ-9172 | Connects to computer via USB |
| Thermocouple input | National Instruments | NI 9211 | Connects to cDAQ-9172 |
| Computer control for Mass Flow Controllers | National Instruments | NI 9263 | Connects to cDAQ-9172 Computer control for Mass Flow Controllers |
| Testing software | National Instruments | LabVIEW 8.6 | |
| Ceramabond | Aremco | 552-VFG | 1 Pint |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.