A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Combustion Characterization and Model Fuel Development for Micro-tubular Flame-assisted Fuel Cells

8.7K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/54638

⸱

October 2nd, 2016

In This Article

Summary

A protocol for creating a model fuel-rich combustion exhaust is developed through combustion characterization and is applied for micro-tubular flame-assisted fuel cell testing and research.

Abstract

Combustion based power generation has been accomplished for many years through a number of heat engine systems. Recently, a move towards small scale power generation and micro combustion as well as development in fuel cell research has created new means of power generation that combine solid oxide fuel cells with open flames and combustion exhaust. Instead of relying upon the heat of combustion, these solid oxide fuel cell systems rely on reforming of the fuel via combustion to generate syngas for electrochemical power generation. Procedures were developed to assess the combustion by-products under a wide range of conditions. While theoretical and computational procedures have been developed for assessing fuel-rich combustion exhaust in these applications, experimental techniques have also emerged. The experimental procedures often rely upon a gas chromatograph or mass spectrometer analysis of the flame and exhaust to assess the combustion process as a fuel reformer and means of heat generation. The experimental techniques developed in these areas have been applied anew for the development of the micro-tubular flame-assisted fuel cell. The protocol discussed in this work builds on past techniques to specify a procedure for characterizing fuel-rich combustion exhaust and developing a model fuel-rich combustion exhaust for use in flame-assisted fuel cell testing. The development of the procedure and its applications and limitations are discussed.

Introduction

Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) innovations have been reported in recent years as the technology continues to develop. Among the many advantages, SOFCs have become known for high fuel efficiency, low emissions and moderate fuel flexibility compared to other combustion based power generation techniques1. Furthermore, SOFCs are scalable allowing for high fuel efficiency even at small scales. Unfortunately, limitations in current hydrogen infrastructure have created a need for fuel reforming systems that are often inefficient. A recent development is the micro-tubular flame-assisted fuel cell (mT-FFC) reported in the author's previous work2. The mT....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Combustion Calculations

  1. Select fuel for analysis. Here, choose methane as the reference fuel, but the principles are transferable to other hydrocarbon fuels.
  2. With 1 mole of methane as the fuel, balance equation (1) for stoichiometric combustion to get equation (2).
    Combustion equation, chemical reaction formula, methane oxidation process, stoichiometric balance.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

The combustion characterization chamber should be checked prior to testing at the desired equivalence ratios for back-flow of air into the chamber or other air leakage during testing. Combustion processes in open chambers are known to be nearly isobaric. As a result, pressure within the combustion chamber may not be enough to ensure that no air from the external environment is back-flowing into the combustion chamber from the chamber exhaust port or other leakage points. There are several.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The protocol discussed here is an important bridge between previous combustion characterization research and fuel cell testing. The use of combustion for fuel reforming and fuel cell testing has been applied for several years in DFFC setups10-15. However, the characterization of the combustion process in DFFCs is primarily concerned with in-situ characterization of the flame composition16 and uses a MS8. As the DFFC is open to the ambient, the exhaust composition consists mostly .......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by an agreement with Syracuse University awarded by the Syracuse Center of Excellence in Energy and Environmental Systems with funding under prime award number DE-EE0006031 from the US Department of Energy and matching funding under award number 53367 from the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), contract 61736 from NYSERDA, and an award from Empire State Development's Division of Science, Technology and Innovation (NYSTAR) through the Syracuse Center of Excellence, under award number #C120183. This work is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. 1247399.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Gas chromotographSRI Instruments, Inc.SRI 8610C
K type thermocouplesOmegaKQXL-116G-6Custom length
K type thermocouple extension wireOmegaEXTT-K-20-SLE-100
Mass flow controllerOmegaFMA54270-40 L/min (N2)
Used for methane
Mass flow controllerOmegaFMA54430-200 L/min (N2)
Used for air
Mass flow controllerOmegaFMA5402A0-10 ml/min (N2)
Used for CO
Mass flow controllerBrooks InstrumentSLA5850200 SCCM (Propane)
Used for CO2
Mass flow controllerBrooks InstrumentSLA58505 L/min (Air)
Used for N2
Mass flow controllerBrooks InstrumentSLA5850500 SCCM (N2)
Used for H2
RegulatorHarris Products GroupHP721-125-350-FMethane tank
RegulatorHarris Products GroupHP702-050-590-EAir tank
RegulatorAirgasY11-SR145BCO tank
RegulatorHarris Products GroupHP702-050-320-ECO2 tank
RegulatorAirgasY12-215BN2 tank
RegulatorHarris Products GroupHP702-015-350-DH2 tank
Methane, Compressed,
Ultra high purity
AirgasUN1971Extremely Flammable
Air, Compressed,
Ultra pure
AirgasUN1002Not classified as hazardous to health.
CO, Compressed,
Ultra high purity
AirgasUN1016Toxic by inhalation, Extremely flammable
CO2, Compressed,
Research grade
AirgasUN1013Asphyxiant in high concentrations
N2, Compressed,
Ultra high purity
AirgasUN1066Not classified as hazardous to health.
H2, Compressed,
Ultra high purity
AirgasUN1049Extremely flammable, burns with invisible flame
Source meterTektronix, Inc.Keithley 2420Connects to computer via USB
Horizontal split tube furnaceMTI CorportationOTF-1200X
Data acquisitionNational InstrumentsNI cDAQ-9172Connects to computer via USB
Thermocouple inputNational InstrumentsNI 9211Connects to cDAQ-9172
Computer control for Mass Flow ControllersNational InstrumentsNI 9263Connects to cDAQ-9172
Computer control for Mass Flow Controllers
Testing softwareNational InstrumentsLabVIEW 8.6
CeramabondAremco552-VFG1 Pint

References

  1. Gorte, R. J. Recent developments towards commercialization of solid oxide fuel cells. AIChE J. 51 (9), 2377-2381 (2005).
  2. Milcarek, R. J., Wang, K., Falkenstein-Smith, R. L., Ahn, J. Micro-tubular flame-assisted fuel cells for micro-combined heat and power systems.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Gas Chromatograph AnalysisMass Spectrometer AnalysisFuel-rich Combustion ExhaustSolid Oxide Fuel CellCombustion Chamber SetupThermocouple Temperature MonitoringExhaust Gas Sampling