$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The olefin ethylene (C2H4) was first discovered as a plant hormone in 1901 when it was observed that pea seedlings, grown in a laboratory that used coal gas lamps, exhibited an abnormal morphology in which stems (hypocotyls) were shorter, thicker and bent sideways compared to normal pea seedlings; a phenotype later termed the triple response1,2. Subsequent studies demonstrated that ethylene is a vital phytohormone that regulates numerous developmental processes such as growth, stress response, fruit ripening and senescence3. Arabidopsis thaliana, a model organism for plant biology research, has been well studied in regards to its response to ethylene. Several ethylene response mutants have been isolated by exploiting the triple response phenotype observed in dark-grown A. thaliana seedlings in the presence of ethylene1,4,5. The biosynthetic precursor for ethylene production in plants is 1-aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid (ACC)6 and is commonly used during the triple response assay to increase endogenous ethylene production that leads to the triple response phenotype1,4,5.
Although the ethylene response is widely studied in plants, the effect of exogenous ethylene on bacteria is vastly understudied despite the close association of bacteria with plants. One study reported that certain Pseudomonas strains can survive using ethylene as a sole source of carbon and energy7. However, only two studies have demonstrated that bacteria respond to ethylene. The first study showed that strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. fluorescens, P. putida, and P. syringae were chemotactic toward ethylene using an agarose plug assay in which molten agarose was mixed with a chemotaxis buffer equilibrated with pure ethylene gas8. However, to our knowledge, there have been no further reports using pure ethylene gas to characterize bacterial ethylene response, likely due to the difficultly of handling gases in the laboratory without specialized equipment. The second report of bacterial ethylene response demonstrated that ethylene increased bacterial cellulose production and influenced gene expression in the fruit-associated bacterium, Komagataeibacter (formerly Gluconacetobacter) xylinus9. In this case, the ethylene-releasing compound, 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid (CEPA) was used to produce ethylene in situ within the bacterial growth medium, bypassing the need for pure ethylene gas or specialized equipment.
CEPA produces ethylene at a 1:1 molar ratio above pH 3.510,11 through a base-catalyzed, first-order reaction12-14. The degradation of CEPA is positively correlated with pH and temperature13,14 and results in the production of ethylene, chloride and phosphate. CEPA provides researchers interested in studying bacterial responses to ethylene with a convenient alternative to gaseous ethylene.
The overall goal of the following protocols is to provide a simple and efficient method to study bacterial ethylene response and includes validation of physiologically relevant levels of ethylene production from CEPA decomposition in bacterial growth medium, analysis of culture pH to ensure CEPA decomposition is not impaired during bacterial growth, and assessment of the effect of ethylene on bacterial morphology and phenotype. We demonstrate these protocols using K. xylinus, however, these protocols can be adapted to study ethylene response in other bacteria by using the appropriate growth medium and phenotype analyses.