$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Presently, the most widely used clinical method for tumor staging, restaging, treatment response monitoring, and recurrence detection of a wide variety of cancers is [18F]-FDG PET.1 However, recently, several novel and alternative approaches have emerged. One of those methods is 13CMRSI. This technique involves the introduction of the 13C-molecule into a biological sample, followed by minimally invasive MRI to assess the metabolism in vitro or in vivo in real time. Nevertheless, the biggest challenge of 13CMRSI, compared to the other methods such as [18F]-FDG PET or computed tomography, is its low signal-to-noise ratio.
The NMR signal is directly proportional to the level of polarization, a ratio of the spin ½ nuclei population difference in two energy states to the total population (Figure 1A). The polarization is a product of the gyromagnetic ratio (γ) of the nuclei and the applied magnetic field strength over the temperature. A typical polarization of 1H nuclei is in the order of 0.001% to 0.005% at 3 T, which gives a relatively poor signal-to-noise ratio. Today's state-of-the-art MRI has been a successful imaging method only due to the high abundance of 1H in biological samples and the high gyromagnetic ratio of 1H (γ1H = 42.576 MHz/T). However, observing other nuclei, such as carbon, is more demanding. The only stable, magnetically active carbon isotope, 13C, makes up only 1.1% of all carbon atoms. In addition, the gyromagnetic ratio of 13C (γ13C = 10.705 MHz/T) is four times lower than that of 1H, leading to a lower detection efficiency. In summary, the low 13C abundance and low γ13C cause thermal 13C measurements to achieve 0.0176% of the sensitivity of a 1H-NMR measurement in vivo.
Dynamic Nuclear Polarization
A method to overcome the relatively poor sensitivity of 13C measurements is DNP. It was originally described for metals in 1953 by Albert W. Overhauser. In his article, he stated: "It is shown that if the electron spin resonance of the conduction electrons is saturated, the nuclei will be polarized to the same degree they would be if their gyromagnetic ratio were that of the electron spin."2 Later that year, Carver and Slichter experimentally confirmed Overhauser's hypothesis3. In 1958, Abragam and Proctor described this effect for electrons in liquids and named it the "solid effect." At temperatures below 4 K, electron-spin polarization reaches nearly 100% and is more than three orders of magnitude higher than the nuclear-spin polarization (Figure 1B)4. This occurs because the gyromagnetic ratio of the electron (γe = 28024.944 MHz/T) is three orders of magnitude higher than the nuclear gyromagnetic ratios. The weak interactions between electrons and nuclei, such as the Overhauser effect, the solid effect, the cross effect, and the thermal mixing effect, allow the transfer of polarization from electron spins to nuclear spins using microwave irradiation with a frequency close to the corresponding electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) frequency5,6. DNP theory has been further developed to involve more electrons and thermal mixing. Nevertheless, to date, no unified quantitative theoretical description of DNP has been published7,8.

Figure 1: Understanding Dynamic Nuclear Polarization and Hyperpolarization. A) A schematic comparison of the spin population in the thermal equilibrium polarization state and the hyperpolarized state. B) The polarization is dependent upon temperature. The polarization of an electron (e-) reaches 100% below 1.4 K. The DNP allows the transfer of the polarization from the e- to the 13C nuclei, which increases their polarization up to 105-fold. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
To introduce DNP in studies of biological systems using 13C NMR, subsequent rapid sample dissolution had to be developed. 50 years after Overhauser's hypothesis, Jan H. Ardenkjaer-Larsen et al. solved the technically challenging issue of bringing the hyperpolarized frozen sample into the liquid state with minimal hyperpolarization loss6. Dissolution DNP opened a new field of research called 13CMRSI, providing a new method to investigate and characterize various disease states9,10. As stable carriers of an unpaired electron, a trityl radical tris (8-carboxy-2,2,6,6-tetra-(hydroxyethyl)-benzo-[1,2-4,5]-bis-(1,3)-dithiole-4-yl)-methyl sodium salt (OX063) or (2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO) is usually used. These are mixed with the desired 13C-labeled molecule and exposed to microwave irradiation with a frequency close to the corresponding EPR frequency. Using this technique, the polarization of 13C nuclei can be increased up to 37%11. This results in a 105-fold polarization enhancement compared to the thermal equilibrium polarization11,12. However, as soon as the microwave irradiation is stopped and/or the 13C-molecule is transferred to the liquid state, the polarization decays with the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of the 13C nucleus that was polarized. Thus, the invention of fast dissolution techniques or any subsequent technique shortening the time before experimental measurement (i.e., injection) is crucial for biological applications13.
There are three major requirements that the candidate molecule needs to fulfill for successful 13CMRSI studies. First, the 13C nucleus of interest has to have a sufficiently long T1 (> 10 s). The choice of the 13C-label is crucial. The best candidate nuclei are carbons with no direct contact with 1H-nuclei via a bond. It also needs to be rapidly metabolized within 2 - 3 T1 times, resulting in a downstream metabolic product with a significantly different chemical shift from the original substance. The sample mixture must also form an amorphous glass when in a solid state so that the spatial distribution decreases the distance between the electron and 13C, allowing the transfer of polarization. If the candidate molecule does not form amorphous glass naturally, it needs to be highly soluble in a glassing agent, such as glycerol or dimethyl sulfoxide14. These requirements result in a relatively small number of candidate molecules. However, even after the successful discovery of a suitable molecule, developing a working protocol for hyperpolarization can be technically challenging9,14,15.
In recent years, several substrates have been successfully polarized, such as [1-13C]pyruvate12,16-36, [2-13C]pyruvate37, [1-13C]ethyl pyruvate38, [1-13C]lactate39, [1-13C]fumarate40-43, 13C-bicarbonate36,44,45, [1-13C]sodium acetate43,46-49, 13C-urea6,36,50,51, [5-13C]glutamine15,52,53, [1-13C]glutamate53,54, [1-13C]2-oxoglutarate55, [1-13C]alanine, and others14,56. A particularly interesting and commonly used substrate for hyperpolarization is [1-13C]pyruvate. It is widely used in preclinical studies to investigate the cellular energy-metabolism in various diseases14,17,22. [1-13C]pyruvate meets all the requirements for successful hyperpolarization, including a relatively long T1 and rapid transport across the cell membrane before subsequently being metabolized. Preclinical studies with [1-13C]pyruvate are currently being translated into the clinic57.
Metabolism of Pyruvate
It is well known that there is a direct link between mutations in a cancer cells' DNA and changes in their metabolic pathways. Already in the 1920s, Otto Warburg discovered that there is an increased metabolism of glucose and production of lactate in tumors compared to healthy tissue58-60. Subsequently, various alternations in other metabolic pathways, such as the pentose-phosphate pathway, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, oxidative phosphorylation, and the synthesis of nucleotides and lipids, have been described.
Pyruvate is the final product of glycolysis. In the tumor, it undergoes anaerobic glycolysis catalyzed by LDH61 and reacts with the reduced form of the coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), resulting in lactate and the oxidized form of the coenzyme (NAD+). Alternatively, pyruvate undergoes a transamination reaction with glutamate to form alanine, catalyzed by alanine transaminase (ALT). Both reactions are readily reversible. Pyruvate also undergoes decarboxylation catalyzed by pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) to carbon dioxide and acetyl-CoA, representing an irreversible reaction at this step. Alternations in these reaction rates can be linked to tumor metabolism17,21,22,25,62. The metabolic pathways are summarized in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Diagram of the major metabolic reaction of pyruvate. Pyruvate/lactate conversion is catalyzed by LDH, and pyruvate/alanine conversion is catalyzed by ALT. Pyruvate is irreversibly converted to acetyl-CoA and CO2 by PDH, and CO2 is in a pH-dependent equilibrium with bicarbonate80. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The detection of hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate and its metabolites has been previously demonstrated in the rat heart37,63-65, liver66, muscle, and kidney62,67. One study demonstrated significant differences in the lactate-to-alanine ratio between the normal and fasted rat liver66 and demonstrated a highly elevated and hyperpolarized [1-13C]lactate level in liver cancer68,69. There is evidence that the tumor grade can be identified in a transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate (TRAMP) using hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate22, with the hyperpolarized lactate levels showing a high correlation with the histological grade of the excised tumors. The alanine catalyzed from pyruvate by ALT has also been suggested as a useful marker in rat hepatocellular carcinoma23.
Measuring the pyruvate-lactate metabolic flux has been used for monitoring ischemia63,65,70 and as a response to treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy17,40, targeted drugs24,25,41, or radiotherapy26 in animal models. It has also been used for the detection of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor LY294002 response in glioblastoma and breast cancer mouse models25. Changes in pyruvate metabolism in brain tumors26 and prostate cancer24,71 have also been observed after treatment.
Prostate Carcinoma
Prostate carcinoma is the predominant cancer in elderly men and the second leading cancer related to death in men worldwide72. To date, no reliable, non-invasive methods are available for an early diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer73,74, emphasizing the urgent need for novel metabolic imaging techniques to enable stringent detection and staging of patients. Prostate carcinoma was used as a model to demonstrate the possibilities of dissolution DNP combined with 13CMRSI in patients57. This work was continued in a first clinical trial employing [1-13C]pyruvate and 13CMRSI for the imaging of prostate cancer, and it has just recently has been completed (NCT01229618).
The motivation behind this work was to illustrate in more detail and for a wider audience the application of the 13CMRSI method in a preclinical setting with cells. Measuring the LDH-catalyzed metabolism of [1-13C]pyruvate to [1-13C]lactate in vitro in the PC3 prostate carcinoma cell line, we demonstrate the possible application of dissolution DNP in in vitro studies and address the crucial steps and challenges during experiments.