$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This method enables the evaluation of the pulmonary diffusing capacity and intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomosis recruitment during exercise.
Critical steps within the protocol
Although the DLCO breath hold is relatively simple at rest, breath holding during exercise presents a unique challenge to the subject, as it is counter-intuitive, and subjects have a high drive to breathe during exercise. Thus, a good-quality determination of Vc and Dm relies on the rapport and clear communication between the tester and the subject. The tester's technical ability can be quantified with the variability of the alveolar volume (± 5% of previous trials) and a breath-hold time (BHT) of 6.0 ± 0.3 s.
Modifications and troubleshooting
At the conclusion of a Vc/Dm measurement, the tester should quickly graph the three DLCO maneuvers to determine the best-fit line of the data points; the DLCO measured with 21% FIO2 should always be greater than that with 40%, which should be greater than that with 60%. If not, it is recommended to check if the valve switch corresponds to the correct testing gas. Similarly, check that the pre-breathing bags are filled with the correct FIO2 gas corresponding to the testing gas (Figure 1B-1D). Caution should be taken when testing a participant who is a smoker, as elevated COHb levels may underestimate DLco.
For the IPAVA recruitment assessment, the position of the subject is critical to ensure high-quality image acquisition. It is possible to replace the upright cycle ergometer with a recumbent cycle ergometer to minimize the movement of the subject. However, recumbent cycle exercise will elicit a different metabolic response for a given work rate, and thus the graded exercise test should be repeated on the recumbent cycle ergometer. Scanning of the upper chest may be uncomfortable to some women; in this case, a female sonographer is recommended. Finally, the recommended exercise protocol is designed for a young, healthy individual; accordingly, the exercise protocol can be modified for a different target population.
Limitations of the technique
The principal limitations of the multiple FIO2 DLCO technique are the skill of the tester and the ability of the subject to follow commands and to remain calm during the breath hold, as Valsalva or Müllerian maneuvers will affect the measurements. Secondly, the number of breath holds in one session should be limited to 12, due to an increase in CO backpressure, which may affect the Vc and Dm measurement5,30 and pose a health risk to the subject. Depending on the research design, it may be necessary to complete the testing across multiple sessions to allow for the clearance of CO and to limit participant fatigue. With good participant coaching and good technical ability, we have determined a satisfactory coefficient of variation between trials for DLco, Vc, and Dm to be 7%, 8%, and 15%, respectively.
The multiple FIO2 DLCO technique assumes that the alveolar O2 is the same as the capillary O2, and thus, caution should be exercised when interpreting the data in individuals with known gas exchange impairment.
Agitated saline contrast echocardiographic imaging is limited by the technical ability of the sonographer and the ability of the subject to minimize thoracic movement while exercising. It is also critical that the interpreter of the images be familiar with the scale for scoring IPAVA recruitment according to established procedures (Figure 4)27. The significance of a positive saline contrast echocardiography during exercise remains a topic of debate15,16, and there is some discussion that a positive agitated saline contrast in the left ventricle may be secondary to capillary distention, and not IPAVA recruitment. Ongoing work is attempting to resolve this issue.
Significance of the technique with respect to existing/alternative methods
By utilizing these physiological techniques, it is possible to assess the pulmonary vasculature during exercise in a variety of conditions, including in health, in disease, and in drug interventions. Although the quality relies with the ability of the tester, these skills are easily and quickly acquired with proper mentorship and training. The multiple FIO2 DLCO method is considered the "gold standard" in the measurement of Dm and Vc31. While these measures are not calculated clinically, the values could be used to determine the mechanisms for hypoxemia and exercise intolerance, to predict patient outcomes, and to further characterize diagnosis31,32. Likewise, the agitated saline echocardiography technique is the most widely-used method in determining the recruitment of IPAVAs.
Future applications or directions after mastering this technique
These techniques are applicable for use in a range of experimental conditions and interventions. We demonstrate these techniques during exercise, but they can easily be modified to measure pulmonary vascular responses during a drug infusion, such as dobutamine or dopamine, inotropes known to increase cardiac output17. Furthermore, it is possible to use these techniques in clinical populations, such as in those with heart failure34 or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in which the DLCO is lower compared to age-matched control subjects35.