$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Translational control is emerging as an equally important step to transcriptional regulation in gene expression, especially during periods of cellular stress1. A focal point of translation control is at the rate-limiting step of initiation where the first steps of protein synthesis involve the binding of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) to the 7-methylguanosine (m7GTP) 5' cap of mRNAs2. eIF4E is part of a trimeric complex named eIF4F that includes eIF4A, an RNA helicase, and eIF4G, a scaffolding protein required for the recruitment of other translation factors and the 40S ribosome3. Under normal physiological conditions, the vast majority of mRNAs are translated via a cap-dependent mechanism, but under periods of cellular stress approximately 10% of human mRNAs contain 5' UTRs that could allow cap-independent translation intiation1,4. Cap-dependent translation has been historically synonymous with eIF4F, however, stress-specific variations of eIF4F have become a trending topic5-8.
Various cellular stresses cause eIF4E activity to be repressed via the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). This kinase becomes impaired under stress, which results in the increased activity of one of its targets, the 4E-binding protein (4E-BP). Non-phosphorylated 4E-BP binds to eIF4E and blocks its ability to interact with eIF4G causing the repression of cap-dependent translation9,10. Interestingly, a homolog of eIF4E named eIF4E2 (or 4EHP) has a much lower affinity for 4E-BP11, perhaps allowing it to evade stress-mediated repression. Indeed, initially characterized as a repressor of translation due to its lack of interaction with eIF4G12, eIF4E2 initiates the translation of hundreds of mRNAs that contain RNA hypoxia response elements in their 3' UTR during hypoxic stress6,13. This activation is achieved through interactions with eIF4G3, RNA binding protein motif 4, and the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) 2α to constitute a hypoxic eIF4F complex, or eIF4FH6,13. As a repressor under normal conditions, eIF4E2 binds with GIGYF2 and ZNF59814. These complexes were, in part, identified through Agarose-linked m7GTP affinity resins. This classic method15 is standard in the field of translation and is the best and most commonly used technique to isolate cap-binding complexes in pull down and in vitro binding assays16-19. As the cap-dependent translation machinery is emerging as flexible and adaptable with inter-changing parts6-8,13, this method is a powerful tool to rapidly identify novel cap-binding proteins involved in the stress response. Furthermore, variations in eIF4F could have broad implications as several eukaryotic model systems appear to use an eIF4E2 homolog for stress responses such as A. thaliana20, S. Pombe21, D. melanogaster22, and C. elegans23.
Evidence suggests that variations in eIF4F may not be strictly limited to stress conditions, but be involved in normal physiology24. The oxygen supply to tissues (at capillary ends) or within tissues (measured via microelectrodes) varies from 2-6% in the brain25, 3-12% in the lungs26, 3.5-6% in the intestine27, 4% in the liver28, 7-12% in the kidney29, 4% in muscle30, and 6-7% in bone marrow31. Cells and mitochondria contain less than 1.3% oxygen32. These values are much closer to hypoxia than the ambient air where cells are routinely cultured. This suggests that what were previously thought of as hypoxia-specific cellular processes may be relevant in a physiological setting. Interestingly, eIF4F and eIF4FH actively participate in the translation initiation of distinct pools or classes of mRNAs in several different human cell lines exposed to physiological oxygen or "physioxia"24. Low oxygen also drives proper fetal development33 and cells generally have higher proliferation rates, longer lifespans, less DNA damage and less general stress responses in physioxia34. Therefore, eIF4FH is likely a key factor in the expression of select genes under physiological conditions.
Here, we provide a protocol to culture cells in fixed physiological oxygen conditions or in a dynamic fluctuating range that is likely more representative of tissue microenvironments. One advantage of this method is that cells are lysed within the hypoxia workstation. It is not often clear how the transition from hypoxic cell culture to cell lysis is performed in other protocols. Cells are often first removed from a small hypoxia incubator before lysis, but this exposure to oxygen could affect biochemical pathways as the cellular response to oxygen is rapid (one or two min)35. Certain cap-binding proteins require interactions with a second base or can hydrolyze the m7GTP, therefore some cap interactors may be missed in the purification process. Agarose-linked to enzymatically resistant cap analogs may be substituted in this protocol. Exploring the activity and composition of eIF4FH and other variations of eIF4F through the method described here will shed light on the intricate gene expression machineries that cells utilize during physiological conditions or stress responses.