$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The efficacy of primary cancer therapies has improved substantially over the last decade due to compelling advances in the genetic and molecular understanding of the disease and the advent of targeted drugs such as therapeutic antibodies and small molecule inhibitors. In contrast, metastatic and recurrent disease is still typically incurable, and morbidity and mortality remain high in these clinical settings. CSCs represent a distinct subpopulation within tumors and are endowed with canonical stem cell properties such as clonogenicity/tumorigenicity, multi-drug resistance and asymmetric cell division1,2. Thus, CSCs not only drive metastatic progression and tumor heterogeneity, but also persist during treatment to predispose the patient to relapse. Therapeutic CSC elimination is therefore an important medical need to prevent disease recurrence and allow long-term cure of cancer3.
Identification of vulnerabilities and elucidation of strategies to eradicate CSCs heavily depends on methods that allow their purification from biological samples for subsequent expression profiling and/or functional investigation. In turn, such methods rely on surface, intracellular or functional markers that are specific for these cells. CSC-specific surface markers include, but are not limited to, CD44, CD133, CD24 and CD90, and have been used to identify CSC populations in a variety of tumor entities including breast cancer and colon cancer4. Another marker, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), shows intracellular localization and can be functionally detected providing a respective substrate whose enzymatic conversion produces light. Using this test, CSC populations have been identified in diverse tumor entities as well5. A complementary method, commonly referred to as SP analysis and portrayed here in methodological detail, harnesses active dye efflux by ABC drug transporters to identify small populations of fluorescence-dim stem-like cells6,7,8. To achieve this, a given sample is incubated in the presence of a lipophilic DNA-binding fluorophore which enters all cells through passive diffusion and targets nuclear and mitochondrial DNA for binding. Non-CSCs devoid of ABC drug transporter expression accumulate the dye resulting in bright fluorescence, whereas CSCs actively extrude the dye which reduces fluorescence. Pharmacological inhibition of drug transporter activity abrogates and functionally confirms the SP phenotype and should be used for control purpose. CSC populations exhibiting SP characteristics have been disclosed, amongst others, in ovarian cancer9,10, prostate cancer11,12, breast cancer13, lung cancer14, endometrial cancer15, glioma16,17 and bone sarcoma18. Importantly, the SP assay is compatible with both cancer cell lines and primary tumor tissue, even though primary material poses additional challenges such as the requirement for a specific tumor cell discrimination strategy (certain host cell populations can exhibit SP characteristics as well)19,20.
The two most established SP-conferring drug transporters are ABCB1/P-glycoprotein/MDR1/CD243 and ABCG2/Bcrp1/CD3388,9,21; however, other drug transporters can be a molecular determinant of the SP phenotype too (e.g., ABCB5)22. ABCB1 can be efficiently blocked with verapamil whereas the activity of ABCG2 can be specifically abrogated with fumitremorgin C (FTC)6,19. A particular strength of SP analysis is that it can be combined with other stainings (e.g., surface markers and ALDH) and that it allows live cell recovery thus being compatible with downstream functional investigations. Moreover, SP detection is broadly applicable owing to the high conservation of ABC drug transporters among CSC populations9,23.
Originally, SP detection has been performed using Hoechst 33342 as a triggering dye24. This dye achieves excellent resolution but requires ultraviolet laser excitation; hence its applicability is naturally limited to high-end flow cytometric instruments. The advent of DyeCycle Violet (DCV)25 has opened new avenues for SP analysis and extended the applicability of this method to standard flow cytometric instruments lacking an ultraviolet laser source (a violet laser source suffices to resolve DCV-SP cells). Importantly, Hoechst 33342 and DCV share common pump specificities, indicating that either dye should identify the same cell populations.
Here, we provide a detailed experimental protocol of DCV-based SP analysis for quick and easy reproduction in independent labs. We thus perceive our article as a resource for CSC researchers that should contribute to the optimization and standardization of this useful cell-biological method.