$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The MK II is more affordable, customizable and less cumbersome than the MK I device. The entire MK II costs only slightly more than the bio-signals shield alone (75 USD). The device is significantly smaller sitting on the wrist rather than the arm and the wireless microcontroller could potentially simultaneously support inputs from 6 muscle sensors. The functional battery life of the MK I device is just under an hour using a 9 V 550 mAh battery and the functional battery life of the MK II device (when used as a clicker) is around 8 hours using a 3.7 V 150 mAh battery; see Table 1 for a comparison of the devices.
The Bionic Clicker MK II can have an issue when used on the abductor indicis: the amplifier can saturate and take more than a second to discharge (see Figure 15). Careful placement of the electrodes and correctly setting the gain can overcome this issue. This does not happen with the Bionic Clicker MK I or on any other commonly used muscles for EMG.
Whilst calibrating the devices to find the Threshold Trigger Value, many different values can be observed. They fall into three ranges: the values when the hand is stationary, the values when the hand is moving, and the values when the finger is moved. Table 2 shows recorded values in each range; for the stationary and hand moving ranges, the maximum values are shown and for the finger tensing range the minimum value is shown. The threshold value is selected to lie above the hand moving value and below the finger tensing value. A value nearer to the hand moving range increases the chance of false positive and reduces the chance of false negatives, whilst a value closer to the finger tensing range has the opposite effect.
Both devices where tested for false negatives and false positives when tensing the abductor indices muscle. A false negative was recorded when the device did not trigger a change of slide upon tensing of the muscle and a false positive was recorded if the slide changed when no tensing occurred. Neither device had an issue with false positives, though the MK II device experienced the occasional false negative (less than 5% of the time). The MK I device experiences no false positives or negatives during the first 45 minutes of operation, though the number of false negatives increases rapidly until total device failure between 50 minutes and an hour (see Table 3).
These results show that the device succeeded in its stated aims. Table 1 shows that the MK II is cheaper and has more flexibility than the MK I. Table 2 and Table 3 show that the device functions as intended and can be used as an EMG-based trigger device. Figure 15 shows the issues that can occur if using the abductor indices muscle: this is not a problem that occurs with most muscles and can be fixed by altering the gain. Although the devices have some issues, they are sufficient for the intended use.

Figure 1: The Bionic Clicker MK I. This shows the Bionic Clicker MK I and all of its components mounted on the left arm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Block diagram of the devices. Each box represents a separate section of the device; within each box is the functionality that section has as a part of the device. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Steps to build the device. A flow diagram containing a high-level overview of each step of the protocol. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Initial MK I assembly. Microcontroller with the bio-signals shield and electrode cables. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Initial MK II assembly. Microcontroller with the muscle sensor and soldered connections. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Electrode Placement. This figure shows the correct placement of the electrodes on the hand when using the abductor indicis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: The MK II case parts. The parts of the MK II case ready for printing in a photolithography printer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: The MK I control circuit. (a) Circuit board from above (gray marks where the strip board had contacts broken on the underside). (b) Completed Circuit Board. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 9: The MK I control board circuit diagram. The circuit diagram for the MK I control board showing the connections between the resistors, switches and wires. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 10: The MK I control circuit. (a) Control Board from above (gray mark where the strip board had contact broken on the underside). (b) Completed Circuit Board Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 11: The MK II control board circuit diagram. The circuit diagram for the MK I control board showing the connections between the resistors, switches and wires. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 12: The assembled MK I. This shows all the components of the MK I device before they have been mounted on the arm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 13: Assembling the Clicker MK II. (a) Place the microcontroller in the bottom of the case. (b) Place the battery in the mid-section and put on the lid. (c) Place the muscle sensor in its case and put on the lid. (d) Connect the microcontroller to the muscle sensor and connect the battery to the microcontroller. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 14: The completed Bionic Clicker MK II. (a) On the hook and loop strap. (b) On the wrist. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 15: Oversaturation of the muscle sensor. This figure shows what happens when the muscle sensor is oversaturated; the plateaus are when muscle activation was too strong for the current gain setting on the device. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| MK I | MK II |
| EMG sensor | General Bio-sensor | Dedicated Muscle Sensor |
| Wireless | Separate wireless module | On the microcontroller board |
| EMG over wireless? | No | Yes |
| Battery | 9 V PP3 | 150 mAh LiPo |
| Operational Time | 1 h | 8 h |
| Build Time | 5 h | 4 h |
| Total cost | $150 | $80 |
| False Positives (%) | 0 | 0 |
| False Negatives (%) | 0 | 4.7 |
Table 1: Comparison of the devices. This table compares several aspects of the devices, from design to functionality.
| Stationary (maximum) | Hand Moving (maximum) | Finger Tensing (minimum) | Threshold Value |
| MK I | 25 | 35 | 215 | 200 |
| MK II | 40 | 280 | 460 | 400 |
Table 2: Calibration Results. This table shows the values obtained whilst keeping the hand stationary, moving the hand and finger tensing, as well as the threshold value selected.
| Number of false negatives (Tested every 30 s) | Number of false positives (Spontaneous activations) |
| First 45 min | 45 min-1 h | 1-8 h | First h | 1-8 h |
| MK I | 0 | 35 | N/A | 0 | N/A |
| MK II | 4 | 1 | 40 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3: Testing of the devices. Comparison of false positives and false negatives between the two devices.
Supplemental code files for MK I and MK II:
Please click here to download "BionicClicker.ino"
Please click here to download "BLEBionicClicker.ino".
Please click here to download "BLEBoomTest.ino".
Please click here to download "BLEThresholdTest.ino".
Please click here to download "BoomTest.ino".
Please click here to download "ThresholdTest.ino".
Please click here to download "Feather-Featherbase.stl".
Please click here to download "Feather-Feathermid.stl".
Please click here to download "Feather-Feathertop.stl".
Please click here to download "Myo-Myobase.stl".
Please click here to download "Myo-Myolid.stl".