A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Determination of the Optimal Chromosomal Location(s) for a DNA Element in Escherichia coli Using a Novel Transposon-mediated Approach

6.9K views

DOI:

10.3791/55946

September 11th, 2017

In This Article

Summary

Here, the power of a transposon-mediated random insertion of a non-coding DNA element was used to resolve its optimal chromosomal position.

Abstract

The optimal chromosomal position(s) of a given DNA element was/were determined by transposon-mediated random insertion followed by fitness selection. In bacteria, the impact of the genetic context on the function of a genetic element can be difficult to assess. Several mechanisms, including topological effects, transcriptional interference from neighboring genes, and/or replication-associated gene dosage, may affect the function of a given genetic element. Here, we describe a method that permits the random integration of a DNA element into the chromosome of Escherichia coli and select the most favorable locations using a simple growth competition experiment. The method takes advantage of a well-described transposon-based system of random insertion, coupled with a selection of the fittest clone(s) by growth advantage, a procedure that is easily adjustable to experimental needs. The nature of the fittest clone(s) can be determined by whole-genome sequencing on a complex multi-clonal population or by easy gene walking for the rapid identification of selected clones. Here, the non-coding DNA region DARS2, which controls the initiation of chromosome replication in E. coli, was used as an example. The function of DARS2 is known to be affected by replication-associated gene dosage; the closer DARS2 gets to the origin of DNA replication, the more active it becomes. DARS2 was randomly inserted into the chromosome of a DARS2-deleted strain. The resultant clones containing individual insertions were pooled and competed against one another for hundreds of generations. Finally, the fittest clones were characterized and found to contain DARS2 inserted in close proximity to the original DARS2 location.

Introduction

The function of any genetic element can be affected by its location in the genome. In bacteria, this mainly results from interference by the transcription of neighboring genes, local DNA topology, and/or replication-associated gene dosage. In particular, the processes of DNA replication and segregation are controlled, at least in part, by non-coding chromosomal regions1, and the proper function of these regions depends on genomic location/context. In E.coli, examples are the dif site, required for sister chromosome resolution2; KOPS sequences, required for chromosome segregation3....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Collection of the Transposon Library

NOTE: The chromosomal DARS2 locus was cloned into the mini Tn10-based transposon, NKBOR (on pNKBOR)21, resulting in NKBOR::DARS2 (pJFM1). pNKBOR can be obtained online22. pNKBOR is a R6K-based suicide vector that requires the initiator protein π for replication23. Plasmid pJFM1 is therefore able to replicate in an E. coli strain (e.g., Dh5α λ pir) containing a chromosomal copy of the pir gene. However, when pJFM1 is transformed into the Pir-deficient wildtype MG165....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

A Southern blot was done to verify that DARS2 was distributed randomly throughout the chromosome in the transposon library (t = 0) and that the fittest clones would persist over time. The Southern blot was performed on DNA extracted from the initial transposon pool (at t = 0) and every estimated 100 out of 700 generations of competition (Figure 3). Here, the total cellular DNA from each time-point was digested with the PvuI restriction enzym.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The methodology used here takes advantage of state-of-the-art techniques to answer a difficult question regarding the optimal genomic position of a genetic element. The random insertion of the genetic element (mediated by the transposon) enables the fast and easy collection of thousands of clones, which then can be made to compete against each other to select for the optimal position of the investigated genetic element (i.e., the fittest clone).

Here, DARS2 was inserted into .......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors were funded by grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Lundbeck Foundation, and the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF120) through the Center for Bacterial Stress Response and Persistence (BASP).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Autoclaved Mili-Q waterNone
Electroporation Cuvettes, 0.1 cmThermo Fisher ScientificP41050
Bio-Rad MicroPulser Electroporation SystemBio-Rad165-2100
LB BrothThermo Fisher Scientific12780029 
LB Agar, powder (Lennox L agar)Thermo Fisher Scientific22700025
GlycerolThermo Fisher Scientific17904
Fisherbrand Plastic Petri DishesFisher ScientificS33580A
Falcon 50mL Conical Centrifuge TubesFisher Scientific14-432-22
Falcon 15mL Conical Centrifuge TubesFisher Scientific14-959-53A
Nunc CryoTubesSigma-AldrichV7634 
Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (2 U/µL)Thermo Fisher ScientificF530S
dATP, [α-32P]- 3000Ci/mmol 10mCi/ml, 250 µCiPerkinElmerBLU012H250UC
DECAprime II DNA Labeling KitThermo Fisher ScientificAM1455
Spectrophotometer  SF/MBV/03.32Pharmacia
Hermle Centrifuge    SF/MBV/03.46Hermle
Ole Dich Centrifuge  SF/MBV/03.29Ole Dich
Eppendorftubes 1.5 mLSigma-AldrichT9661
Eppendorftubes 2.0 mLSigma-AldrichT2795
Sodium ChlorideMerck6404
96% EthanolSigma-Aldrich16368
Trizma HClSigma-AldrichT-3253
Phenol Ultra PureBRL5509UA
ChloroformMerck2445
Ribonuclease A type II ASigma-AldrichR5000
Sodiumdodecylsulphate (SDS)Merck13760
LysozymeSigma-AldrichL 6876
IsopropanolSigma-Aldrich405-7
0.5M Na-EDTA pH 8.0BRL5575 UA
Kanamycin sulfateSigma-Aldrich10106801001
PvuI (10 U/µL)Thermo Fisher ScientificER0621
UltraPure AgaroseThermo Fisher Scientific16500500
DNA Gel Loading Dye (6X)Thermo Fisher ScientificR0611
Tris-Borate-EDTA bufferSigma-AldrichT4415
Ethidium bromideSigma-AldrichE7637
Hydrochloric acidSigma-Aldrich433160
Sodium HydroxideSigma-Aldrich71687
Whatman 3MM papersSigma-AldrichWHA3030931
SSC Buffer 20× ConcentrateSigma-AldrichS6639
Amersham Hybond-N+GE HealthcareRPN119B
Ficoll 400Sigma-AldrichF8016
PolyvinylpyrrolidoneSigma-AldrichPVP40
Bovine Serum Albumin - Fraction VSigma-Aldrich85040C
Deoxyribonucleic acid sodium salt from salmon testesSigma-AldrichD1626
Carestream Kodak  BioMax  light filmSigma-AldrichZ373494
GenElute  Gel Extraction KitSigma-AldrichNA1111 
GenElute  PCR Clean-Up KitSigma-AldrichNA1020
T100  Thermal CyclerBio-Rad
SmartSpec Plus SpectrophotometerBio-Rad
RifampicinServa34514.01
CephalexinSigma-AldrichC4895
MithramycinServa29803.02
Magnesium chloride hexahydrateSigma-Aldrich246964
Apogee A10 instrumentApogee

References

  1. Frimodt-Moller, J., Charbon, G., Lobner-Olesen, A. Control of bacterial chromosome replication by non-coding regions outside the origin. Curr Genet. , (2016).
  2. Sherratt, D. J., et al. Recombination and chromosome segregation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 359 (1441), 61-69 (2004).
  3. Bigot, S., et al.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Transposon Mediated InsertionGrowth CompetitionWhole Genome SequencingGene WalkingFlow CytometrySouthern BlotRifampicin Run outDARS2 Element