This manuscript describes a procedure for operating a calcium looping pilot-plant for post-combustion carbon capture with high oxygen concentrations in the calciner in order to reduce or eliminate the flue gas recycle.
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
This manuscript describes a procedure for operating a calcium looping pilot-plant for post-combustion carbon capture with high oxygen concentrations in the calciner in order to reduce or eliminate the flue gas recycle.
Calcium looping (CaL) is a post-combustion CO2 capture technology that is suitable for retrofitting existing power plants. The CaL process uses limestone as a cheap and readily available CO2 sorbent. While the technology has been widely studied, there are a few available options that could be applied to make it more economically viable. One of these is to increase the oxygen concentration in the calciner to reduce or eliminate the amount of recycled gas (CO2, H2O and impurities); therefore, decreasing or removing the energy necessary to heat the recycled gas stream. Moreover, there is a resulting increase in the energy input due to the change in the combustion intensity; this energy is used to enable the endothermic calcination reaction to occur in the absence of recycled flue gases. This paper presents the operation and first results of a CaL pilot plant with 100% oxygen combustion of natural gas in the calciner. The gas coming into the carbonator was a simulated flue gas from a coal-fired power plant or cement industry. Several limestone particle size distributions are also tested to further explore the effect of this parameter on the overall performance of this operating mode. The configuration of the reactor system, the operating procedures, and the results are described in detail in this paper. The reactor showed good hydrodynamic stability and stable CO2 capture, with capture efficiencies of up to 70% with a gas mixture simulating the flue gas of a coal-fired power plant.
CO2 emissions and the resulting global warming are critical environmental issues that have attracted a large amount of research in the past years. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been acknowledged as a potential technology for reducing CO2 emissions to the atmosphere1,2. The most challenging part of the CCS chain is the capture of CO2, which is also the most costly stage3. In consequence, there has been a focus on developing new technologies for CO2 capture from power plants and other industrial facilities.
CaL....
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
1. Material Preparation
2. Start-up Procedure
CAUTION: Extremely high temperatures are achieved here. Suitable PPE such as gloves, ....
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The experimental set-up is shown in Figure 3. The plant comprises two interconnected fluidized-beds. Namely, the carbonator is a CFB with 4.3 m height and 0.1 m internal diameter (ID); while the calciner is a BFB with 1.2 m height and 0.165 m ID. The solid transport from one reactor to the other is controlled by two loop-seals fluidized with nitrogen. Both reactors are fed a mixture of gas through a preheating line, and both are electrically heated; moreover,.......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The operation of the calciner with an inlet of 100% vol oxygen is achievable, based on exploiting the endothermic nature of the calcination reaction, as well as the fact that the solids circulate between the two reactors at different temperatures. This operating mode aims to make the CaL process more economically promising by reducing capital and operating costs. As the recycle of flue gas (mainly CO2, water vapor and unreacted O2) is reduced or even eliminated, the heat consumed to preheat this str.......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Research Fund for Coal and Steel (RFCS) under grant agreement n° RFCR-CT-2014-00007. This work was funded by the UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre (UKCCSRC) as part of Call 2 projects. UKCCSRC is supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) as part of the Research Council's UK Energy Programme, with additional funding from the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS - formerly DECC). The authors would also like to thank Mr. Martin Roskilly for his enormous help throughout the course of this work.
....Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Longcal limestone | Loncliffe | Longcal SP52 | n/a |
| Mechanical Shaker | SWECO | LS24S544+C | Mechanical siever to separate particles |
| Oxygen | BOC | n/a | BOC cylinders |
| Nitrogen | BOC | n/a | BOC tank |
| Carbon dioxide | BOC | n/a | BOC tank |
| Natural gas | n/a | n/a | Taken from the line |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.