Migration of eukaryotic cells is biased by diverse chemical and physical cues in the environment, including gradients of soluble or substrate-bound chemoattractants, variable stiffness of the substrates, electric fields, or shear flow. Although there have been many advances in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving chemotaxis, less is known about other types of directed migration and how these diverse signals are integrated at the cellular level to produce a unified migratory response.
Directed migration toward an increasing concentration of a chemoattractant involves three behavioral components: motility, directional sensing, and polarity1. Motility refers to random movement of cells achieved by pseudopod protrusion. Directional sensing is the ability of a cell to detect the source of a chemoattractant, which can occur even in immobilized cells. Polarity refers to the more stable asymmetrical distribution of intracellular components between the leading and lagging edge of a cell, which leads to increased persistence in movement.
Cellular response to a chemoattractant depends on the activity of four conceptually defined regulatory networks: receptor/ G protein, signal transduction, actin cytoskeleton, and polarity1. Chemoattractant binding to the G protein-coupled receptor transmits the signal via heterotrimeric G proteins α and βγ to the downstream signal transduction network, which amplifies the directional signal. Multiple pathways within the signal transduction network act in parallel and feed into the actin cytoskeleton network to bias actin polymerization, and consequent pseudopod protrusion, in the direction of the gradient. Among important regulators of chemotaxis are Ras GTPase, TorC2, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), and guanylyl cyclase. Feedback mechanisms within the signal transduction network and between the signal transduction and actin cytoskeleton networks further amplify the response. Finally, the poorly defined polarity network receives input from the actin cytoskeleton, and further biases the signal transduction network to promote persistent migration in the direction of the gradient.
Much of our mechanistic understanding of chemotaxis was made possible because of the development of fluorescently-tagged biosensors for various components of the regulatory networks. Many chemotaxis regulators have an asymmetrical distribution either of the regulatory molecule itself or its activity. For example, biosensors that recognize activated versions of small GTPases Ras and Rap1 – Ras-binding domains of Raf1 (referred to as RBD here) and RalGDS, respectively – localize to the leading edge of a chemotaxing cell2,3. Similarly, PI3K and its product phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3), recognized by a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, also show localization at the front of a cell4,5. In contrast, a 3-phosphatase PTEN, which converts PIP3 back to phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate, localizes to the lagging edge of the cell6. Importantly, these biosensors change their localization in response to global stimulation with a chemoattractant. Leading edge markers, which are cytosolic or on the tips of protrusions in a resting cell, relocalize to the cortex, whereas lagging edge markers, which have cortical localization and are absent from the tips of protrusions in a resting cell, become cytosolic after stimulation. Analysis of biosensor distribution in response to global stimulation with a chemoattractant minimizes the contribution of motility and polarity, which often confound the observations. Global or uniform stimulation of a cell suspension with a chemoattractant is also used as a tool to assess population-wide changes in protein activation, often detected by protein phosphorylation7,8,9. This biochemical assay is primarily used to obtain temporal information, whereas microscopy is used to gather both temporal and spatial information about the behavior of various components of the regulatory networks.
The signal transduction network incorporates features of an excitable system10,11. Responses to supra-threshold chemotactic stimuli are "all-or-none" and display refractory periods. Responses are also triggered stochastically and can show oscillatory behavior. Signal transduction events are localized to regions of the cortex that propagate as waves12,13,14,15. Front, or back, markers are recruited to, or dissociate from, the active zones of the propagating waves. Due to the refractory region trailing the active zone, the oppositely directed waves annihilate as they meet. The propagating signal transduction waves underlie the cellular protrusions that mediate cell migration10.
Much of the aforementioned information on chemotaxis came from the studies on the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum, although similar regulatory mechanisms are also applicable to neutrophils and other mammalian cell types16. Dictyostelium is a well-established model organism that has a robust chemotactic response during starvation, when thousands of single cells migrate toward an aggregation center, eventually forming a multicellular fruiting body containing spores. Chemotaxis is also essential during the single-cell growth stage of this organism for locating bacterial food sources. Importantly, migration of single Dictyostelium cells is remarkably similar to the migration of mammalian neutrophils or metastatic cancer cells, all of which undergo very rapid amoeboid-type migration. In fact, both the overall topology of the regulatory networks, as well as many of the individual signal transduction pathways involved in chemotaxis are conserved between Dictyostelium and mammalian leukocytes17. Furthermore, other cells, such as fibroblasts, use receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) instead of GPCRs; however, RTKs may feed into similar networks.
In contrast to chemotaxis, thorough understanding of the signaling mechanisms that drive various other modes of directed migration is lacking. Similarly to cells migrating in a chemoattractant gradient several studies have reported activation and/or localization of typical leading edge markers, including actin polymerization, PIP3 and/or extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2, at the front of cells undergoing directed migration in response to shear flow or changes in electric fields18,19,20,21. However, in these studies continuous exposure to the stimulus also resulted in cell migration, leaving open the question whether, for example, the leading edge markers localize specifically in response to a stimulus, or if they simply localize at the leading edge because of increased number of pseudopods at the front of a migrating cell.
We developed assays that allow us to observe the response of cells to acute mechanical perturbation delivered as shear flow both at the population level and as individual cells22. Similar to global stimulation with a chemoattractant, acute stimulation with shear flow allows the study of a cellular response to a mechanical stimulus without the confounding contribution from motility or polarity. Combining these biochemical and microscopic assays with genetic or pharmacological perturbations allows us to learn about how mechanical stimuli are perceived and transmitted. Moreover, this approach also provides a novel method for tapping into the system downstream of the chemoattractant receptor in the absence of a chemoattractant, thereby isolating the signal transduction and actin cytoskeleton networks from the receptor/G protein network.
Using the techniques described below we recently demonstrated that acute shear stress leads to activation of multiple components of the chemotactic signal transduction and actin cytoskeleton networks22. By applying the acute mechanical stimulus at varying intervals, we demonstrated that, similarly to chemoattractants, response to mechanical stimuli also exhibits features of an excitable system, including the all-or-none behavior of the response under saturating conditions and the presence of a refractory period. Finally, by combining mechanical and chemical stimulation we showed that the two stimuli share signal transduction and actin cytoskeleton networks, which likely allow for integration of multiple stimuli to bias cell migration.