Isolation of intestinal tissue for immuno-labeling
The described tissue isolation protocols for colon and small intestine were optimized for preservation and immuno-labeling of microtubules and associated proteins, but not for stem cell viability and organoid generation (Figure 1 and Table 1). The aim was to generate crypt and villus factions that were as clean (devoid of mucus and other tissue) as possible, while minimizing exposure to EDTA and cold to preserve structure and prevent depolymerization of microtubules with ice cold solutions, which induce depolymerization of all but stable microtubules. Figure 2 shows examples of images of Fractions 2 and 3 from isolated small intestinal tissue, with Fraction 2 containing a mixture of both villi and crypts (Figure 2A, B), while Fraction 3 contains mainly crypts (Figure 2C, D).
Fixation and immuno-labeling of isolated intestinal tissue
The individual or combined fractions were then processed for fixation and immuno-labeled through a series of steps including fixation, detergent, blocking, antibody, and washing solutions, before re-suspending the final villi/crypts pellet in mounting media, transferring to slides, and covering with glass coverslips. The crypts and villi were then imaged on a confocal microscope.
Good preservation and labeling of microtubules and actin in both villi and crypts was achieved by the following: a combination of formaldehyde/methanol fixation at -20 °C, repeated washing in PBS containing 0.1% detergent and 1% serum and blocking in PBS with 0.1% detergent and 10% serum, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C in primary antibodies and then 2 h in secondary antibodies at room temperature (Figure 3). Formaldehyde/methanol fixation also worked well for labeling +TIPs such as the EBs and CLIP-170 in isolated crypts and villi (Figure 4). EB3 accumulations at the plus-end of microtubules (known as comets) were evident in crypts (Figure 4A), while association along the lattice of stable microtubules could be seen in villi samples (Figure 4C). Distinct localization of CLIP-170 and p150Glued (subunit of dynactin) was clearly evident at the apical n-MTOCs in isolated villi (Figure 4B). Fixation with the formaldehyde/methanol protocol did not consistently work for ninein localization in isolated intestinal tissue using our Pep3 antibody against mouse ninein. However, methanol fixation at -20 °C followed by the same washing and blocking solutions as for formaldehyde/methanol gave very good localization of ninein within isolated crypts and villi (Figure 5; reference8). Interestingly, while ninein is concentrated at the apical centrosomes some accumulation at the cell base was evident in some cells within isolated crypts (Figure 5). Whether this is due to non-specific labeling or a consequence of the isolation procedure delaying fixation (and thus affecting preservation) will need further investigation. However, methanol-fixed (-20 °C) cryostat sections of villi (see Figure 3bi in8) also revealed ninein at the cell base in some cells suggesting that ninein may also associate with a basal population of microtubules.
Fixation and immuno-labeling of organoids isolated from basement matrix
Small intestinal organoids were generated and grown in basement matrix for three weeks or longer (Figure 6A; reference6,15). A cold (4 °C) cell recovery solution was used to isolate organoids from the basement matrix. The depolymerized basement matrix solution with organoids was transferred to tubes and centrifuged prior to fixation and immuno-labeling. This produced very clean preparations and allowed good access to the organoids for the various solutions. The differentiated cells within the organoid villus domains contain stable apico-basal microtubules; these labeled well in most cases (Figure 6B, C) and EB1 could also be seen along the microtubule lattice (Figure 6E; reference13). However, the cold cell recovery solution may result in depolymerization of the dynamic microtubules, which was evident in some samples by the lack of EB1 comets (which bind to the plus-end of growing microtubules) within the basal crypt domains (Figure 6F). In other samples, astral (dynamic) microtubules were preserved (Figure 6D). Organoid isolation prior to fixation and immuno-labeling also worked for junctional proteins, ninein, CLIP-170, and cell markers, such as mucin for goblet cells and chromogranin A for enteroendocrine cells.
Fixation and immuno-labeling of organoids within basement matrix
Figure 7 shows an organoid at the cyst stage (A-C) and at an early stage of crypt development (D), both fixed in formaldehyde/methanol and immuno-labeled for microtubules and ninein. Good microtubule preservation and labeling as well as labeling for ninein at apical n-MTOCs were evident. Figure 8A, B shows a crypt domain within a day 6 organoid fixed with the methanol protocol and labeled for microtubules and EB1. Good preservation of microtubules and EB1 comets was evident suggesting preservation of dynamic microtubules.
Organoids were also fixed and immuno-labeled while remaining within the basement matrix. The disadvantages of this procedure may be poor penetration of fixative and trapping of antibodies within the basement matrix (Figure 8B), although in both cases less frequently when 0.1% detergent was included in the fixative and/or wash solutions. In addition, 4% PFA did not preserve the basement matrix well but caused it to dissolve, although this was less so with 1% PFA. Methanol fixation, on the other hand, sometimes induced organoid collapse.
Labeling with some antibodies such as against the stem cell marker Lgr5 and Paneth cell marker CD24 proved unsuccessful with the 4% PFA, methanol, or formaldehyde/methanol protocols. However, fixing the organoids within the basement matrix with 1% PFA in PBS with 0.1% detergent at room temperature did result in labeling for both Lgr5 and CD24 (Figure 9).

Figure 1: Isolation of small intestinal villi and crypts. Flow diagram of the key steps in small intestinal villus and crypt isolation prior to fixation and immuno-labeling. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Isolated villi and crypts from mouse small intestine. Brightfield microscope images of intestinal fractions showing villi (large arrows) and crypts (small arrows). (A, B) Fraction 2 contains a mixture of villi and crypts, and preservation of the morphology on the villus and crypt is evident in B. (C, D) Fraction 3 shows isolation of crypts and absence of villi and intact crypts including a bifurcated crypt in C. Scale bars = 500 μm (A, C); 100 μm (B, D). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Isolated small intestinal villus and crypt fixed in formaldehyde/methanol and immuno-labeled for microtubules and actin. (A) Schematic of the villus and crypt epithelium with different cell types indicated. The highlighted boxes indicate the representative regions imaged in B and C. (B, C) Confocal optical sections through part of a villus (B) and basal crypt (C) isolated from the small intestine using 30 mM EDTA and fixed in formaldehyde/methanol, washed in PBS containing 1% goat serum and 0.1% detergent, blocked in PBS containing 10% goat serum and 0.1% detergent, and labeled for microtubules with rat monoclonal anti-tubulin antibody (green) and for actin with rabbit polyclonal anti-β-actin antibody (red). Well preserved apico-basal microtubule bundles are evident in both villus and crypt cells, and actin can be seen concentrated in the apical region facing the lumen (arrow). Scale bars = 5 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Isolated small intestinal crypt and villi fixed in formaldehyde/methanol and immuno-labeled for microtubules, EB3, p150Glued, and CLIP-170. Confocal optical sections of crypt and villi regions isolated from the small intestine using 30 mM EDTA and fixed in formaldehyde/methanol, washed in PBS containing 10% goat serum and 0.1% detergent, blocked in PBS containing 10% goat serum and 0.1% detergent, and immuno-labeled. (A) Crypt labeled with rabbit polyclonal α-tubulin antibody (red) and rat monoclonal EB3KT36 antibody (green) and stained for DNA with DAPI (blue) showing apico-basal microtubules and EB3 comets. The inverted single channel image clearly shows EB3 comets throughout the basal crypt cells suggesting good preservation of dynamic as well as stable microtubules. (B) Villus epithelial cells labeled with rabbit polyclonal CLIP-170 antibody (red, see also reference16) and mouse monoclonal p150Glued antibody (green) showing apical co-localization. Inverted single channel images are shown below. (C) Villus cells labeled with rabbit polyclonal α-tubulin antibody (red) and rat monoclonal EB3-KT36 antibody (green) and stained for DNA with DAPI (blue) showing apico-basal microtubules with EB3 along the lattice. The EB3 lattice association is highlighted in the enlarged image while the inverted single channel image suggests both EB3 comets and lattice association. Scale bars = 5 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Isolated colon crypt fixed in methanol, immuno-labeled for ninein and E-cadherin, and stained with DAPI. Confocal optical section of the basal and transit-amplifying region of a crypt isolated from the colon using 3 mM EDTA and fixed in methanol, washed in PBS containing 1% goat serum and 0.1% detergent, and blocked in PBS containing 10% goat serum and 0.1% detergent. The crypt was labeled with rabbit polyclonal ninein antibodies (Pep3, see also reference8, red) and mouse monoclonal E-cadherin antibody (green) and stained with DAPI (blue). The inverted single channel image shows ninein only. The image shows a well-preserved crypt with E-cadherin revealing the outline of the individual cells and ninein concentrated at the apical centrosomes. It suggests good penetration of fixative and antibodies, and preservation of antigenicity. Scale bar = 5 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Organoid development, fixation, and immuno-labeling of isolated organoids. (A) Phase contrast images showing different stages of organoid development from cell aggregates to cyst with bud initiation and fully formed organoids with crypt and villus domains. (B-F) Confocal optical sections through organoids isolated from basement matrix using cell recovery solution at 4 °C (10 min) followed by formaldehyde/methanol fixation, washing in PBS containing 10% goat serum and 0.1% detergent, blocking in PBS containing 10% goat serum and 0.1% detergent, and immuno-labeling for microtubules, β-catenin, and EB1. (B) Organoid cyst labeled for microtubules (blue) and β-catenin (red) revealing good microtubule preservation and labeling in most cells. (C) Distinct apico-basal microtubules are evident in these enlarged epithelial cells from an organoid cyst. (D) Dividing cells labeled for microtubules showing spindles including astral (dynamic) microtubules (arrow). (E, F) Villus domain (E) and crypt domain (F) organoid regions showing some EB1 labeling along the lattice of stable microtubules, especially in the villus, while very few EB1 comets are seen even within the basal crypt suggesting that dynamic microtubules have not been preserved. Scale bars = 20 μm (A); 2 μm (D); 5 μm (B, C, E-F). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Organoids fixed within the basement matrix in formaldehyde/methanol and immuno-labeled for microtubules and ninein. Confocal optical sections of organoids fixed in formaldehyde/methanol, washed and blocked in PBS containing 10% goat serum and 0.1% detergent, and labeled while remaining in the basement matrix. (A-C) Organoid cyst labeled for microtubule (green) and ninein (Pep3; reference8, red) and stained with DAPI (blue) showing the merged image in A and inverted single channel images for microtubules (B) and ninein (C). The images show apico-basal microtubules and apical ninein localization, suggesting very good structural preservation of the organoid and penetration of antibodies as well as clearing of unbound antibodies. (D, E) Organoid with developing crypt fixed and labeled as above and again showing excellent structural preservation, labeling, and clearing of antibodies. Distinct apico-basal microtubules and apical n-MTOC ninein localization is evident and highlighted in the enlarged image (E) of the boxed region in D. Scale bars = 10 μm (A-D); 5 μm (E). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Organoids fixed within the basement matrix in methanol and immuno-labeled for microtubules and EB1. Confocal optical sections of organoids fixed in methanol, washed and blocked in PBS containing 10% goat serum and 0.1% detergent, and labeled, while remaining in the basement matrix. (A) Cyst domain from a fully developed organoid labeled with rabbit polyclonal α-tubulin (red) and mouse monoclonal EB1 (green) antibodies showing apico-basal microtubules, spindles (arrow) in two dividing cells and distinct EB1 comets. Some trapping of unbound EB1 antibodies is evident. However, good structural preservation and labeling of microtubules and EB1 is observed. The presence of EB1 comets suggests that dynamic microtubules have been preserved (A, invert). (B) Inverted image of organoid cyst region showing α-tubulin antibody labeling with considerable antibodies trapped within the surrounding basement matrix (arrow). Scale bars = 5 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 9: Organoids fixed within the basement matrix in 1% PFA and immuno-labeled for Lgr5 and CD24. Confocal optical sections of organoids fixed within the basement matrix in 1% PFA in PBS containing 0.1% detergent, washed in PBS with 1% goat serum and 0.1% detergent, and labeled with antibodies against Lgr5 and CD24. (A, B) Stem cell niche within a crypt domain showing Paneth cells positive for CD24 (red). The confocal and phase contrast images have been merged in A. B shows the single channel of CD24 labeling. (C) Stem cell region within a crypt domain showing a Lrg5 positive stem cell. Scale bars = 10 μm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Table 1: Timeline of small intestinal crypt and villi isolation and fixation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.