A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

9.3K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/56918

⸱

January 18th, 2018

 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

Persistent postsurgical pain may be related to changes in pain processing. By assessing pain in response to standardized stimuli, changes in pain processing can be elucidated. We present methods to obtain pain thresholds to different stimuli and a measure of endogenous analgesia in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.

Abstract

Chronic pain following surgery, persistent postsurgical pain, is an important highly prevalent condition contributing to significant symptom burden and lower quality of life. Persistent postsurgical pain is relatively refractory to treatment hence generating a high need for preventive strategies and treatments. Therefore, the identification of patients at risk of developing persistent pain is an area of active ongoing research. Recently it was demonstrated that peri-operative disruptions in central pain processing may be able to predict persistent postsurgical pain at long term follow-up in breast cancer patients. The aim of the current report is to present a short protocol to obtain pain thresholds to different stimuli at multiple sites and a measure of endogenous analgesia in breast cancer patients. We have used this method successfully in a clinical context and detail some representative results from a clinical study.

Introduction

Chronic pain following surgery, persistent postsurgical pain, is an important condition contributing to significant symptom burden and lower quality of life1. Persistent post-surgical pain remains poorly understood, but is broadly recognized as pain lasting more than 3 months after surgery2. The condition is common, with estimates of its prevalence ranging from 10% to 50% of all postsurgical patients3. High-risk procedures include breast surgery4, thoracotomy5, limb amputation6, and hernia repair7. Pers....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

This protocol has been approved in the context of a previous randomized controlled trial8 by the human research ethics committee region Arnhem-Nijmegen, the Netherlands (nr. 2004/239).

1. Preparation for Testing

  1. Informed consent:
    1. Review the informed consent form together with the patient.
    2. Answer any questions that patient may have regarding the study.
    3. Obtain written informed consent by having the patient sign the informed consent form and signing it yourself.
  2. Testing environment:
    1. Perform all the measure....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

In a previously published clinical trial in women (N = 94) undergoing surgery for breast cancer, we measured electrical and pressure pain thresholds as well as CPM using the protocol described in this report8. We performed the testing paradigm pre-operatively and at various time points throughout the year following surgery. We found that women who developed persistent postsurgical pain 12 months after breast cancer surgery, defined as a VAS of >30 mm, e.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Our method of quantifying pressure pain thresholds, electrical pain thresholds, and CPM can be successfully applied in a clinical context given its short duration (~20 minutes). We have previously shown that pressure pain values obtained early after surgery may be of value in predicting persistent pain at long term follow-up in the context of breast cancer surgery8. While electrical pain thresholds CPM were not predictive of persistent pain in our study, others have shown that these measures may b.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interests or any financial interests to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients who participated in the study presented in the 'Representative results' section.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
BedN/AN/AAny type of hospital bed or medical exam table
DeskN/AN/AAny type of commercially available desk
Office chairN/AN/AAny type of commercially available office chair
Force FPX 50 Pressure algometerWagner Instruments, Greenwich, CT, USAN/APressure algometer with a 1.0 cm2 circular tip to deliver pressure to perform pressure pain threshold measurements
Desktop computerN/AN/AAny type of commercially available Windows computer to run QST-IV Stimulus Manager software on to control the QST-IV stimulator
QST-IV Stimulus ManagerEmbedded Control BV, Ruurlo, the NetherlandsN/ASoftware to control the settings of QST-IV electrical stimulator
QST-IV Electrical StimulatorEmbedded Control BV, Ruurlo, the NetherlandsN/AElectrical quantitative sensory testing device with a patient operated switch. Device used to deliver electrical current to perform the electrical threshold measurements
VAS SliderEmbedded Control BV, Ruurlo, the NetherlandsN/AThe VAS slider consists of a box with a mobile lever on a horizontal bar that represents the VAS and is connected to the QST-IV.
Kendall H34SG 50 x 45 mmCovidien, Mansfield, USAN/ASelf-adhesive skin electrodes to apply to the measurement points on the skin to deliver electrical stimualtion
Crushed IceN/AN/AIce generated by ice machine to cool water sufficiently for the cold pressor test
BucketN/AN/AAny type of commercially available 10 L bucket
Surgical skin markerCovidien, Mansfield, USAN/AAny type of commercially available surgical skin marker
StopwatchN/AN/AAny type of commercially available stopwatch
Measurement formN/AN/AScore form provided in the manuscript
PencilN/AN/AAny type of commercially available pencil
ThermometerN/AN/AThermometer to measure water temperature of ice water
RulerN/AN/AAny type of commercially available ruler

References

  1. Macrae, W. A. Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on. Br J Anaesth. 101 (1), 77-86 (2008).
  2. IASP Taxonomy Working Group. Classification of Chronic Pain. , (2011).
  3. Kehlet, H., Jensen, T. S., Woolf, C. J. ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Pain Threshold AnalysisElectrical Detection ThresholdElectrical Pain ThresholdPressure Pain ThresholdConditioned Pain ModulationVisual Analog ScalePersistent Postsurgical PainCentral Pain Processing