$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Although numerous relevant techniques have been developed in recent years, bone reconstruction remains limited by multiple constraints, and estimating the extent of necessary reconstruction is often impossible. Hard-tissue augmentation is required to achieve both esthetic and functional goals in addition to a favorable long-term success rate. Methods commonly used for such procedures include autogenous and allogenic bone grafting, xenografting, and alloplastic bone grafting. Among the various types of bone graft, autogenous bone grafts are considered the most effective. However, donor site morbidity, compromised vascularity, and limited tissue availability1 have been major drawbacks for autogenous bone grafting. In addition, allogenic bone grafts and xenografts have been associated with disease transmission. Currently, synthetic bone grafts are widely used to resolve these problems. However, with their lack of osteogenic potential, clinical outcomes have varied widely. Materials such as cellulose are associated with volume fluctuation, infection, and a lack of strength.
Bone augmentation using tissue engineering has generated considerable interest. In this technique, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are initially used to promote osteoblast differentiation, which are then transplanted to the site of bone loss to achieve bone repair. This procedure is currently applied in cell therapy. Achieving bone reconstruction by extracting a limited amount of tissue is simpler and less invasive compared with other methods.
The potential role of MSCs as a tool for cell-based therapies aimed at dental regeneration is an emerging interest among various research groups. Studies have confirmed that MSCs can be differentiated from the following types of tissue: bone marrow, adipose, synovial membrane, pericyte, trabecular bone, human umbilical cord, and dental tissues2,3. Common sources of MSCs include bone marrow, adipose tissue, and dental tissues. Compared with MSCs derived from adipose tissue and bone marrow, the advantages of dental stem cells are easy accessibility and less morbidity after harvesting. Compared with embryonic stem cells, MSCs derived from dental tissue appear nonimmunogenic and are not associated with complex ethical concerns3.
In 2006, the International Society for Cellular Therapy recommended using the following standards to identify MSCs: First, MSCs must be capable of attaching to plastic. Second, MSCs must be positive for the surface antigens CD105, CD73, and CD90 and negative for the markers for monocytes, macrophages, and B cells in addition to the hematopoietic antigens CD45 and CD344. As a final criterion, MSCs must be able to differentiate into the following three types of cells under standard conditions of in vitro differentiation: osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes4. To date, six types of human dental stem cell have been isolated and characterized. The first type was isolated from human pulp tissue and termed postnatal dental pulp stem cells5. Subsequently, three additional types of dental MSCs have been isolated and characterized: stem cells from exfoliated deciduous teeth6, the periodontal ligament7, and the apical papilla8. More recently, dental follicle-derived9, gingival tissue-derived10, dental bud stem cells(DBSCs)11, and periapical cyst MSCs (hPCy-MSCs)12 have also been identified.
Friedenstein was the first to define MSCs13. MSCs exhibit a high proliferation potential and can be manipulated to differentiate before being transplanted, which suggests that they are ideal candidates for regenerative procedures10.
Although most studies have used bone marrow as a source of stem cells, periosteum-derived cells (PDCs) have also been used recently14. The periosteum is more easily accessible than is the bone marrow. Therefore, in this technique, we use alveolar periosteum to eliminate the need for additional incisions during surgery and to reduce postsurgical morbidity in patients. The periosteum is the connective tissue that forms the outer lining of long bones and comprises two distinct layers: the outer fibrous layer composed of fibroblasts, collagen, and elastic fibers15, and the inner cell-rich cambium layer in direct contact with the bone surface. The cambium layer contains a mixed cell population, primarily fibroblasts16, osteoblasts17, pericytes18, and a critical subpopulation identified as MSCs19,20,21. Most studies have reported that PDCs are comparable, if not superior, to bone marrow-derived stem cells (bMSCs) in bone healing and regeneration22,23,24. The periosteum is easily accessible and exhibits excellent regenerative effectiveness. However, few studies have focused on the periosteum25,26,27.
Regarding bone repair, the current clinical practice involves the transplantation of periosteal progenitor cells amplified within supportive scaffolds. Recent studies have focused on acquiring stem cells in defective regions and employing progenitor cells for tissue regeneration20. Dentists also anticipate future application of periodontal bone regeneration in periodontal treatments and dental implants. Regarding the donor site, the periosteum can be easily harvested by general dental surgeons. This compares favorably against marrow stromal cells, as the periosteum can be accessed during routine oral surgery. Thus, the objective of this study is to establish a protocol for harvesting PDCs and to assess the morphology, attachment, viability, and proliferation of human periosteum stem cells.
Vitamin D metabolites affect the in vivo bone-mineral dynamic equilibrium. One study reported that the 24R,25-(OH)2D3 active form of Vitamin D is essential for the osteoblastic differentiation of human MSCs (hMSCs)28. Bone homeostasis and repair are regulated by a network of Vitamin D3 metabolites, of which 1,25-(OH)2D3 (calcitriol) is the most biologically active and relevant in the regulation of bone health. Vitamin D3 is essential for calcification29. In one study using 2-d-old Kunming white mice, the embryoid bodies in the mice indicated that Vitamin C and Vitamin D supplements effectively promoted the differentiation of ESC-derived osteoblasts30. Among its other biological activities, 1,25-(OH)2D3 stimulates the in vitro differentiation of hMSCs to osteoblasts, which can be monitored based on the increase in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) enzyme activity or OCN gene expression.
Few studies have detected a dose-response relationship of combined treatments with Vitamin C and 1,25-(OH)2D3 in human PDCs with a particular focus on bone tissue engineering. Therefore, in this study, we examine the optimal concentrations for single or combined treatment of 1,25-(OH)2D3 and Vitamin C for inducing osteogenic differentiation of human PDCs. The goal of this protocol is to determine whether a cell population isolated from the dental alveolar periosteum contains cells with an MSC phenotype and whether these cells can be expanded in culture (in vitro) and differentiated to form the desired tissue. In addition, we evaluate the ability of PDCs to differentiate into osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. The second part of the study evaluates the effects of Vitamin C and 10−10, 10−9, 10−8, and 10−7 M 1,25-(OH)2D3 on the osteogenic activity of PDCs. The primary objective of this study is to assess the functions of Vitamin C and 1,25-(OH)2D3 during the osteoblastic differentiation of PDCs by ALP activity, and pro-osteogenic genes, such as ALP, collagen-1, OCN, BSP, and CBFA1. In addition, this study determines the optimal osteoinductive conditions for human PDCs based on these findings.