Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification on Non-gated Computed Tomography Scans

Summary

Here, we present a protocol to reliably and systematically identify coronary artery calcification (CAC) on non-gated computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest or abdomen. CAC provides an objective measure of coronary artery disease for both research and clinical purposes.

Abstract

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) provides an objective measure of coronary artery disease and can readily be identified on non-gated computed tomography (CT) scans with a high correlation with gated cardiac CT scans. This standardized protocol takes a step-wise approach to not only optimizing an image for the identification of calcification but also to distinguishing CAC from other common causes of calcification in the cardiac silhouette. Recognition of CAC on non-gated CT scans helps to identify a very powerful prognostic factor that can influence therapeutic interventions or downstream diagnostic testing without requiring a gated cardiac scan. These non-gated CT scans are often acquired as part of the routine care of the patient, and this data is readily available without another dose of ionizing radiation. This protocol allows for the precise and accurate extraction of this data for the purposes of retrospective data analysis in clinical research studies, but also in the clinical evaluation and management of patients.

Introduction

Coronary artery disease is a predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events. CAC on CT scans provides objective evidence of coronary artery disease and may identify previously undiagnosed patients. In addition, CAC has a significant prognostic value. Specifically, the absence of CAC on gated cardiac CT scans identifies a patient population that has a low risk for subsequent cardiovascular events in many different subsets of patients, including patients presenting with cardiac symptoms, as well as asymptomatic patients^1,2. With ~70 million CT scans performed in the United States and the usage rising, and approximately 11 - 12 million of those scans being CT scans of the chest, the potential for identification of CAC in a large number of patients remains high³. However, the majority of the CT scans of the chest performed in that analysis are not dedicated cardiac CT scans. Dedicated cardiac CT scans have standardized slice thickness, acquisition protocols, electrocardiographic (ECG) gating to minimize cardiac motion, and reconstruction protocols. There is also a standardized quantitation for gated cardiac CT scans using the Agatston score. The Agatston scoring system has been well validated and associated with clinical outcomes^1,2.

CAC can be readily identified on these non-gated CT scans but is often overlooked⁴. Good correlation has been demonstrated between CAC identified on non-gated CT scans and Agatston scores obtained from gated CT scans (> 90% in pooled analysis)^5,6,7,8,9,10. In non-gated CT scans, the presence of CAC has been associated with worse clinical outcomes; whereas, the absence is linked to morbidity and mortality benefits^{10,11,12,13,14,15}.

While different studies have looked at the prognosis of CAC on non-gated studies, there has been limited published data on how best to identify CAC. There have been attempts to identify an automated approach to the identification of CAC in low-dose CT chests scans done for lung cancer screening purposes; however, the translation of this to other study protocols is extremely limited¹⁶. The introduction of differential CT scanners, protocols, and contrast (both timing and amount) limits the application of this automated approach. Attempts by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and the Society of Thoracic Radiology to promote the standard reporting of CAC on all CT chests have been met with mixed results¹⁷. While offering a general framework in this guideline document, the specifics of the identification of coronary calcification, especially for providers who do not routinely visualize coronary anatomy, are limited. Also, strategies specific to abdominal CT scans, contrasted studies, and adjudicating challenging cases are not addressed. Many studies publish their own inter- and intra-observer reproducibility for the protocol they used; however, there is not a standard approach used across different studies.

The ability to consistently and reliably identify CAC on these non-gated CT scans allows for the retrospective and prospective observational investigation of CAC in predicting cardiovascular outcomes in many different conditions. However, there needs to be a standard approach taken to identifying CAC on non-gated CT scans to ensure the reproducibility of the results, as well as a consistency in training to help in clinical practice.

Protocol

This protocol follows guidelines set forth by the Institutional Review Board and human subject research protocol of the University of Kentucky.

1. Opening the Image Viewer

1. Open the image viewer used at the institution where the research is being conducted. Double-click on the desktop icon to open the viewer.
2. Log in using an institutional username and password.

2. Identifying the Appropriate Patient

1. Click on the Study List icon in the toolbar.
2. Under the Search Criteria drop-down list, choose the option labeled With Patient ID Equal To.
3. Enter the patient's hospital identification number.
4. Under Modalities, click on All Modalities to unselect all the imaging modalities.
   1. Click on CT to select this modality.
5. Under Body Regions, leave the default to All Body Regions.
6. Then, click with the mouse on Find.

3. Identifying the Optimal Study

1. Click on Performed on to organize the list by the date of study.
2. Then, click on the study of interest.
   NOTE: The optimal study is a CT chest (either with or without contrast). When multiple studies are available, use the CT scan that can visualize the entire coronary tree closest to the index time point (for retrospective data analysis) or the most recent CT scan (for clinical purposes).

4. Identifying Optimal Image Series

1. Click with the mouse on the tile icon in the top-right corner of the screen and highlight a single tile. Click to make the screen a single pane.
2. Hover over the series icon on the top row of images to identify the series that has a 3 mm slice thickness (or the closest to 3 mm).
3. Click and hold the left mouse button, drag this icon to the center of the viewing screen, and release the left mouse button.
4. Use the center mouse scroll bar (or, alternatively, hold the left mouse button and drag to the right) to scroll through images and ensure an adequate visualization of the coronary tree.

5. Optimizing the Images to Highlight Calcification

1. Scroll through the images until an image where one of the coronary arteries is visualized.
2. Right-click and select the Window/Level option.
3. Click on Interactive W/L.
4. As a starting point, type in 500 in the W (window) field.
5. As a starting point, type in 150 in the L (level) field.
   NOTE: The goal of adjusting the window and level settings is to optimize the contrast between epicardial fat [usually the lowest Hounsfield unit (HU) in the cardiac silhouette], cardiac chambers, and calcification or metallic structures (usually the highest HU). CT scans with contrast that use lower kV often require the highest level (often > 250 HU) and the largest window (often > 1,000 HU). For "low-dose" CT scans (low mAs) without contrast, would use a slightly lower level (0 - 150 HU).
6. Manually adjust the window by holding down the left mouse button on the horizontal slide bar and moving it right and left (moving the scroll bar to the right increases the window).
7. Manually adjust the level by holding down the left mouse button on the vertical slide bar and moving it up and down (moving the scroll bar up increases the level).
   NOTE: The goal is to adjust the window and level to achieve the following: fat, including epicardial fat, should be dark gray to black; myocardium should be a slightly lighter gray; and calcium and metal should be white.
8. Click on Close to close the window and level box and begin viewing the images.

6. Identifying Coronary Artery Calcification

1. Use the center scroll ball on the mouse to scroll up and down the series of images, looking at one coronary at a time.
2. Mark (on a separate document, spreadsheet, etc.) whether coronary artery calcification is present or absent in each of the four major epicardial coronary arteries (Figure 1).
   NOTE: CAC is deemed as present in the left anterior descending artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCx), or right coronary artery (RCA) if it is seen in the vessel itself or in its branches.

7. Techniques for Identifying Subtle Areas of Calcification

1. Identify an area of questionable coronary artery calcification.
2. Right-click on the screen to bring up the menu.
3. Click on Annotate.
4. Then, click on Elliptical ROI.
5. Click and hold down the left mouse button on the area of calcification and move it down and to the right to create a circle or ellipse large enough to cover the area of calcification.
   ​NOTE: Make sure the region of interest (ROI) is large enough to cover the entire area of potential calcification and some epicardial fat, but small enough to not include other chambers (especially those with contrast). The software will then provide the minimum, maximum, and average HU in the area without the region of interest.
   1. Click and hold the left mouse button in the center of the region of interest to move it if necessary.
   2. Click and hold the left mouse button on the corners of the region of interest to adjust the size if necessary.
6. Repeat steps 7.5 - 7.5.2 to create another region of interest over the sternum, the bright bony structure at the top of the screen.
7. Repeat steps 7.5 - 7.5.2 to create another region of interest over the ascending aorta.
8. Compare the maximum HU in the area of potential calcification to the maximum HU in the ascending aorta and the sternum.
   NOTE: Classify an area as coronary artery calcification if it is more than 2 standard deviations away from the maximum HU in the ascending aorta. Coronary artery calcification should have a maximum HU closer to the maximum HU in the sternum than the maximum HU in the ascending aorta (Figure 2).

8. Distinguishing Coronary Artery Calcification from Other Sources of Calcification

1. To open the post-processing software, left click on Windows' start button and then click on the post-processing software. Now, log in using an institutional username and password.
2. To open the study and series, type in either the Patient ID or the Patient Name in the appropriate field in the search options at the top right of the screen. Then, uncheck Date 1.
   1. Now, click on Update Study List and then perform a single click on the desired study from the results list at the top left of the screen.
   2. In the Series List below, click on the series that has the 3 mm slice thickness in the label.
3. Click and hold the center mouse scroll bar on one of the images and move the mouse up to zoom in so the arteries can be visualized well.
4. Click and hold the left mouse button on the center of each of the crosshairs to move them over the center of the area of calcification in question.
5. Click and hold the left mouse button on the marker on the crosshairs to be able to rotate the other two images. Continue to watch the other two images until the adjacent structure of interest is well visualized.
   NOTE: The 3 areas that are most often confused for coronary artery calcification include aortic wall calcification as RCA or left main artery (LM) calcification, mitral annular calcification (mistaken for LCx calcification) or tricuspid annular calcification (mistaken for RCA calcification), and pericardial calcification. Coronary arteries are surrounded by epicardial fat, whereas these other adjacent structures are not.

Results

Coronary anatomy is relatively predictable in most patients as described above. The typical locations to evaluate these vessels are also easily identified in most patients (Figure 1). Using the described methodology, the presence or absence of CAC could be reliably identified in 84% of the patients in a single cohort (267 of 317 possible patients)¹⁵. The vast majority of patients excluded did not have a CT scan in the designated time f...

Discussion

The identification of CAC is an extremely powerful prognostic tool with an ever-growing body of literature supporting its use in many different clinical scenarios. The majority of the literature is focused on gated cardiac CT scans for the identification of CAC, but there is robust evidence of both the correlation of CAC on non-gated CT scans, as well as the prognostic ability of this finding. Given the CT scan utilization in the United States, as well as the ever-growing concerns about radiation exposure, the ability to...

Materials

List of materials used in this article

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard	PowerEdge R730	8F8KFB2	Server specifications for post-processing software: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 v3 @ 1.90GHz Intel(R) Xeon®CPU E5-2609 v3 @ 1.90GHz
Intuition	Terarecon	4.4.12.xxx	Post-processing software
McKesson Radiology Viewing Station	McKesson	Station Lite Version 1.0.0.182	IP version 8.0.31.0
Computer Desktop and Monitor: Optiplex 9030 AIO	Dell	Optiplex 9030 AIO	Processor: Intel  Core i5-4590S CPU @ 3.00 GHz, 3001Mhz, 4 Cores, 4 Logical Processors