This protocol describes a technique using mouse splenocytes to discover pathogen-associated molecular patterns that alter molecular clock gene expression.
Method Article
This protocol describes a technique using mouse splenocytes to discover pathogen-associated molecular patterns that alter molecular clock gene expression.
From behavior to gene expression, circadian rhythms regulate nearly all aspects of physiology. Here, we present a methodology to challenge mouse splenocytes with the pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) lipopolysaccharide (LPS), ODN1826, and heat-killed Listeria monocytogenes and examine their effect on the molecular circadian clock. Previously, studies have focused on examining the influence of LPS on the molecular clock using a variety of in vivo and ex vivo approaches from an assortment of models (e.g., mouse, rat, and human). This protocol describes the isolation and challenge of splenocytes, as well as the methodology to assess clock gene expression post-challenge via quantitative PCR. This approach can be used to assess not only the influence of microbial components on the molecular clock but other molecules as well that may alter expression of the clock. This approach could be utilized to tease apart the molecular mechanism of how PAMP-Toll-like receptor interaction influences clock expression.
The master clock in mammals, which orchestrates 24 h oscillations for nearly all aspects of physiology and behavior, is located within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus1,2. In addition to regulating biological processes on an organismal level, the master clock also synchronizes peripheral cellular clocks throughout the body3,4,5. While the molecular clock machinery consists of at least three interlocking transcriptional-translational feedback loops, the core is comprised of the Period (Per1-3), Cryptochrome (Cry1-2), Bmal1, and Clock genes6,7. Besides maintaining the accurate timing of the core molecular clock, some ancillary clock gene products (e.g., Rev-erbα and Dbp) also regulate expression of non-clock genes, i.e., clock controlled genes (CCGs)6,7.
Functional molecular clocks have been described in various immune tissues (e.g., spleen and lymph nodes)8 and cells (e.g., B cells, dendritic cells, macrophages)8,9. These cells detect and respond to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), conserved microbial components, via innate immune recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs)10. To date, 13 functional TLRs have been described, which recognize microbial constituents such as bacterial cell wall components, flagellar protein, and microbial nucleic acids10. The PAMP, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a cell wall component of gram-negative bacteria recognized by TLR4, has been shown to alter circadian rhythms at the both organismal and molecular levels. For example, in vivo challenge of LPS induced photic-like phase delays as measured by activity in mice11 and led to reduced clock gene expression in the SCN and liver as determined by in situ hybridization and quantitative PCR, respectively, in rats12. After an in vivo challenge with LPS, analysis of human peripheral blood leukocytes13 and subcutaneous adipose tissue14 revealed altered expression of several clock genes as measured via qPCR. Lastly, ex vivo LPS challenges of human macrophages and mouse peritoneal macrophages, also led to altered clock expression as measured by qPCR14.
Here, we describe a protocol to assess the influence of the PAMPs LPS, ODN1826 (synthetic oligonucleotides containing unmethylated CpG motifs), and heat-killed Listeria monocytogenes (HKLM), recognized by TLR4, TLR9, and TLR2, respectively, on molecular clock gene expression in mouse splenocytes. The protocol includes mouse splenectomy, splenocyte isolation and challenge, RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and qPCR to assess expression of several clock genes. This protocol allows for the timely acquisition of a large number of immune cells with very little animal or cellular manipulation, which can then be challenged ex vivo with various PAMPs. The molecular clock has been shown to modulate various aspects of the immune response8,15,16, therefore, disruption of the molecular clock would most likely impair the proper time-dependent variation of the immune response. In addition, since disruptions of circadian rhythms can lead to serious pathologies17,18,19,20, it may be of interest for researchers to challenge splenocytes with a wide range of molecules and assess their influence on the clock.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
During the study, animal care and treatment complied with National Institutes of Health policy, were in accordance with institutional guidelines, and were approved by the University of Hartford Animal Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
1. Entrainment of Animals
NOTE: Twenty week-old male B6129SF2/J mice are used in the study.
2. Preparation of Instruments, Culture Medium, and Challenge Medium
3. Splenocyte Isolation and Challenge
4. RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis
5. Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)
6. Statistical Analysis
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Mice were sacrificed at ZT13, splenocytes were isolated and challenged ex vivo with the PAMPs LPS, ODN1826, or HKLM. After 3 h, RNA was isolated, and qPCR was used to assess relative expression levels of the molecular clock genes Clock, Per2, Dbp, and Rev-erbα compared to unchallenged control cells. After PAMP challenge, Clock expression levels were not significantly different than expression in the control cells (...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Within this protocol, a microvolume spectrophotometer can be used to quantify and assess the purity of the RNA being used in determining gene expression. Nucleic acids absorb UV light at 260 nm, proteins typically absorb light at 280 nm, while other potential contaminants used during an RNA extraction procedure (e.g., phenol) are detectable at 230 nm. Therefore, by assessing the absorbance (A) ratio at 260/280 nm (RNA to protein) and 260/230 nm (RNA to non-protein contaminants) the quality of the RNA can be asse...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The author has nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by Faculty Research grants from the College of Arts and Sciences Dean's Office at the University of Hartford.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frosted slides | Fisher | 12-550-343 | |
| Cell strainers | Fisher | 22363547 | |
| Lipopolysaccharide | InvivoGen | ltrl-eklps | |
| ODN1826 | InvivoGen | Tlrl-1826-1 | |
| HKLM | InvivoGen | Tlrl-hklm | |
| RPMI 1640 | Gibco | 11875-093 | |
| PBS | Gibco | 20012-043 | |
| RNeasy Mini Kit | Qiagen | 74104 or 74106 | |
| RNase-Free DNase Set | Qiagen | 79254 | |
| 6-well cell culture plate | Denville | T1006 | |
| 50 mL tubes | Corning | 352070 | |
| 15 mL tubes | Corning | 352097 | |
| High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit | ThermoFisher | 4368814 | |
| TaqMan Gene Expression Assays b-actin | ThermoFisher | Mm00607939_s1 | |
| TaqMan Gene Expression Assays Per2 | ThermoFisher | Mm00478113_m1 | |
| TaqMan Gene Expression Assays Rev-erba | ThermoFisher | Mm00520708_m1 | |
| TaqMan Gene Expression Assays Bmal1 | ThermoFisher | Mm00500226_m1 | |
| TaqMan Gene Expression Assays Dbp | ThermoFisher | Mm00497539_m1 | |
| qPCR machine StepOnePlus | ThermoFisher | ||
| TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix | ThermoFisher | 4369016 | |
| MicroAmp Fast 96-well reaction plate (0.1 mL) | ThermoFisher | 4346907 | |
| Statistical Analysis Software | Prism 7.0a |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission