Erratum: The Preparation of Electrohydrodynamic Bridges from Polar Dielectric Liquids

DOI:

10.3791/5806

Not Published

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

An erratum was issued for The Preparation of Electrohydrodynamic Bridges from Polar Dielectric Liquids. Figure 3 was updated because it had an incorrect representation of the power used in an operating bridge.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

An erratum was issued for The Preparation of Electrohydrodynamic Bridges from Polar Dielectric Liquids. Figure 3 was updated because it had an incorrect representation of the power used in an operating bridge.

Figure 3 has been updated from:

Floating water bridge, characteristic curves graph; current vs. voltage relationship; threshold analysis.
Figure 3. Characteristic curves for a liquid water bridge. The current-voltage relationship for liquid water bridges at 0, 5, 10, 15 mm separation distance is plotted. A lower threshold below which no liquid bridge will form (see inset photo at lower left), and an upper threshold above which bridges are unstable (inset photos 1-4) bound the region of stability. For most bridges with some measureable extension (i.e. ≥ 5 mm) the total power dissipation lies between 10 and 20 watts. The rupture of a bridge beyond the upper threshold will often follow a sequence of events progressing from normal operation (inset 1), to leaking (inset 2), sagging (inset 3), and finally rupture (inset 4).

to:

Floating water bridge graph with current vs. voltage, diagram showing threshold curves and stability images.
Figure 3. Characteristic curves for a liquid water bridge. The current-voltage relationship for liquid water bridges at 0, 5, 10, 15 mm separation distance is plotted. A lower threshold below which no liquid bridge will form (see inset photo at lower left), and an upper threshold above which bridges are unstable (inset photos 1-4) bound the region of stability.  Power dissipation is a tunable parameter where longer bridges have a more narrow tuning range than shorter bridges. The rupture of a bridge beyond the upper threshold will often follow a sequence of events progressing from normal operation (inset 1), to leaking (inset 2), sagging (inset 3), and finally rupture (inset 4).

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

An erratum was issued for The Preparation of Electrohydrodynamic Bridges from Polar Dielectric Liquids. Figure 3 was updated because it had an incorrect representation of the power used in an operating bridge.

Figure 3 has been updated from:

Floating water bridge, characteristic curves graph; current vs. voltage relationship; threshold analysis.
Figure 3. Characteristic curves for a liquid water bridge. The current-voltage relationship for liquid water bridges at 0, 5, 10, 15 mm separation distance is plotted. A lower threshold below which no liquid bridge will form (see inset photo at lower left), and an upper threshold above which bridges are unstable (inset photos 1-4) bound the region of stability. For most bridges with some measureable extension (i.e. ≥ 5 mm) the total power dissipation lies between 10 and 20 watts. The rupture of a bridge beyond the upper threshold will often follow a sequence of events progressing from normal operation (inset 1), to leaking (inset 2), sagging (inset 3), and finally rupture (inset 4).

to:

Floating water bridge graph with current vs. voltage, diagram showing threshold curves and stability images.
Figure 3. Characteristic curves for a liquid water bridge. The current-voltage relationship for liquid water bridges at 0, 5, 10, 15 mm separation distance is plotted. A lower threshold below which no liquid bridge will form (see inset photo at lower left), and an upper threshold above which bridges are unstable (inset photos 1-4) bound the region of stability.  Power dissipation is a tunable parameter where longer bridges have a more narrow tuning range than shorter bridges. The rupture of a bridge beyond the upper threshold will often follow a sequence of events progressing from normal operation (inset 1), to leaking (inset 2), sagging (inset 3), and finally rupture (inset 4).

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
No conflicts of interest declared.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Electrohydrodynamic BridgesPolar Dielectric LiquidsLiquid Water BridgeCurrent Voltage RelationshipThreshold AnalysisPower DissipationBridge StabilityBridge RuptureSeparation DistanceFloating Water Bridge