Method Article

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis

DOI:

10.3791/58214

January 7th, 2019

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Here, we present an elaborate and efficient protocol to treat isolated short bulbar or posterior urethral strictures with vessel-sparing excision and primary anastomosis.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Urethroplasty is considered to be the standard treatment for urethral strictures since it provides excellent long-term success rates. For isolated short bulbar or posterior urethral strictures, urethroplasty by excision and primary anastomosis (EPA) is recommended. As EPA only requires the excision of the narrowed segment and the surrounding spongiofibrosis, a full-thickness transection of the corpus spongiosum, as performed in the traditional transecting EPA (tEPA), is usually unnecessary. Jordan et al. introduced the idea of a vessel-sparing approach in 2007, aiming to reduce surgical trauma, especially to the dual arterial blood supply of the urethra, and, thus, potentially reducing the risk of postoperative erectile dysfunction or glans ischemia. This approach could also be beneficial for subsequent urethral interventions such as redo urethroplasty using a free graft, in which a well-vascularized graft bed is imperative. Nevertheless, these potential benefits are only assumptions as prospective studies comparing the functional outcome of both techniques with validated questionnaires are currently lacking. Moreover, vessel-sparing EPA (vsEPA) should at least be able to provide similar surgical outcomes as tEPA. The aim of this paper is to give an elaborate, step-by-step overview of how to manage patients with isolated short bulbar or posterior urethral strictures with vsEPA. The main objective of this manuscript is to outline the surgical technique and to report the representative surgical outcome. A total of 117 patients were managed according to the described protocol. The analysis was performed on the entire patient cohort and on the bulbar (n = 91) and posterior (n = 26) vsEPA group separately. Success rates were 93.4% and 88.5% for the bulbar and posterior vsEPA, respectively. To conclude, vsEPA, as outlined in the protocol, provides excellent success rates with low complication rates for isolated short bulbar and posterior urethral strictures.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Urethroplasty is considered the standard treatment for urethral strictures as it provides excellent long-term success rates1,2. A numerous amount of surgical techniques has been described, challenging the reconstructive urologist to choose the best approach, considering various stricture modalities such as the number of strictures, the stricture length, the stricture location, the etiology, comorbidities, and previous urethral interventions. For isolated short bulbar urethral strictures, the International Consultation on Urologic Diseases (ICUD) recommends urethroplasty by excision and primary anastomosis (EPA....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

All patients provided a signed written informed consent and the approval of the local Ethics Committee (EC/2014/0438) was obtained.

NOTE: The inclusion criteria for the presented protocol were: male; age ≥18 years; signed written informed consent; fit for operation; isolated urethral stricture; urethral stricture ≤3 cm; urethral stricture only at the bulbar or membranous site. The exclusion criteria were: female; transgender; age <18 years; absence of signed written informed consent; unfit for operation; >1 concomitant urethral strictures; urethral stricture >3 cm; urethral stricture outside of the b....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Between 2011 and 2017, a total of 117 patients with isolated short bulbar (n = 91) or posterior (n = 26) urethral strictures were treated with vsEPA at Ghent University Hospital. The baseline characteristics are displayed in Table 1. The median follow-up was 35 and 45 months for bulbar and posterior strictures, respectively. The strictures were longer in the patients who underwent posterior vsEPA and, accordingly, the number of patients with a calculated.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Urethral stricture repair by vessel-sparing excision and primary anastomosis was initially performed at Ghent University Hospital in 2010. Thereafter, it became a standard of practice in the hospital's management of patients with isolated short bulbar or posterior urethral strictures. As the bulb remains attached to the perineal body, access to the posterior urethra and the resection of the fibrotic tissue at that site can be compromised. A distortion of the pubic rami due to a pelvic fracture might further impede ac.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have no acknowledgments.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
iso-Betadine Dermicum 125 mL (1)Meda PharmaA-472825
Sterile gown (3)According to surgeon's preferenceNA
Sterile gloves (3 pairs)According to surgeon's preferenceNA
Sterile drapes (4)MedlineAGBBA073A
Bard-Parker scalpel number 3 (1)Zepf Medical Instruments06-1003-00
Bard-Parker scalpel number 4 (1)KLS Martin Group10-100-04
Scalpel blade number 15 (1)Swann-Morton0205
Scalpel blade number 24 (1)Swann-Morton0211
Surgical forceps 14 cm (2)KLS Martin Group12-301-14
Monopolar electrocauter Valleylab  (1)MedtronicE2100
Electrocauter blade 15 cm (1)ComepaCO 150i
Debakey forceps 20 cm (2)Düfner06232-20
3-layered compress 30 cm x 45 cm (5)Mölnlycke Health Care175260
Surgical compress 10 cm x 10 cm (10)Hartmann232088
Mayo-Hegar needle driver 18 cm (1)Zepf Medical Instruments24-1804-18
Mayo-Hegar needle driver 25 cm (1)Zepf Medical Instruments24-1804-25
Jones scissor 18 cm (1)Düfner04940-18
Mayo-Stille scissor 17 cm (1)Zepf Medical Instruments08-1700-17
Lone Star retractor (1)CooperSurgical, Trumbull, CT, USA72403867
Lone Star elastic stays (4)CooperSurgical, Trumbull, CT, USA3311-1G
Vessel loop 45 cm (1)Braun1095137
Halsted-Mosquito (6)KLS Martin Group13-317-21
20Fr silicone urethral catheter (1)Yushin Medical Co.1037B-20
3Fr ureteral catheter (1)Teleflex223602
20Fr metal sound (1)Custom madeNA
Vicryl 4-0 wire (6)EthiconV734D
Vicryl 3-0 wire (2)EthiconVCP316H
Vicryl Rapide 3-0  wire (1)EthiconVF2260
10Fr Drain needle (1)Vygon658.10
10Fr Suction drain (1)Oriplast203102
Vacuum flask 400 mL (1)Oriplast213215AL/QL
Zetuvit 10 cm x 20 cm (1)Hartmann413771

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Hampson, L. A., McAninch, J. W., Breyer, B. N. Male urethral strictures and their management. Nature Reviews Urology. 11 (1), 43-50 (2014).
  2. Andrich, D. E., Mundy, A. R. What is the Best Technique for Urethroplasty? European Urology. 54 (5), 1031-1041 (2008).
  3. Chapple, C., ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Vessel sparing ExcisionPrimary AnastomosisUrethral StrictureBulbar UrethraPosterior UrethraSurgical TechniqueVessel LoopStay SuturesUrethral CatheterSuccess Rates

Related Articles