$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
With the increasing use of CT scans of the chest for diagnostic and screening purposes1, there is an increased detection of subcentimeter pulmonary nodules requiring diagnostic evaluation2. Percutaneous and/or transbronchial biopsy have been successfully used to sample indeterminate and high-risk nodules. These lesions often make for challenging targets due to their distal parenchymal location and small size3. When indicated, surgical excision of these lesions should be performed, using a lung-sparing resection via minimally invasive thoracic surgery (MITS), such as video- or robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS/RATS)4. Even with advances in surgical technique, there remain intra-operative challenges to resection, despite direct visualization of the lung parenchyma during MITS. These challenges are primarily related to difficulties with nodule localization, especially with ground-glass/semisolid nodules, subcentimeter lesions, and those more than 2 cm from the visceral pleura5,6. These challenges are exacerbated during MITS due to a loss of tactile feedback during the procedure and can lead to more invasive surgical methods, including diagnostic lobectomy and/or open thoracotomy5. Many of these issues with intra-operative nodule localization can be mitigated by the use of adjunct nodule localization methods via electromagnetic navigation (EMN) and/or CT-guided localization (CTGL). This protocol will first highlight the benefits of using electromagnetic transthoracic nodule localization (EMTTNL). Secondly, it will delineate in a step-by-step fashion how to replicate the process prior to MITS.
Electromagnetic navigation helps to target peripheral pulmonary lesions by overlapping sensor technology with radiographic images. EMN first consists of using available software to convert CT images of the airway and parenchyma into a virtual roadmap. The patient's chest is then surrounded by an electromagnetic (EM) field within which the exact location of a sensory guide is detected. When a guide instrument (e.g., magnetic navigation [MN]-tracked needle) is placed within the patient's EM field (endobronchial tree or skin surface), the location is superimposed on the virtual roadmap, allowing for navigation to the target lesion identified on the software. EMN can be performed via either transthoracic needle approach or bronchoscopy. EMN bronchoscopy has previously been described for use in both biopsy and fiducial/dye localization7,8,9,10,11. A number of other localization techniques have been developed with varying success rates, including CT-guided fiducial placement, CT-guided injection of dye or radiotracer, intraoperative ultra-sonographic localization, and EMN bronchoscopy12. A recently introduced EMN platform has incorporated an electromagnetically guided transthoracic approach into its workflow. Using the CT roadmap, the system allows the user to define a point of entry on the chest wall surface through which they will pass a tip-tracked EMN-sensed needle guide into the lung parenchyma and lesion in question. Through this needle guide, biopsies and/or nodule localization can then be performed7.
Prior to the EMN localization of nodules for MITS, CTGL using dye marking or fiducial (e.g., microcoils, lipoidal, hook-wire) placement was the primary method employed. A recent meta-analysis of 46 studies of fiducial localization showed high success rates among all three fiducials; however, pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage, and the dislodgement of fiducial markers remained significant complications13. A CT-guided tracer injection with methylene blue has had similar rates of success, but with fewer complications when compared with hook-wire fiducial placement14. One of the primary limitations of using dye for lung nodule localization has been diffusion over time15. Patients undergoing CTGL with dye marking have the localization performed in the radiology suite, followed by transport to the operating room, during which time dye diffusion can occur, making this technique less attractive. Some centers have mitigated this time lapse with the use of hybrid operating rooms with robotic C-arm CTs16,17; however, radiation exposure can be higher with the repeated images and use of fluorosocope15. The use of EMN bronchoscopy allows for peri-operative nodule localization. This, however, has been plagued by prolonged bronchoscopy times and an inability to navigate to those lesions without airway access. EMTTNL allows for a rapid percutaneous nodule localization followed by MITS in one location (i.e., the operating room), therefore decreasing time between the localization and the surgery18. In addition to EMN bronchoscopy, Arias et al. described using EMN for percutaneous biopsy7. An adaptation of this procedure for nodule localization is described below.
A 79-year-old male with a 40 pack-year history of tobacco use and bladder cancer was found to have a new PET fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lung nodule of size 1.0 cm x 1.1 cm in the left lower lobe by surveillance imaging (Figure 1). Given the lesion's size and position, wedge resection was considered challenging and the patient's pulmonary reserve made him a less than ideal candidate for diagnostic lobectomy. It was decided that he would undergo EMTTNL to aid in the MITS resection of the lung nodule.