How to Quantify the Fraction of Photoactivated Fluorescent Proteins in Bulk and in Live Cells

Summary

Here, we present a protocol that involves genetically coupled spectrally distinct photoactivatable and fluorescent proteins. These fluorescent protein chimeras permit quantification of the PA-FP fraction that is photoactivated to be fluorescent, i.e., the photoactivation efficiency. The protocol reveals that different modes of photoactivation yield different photoactivation efficiencies.

Abstract

Photoactivatable and -convertible fluorescent proteins (PA-FPs) have been used in fluorescence live-cell microscopy for analyzing the dynamics of cells and protein ensembles. Thus far, no method has been available to quantify in bulk and in live cells how many of the PA-FPs expressed are photoactivated to fluoresce.

Here, we present a protocol involving internal rulers, i.e., genetically coupled spectrally distinct (photoactivatable) fluorescent proteins, to ratiometrically quantify the fraction of all PA-FPs expressed in a cell that are switched on to be fluorescent. Using this protocol, we show that different modes of photoactivation yielded different photoactivation efficiencies. Short high-power photoactivation with a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) resulted in up to four times lower photoactivation efficiency than hundreds of low-level exposures applied by CLSM or a short pulse applied by widefield illumination. While the protocol has been exemplified here for (PA-)GFP and (PA-)Cherry, it can in principle be applied to any spectrally distinct photoactivatable or photoconvertible fluorescent protein pair and any experimental set-up.

Introduction

In 2002, the first broadly applicable photoactivatable (PA-GFP¹) and photoconvertible (Kaede²) fluorescent proteins were described. These optical highlighter fluorescent proteins change their spectral properties upon irradiation with UV-light, i.e., they become bright (photoactivatable fluorescent proteins, i.e., PA-FPs), or change their color (photoconvertible FPs). To date, several reversible and irreversible photoactivatable and photoconvertible fluorescent proteins have been developed^3,4. In ensemble or bulk studies, optical highlighters have been used to study the dynamics of entire cells or proteins, and the connectivity of subcellular compartments. Furthermore, optical highlighters enabled single-molecule based superresolution imaging techniques such as PALM⁵ and FPALM⁶.

Although the photochemical processes during photoactivation or -conversion have been described for many optical highlighters and even crystallographic structures before and after photoactivation/ -conversion have been made available^7,8, the underlying photophysical mechanism of photoactivation and -conversion is not completely understood. Furthermore, thus far only crude estimates exist of the efficiency of photoactivation and -conversion, that is, the fraction of fluorescent proteins expressed that is actually photoconverted or photoactivated to be fluorescent. In vitro ensemble studies have been reported quantifying the shift in absorption spectra and the amount of native and activated protein in a gel^9,10,11.

Here, we present a protocol involving fluorescent protein chimeras to assess the fraction of photoactivated fluorescent proteins in bulk and in live cells. Whenever working with genetically encoded fluorescent proteins, the absolute amount of protein expressed varies from cell to cell and is unknown. If one cell expressing a PA-FP shows a brighter signal after photoactivation than another cell, it cannot be differentiated if this brighter signal is due to higher expression of the PA-FP or a more efficient photoactivation of the PA-FP. To standardize the expression level in cells, we introduce internal rulers of genetically coupled spectrally distinct fluorescent proteins. By coupling the genetic information of a photoactivatable fluorescent protein to a spectrally distinct always-on fluorescent proteins, internal rulers are created that will still be expressed to an unknown total amount but in a fixed and known relative amount of 1:1. This strategy allows the quantitative characterization of different UV-light photoactivation schemes, i.e., the assessment of the relative amount of PA-FPs that can be photoactivated with different modes of photoactivation, and thereby permits to define photoactivation schemes that are more effective than others. Furthermore, this strategy allows in principle the assessment of the absolute quantification of the photoactivated PA-FP fraction. To this end, it is important to realize that the presented ensemble studies are intensity-based which makes the analysis more complex as laid out in this protocol. Parameters determining the measured fluorescent intensity, i.e., different molecular brightness, absorbance and emission spectra and FRET effects, need to be considered when comparing fluorescence intensities of different fluorescent proteins.

The presented ratiometric intensity-based quantification of photoactivation efficiency is exemplified for PA-GFP and PA-Cherry in live cells, but is in principle broadly applicable and can be used for any photoactivatable fluorescent protein under any experimental condition.

Protocol

1. Plasmid Construction

1. Generate two-color fusion probes. Use a mammalian cell expression vector (see Table of Materials) in which mCherry1¹² and PA-mCherry1¹³ have been inserted with the restriction sites AgeI and BsrGI.
2. Order custom oligo-nucleotides to amplify the monomeric variants of eGFP and PA-eGFP containing the A206K mutation, i.e., mEGFP and PA-mEGFP¹⁴ without a stop codon as a SalI-BamHI fragment. Use the N-terminal primer 5’-AAT TAA CAG TCG ACG ATG GTG AGC AAG GGC GAG G 3’ and the C-terminal primer 5’-AAT ATA TGG ATC CCG CTT GTA CAG CTC GTC CAT GC 3’ and insert this SalI-BamHI fragment into the multiple cloning site of the expression vector. This will create the five amino acid linker RNPPV between the green and red fluorescent protein. We will refer to the fluorophore chimeras as GFP—Cherry, PA-GFP—Cherry, and GFP—PA-Cherry for the remainder of this article.
   Note: The coupling of fluorophores and creation of internal rulers to assess photoactivation efficiency can be done with any spectrally distinct fluorophore pair, e.g. superfolder PA-GFP ¹⁵/ PA-TagRFP ¹⁶, etc. Many of the photoactivatable fluorescent proteins are derived from GFP. Hence, the primer sequence provided above can be used for many fluorescent proteins to construct a fluorophore chimera in a mammalian cell expression vector.

2. Cell Culture and Transfection

1. Use either any standard cell line such as HeLa, NRK, Cos-7 or a specific cell line to be used for specific photoactivation experiments. Use DMEM (supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, and 2 mM glutamine) and trypsin without phenol red (see Table of Materials) to reduce background fluorescence.
2. Detach the cells of a confluent culture with trypsin, count the number of cells in cell suspension using a Neubauer chamber, and seed 5,000 – 10,000 cells per well. Alternatively, use 1 drop from a 2-mL pipette of a 10-mL cell suspension from a confluent cell culture grown in a T 25-cell culture flask or 3 drops from a 5-mL cell suspension from a confluent culture grown in a T 12.5-cell culture flask.
3. Grow cells in 8-well chambers with #1.0 cover glass (see Table of Materials) for fluorescence live-cell microscopy.
4. Transfect cells 24 h after plating using commercial reagents (see Table of Materials) per distributer’s protocol with the GFP—Cherry, PA-GFP—Cherry, and GFP—PA-Cherry chimeras.
5. Image cells after a total of 20 h post transfection to allow for protein expression, folding and maturation.

3. Imaging and Photoactivation

1. Image cells in a humidified and heated environmental chamber at 37 degrees Celsius. To buffer the cell media at physiological pH and render it CO₂-independent, add 20 mM HEPES, or use CO₂ gas set to 5% flow.
2. First, image cells expressing the GFP—Cherry construct. Set parameters that define time-integrated laser intensity per pixel in a confocal image, i.e., pixel dwell time in microseconds, acousto-optical tunable filter (AOTF) transmission in percent, and digital zoom.
   Note: Using a 60x objective and a digital zoom of 3x allows imaging of a cell in its entirety while providing sufficient magnification. Set pixel dwell time to 2-4 μs and AOTF transmission for the 488-nm and 561-nm laser such that images show a good signal-to-noise ratio without any bleaching and no pixels indicating fluorescence intensity saturation.
3. Image, using the set laser power, AOTF transmission, pixel dwell time and digital zoom, 15-20 cells expressing GFP—Cherry.
4. Then, image with the same set laser power, pixel dwell time, AOTF transmission and digital zoom cells expressing GFP—PA-Cherry and PA-GFP—Cherry. Search for expressing cells in the green channel or red channel, respectively. Avoid long exposure of the cells during the search for expressing cells in order to not bleach the fluorescent proteins.
5. Set up a mini-time series with one pre-activation image and three post-activation images. The post-activation images will help identify potential transient dark states due to the exposure to UV-light.
   Note: In our hands, changes in detected fluorescence intensity due to transient dark states were <1% and could be neglected, but those dark states should be assessed for every experimental set-up.
6. To determine photoactivation efficiency, i.e., the fraction of PA-FPs that is switched on to be fluorescent, in the specific photoactivation experiments that have already been established, apply the same photoactivation settings to 15-20 cells that are expressing the internal rulers introduced here and proceed with image analysis (section 4). If beginning to set up photoactivation experiments, find here a few different settings based on our experimental experience with PA-GFP and PA-Cherry; modify as needed.
   1. For instantaneous photoactivation of PA-GFP and PA-Cherry using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM), apply 90 μW of 405-nm laser light in 3 or 5 iterations, respectively.
      Note: With our microscopic set-up, using a 38% AOTM transmission and a 2 μs pixel dwell time, we measured this 405-nm laser power in line-scan mode at the objective lens. With these settings, about 8% and 16% of the PA-GFP and PA-Cherry expressed can be photoactivated to be fluorescent. The entire titration series using CLSM for instantaneous photoactivation has been published previously¹⁷.
   2. If a higher fraction of photoactivated PA-GFP and PA-Cherry fluorophores is advantageous e.g. to achieve a higher signal-to-noise ratio, and photoactivation does not have to be immediate, apply 40 μW of 405-nm laser light with a 2 μs pixel dwell time and 6% AOTF transmission for 450 iterations. Then, photoactivation will take up to 4 min as opposed to only 1-2 seconds, but photoactivation efficiency for PA-GFP will be 29% instead of 8%, allowing for a higher signal-to-noise ratio.
7. If a mosaic digital illumination system that contains micro mirror arrays in a spatial light modulator is available, 405-nm laser light can be used for widefield-photoactivation. This allows for efficient photoactivation within milliseconds.
   Note: With 1.6 mW laser power as measured at the objective lens and an exposure time of 250 ms, 29% of PA-GFP can be photoactivated to be fluorescent.
8. Image with any set photoactivation parameters 15-20 cells expressing PA-GFP—Cherry and GFP—PA-Cherry, respectively.
9. Since pH, reactive oxygen species and other environmental factors may influence photoactivation efficiency, it may be important to assess photoactivation efficiencies of the PA-FPs in the respective subcellular micromilieu where the protein of interest is located. By coupling the fluorophore chimeras to the protein of interest, as the authors have done with the plasma membrane protein VSVG ¹⁸, photoactivation efficiency can be assessed in the specific subcellular compartment of interest.

4. Image Analysis and Algorithm for Ratiometric Intensity-based Quantification of Photoactivation Efficiency

1. Image analysis can be done with the open source image processing platforms ImageJ or Fiji. Determine the background fluorescence intensity in non-transfected cells in the green (B₁) and red (B₂) channel. Avoid perinuclear or any areas showing increased auto-fluorescence.
2. To determine the fluorescence intensity in a transfected cell, outline the cell body with the freehand selections tool. Again, avoid perinuclear or any other areas showing auto-fluorescence.
3. Subtract the background from the measured fluorescence intensity in each channel.
   I_G = I_{Green_measured} – B₁
   I_R = I_{Red_measured} – B₂
4. Use the GFP—Cherry construct to calculate the red-to-green ratio (RtoGr) and correct for donor-quenching due to fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). The FRET efficiency E was determined to be 0.3 in previous experiments for the GFP—Cherry construct using the same amino acid linker between the two fluorophores¹⁸.
   RtoGr = (I_{Red_measured} – B₂) / (I_{Green_measured} – B₁)
   RtoGr_corr = RtoGr * (1 – E)
   Note: In this intensity- based approach, donor quenching for mEGFP and PA-mGFP may be different given possible distinct spectral properties which have not been characterized. The rate of FRET (kET) and the Foerster distance (R0) depend upon the quantum yield of the donor which has not been determined for mEGFP and PA-mGFP.
5. Use the GFP—PA-Cherry construct to assess the fraction of photoactivated PA-Cherry. Determine the expected fluorescence intensity of PA-Cherry by multiplying the measured unquenched green fluorescence intensity of the GFP—PA-Cherry construct prior to photoactivation with the corrected red-to-green-ratio (RtoGr_corr).
   I_{Red_expected} = (I_{Green_measured} – B₁) * RtoGr_corr
   Note: As indicated above, the molecular brightness of the always-on FP and the photoactivatable FP may be different. See Discussion for more information on how to account for these differences.
6. Calculate the PA-Cherry photoactivation efficiency as a fraction of the measured red fluorescence intensity after photoactivation and the expected fluorescence intensity in the red channel.
   (F_PA-Cherry) = (I_{Red_measured} – B₂) / I_{Red_expected}
7. Use the PA-GFP—Cherry construct to assess the fraction of photoactivated PA-GFP. Determine the expected fluorescence intensity of PA-GFP by dividing the measured red fluorescence intensity of the PA-GFP—Cherry construct prior to photoactivation by the red-to-green-ratio (RtoGr). Here, the RtoGr does not need to be corrected for donor quenching, because GFP and PA-GFP are subject to donor quenching to the same amount.
   I_{Green_expected} = (I_{Red_measured} – B₂) / RtoGr
8. Calculate the PA-GFP photoactivation efficiency as a fraction of the measured green fluorescence intensity after photoactivation and the expected fluorescence intensity in the green channel.
   (F_PA-GFP) = (I_{Green_measured} – B₁) / I_{Green_expected}

Results

The protocol presented here shows the ratiometric quantification of the fraction of fluorescent proteins that are photoactivated to be fluorescent (Figure 1). This fraction differs depending upon the mode of photoactivation.

A typical result using short time high-power photoactivation with a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) is shown in Figure 2c. After titratin...

Discussion

So far, no method existed to determine in bulk the fraction of PA-FPs expressed in live cells that is photoactivated to be fluorescent. The presented protocol can be used for any spectrally distinct fluorescent protein pair. While exemplified here for the irreversible PA-FPs PA-GFP and PA-Cherry, this approach is in principle applicable to photoconvertible proteins as well. The spectrally distinct fluorescent protein, however, must be selected carefully to minimize spectral overlap given that photoconvertible fluorescent...

Materials

List of materials used in this article

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
pEGFP-N1 mammalian cell expression vector	Clontech
DMEM w/o phenol red	Thermo Fisher Scientific	11054020
Trypsin w/o phenol red	Thermo Fisher Scientific	15400054
L-Glutamine (200 mM)	Thermo Fisher Scientific	25030081
HEPES	Thermo Fisher Scientific	15630080
LabTek 8-well chambers #1.0	Thermo Fisher Scientific	12565470
Fugene 6	Promega	E2691