$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The ability to record high quality OCR measurement relies on centering the head in the middle of the net (Figure 1). This is important for the XF24 machine, which has a rather small oxygen sensor spot compared to the newer XFe24 machine in which the sensor is larger. As previously shown, centering the heads display a steady OCR for at least 20 consecutive measurements in young flies13.
One critical aspect of using the machines is to apply the correct analysis. It is recommended to check the oxygen levels during the experiments. Each 2 min measurement is subdivided into 10 sub-measurements (ticks). A well with 16 healthy heads usually displays an oxygen partial pressure (pO2) of 140-170 (mmHg) for the first tick. In the first example, we compared young vs. midlife fly heads (Figure 2A and 2B). While the oxygen levels drop quicker in the middle-aged heads, the observed difference is small (Figure 2A). Moreover, the range of the oxygen levels is similar between the conditions, with 165 during the first tick to 120 during the last tick. In such a case, it is preferable to use the AKOS algorithm to automatically generate the OCR (pmol/min)2, which reliably mirrors the oxygen level drop between young versus midlife heads (Figure 2B). Of note, the analysis program by the machine automatically chooses the AKOS algorithm.
However, based on our observations, automatically using the AKOS algorithm may give misleading, if not opposite results for the correct OCR. Such artefacts can be generated in conditions of a highly consuming sample which reaches anoxia13,22. For example, the addition of sodium butyrate (SB), a KDAC inhibitor, transiently changes the dynamics of the oxygen levels (Figure 3A). Whereas the vehicle controls display steady levels of oxygen during the first and last ticks, SB addition causes a considerable and transient drop of the oxygen levels in these ticks (Figure 3A). SB by itself does not alter the oxygen levels in the background wells, where no heads are added (data not shown). The data supports the notion that SB increases oxygen consumption. As the collection of first tick is delayed (12 seconds until the first tick is recorded in the measuring phase) the first data point is already lower in the SB treated wells. Therefore, it is difficult to capture the early changes in oxygen consumption following the addition of this HDAC inhibitor. Furthermore, the oxygen levels in the SB treated samples are reduced to already low levels (anoxia) as indicated by the collection of the last ticks. At anoxia, the heads slow down their oxygen consumption in the last ticks (Figure 3A). Because the AKOS calculation takes into account all ticks and ignores an anoxic state, it generates a misleading OCR. Indeed, the non-normalized AKOS based OCR levels show little change upon the injection (dashed line) of port A (Veh/SB) (Figure 3B).
Normalizing the OCR levels to the pre-injection measurement based on the AKOS reveals very similar levels of OCR before and after the injection of port A, which does not support the oxygen level changes (Figure 3A). Under these circumstances, the FIXED algorithm, which more closely models/resembles the OCR and oxygen level changes is recommended (Figure 3C). Consequently, the FIXED algorithm based normalized measurement reveals an increased OCR upon SB treatment (Figure 3C).
A drawback with the new machine is the absence of the FIXED algorithm. Therefore, in experiments where highly consuming sample/treatment is used, it is recommended to calculate the OCR measurements manually, and calculating the decrease in oxygen level per time for the first 3-5 ticks in each measurement.

Figure 1. An example of a well containing 16 one-week old heads of male flies. The heads are centered below a net and floating in the media. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2. A representative example of OCR measurement comparison between one-week old fly heads (young) and four-week old fly heads (middle-age). (A) The oxygen levels are shown for three separate measurements; each 2 min measurement is subdivided into ten sub-measurements (ticks). (B) A quantification of (A). The levels of the first and last ticks are similar, although the levels of the middle-age sample are slightly lower. A quantification of the slope of the decrease in oxygen levels is used to generate the OCR levels. As previously described22, the OCR of middle aged flies is 10%-15% higher than young flies. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3. An example of the alteration of OCR by sodium butyrate (SB) in young fly heads. (A) Oxygen levels recorded from seven measurements following the addition of 15 mM SB. The dashed line marks the injection of the drug (or vehicle) from port A. Of note, while the oxygen levels of ticks 1 and 10 remain stable in the control group (Blue), the levels of oxygen during these ticks are transiently (six measurements following the injection) reduced in the SB treated samples (orange). In addition, the decrease in oxygen levels is greatly reduced during the last ticks of SB treated samples. N=3 per group (B) [Left] Non-normalized OCR levels calculated from the AKOS algorithm. The calculation incorrectly shows similar levels of OCR before and after the injection of SB by port A. [Right] Normalization of the OCR to the measurement prior to the injection of port A. (C) [Left] 'Fixed' algorithm calculation of (A) showing the non-normalized OCR. Here, the OCR closely represents the transient increase in oxygen usage of the heads upon SB treatment; [Right] Normalization of the OCR to the measurement prior to the injection of port A. Error bars indicate the S.E.M. in all the graphs. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.