$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
A biopsy is a procedure to harvest a core section of tissue from subjects for medical or research purposes. It is a minimally invasive and widely used technique to collect tissue as an alternative to euthanasia1 to allow analysis of tissue responses to treatment or other factors of interest. Samples of bovine mammary gland (MG) tissues are essential for dairy research to study gene and protein expression, histology, the organization of cellular organelles, signaling pathways, and metabolic processes in response to changes in management or the environment. Additionally, MG tissue is needed to diagnose and research certain infectious diseases, such as bovine mastitis caused by bacterial infections2.
The udder of cattle contains four separate glands and each gland contains an independent milk secretory system collectively called parenchyma. The alveoli, ducts, and connective tissue are present in the mammary parenchyma. The alveoli are microscopic spherical hollow structures that are composed of epithelial cells in the internal surface (luminal) and specialized myoepithelial cells on the external surface (basal). The alveoli are responsible for synthesis and secretion of milk. The fibrous connective tissue present in the parenchyma can separate a group of alveoli from other groups of alveoli, and each group is called a lobule3. Several factors can affect the development and function of the MG including animal physiology, nutrition, management, genetics, and the environment4. Mastitis also is a critical factor that negatively affects MG function and milk quality5. The toxins released by mastitic pathogens can cause damage to the alveoli and induce necrosis resulting in biochemical and histological changes in the MG tissue6. Thus, the histology and metabolic processes of each alveoli or lobule in the MG may be significantly different from others. As such, biopsies that are representative samples of the entire mammary gland are desirable. Small biopsies may only capture a single lobule or individual alveolus, limiting the resulting scientific or diagnostic information. For research purposes, it is necessary to be aware that a mammary biopsy provides a 'snapshot' of tissue characteristics but a biopsy cannot adequately characterize total mammary function in the absence of estimates of total mammary gland mass.
Several biopsy tools have been developed over the last 30 years for human use. Currently, adaptations of those instruments are available for use with animals. For dairy cattle, samples of MG tissue have been obtained using different techniques including surgical excision (blunt dissection)7, biopsy needles1,8, and core biopsy instruments9,10. Thus, MG biopsy techniques in lactating dairy cows have transitioned from procedures using recumbent sedation with surgical dissection using electrocautery hemostasis in 19927 to collection of core biopsies under standing sedation9,10,11,12. Surgical biopsy is an invasive method, which can be expensive and have a higher incidence of complications such as hematoma, wound problems, and tumor spread13. Currently, core biopsy and needle biopsy (also known as a tru-cut biopsy) have been widely adopted as alternatives to surgical biopsy. The advantages of core and needle biopsies compared to surgical biopsy include: the procedure is minimally invasive; major complications are rare; general anesthesia is not required; the procedure is relativley rapid; the recovery time is short; there is minimal negative effects on udder health, and only short-term effects on milk yield and composition8,9,10; and the cost is less than surgical biopsy13.
One core biopsy procedure described in 1996 used a sterile, stainless steel cannula with a removable retractable blade to remove a representative amount of tissue from the bovine MG without general anesthesia9,10,11,12. During the procedure, the instrument was attached to a cordless drill to create a low speed, rotational motion which cleanly cut a tissue core as the tool was advanced into the tissue. The benefit was a larger tissue sample (70 mm x 4 mm in diameter, about 0.75 to 1 g) 9. A recent study10 showed that the biopsy procedure described by V. C. Farret al.9 can be used to perform repeated MG tissue collections without negative impact on performance and udder health of lactating dairy cows. Most recently, a study14 was carried out in dairy cows to evaluate repeated biopsies of the MG using a larger trocar (31 cm long, outer diameter of 9.5 mm, inner diameter of 8 mm) with vacuum applied to an internal stainless steel cannula to collect the biopsy. This method used sedation (xylazine) and local anesthesia (2% lidocaine hydrochloride).
The needle biopsy is another technique to collect mammary tissue. Several studies have adopted this technique. One study1 used sedation (detomidine)and local anesthetic (1% lidocaine) in the procedure. After the biopsy, the cows received a prophylactic antibiotic treatment. The mammary gland was manually massaged before and after the milking. Blood in the milk was observed for up to 84 h after the biopsy. The amount and composition of the milk were affected for a short period of time. Recently, a study used a biopsy needle to perform repeated MG biopsies in dairy cows8. Sedation (1% acepromazine, intramuscular) and local anesthesia (2% lidocaine hydrochloride, subcutaneous) were administered to the animals. The animals did not receive intramammary drugs or antibiotics before or after the procedure, and there were no signs of infection at the biopsy site during the post-surgical period. In this study, repeated bovine MG biopsies using a needle had a minor negative impact on milk production and udder health of dairy cows. In general, the needle biopsy seems to be a less invasive method than the core biopsy instrument. However, as noted previously, it is essential for the biopsy technique to harvest a representative sample of the MG tissue. The limitation of a needle biopsy is that a small amount of bovine MG tissue is obtained (about 20 to 25 mg)8,15.
Almost all of the studies used a combination of α-2 agonist sedation and local anesthetic8,9,10, whether the biopsy was via a needle or a larger core. In the bovine MG, most nerve endings are associated with the skin. Innervation to the parenchymal tissue is largely via stretch receptors with sparse Type A nerve fibers to detect sharp surgical pain. As a result, physiological mechanisms of pain due to surgical manipulation of the MG is via skin and subcutaneous tissues3 and not deep tissues such as parenchymal tissue. Therefore, for biopsy procedures, it is only necessary to locally anesthetize the skin and subcutaneous tissues, as infiltration of local anesthetic into the deeper tissues does not significantly reduce surgical pain. After an appropriate preparation of the biopsy area, animal discomfort is, primarily, associated with restraint.
Collection of larger core samples may increase hematoma formation and increase the risk of infection within the MG parenchyma. Therefore, peri-operative protocols often include administration of parenteral antibiotics7, although that is not universals8. Achieving hemostasis is also an important factor for reducing cow morbidity. In the aforementioned study using a large core biopsy instrument14, manual pressure was applied to the biopsy site and a cow bra was used to apply ice to the wounds for at least 2 h following the procedure. Despite the large amount of tissue harvested, only slight reductions in feed intake and milk yield were observed, and the procedure was repeated every three weeks without negative effects on cow health.
Researchers performing MG biopsy in dairy cows need to consider the diagnostic or analytical quality of the resulting biopsy, ease of technique, and cow morbidity. Accurate and pre-planned surgical techniques are imperative to achieve these goals. To date, MG biopsy studies have focused on describing biopsy outcomes, as opposed to describing the biopsy technique itself, and descriptions for lactating dairy cows lack sufficient detail to allow replication. Thus, the objective of this work was to describe both needle biopsy and larger core biopsy techniques in sufficient detail to allow safe and humane replication of MG biopsy of cattle.