A detailed description of the PCLeB procedures was provided with a representative case treated using PCLeB. PCLeB consists of intermittent reperfusion and timely coronary injections of lactated Ringer's solution to achieve controlled reperfusion with tissue oxygenation and minimal lactate washout7,8,9. Not only intermittent reperfusion but also supplementary lactate, administered as lactated Ringer's solution, may increase the delay in recovery from tissue acidosis produced during ischemia; in this supposed mechanism, PCLeB may potentiate the beneficial effects of the original postconditioning protocol that consists of intermittent reperfusion only10.
Several critical steps need to be pointed out to successfully perform PCLeB. First, before starting PCLeB, incidental coronary flow recovery should be prevented as much as possible because uncontrolled reperfusion before PCLeB ruins the subsequent controlled reperfusion achieved by PCLeB in terms of tissue oxygenation with minimal lactate washout. Spontaneous reperfusion before CAG cannot help. However, during the initial wiring procedures, coronary flow is sometimes unintentionally re-started before balloon delivery to the occluded coronary artery. This is an unwanted phenomenon. To minimize the effects of this phenomenon, the balloon catheter is recommended to be placed inside the guiding catheter beforehand, close to its outlet during the wiring procedures, so that the balloon can be quickly moved forward to the culprit lesion to re-occlude the lesion site once the coronary flow is unintentionally re-started.
Second, once PCLeB is started, confirming the restoration of coronary flow during each brief reperfusion is important because the failure to restore the coronary flow during PCLeB procedures makes PCLeB meaningless. Therefore, during each brief reperfusion, contrast medium injection into the culprit coronary artery should be performed to check if the coronary flow was restored. This can be achieved by injecting ≥4 mL of 20–30 mL of the lactated Ringer's solution prefilled in the 30 mL syringe into the guiding catheter, which pushes out approximately 4 mL of the contrast medium prefilled within the lumen from the manifold to the tip of the guiding catheter in the default set-up. Injections of both the contrast medium and 20–30 mL of lactated Ringer' solution need to be performed even during the first 10 s reperfusion; thus, the busiest time during the entire procedures of PCLeB occurs at the very start of this protocol. Even if the initial brief reperfusion took 12–13 s instead of 10 s, it might be still acceptable. Since the reason for starting brief reperfusion with 10 s duration is to achieve minimal lactate washout during the very early phase of reperfusion, the initial brief reperfusion of 12–13 s duration can still achieve this goal.
Third, the size of the balloon used for PCLeB is important. Since the balloon is left at the lesion site throughout the procedures of PCLeB, if a small-sized balloon is selected, the lumen area gained after balloon dilation may be small and coronary flow may be hampered by the deflated balloon left at the lesion site during each brief reperfusion. Therefore, the balloon should ideally have the same size as the lumen diameter of the target lesion. However, one size smaller balloon may still be acceptable. Selection of balloons of such sizes is also beneficial in imposing adequate stretch stimuli on the vessel wall before stenting because of the reason mentioned later.
Fourth, the speed of lactated Ringer's solution injection and the timing of the balloon inflation are vital. The core objective of PCLeB is to keep tissue lactate concentrations high during the early reperfusion period. To achieve this objective, a larger amount of lactated Ringer's solution should be trapped inside the ischemic myocardium in a less diluted form. To make it possible, fast and continued injection of lactated Ringer's solution until the last moment of the balloon inflation process is needed. Therefore, 20–30 mL of lactated Ringer's solution needs to be injected within several seconds and the balloon inflation should be completed a little before completion of lactated Ringer's solution injection. To trap a larger amount of lactated Ringer's solution inside the ischemic myocardium, a larger amount of the solution, instead of 20–30 mL, can be used for each injection, but care should be taken to avoid volume overload.
Some modification of the PCLeB protocol might be possible if the modification adheres to the two critical components of PCLeB, i.e., starting with a very short period of reperfusion (i.e., 10–15 s) and trapping lactated Ringer's solution inside the ischemic myocardium in each brief repetitive ischemia. Reduction of the number of intermittent reperfusions and modification of the period of brief ischemia/reperfusion may be allowed. However, whether such modifications will reduce the beneficial effects of PCLeB is unknown.
Coronary flow recovery is generally very good after reperfusion therapy with PCLeB8,9,15. No-reflow phenomenon may not be experienced with this approach; this cannot be prevented by the original postconditioning protocol in animal experiments, reportedly17. However, at the end of the reperfusion therapy with PCLeB, if good coronary flow recovery cannot be achieved (i.e., TIMI grade flow II instead of III), there might be two possible explanations. First, insufficient stretch stimuli to the culprit lesion before stenting might reduce the beneficial effects of PCLeB. Stretch stimuli to the culprit lesion by balloon dilation or stenting procedures induces endothelin release from the endothelium of the lesion site18 and causes intracellular alkalization in myocardial cells19 distal to the lesion, which is an opposite effect of PCLeB20 and may reduce the beneficial effects of PCLeB. Therefore, it is recommended that supposed endothelin storage in the culprit lesion should be released as much as possible during the PCLeB procedures when tissue acidosis is maintained. If a smaller-sized balloon relative to the vessel size was used during the PCLeB procedures, stretch stimuli to the culprit lesion may be suboptimal and the endothelin inside the culprit lesion will be spared. Subsequent larger stimuli imposed by stenting procedures may induce an intense release of spared endothelin from the lesion site, possibly causing abrupt intracellular alkalization; this may attenuate the beneficial effects of PCLeB. Second, if a fairly longer stent, relative to the balloon used for PCLeB, is implanted, the similar phenomenon will ensue even if a sufficiently large balloon is used for the PCLeB procedures because no stretch stimuli is imposed on the coronary vessel wall excessively covered by the stent. Therefore, if possible, spot stenting using a shorter stent is preferable after the PCLeB procedures.
There might be no limitation in the application of PCLeB in patients with STEMI as long as reperfusion therapy is indicated. Cardiogenic shock is not a contraindication at all but rather a good indication for PCLeB. Increase in aortic pressure can be expected during PCI using PCLeB, as shown in the representative results. Simultaneous use of IABP may reduce the beneficial effects of PCLeB because IABP may enhance the washout of lactate via a mechanically driven force and may promote recovery from tissue acidosis produced during ischemia. Therefore, simultaneous use of IABP is not recommended even in severe cases, such as in patients with cardiogenic shock. Spontaneous reperfusion before CAG may reduce or remove the beneficial effects of PCLeB. However, spontaneous reperfusion before CAG does not necessarily preclude the application of PCLeB because coronary flow may still be insufficient and low-flow ischemia may still exist in the reperfused myocardium in such cases. Therefore, PCLeB may be worth trying as long as TIMI flow grade III is not achieved before PCI. Conversely, cases with spontaneous reperfusion with TIMI flow grade III achieved before PCI may be a clear limitation of the application of PCLeB.
The protocol of PCLeB appears complicated at a glance. However, once the initial busiest part of the protocol has finished, it can be realized that the patient's condition is becoming more stabilized as the procedures proceed to the less busy, later stages of the protocol. Before finishing the entire protocol, secondary operators often start to prepare for the next procedures after PCLeB, such as intravascular ultrasonography, because they know that nothing worse will happen, thereafter. Currently, myocardial reperfusion injury is generally left untreated during reperfusion therapy for STEMI. Despite the absence of firm evidence for the beneficial effects of PCLeB, considering its safety aspect and the current lack of alternative effective approaches, PCLeB is worth trying instead of leaving myocardial reperfusion injury as it occurs. Once the effectiveness of PCLeB is generally confirmed in the future, this technique might, hopefully, be applied to other arterial occlusive disorders, such as acute limb ischemia.