$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The clinical manifestation of metastasis in distant organs represents the final stage of cancer progression and accounts for more than 90% of cancer-related deaths1. The transition from localized to metastatic disease is a multi-step process, often mediated by circulating tumor cells (CTCs)2,3,4. These cells are shed from the primary tumor into the blood circulation and are transported to distant organs, where they may extravasate and establish metastatic lesions5,6. Although solid tumors can release a relatively high number of CTCs, most CTCs are destined to die, owing to high shear forces in circulation, anoikis-mediated cell death, immune attack or limited capabilities to adapt to a foreign microenvironment7. Therefore, it is pivotal to establish tools that enable the dissection of the molecular features of those CTCs that are endowed with metastasis-seeding ability. Recent preclinical and clinical studies suggest that the presence and quantity of single CTCs and CTC clusters is associated with a worse outcome in patients with various types of solid tumors8,9,10,11,12,13,14. CTC clusters are groups of two or more CTCs attached to each other during circulation and are more efficient in forming metastasis compared to single CTCs3,15,16. Cells within a cluster maintain strong cell-cell adhesion through desmosomes and adherens junctions, which may help to overcome anoikis17,18. Recently, we observed that clustering of CTCs is linked to hypomethylation of binding sites for stemness- and proliferation-associated transcription factors, leading to an increased ability to successfully initiate metastasis19. CTC cluster dissociation results in remodeling of key binding sites, and consequently, the suppression of their metastatic potential19. Additionally to clusters of cancer cells, CTCs can also associate to white blood cell (most frequently neutrophils) to maintain high proliferation levels in circulation and increase their metastatic capability20. However, the biology of CTCs is understood only in part and several questions remain open, including the underlying molecular features and vulnerabilities of single and clustered cells.
In recent years, several strategies have been established that exploit cell-surface expression patterns as well as physical properties of CTCs for their isolation21,22,23,24,25. Antigen-dependent isolation methods rely mostly on the expression of cell surface Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM)26. The most frequently used and (at present) the only FDA-approved platform for CTC enumeration, is the CellSearch system, which is based on a two-step procedure to isolate CTCs21. In the first step, plasma components are removed by centrifugation, while CTCs are captured with magnetic ferrofluids coupled to anti-EpCAM antibodies. In the second step, the CTC-enriched solution is stained for nucleated (DAPI-positive) cells expressing cytokeratin (CK)8,18,19, while white blood cells (WBCs) are identified using the pan-leukocyte marker CD45. Finally, captured cells are placed on an integrated screening platform and CTCs are identified through the expression of EpCAM, CKs, and DAPI while being negative for CD45. Although this is considered to be the gold standard for CTC enumeration, downstream molecular analysis is challenging with this technology due to inherent constraints in CTC retrieval. Additionally, given its isolation procedure, CellSearch may favor the enrichment of CTCs with higher EpCAM levels compared to CTCs with lower EpCAM expression, due for instance to cancer heterogeneity27 or downregulation of epithelial markers28,29. To overcome these limitations, antigen-independent technologies for the enrichment of CTCs have emerged. For example, the CTC-iChip integrates hydrodynamic separation of nucleated cells, including CTCs and WBCs from remaining blood components, followed by an immunomagnetic depletion of antibody-tagged WBCs, allowing purification of untagged and viable CTCs in solution25. Additionally, the fact that most CTCs are slightly bigger than red blood cells (RBCs) or WBCs led to the development of size-based CTC enrichment technologies23,30 (e.g., the Parsortix system (ANGLE)) which makes use of a microfluidic-based technology, comprising a narrowing channel across the separation cassette, leading cells to a terminal gap of either 10, 8, 6.5 or 4.5 µm (different sizes are available depending upon the expected diameter of target cancer cells). Most of the blood cells pass through the narrow gap, while CTCs get trapped due to their size (but also due to their lower deformability) and are, therefore, retained in the cassette. Reverting the flow direction enables the release of captured CTCs, which are in a viable state and suitable for downstream analysis. Independently of the chosen protocol for CTC isolation, however, typical post-enrichment procedures still yield CTCs that are mixed with a relatively small number of RBCs and WBCs, making the analysis of pure single or bulk CTCs challenging. To address this issue, we established a workflow that allows CTC manipulation without potential bias introduced by blood cell contaminants. The addition of immunostaining beforehand, with variable antibody-combinations, distinguishes CTCs from blood cells and even allows to identify CTC subgroups with distinct surface-marker expression profiles. This highly customizable procedure can be then further combined with specific downstream applications.
Here, we describe a workflow that starts from a CTC-enriched product (obtained with any CTC enrichment technology of choice) and combines several approaches to gain insight into CTC biology at single-cell resolution. In a nutshell, our workflow enables the identification of single CTCs, CTC clusters and CTC-WBC clusters by live immunostaining, followed by single-cell micromanipulation and downstream analysis using ex vivo culturing protocols, single cell sequencing, and in vivo metastasis assays.