A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius Ludovicianus) Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern

5.9K views

DOI:

10.3791/59713

March 8th, 2020

In This Article

Summary

We present a protocol to characterize the sex of loggerhead shrike visually based on the coloration and pattern of the sixth primary wing feather.

Abstract

The loggerhead shrike is a small sexually monomorphic passerine bird using grassland habitats across North America. Based on Breeding Bird Survey data, the species has undergone a drastic decline since the mid-1960s. The cause of decline is unknown, and research is actively underway to address this knowledge gap. These efforts are hindered by an inability to sex the species in hand, which to date was only possible using molecular markers. Here, we present a protocol to sex loggerhead shrikes by visually analyzing the coloration and pattern in the sixth primary feather. The application of the method will facilitate our ability to identify threats on a finer scale than has been possible to date and to address various ecological and evolutionary hypotheses. The methodology is simple and results reliable–we encourage including this method for research of both in situ and ex situ populations.

Introduction

The loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus) is a North American passerine with a broad geographical range encompassing most of North America and a variety of habitats that can generally be described as grassland1. It is one of only two species of shrikes (Order Passeriformes) that occur in North America. Shrikes are best known for the unique raptor-like bill, which allows them to take vertebrate prey, and their unique behavior of impaling food items on thorns or other sharp objects. The loggerhead shrike is the only species of 'true shrike' (Family Laniidae) endemic to the continent. Shrikes breeding above 40°N are generally obligate migrants1,2,3, with wintering grounds almost entirely encompassed within that of non-migratory conspecifics1,4.

North American Breeding Bird Survey data5 for loggerhead shrike indicate a significant (3.18% yr-1) range-wide population decline. The loggerhead shrike is one of Partners in Flight's 24 "Common Birds in Steep Decline"-i.e., those that have lost more than 50% of their populations over the past 40 years, but which lack other elevated vulnerability factors that would warrant higher "Watch List" status6. Habitat loss due to succession and human development likely contributed to the initial declines4,7, but continued population declines are outpacing habitat loss in the breeding season, suggesting other limiting factors, in particular in areas where the species is an obligate migrant4,8. Results of a population viability analysis conducted for the critically endangered population of loggerhead shrike in Ontario suggests that over-wintering success of birds in their first year of life is a driver of the population trends9,10. Results further indicate that the conservation breeding effort, which is augmenting the wild population, has kept the species from extirpation in this area9,10.

Understanding sex differences is an important component of both ecological and evolutionary hypotheses. The plumage of loggerhead shrikes (Laniusludovicianus) is sexually monochromatic and therefore individuals cannot reliably be sexed in the hand. However, based on a method applicable to the northern shrike (Lanius excubitor)11,12, it has been shown to be possible to sex at least some populations of adult loggerhead shrikes using the coloration pattern in the sixth primary wing feather13. We have revised this methodology13 to include consideration of a second variable, specifically the extent of pigmentation in the rachis of the sixth primary, which allows reliable identification of sex in the majority of individuals in eastern populations, and tested its application (previously only applied to adult birds) to fledged young of the year. The method requires no specialized equipment or costly lab assays, and no measurements are required that would be subject to observer bias. Based on our results, the method is easily learned and, once mastered, highly accurate. Here, we present detailed instructions on how to sex shrike in the hand using our method and discuss the wider implications of including sex assessment in future research and conservation efforts for this unique and enigmatic species of conservation concern.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

The research protocol presented herein complies with African Lion Safari's Animal Care Committee guidelines.

1. Sexing Loggerhead Shrikes by Color and Patern of the Sixth Primary Wing Feather

NOTE: Shrikes can be sexed in hand based on the coloration and pattern in the sixth primary wing feather (P6). In brief, the technique requires the observer to visually extrapoloate a line along the lower edge of the primary wing coverts, and then to assess how far the brown extends in the rachis (shaft) through the white portion of the feather visible below the primary coverts.

  1. Hold the bird firmly in the banders grip and carefully extend one wing to allow the sixth primary wing feather to be viewed (Figure 1). Do not over-extend as this can cause harm to the bird's musculature.
  2. Locate the P6 feather: Loggerhead Shrikes have 10 primary feathers, with the last (10th) being the most distal (outermost) feather and reduced in size compartive to the other 9 primary feathers. Unlike the secondary feathers, and with the exception of the reduced 10th primary feather, all primaries have a degree of white coloration. It may be easier to count backwards from the 10th primary than to locate the first primary and count forward to locate the P6.
  3. Assess the brown in the rachis (hereafter shaft): Does it extend at least half way through the white, and touch, or nearly touch the distal end (furthest from the body and point of emergence) of the primary covert feathers as they lay naturally over the primary feathers? If "yes", the bird is female (Figure 2). If "no", then the bird is male (Figure 2).
  4. The pattern and extent of coloration in the primary feathers varies among individuals. If unsure of whether the brown in the shaft extends at least half way through the white patch to the distal tips of the primary coverts, or if the brown is somewhat indistinct, use a secondary technique. Specifically, assess the symmetry of the brown to white transition in the feather vane on each side of the shaft (Figure 2). If the brown at the point where the coloration changes to white in the vane meets at the same spot on either side of the shaft, the bird is male. If there the line meets asymetrically at the shaft, creating a step or notch, the pattern indicates that the bird is a female (Figure 2).
  5. If there is still uncertainty as to the individual's sex, examine the angle of the transition between the brown and the white coloration. If the brown in the feather vane has a steep angle where it meets the white in the vane at the shaft, forming an upside down "V", the pattern indicates that the bird is a female (Figure 2). If the pattern is more that of an "M", it indicates a male bird (Figure 2).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Male and female plumage is, overall, monomorphic in the loggerhead shrike. However, it has been established that sex can be discerned based on the pattern of coloration in the 6th primary in the population that occurs on mainland California13 and northern shrike12. We tested Sustaita et al.'s (2014) protocol13 to determine if it was applicable to northeastern populations of loggerhead shrike and to younger ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Herein, we describe a simple and efficient method whereby loggerhead shrike can be sexed based only on visual cues, and provide an assessment of the method's accuracy. Our simple method is easily and quickly undertaken, with results indicating a high accuracy rate that increases with a small amount of training. Our results support those of previous work13 that indicated the method originally developed for use in northern shrike12 had utility for sexing adult loggerhead ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Funding for fieldwork during which our methodologies were developed was provided by Environment Canada's Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada's Strategic Technologies Application of Genomics in the Environment Research Fund, the Endangered Species Recovery Fund, the Interdepartmental Recovery Fund, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and the Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities (scholarships to A.A.C.), Queen's University (Duncan and Urlla Carmichael Fellowship to A.A.C.) and Wildlife Preservation Canada. We wish to thank the Editor and four anonymous reviewers for their comments, which greatly improved this manuscript. Thanks to Wildlife Preservation Canada staff and the members of the North American Loggerhead Shrike Working Group for discussions that assisted in development of this methodology. We extend our thanks to all the Citizen Scientists and staff at African Lion Safari, Cambridge, Ontario, for their assistance in completing the survey. We especially thank Erin Sills, Marketing and PR Coordinator, African Lion Safari, for her assistance in producing the on-line survey and summarizing results.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

References

  1. Yosef, R. Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus). Birds of North America, Number 231. Poole, A., Gill, F. , Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union. Washington, D.C. (1996).
  2. Pruitt, L. Loggerhead Shrike status assessment. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. , Fort Snelling, Minnesota. (2000).
  3. Burnside, K. M. Moults, plumages, and age classes of passerines and "near-passerines": a bander's overview. North American Bird Bander. 31, 175-193 (2006).
  4. Chabot, A. A., Hobson, K. A., Van Wilgenburg, S. L., Pérez, G. E., Lougheed, S. C. Migratory connectivity in the Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus). Ecology and Evolution. 8 (22), 10662-10672 (2018).
  5. Sauer, J. R., et al. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966-2016. Version 01.30.2017. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. , Laurel, Maryland. (2017).
  6. Rosenberg, K. V., et al. Partners in Flight Landbird Conservation Plan: 2016 Revision for Canada and Continental United States. Partners in Flight Science Committee. , (2016).
  7. Cade, T. J., Woods, C. P. Changes in distribution and abundance of the loggerhead shrike. Conservation Biology. 11 (1), 21-31 (1997).
  8. COSEWIC. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Loggerhead Shrike Eastern subspecies Lanius ludovicianus ssp. and the Prairie subspecies Lanius ludovicianus excubitorides in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. , Ottawa. (2014).
  9. Tischendorf, L. Population viability analysis of the eastern Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus migrans). Unpublished report for the Canadian Wildlife Service. , Environment Canada. Ontario. (2009).
  10. Tischendorf, L. Population viability analysis of the eastern Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus migrans). Unpublished report for the Canadian Wildlife Service. , Environment Canada. Ontario. (2014).
  11. Pyle, P. Identification guide to North American birds. , Slate Creek Press. Bolinas, California. (1997).
  12. Brady, R. S., Paruk, J. D., Kern, A. J. Sexing adult Northern Shrike using DNA, morphometrics and plumage. Journal of Field Ornithology. 80 (2), 198-205 (2009).
  13. Sustaita, D., Owen, C. L., Villarreal, J. C., Rubega, M. A. Morphometric tools for sexing Loggerhead Shrikes in California. The Southwest Naturalist. 59 (4), 560-567 (2014).
  14. Fridolfsson, A., Ellegren, H. A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. Journal of Avian Biology. 30, 116-121 (1999).
  15. Miller, A. H. Systematic revision and natural history of the American shrikes (Lanius). University of California Publication in Zoology. 38, (1931).
  16. Chabot, A. A., Hobson, K. A., Craig, S., Lougheed, S. C. Moult in the Loggerhead Shrike Lanius ludovicianus is influenced by sex, latitude and migration. Ibis. 160 (2), 301-312 (2018).
  17. Kiat, Y., Vortman, Y., Sapir, N. Feather moult and bird appearance are correlated with global warming over the last 200 years. Nature Communications. 10, 2540(2019).
  18. Moskat, C., Hauber, M. E. Sex-specific responses to simulated territorial intrusions in the common cuckoo: a dual function of female acoustic signaling. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology. 73, 60(2019).
  19. Ducret, V., Schaub, M., Goudet, J., Roulin, A. Female-biased dispersal and non-random gene flow of MC1R variants do not result in a migration load in barn owls. Heredity. 122 (3), 305-314 (2019).
  20. Li, X. Y., Kokko, H. Sex-biased dispersal: a review of the theory. Biological Reviews. 94 (2), 721-726 (2019).
  21. Bosque, C., Pacheco, M. A. Skewed adult sex ratios in Columbina ground doves from Venezuela. Journal of Field Ornithology. 90 (1), 1-6 (2019).
  22. Heinsohn, R., Ohal, G., Webb, M., Peakall, R., Stojanovic, D. Sex ratio bias and shared paternity reduce individual fitness and population viability in a critically endangered parrot. Journal of Animal Ecology. 88 (4), 502-510 (2018).
  23. Lees, D., et al. Equitable chick survival in three species of the non-migratory shorebird despite species-specific sexual dimorphism of the young. Animals. 9 (5), 271(2019).
  24. Briedis, M., et al. A full annual perspective on sex-biased migration timing in long-distance migratory birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Science. 286 (1897), 20182821(2019).
  25. Cohen, E. B., et al. The strength of migratory connectivity for birds en route to breeding through the Gulf of Mexico. Ecogeography. 42 (4), 658-669 (2019).
  26. Ledwon, M., Neubauer, G., Zmuda, A., Flis, A. I. Interaction between parent body condition and sex affects offspring desertion in response to acute stress. Journal of Ornithology. 160 (2), 417-428 (2019).
  27. Akresh, M. E., King, D. I., Marra, P. P. Examining carry-over effects of winter habitat on breeding phenology and reproductive success in prairie warblers Setophaga discolor. Journal of Avian Biology. 50 (4), 1-13 (2019).
  28. Devoucoux, P., Besnard, A., Bretagnolle, V. Sex-dependent habitat selection in a high-density Little Bustard Tetrax population in southern France, and the implications for conservation. Ibis. 161 (2), 310-324 (2018).
  29. Lamacchia, P., Madrid, E. A., Mariano-Jelicich, R. Intraspecific variability in isotopic composition of a monomorphic seabird, the Common Tern (Sterna hirundo), at wintering grounds. Emu-Austral Ornithology. 119 (2), 176-185 (2019).
  30. Whiteside, M. A., van Horik, J. O., Langley, E. J. G., Beardsworth, C. E., Capstick, L. A., Madden, J. R. Patterns of association at feeder stations for Common Pheasant released into the wild: sexual segregation by space and time. Ibis. 161 (2), 325-336 (2018).
  31. Li, M., et al. Effects of capture and captivity on plasma corticosterone and metabolite levels in breeding Eurasian Tree Sparrows. Avian Research. 10, 16(2019).
  32. Pegan, T. M., Winkler, D. W., Haussman, M. F., Vitousek, M. N. Brief increases in corticosterone affect morphology, stress responses, and telomere length but not post fledging movements in a wild songbird. Physiology and Biochemical Zoology. 92 (3), 274-285 (2019).
  33. Carzzaolo, C. S., Sironi, N., Glaizot, R., Christe, P. Sex-biased parasitism in vector-born disease: vector preference? PLoS One. 14 (6), e0218452(2019).
  34. Gutierrez-Lopez, R., Martinez-de la Puente, J., Gangoso, L., Soriguer, R., Figuerola, J. Effects of host sex, body mass and infection by avian Plasmodium on the biting rate of two mosquito species with different feeding preferences. Parasites and Vectors. 12, 87(2019).
  35. Eng, M. L., et al. In ovo exposure to brominated flame retardants Part II: Assessment of effects of TBBPA-BDBPE and BTBPE on hatching success, morphometric and physiological endpoints in American kestrels. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 179, 151-159 (2019).
  36. Riebel, K., Odom, K. J., Langmore, N. E., Hall, M. L. New insights from female bird song: towards and integrated approach to studying male and female communication roles. Biology Letters. 15 (4), 20190059(2019).
  37. Chabot, A. A., Harty, F., Herkert, J., Glass, W. Population demographics of the Loggerhead Shrike: insights into the species decline from a long-term study in the Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie. 2016 North American Prairie Conference. , 69-78 (2016).
  38. Chabot, A. A., Hobson, K. A., Van Wilgenburg, S. L., McQuat, G. J., Lougheed, S. C. Advances in linking wintering migrant birds to their breeding-ground origins using combined analyses of genetic and stable isotope markers. PLoS One. 7 (8), e43627(2012).
  39. Soorae, P. S. Field propagation and release of migratory Eastern Loggerhead Shrike to supplement wild populations in Ontario, Canada. Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2013. Further case studies from around the globe. , (2013).
  40. Lagios, E., Robbins, K., Lapierre, J., Steiner, J., Imlay, T. Recruitment of juvenile, captive-reared eastern loggerhead shrikes Lanius ludovicianus migrans into the wild population in Canada. Oryx. 49 (2), 321-328 (2015).
  41. Wheeler, H. 2018 Eastern Loggerhead Shrike Recovery Program - Summary Report. Unpublished report, Wildlife Preservation Canada. , (2018).
  42. Romanov, M. N., et al. Widely applicable PCR markers for sex identification in birds. Animal Genetics. 55 (2), 220-231 (2019).
  43. Haas, C. Eastern subspecies of loggerhead shrike: the need for measurements of live birds. North American Bird Bander. 12, 99-102 (1987).
  44. Collister, D. M., Wicklum, D. Intraspecific variation in Loggerhead Shrikes: sexual dimorphism and implication for subspecies classification. Auk. 113, 221-223 (1996).
  45. Santolo, G. Weights and measurements for American Kestrels, Barn Owls and Loggerhead Shrikes in California. North American Bird Bander. 38, 161-162 (2013).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Primary FeatherSexing ProtocolVisual IdentificationBird BandingConservation BiologyAvian MorphologyField MethodologyPopulation Monitoring