$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Tumor antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) play a crucial role in the response to cancers through a process known as cancer "immune surveillance". Their anti-tumor functions are enhanced by immune checkpoint blockade antibodies such as CTLA-4 inhibitors and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies result in response rates ranging from 0%-17% in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors and 36%-100% in those expressing PD-L1. The robust responses to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade observed in melanoma and NSCLC are shown by evidence of improved overall response rate (RR), durable clinical benefits, and progression-free survival (PFS). Currently, anti-PD1 treatments are the standard of care in second-line NSCLC treatment with nivolumab regardless of PD-L1 expression and with pembrolizumab in patients expressing PD-L1 ≥1%. In first-line treatment, standard of care is pembrolizumab alone in patients with NSCLC expressing PD-L1 ≥50% and can be potentially enhanced with chemotherapy (platin and doublet drug depending on histologic subtype)1,2.
However, such an approach to patient management is debatable3, since PD-L1 expression in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is probably not the most ideal companion biomarker. Others such as tumor mutation burden4 (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and/or microbiota are possibly interesting in this setting either alone or in combination. NSCLC are known to be heterogeneous tumors, either spatially (from a tumor site to another one) or temporally (from diagnosis to recurrence). Patients with NSCLC are usually fragile, and iterative invasive tissue biopsies may be an issue. Indeed, re-biopsy rate at first progression ranges from 46%-84% depending on series, and successful re-biopsy (meaning with histological and full molecular analysis) ranges from 33%-75%. This means that 25%-67% of patients cannot receive a comprehensive re-biopsy analysis during first progression5,6,7,8.
The advent of "liquid biopsies" has thus generated considerable enthusiasm in this particular setting, as it enables crucial reassessment of molecular alterations during disease progression by examining circulating free DNA (cfDNA) derived from circulating tumor cells (CTCs). These live cells are released from the tumor into the bloodstream, where they circulate freely. Although not routinely used, the analysis of CTCs appears to be highly promising in the case of molecular and phenotypic characterization, prognosis, and predictive significance in lung cancer (via DNAseq, RNAseq, miRNA and protein analysis). Indeed, CTCs likely harbor phenotypic characteristics of the active disease rather than the initial markers (detected on tissue biopsies at diagnosis). Furthermore, CTCs bypass the problem of spatial heterogeneity of the tumor tissue, which may be a crucial issue in small biopsies. Consequently, PD-L1 expression on CTCs may potentially shed light on the discrepancies derived from its use as a predictive biomarker using tumor tissue.
Recently, PD-L1 expression has been tested in CTCs of NSCLC. Almost all of the patients tested9 were PD-L1 positive, complicating the interpretation of the result and its clinical use. Overall, PD-L1-positive CTCs were detected in 69.4% of samples from an average of 4.5 cells/mL10. After initiation of radiation therapy, the proportion of PD-L1-positive CTCs increased significantly, indicating upregulation of PD-L1 expression in response to radiation11. Hence, PD-L1 CTCs analysis may be used to monitor dynamic changes of the tumor and immune response, which may reflect the response to chemotherapy, radiation, and likely immunotherapy (IT) treatments.
To date, CTCs isolation and PD-L1 characterization rely on various methods such as anti-EpCAM-coated magnetic bead-based CTC capturing, enrichment-free based assay, and size-based12,13 CTC capture assays. However, CTCs were only detected in 45%-65% of patients with metastatic NSCLC, thus limiting their ability to provide any information for more than half of metastatic NSCLC patients. In addition, CTC count was low in most of these studies using size-based approach10. Furthermore, this method has led to discrepancies such as the detection of CD45(-)/DAPI(+) cells with "cytomorphological patterns of malignancy" in the bloodstream of healthy donors. These concerns highlight the need for a highly sensitive method of CTC collection associated with immune-phenotyping of atypical CD45(-) cells from healthy whole blood using additional cancer biomarkers (i.e., TTF1, Vimentin, EpCAM, and CD44) in NSCLC.
Consequently, we evaluated a spiral microfluidic device that uses inertial and Dean drag forces to separate cells based on size and plasticity through a microfluidic chip. The formation of Dean vortex flows present in the microfluidic chip results in larger CTCs located along the inner wall and smaller immune cells along the outer wall of the chip. The enrichment process is completed by siphoning the larger cells into the collection outlet as the enriched CTC fraction. This method is particularly sensitive and specific (detection of around 1 CTC/mL of whole blood)14 and can be associated with customized immunofluorescence (IF) analyses. These tools will enable setting up of a positive threshold for clinical interpretation. A workflow is thus described that enables biologists to isolate and immunophenotype CTCs with a high rate of recovery and specificity. The protocol describes optimal use of the spiral microfluidic device to collect CTCs, the optimized IF assays that can be customized according to cancer type, and use of free open-source software for measuring and analyzing cell images to perform a semi-automatic numeration of the cells according to fluorescent staining. In addition, microscope multiplexing can be carried out depending on the number of fluorescent filters/markers available.