Spin coating, polyjet printing, and fused deposition modeling are integrated to produce multilayered heterogeneous phantoms that simulate structural and functional properties of biological tissue.
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
Spin coating, polyjet printing, and fused deposition modeling are integrated to produce multilayered heterogeneous phantoms that simulate structural and functional properties of biological tissue.
Biomedical optical imaging is playing an important role in diagnosis and treatment of various diseases. However, the accuracy and the reproducibility of an optical imaging device are greatly affected by the performance characteristics of its components, the test environment, and the operations. Therefore, it is necessary to calibrate these devices by traceable phantom standards. However, most of the currently available phantoms are homogeneous phantoms that cannot simulate multimodal and dynamic characteristics of biological tissue. Here, we show the fabrication of heterogeneous tissue-simulating phantoms using a production line integrating a spin coating module, a polyjet module, a fused deposition modeling (FDM) module, and an automatic control framework. The structural information and the optical parameters of a "digital optical phantom" are defined in a prototype file, imported to the production line, and fabricated layer-by-layer with sequential switch between different printing modalities. Technical capability of such a production line is exemplified by the automatic printing of skin-simulating phantoms that comprise the epidermis, dermis, subcutaneous tissue, and an embedded tumor.
Biomedical optical imaging represents a family of medical imaging tools that detect diseases and tissue anomalies based on light interactions with biological tissue. In comparison with other imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), biomedical optical imaging takes the advantage of noninvasive measurement of tissue structural, functional, and molecular characteristics using low-cost and portable devices1,2,3,4. However, despite its superiority in cost and portability, optical imaging has not been widely accepted for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic guidance, partially due to its poor reproducibility and lack of quantitative mapping between optical and biological parameters. The main reason for this limitation is the lack of traceable standards for quantitative calibration and validation of biomedical optical imaging devices.
In the past, a variety of tissue-simulating phantoms were developed for biomedical optical imaging research in various tissue types, such as brain5,6,7, skin8,9,10,11,12, bladder13, and breast tissues14,15,16,17. These phantoms are primarily produced by one of the following fabrication processes: 1) spin coating10,18 (for simulating homogenous and thin-layered tissue); 2) molding19 (for simulating bulky tissue with geometric features); and 3) three-dimensional (3D) printing20,21,22 (for simulating multilayered heterogeneous tissue). Skin phantoms produced by molding are able to mimic the bulk optical properties of skin tissue but cannot simulate the lateral optical heterogeneities19. Bentz et al. used a two-channel FDM 3D printing method to mimic different optical properties of biological tissue23. However, using two materials cannot sufficiently simulate tissue optical heterogeneity and anisotropy. Lurie et al. created a bladder phantom for optical coherence tomography (OCT) and cystoscopy by combining 3D printing and spin coating13. However, heterogeneous features of the phantom, such as blood vessels, had to be hand painted.
Among the above phantom fabrication processes, 3D printing provides the most flexibility for simulating the structural and functional heterogeneities of biological tissue. However, many biological tissue types, such as skin tissue, consist of multilayered and multiscaled components that cannot be effectively duplicated by a single 3D printing process. Therefore, integration of multiple manufacturing processes is necessary. We propose a 3D printing production line that integrates multiple manufacturing processes for automatic production of multilayered and multiscaled tissue simulating phantoms as a traceable standard for biomedical optical imaging (Figure 1). Although spin coating, polyjet printing, and FDM are automated in our 3D printing production line, each modality retains the same functional characteristics as the established processes. Therefore, this paper provides a general guideline for producing multiscaled, multilayered, and heterogeneous tissue-simulation phantoms without the need for physical integration of multiple processes in a single apparatus.

Figure 1: The CAD diagram of the 3D printing production line. (A) The 3D printing production line with the top shell removed. (B) The schematic of the spin coating module and the mechanical hand module. (C) The schematic of the polyjet printing module. (D) The schematic of the FDM printing module (the UV lamp belongs to the polyjet printing module). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
1. Preparing materials for 3D printing
NOTE: Our optical phantom production line uses a variety of printing materials to simulate the structural and functional heterogeneities of biological tissue. The selection of the printing materials also depends on the manufacturing processes.
2. Preparing computer models for multimodal 3D printing
NOTE: The heterogeneous skin tissue is simplified into three layers: epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue. The epidermis layer is produced by spin coating using the material introduced in step 1.1. The dermis layer is produced by polyjet printing using the photosensitive polymer introduced in step 1.2. The subcutaneous tissue layer is produced by FDM using the material introduced in step 1.3. A prototype computer aided design (CAD) file of different printing parameters is generated to guide the aforementioned fabrication processes.
3. Printing the skin epidermis layer phantom component by spin coating
NOTE: The spin coating module is mainly comprised of three parts: 1) a spin coater; 2) a glue dispenser; and 3) a UV lamp.
4. Printing the skin dermis layer phantom component by polyjetting
NOTE: The polyjet printing module consists of a piezoelectric inkjet nozzle, a three-dimensional mobile platform, a control panel, and a UV lamp (mercury lamp). The solvent-based photocurable material, absorption material, and scattering material are used as a matrix. Different optical parameters are obtained by spraying materials in different proportions in different regions. Finally, the dermis layer phantom is printed and cured layer-by-layer.
5. Printing the subcutaneous tissue phantom component by FDM
NOTE: The FDM module is comprised of a hybrid-three-head module, a single-head module, and a 3D mobile platform. The gel wax, the absorbing material, and the scattering material are used as raw materials to prepare a phantom simulating subcutaneous tissue/tumor. The gel wax is heated and melted in the feeder. Uniformly stirred by the extrusion head, it is extruded to print the final phantoms with the desired optical parameters.
6. Moving the substrate back to the loading station
7. Casting the subcutaneous tissue layer phantom component by molding
NOTE: If the tumor model for the phantom is designed, it will be necessary to cast the entire phantom by pouring the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) outside the tumor. Steps 7.1–7.3 are not required for the FDM module to print subcutaneous tissue layer without a tumor.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Phantom fabricated by spin coating
The spin coating evenly distributes the droplets on the substrate by rotating the turntable, and a single layer of the original body is fabricated after curing. The rotational speed of the substrate and the time of rotation not only affect the surface quality of the phantom, but also determine the thickness of each layer of the phantom. Phantoms of different thicknesses can be fabricated by repetitive spin coating layer-by-layer. The optical parameters of the phanto...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
In the fabrication of the multilayered phantom, the material used for spin coating is a kind of light-curable material instead of PDMS. The intermediate layer is printed with the polyjet printing method, which uses the light-curable resin as raw material. Although thin PDMS phantoms can be made by spin coating after adding tert-butyl alcohol, a PDMS layer cannot effectively bind to the light-curable material during polyjet printing. Therefore, we chose the light-curable resin for spin coating.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11002139 and 81327803) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. We thank Zachary J. Smith of the University of Science and Technology for providing the audio voiceover.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Hydroxy-2-methylpropiophenone | aladdin | H110280-500g | Light initiator http://www.aladdin-e.com/ |
| 3D printing control system | USTC | USTC-3DPrinter_control1.0 | custom-made github: https://github.com/macanzhen/ |
| 3D printing system | USTC | USTC-3DPrinter1.0 | custom-made |
| AcroRip color | Human Plus | AcroRip v8.2.6 | |
| All-in-one nozzle slicing script | Shenzhen CBD Technology Co.,Ltd. | github: https://github.com/macanzhen/ | |
| Chinese Red Dye | Juents | Oil-soluble | |
| Cura | Ultimaker | Cura_15.04.6 | |
| Gel Wax | Shanghai Lida Industry Co.,ltd. | LP | melting point: 56 °C |
| Graphite | aladdin | G103922-100g | Change object optical absorption parameters http://www.aladdin-e.com/ |
| PDMS | Dow Corning | 184 | |
| Titanium dioxide | ALDRICH | 24858-100G | 347 nm |
| Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate | aladdin | T101642-250ml | Photocured monomer http://www.aladdin-e.com/ |
| UV ink SLA Photopolymer Resin | time80s | RESIN-A | http://www.time80s.com/zlxz |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.