$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The cytotoxicity and migration methods described here can be used to evaluate NK cell cytotoxicity to cancer cells and NK cell-mediated immune evasion mechanisms in malignant tumors, as well as to identify therapeutic agents that will enhance NK cell activity/function. The protocols are simple, sensitive, reproducible, and preferable alternatives to classical radioactivity-based 51chromium release assay. The protocols have been specifically designed to be readily adaptable for use in most laboratories, with straightforward colorimetric, microscopic, or FACS-based readouts that are easy to interpret, allowing researchers to reach reliable conclusions. All are scalable for high-throughput screening-based approaches. Although the protocols are presented in the context of a single hepatic tumor cell line, they can be easily adapted easily to other cancer cell types and/or other non-cancer target cells.
Whereas all of the methods presented are robust and reproducible, inter-experimental variation could occur with different batches of cancer cells and NK cells. To ensure that results accurately support the conclusions of the experiments, it is advisable to repeat the experiment at least two times using biological triplicates.
A limitation of this method is that the growth rate of NK92MI cells can be slow. Therefore, for experiments with 50 or more samples, sufficient numbers of NK92MI should be grown beforehand to prevent delays. Also, all of the controls described in the protocols must be implemented to avoid spurious and nonreproducible results. Another limitation of the NK cytotoxicity assay is that the NK to cancer cell ratio, as well as the incubation time, must be optimized for each target cell. For example, we have tested various ratios of cancer cells to NK cells (1:5, 1:10, 1:20, 1:40, and 1:80) for the hepatic cancer cell lines, as well as multiple incubation times (2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h). Based on our results we observed most consistent results with 1:10 and 1:20 ratios of cancer cells to NK cells and incubation for 3 h.
In addition, cancer cells derived from solid tumors will attach and grow on the surface of the culture plate, whereas NK cells grow in suspension. If the incubation time is longer than 3 h, it is advisable to use ultralow attachment 96 well plates, which will improve consistency and reproducibility between experiments and biological replicates. It is also important to note that NK cell-induced cytotoxicity assays can also be performed using primary NK cells isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). However, there are several limitations with such experiments. First, these experiments cannot be as easily scaled as with NK92MI cells. Second, batch-to-batch variation of cytotoxic activity of NK cells isolated from PMBCs can be problematic in terms of reproducibility and interpretation of the results. Similarly, other human NK cell lines are described in the literature and could be used in these types of experiments, including NKL cells29; however, unlike NK-92MI cells, NKL cells are IL-2 dependent and not commercially available.
When considering the calcein AM experiments described, it is important to note that calcein AM remains in apoptotic bodies after cell death30. Therefore, the quantitation of calcein AM staining should be carefully performed, as it may lead to an underestimation of NK cytotoxicity.
Similar to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, modulation of NK cell migration by cytokines and other chemoattractants plays an important role in the regulation of NK cell function. The NK cell migration assay described here provides a simple platform to evaluate NK cell migration in the context of a stimulus such as a chemokine or chemoattractant. This assay can be used to evaluate agents that can either promote or interfere with NK cell migration - thus, identifying enhancers and repressors of NK cell migration. This method can also be useful to study the NK cell migration regulatory capacity as a result of a genetic/epigenetic alterations (upregulation or downregulation) or arising due to drug treatment.
To accurately measure NK cell migration, there are few critical steps that should be followed. For all of the experiments using conditioned medium, it is important that equivalent conditioned medium be used from both control and treatment conditions to obtain accurate measurements. The time of incubation will be varied with purified chemoattractants and conditioned medium. Finally, transwell migration assays are well established and considered an excellent method to assess NK cell migration; however, the homogeneous monocultures employed in the assays lack the complex physiology of tissues or even 3D cultures that might more accurately mimic the tumor microenvironment.
Thus, although there are some limitations to the NK cell cytotoxicity assays and NK migration assay presented in this article, these assays are applicable to a wide range of immunological studies and thus provide important and reliable methods to assess NK cell function and NK cell modulatory immune therapeutics.