3D printing is an additive method based on gradual placement of layers from different materials, thus creating 3D objects. It was originally developed for rapid prototyping and was introduced in 1984 by Charles Hull, who is considered the inventor of the stereolithography method based on solidifying layers of photopolymer resin1. Technological advancements in virtual planning of surgeries and planning and printing of patient-specific implants are constantly evolving. Innovations arise both in the field of computer assisted design (CAD) software and in 3D printing technologies2. Simultaneous to developments in technology, the software and printers become more user-friendly. This shortens the time required for planning and printing and allows the surgeon the option to plan his/her operations and create his/her own patient-specific surgical guides and fixation plates in a field that was exclusively an engineer’s “playground”. These developments also allow for surgeons and engineers to introduce new applications and designs of patient-specific implants3,4,5.
One of these applications is 3D planning of orthognathic surgeries followed by 3D planning and printing of surgical guides and patient-specific fixation plates. Historically, orthognathic surgeries were planned using articulators. A facebow was used to register the relationship of the upper jaw to the temporomandibular joint thus positioning the patient’s casts in the articulator. Later, the surgical movements were performed on the casts and an acrylic wafer was prepared to help with proper positioning of the jaws during surgery. This method was used for many years and is still used nowadays by most, but the utilization of cone beam computed tomography (CT) together with intra-oral scanners and CAD software allowed for accurate planning, sparing the need for facebows or casts and moving towards creation of digitally planned wafers6. This method reduced the inaccuracy of manual manipulation and measurements but still had flaws including using the instable lower jaw as a reference point for positioning the upper jaw and lack of control over the vertical positioning of the upper jaw7. Thus, a new method was introduced. This method is called the “waferless” surgery and is based on repositioning of the jaws anatomically using surgical cutting guides and patient-specific fixation titanium plates8. This method resolves the disadvantages of the digital wafer method described before. We will describe this method, which allows the surgeon complete freedom in planning these surgeries in a patient-specific manner, with minimal possible errors and inaccuracies. This method allows for a “waferless” surgery, which means there is no need for using the opposed jaw as reference for repositioning the bones, thus decreasing the inaccuracies derived from this reliance9.