$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The drainage pattern of the pulmonary veins (PV) is highly variable with 56.5% variation in the average population1. Evaluation of the PV drainage pattern is crucial when planning PV isolation (PVI), which is the most common interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation nowadays2,3,4. Although radiofrequency catheter ablation has been the standard technology for achieving PVI, the cryoballoon (CB)-based ablation technology (CA) is an alternative method requiring less procedural time. The technique is less complicated compared with radiofrequency ablation5,6, while the efficacy and safety of CA are similar to those of radiofrequency ablation7.
The rate of procedural PV occlusion by the CB and the continuous circumferential extension of tissue injury in the PV ostium determines the permanent success of PVI after CA. One of the main determinants of PV occlusion is the variation of PV anatomy. In recent, computed tomography- (CT) and cardiac MRI-based studies, several PV parameters were identified with predictive values of short and long term success rates following CA. These parameters included variations of both the PV anatomy (left common PV, supernumerary PVs8,9,10, ostial area, ovality index8,11,12,13) and its surroundings (intervenous ridge8,14,15,16, thickness of left lateral ridge8,9,17).
Although conventional 2D echocardiography is not suitable for displaying and measuring most of the above parameters, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE) seems to be an alternative tool to visualize the PVs, as demonstrated in previous literature data18,19.
Furthermore, 3D TEE prior to PVI brings additional value compared to CT or MRI, as it not only provides data on PV characteristics for procedural design, but also clarifies whether a thrombus in the left atrial appendage (LAA) is present. This investigation is especially important prior to PVI. At the same time, 3D TEE requires less time, its procedural cost is low, and it does not expose the patient and the medical staff to radiation.
In the past, several types of CBs existed with different sizes, which made it difficult to extrapolate how the various parameters of the PVs influence the success rate of CA. Today, the newly introduced second-generation CB is used for CA, which only exists in one size. Thanks to its improved cooling effect, the second-generation CB offers a much higher performance compared to the first-generation CB20, which further highlights the importance of PV anatomy and interventional planning before PVI.