Summary
People with BRCA1 mutations have a higher risk of developing cancer, which warrants accurate evaluation of the function of BRCA1 variants. Herein, we described a protocol for functional assessment of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-mediated cytosine base editors that enable targeted C:G to T:A conversion in living cells.
Abstract
Recent studies have investigated the risks associated with BRCA1 gene mutations using various functional assessment methods such as fluorescent reporter assays, embryonic stem cell viability assays, and therapeutic drug-based sensitivity assays. Although they have clarified a lot of BRCA1 variants, these assays involving the use of exogenously expressed BRCA1 variants are associated with overexpression issues and cannot be applied to post-transcriptional regulation. To resolve these limitations, we previously reported a method for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants via CRISPR-mediated cytosine base editor that induce targeted nucleotide substitution in living cells. Using this method, we identified variants whose functions remain ambiguous, including c.-97C>T, c.154C>T, c.3847C>T, c.5056C>T, and c.4986+5G>A, and confirmed that CRISPR-mediated base editors are useful tools for reclassifying the variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1. Here, we describe a protocol for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-based cytosine base editor. This protocol provides guidelines for the selection of target sites, functional analysis and evaluation of BRCA1 variants.
Introduction
The breast cancer type 1 susceptibility gene (BRCA1) is a widely known tumor suppressor gene. Because the BRCA1 gene is related to the repair of DNA damage, mutations in this gene would lead to a greater risk of cancer development in an individual1. Breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers are linked to inherited loss-of-function (LOF) mutations of the BRCA1 gene2. Functional assessment and identification of BRCA1 variants may help in preventing and diagnosing the various diseases. To address function of BRCA1 variants, several methods have been developed and broadly used for investigating the pathogenicity of BRCA1 variants such as embryonic stem cell viability assays, fluorescent reporter assays, and therapeutic drug-based sensitivity assays3,4,5,6. Although these methods have assessed the function of a lot of BRCA1 variants, the methods involving exogenously expressed BRCA1 variants pose limitations in terms of overexpression that might affecting downstream regulation, gene dosage, and protein folding7. Furthermore, these assays cannot be harnessed to the posttranscriptional regulation such as mRNA splicing, transcript stability, and effect of untranslated region8,9.
CRISPR-Cas9 system enables targeted genome editing in living cells and organisms10. Through a single-guide RNA, Cas9 can induce double-strand breaks (DSBs) in chromosomal DNA at specific genomic loci in order to activate two DNA repair pathways: error-prone nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway and error-free homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway11. HDR is a precise repair mechanism; however, DSBs induced by Cas9 nuclease for HDR often results in unwanted insertion and deletion (indel) mutation. Additionally, it needs homologous donor DNA templates for repairing DNA damage and has relatively low efficiency. Recently, Cas9 nickase (nCas9) have been fused with cytidine deaminase domains for targeting C:G to T:A substitutions, without the need for homologous DNA templates and DNA double strand breaks12,13,14,15. Using the cytosine base editor, we developed a new method for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants16.
In this study, we used CRISPR-mediated cytosine base editor, BE314, which induces efficient C:G to T:A point mutations, for implementing the functional assessment of BRCA1 variants and successfully identified the functions of several BRCA1 variants (Figure 1).
Figure 1: An overview of the workflow for functional assessment. (A) Schematic showing the functional assessment of BRCA1. Because the LOF of BRCA1 affects cell viability, when the BRCA1 mutation is pathogenic, the cells die as the passage number increases. (B) Stages of the functional assessment of BRCA1. Dotted box is optional. It can be replaced by co-transfection of gRNA expressing and BE3 expressing plasmids DNA. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.
Protocol
NOTE: Method 1 (generation of HAP1-BE3 cell lines) is optional. Instead of constructing a BE3-expressing cell line, BE3-encoding plasmid DNA can be co-transfected with gRNA-encoding plasmid DNA. Other variants of cytosine base editors, such as BE4max, also can be used for highly efficient base editing.
1. Generation of HAP1-BE3 cell lines
- Construction of plasmid DNA
- To construct the lentiBE3-blast plasmid DNA for lentivirus production, amplify the BE3 coding sequences in pCMV-BE3 (Table of Materials) by PCR using high-fidelity polymerase. Design the PCR primer to contain overlapping sequences of the digested vector (from step 1.1.2) for isothermal assembly as follows17:
primer-F: 5’-TTTGCCGCCAGAACACAGGACCGGTTCTAGA GCCGCCACCATGAGCTCAGAG-3’,
primer-R: 5’-CAGAGAGAAGTTTGTTGCGCCGGATCC GACTTTCCTCTTCTTCTTGGG-3’
NOTE: Nucleotides shown in underlined are overlapped with the digested vector and these sequences will be specific to the destination vector chosen by the user. - Digest lentiCas9-blast (Table of Materials) plasmid DNA with the restriction enzymes, XbaI and BamHI (1 unit per 1 μg) for 1 h at 37 °C. Run the digested product on a 0.8% agarose gel and purify the appropriate-sized bands (8.6 kb) using a commercial gel extraction kit (Table of Materials).
- Clone the amplified BE3 PCR product and digested lentiCas9-Blast vector using the isothermal assembly kit (Table of Materials). Use a total of 0.02-0.5 pmol of DNA fragments and a 1:3 ratio of vector:insert. Transform the assembly product into DH5 alpha-competent cells18. Add the transformants on an agar plate containing ampicillin (100 µg/mL) and incubate the plate overnight at 37 °C.
- Pick several colonies and inoculate them in 4 mL of LB (lysogeny broth) medium containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL) and grow the culture in a shaking incubator at 180 rpm.
- Purify plasmid DNA using a commercial plasmid DNA purification kit (Table of Materials) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.
- To confirm DNA cloning success, analyze the BE3 sequences of each purified plasmid DNA (from step 1.1.5) by Sanger sequencing using standard and BE3-specific primers (Supplementary Table 1) and select the exact cloned lentiBE3-blast construct.
NOTE: To analyze the results of Sanger sequencing, we recommended several tools such as BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and CLUSTALW (https://www.genome.jp/tools-bin/clustalw).
- To construct the lentiBE3-blast plasmid DNA for lentivirus production, amplify the BE3 coding sequences in pCMV-BE3 (Table of Materials) by PCR using high-fidelity polymerase. Design the PCR primer to contain overlapping sequences of the digested vector (from step 1.1.2) for isothermal assembly as follows17:
- Cell culture and generation of HAP1-BE3 cell lines
- Maintain cells in a healthy condition and in an actively dividing state. Culture HAP1 cells in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (Table of Materials) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Culture HEK293T/17 cells in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Table of Materials) containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin.
NOTE: HAP1 cell is useful for genetic research because of it is nearly haploid cells. However, the cells can spontaneously return to a diploid state in cell culture. Enrichment Hoechst 34580 stained 1n-population using flowcytometry will be helpful for maintenance of haploidy of HAP1 cells19. - Seed 5 x 106 HEK293T/17 cells on a 100 nm dish 1 day before transfection. On the day of transfection, transfect the plasmid DNA (15 µg of lentiBE3-blast, 9 µg of psPAX2 for viral packaging, and 6 µg of pMD2.G for vial envelope of 2nd generation lentiviral packaging system) using commercial transfection reagents according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Table of Materials)20. Change the medium at 6 h post-transfection and harvest virus-containing medium at 48 h or 72 h post-transfection. Filter the supernatant using a 0.45 µm filter.
- Transduce the lentiviral particles of BE3 into HAP1 cells at a MOI (multiplicity of infection) of 0.1. To adjust for an appropriate MOI, use serially diluted concentrations of virus. Remove the medium and replace it with adjusted viral supernatant and fresh culture medium.
- One day after transduction, change the medium to 10 µg/mL of blasticidin (Table of Materials)-containing medium and select the transduced cells for 3 days with blasticidin. After blasticidin selection, select a well with ~10% of surviving cells for the next step.
- After blasticidin selection, seed the transduced cells on 96-well plates at a density of 0.5 cells/well in order to isolate single clones (e.g., dilute 50 cells in 20 mL (0.5 cells per 200 µL) culture medium and aliquot 200 µL per well in 96 well plate). Incubate the 96-well plates for 2 weeks and pick the single colonies to confirm the BE3 activity.
- Divide the single colonies into two sets, one sets for testing BE3 activity and other for maintenance. Transduce the lentiviral particles of gRNAs into one of the sets to confirm the BE3 activity. Analyze the mutation frequency of each colony using T7 endonuclease I (T7E1, Table of Materials) assay or by performing the targeted deep sequencing technique (step 4)21. Select appropriate single clones that are healthy and have a highly active BE3.
NOTE: To validate exact mutation frequencies, we recommend the targeted deep sequencing than T7E1 assay. HEK2 (5’-GAACACAAAGCATAGACTGCGGG-‘3) is well validated target site for BE3.
- Maintain cells in a healthy condition and in an actively dividing state. Culture HAP1 cells in Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (Table of Materials) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Culture HEK293T/17 cells in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Table of Materials) containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin.
2. Design and construction of BRCA1 targeting gRNAs
Figure 2: An example of a gRNA plasmid DNA. (A) To effectively edit the target sequence with BE3, an NGG PAM (CCN PAM) that places the target C (target G) within a five-nucleotide window is required. NGG PAM is shown in red and the base editing window is represented by a gray box. (B) The gRNA sequence for c.8047C>T (H1283Y) base editing is indicated and the target C:G pairs are shown in red while the active window is highlighted by a gray box. For gRNA cloning, the overhang sequences indicated in bold are added at both the 5ʹ ends. Templates for gRNA were generated by annealing the two complementary oligonucleotides. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
NOTE: Positive and negative controls of BRCA1 variants are essential. In this study, c.5252G>A (R1751Q) and c.4527C>T (Y1509Y) are used as benign controls. c.191G>A (C64Y), 81-1G>A, and c.3598C>T (Q1200*) are used as pathogenic controls. Target sequences of each gRNA are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
- Obtain the BRCA1 genome sequence from GenBank at NCBI22.
- Search the 20-bp target sites with the Protospacer Adjacent Motif (PAM) sequence “NGG” and “CCN” around mutation of interest. The mutation of interest should be located in 4–8 nucleotides in the PAM-distal end of the gRNA target sequences because of the active window of BE3 is 4–8 nucleotides in the PAM-distal end of the gRNA target sequences14. In the case of c.8047C>T (H1283Y)- and c.5252G>A (R1751Q)-targeting gRNAs, 5ʹ-TCAGGAACATCACCTTAGTG-AGG-3ʹ and 5ʹ-CCA-CCAAGGTCCAAAGCGAGCAA-3ʹ, the sequences in bold are active windows. C to T and G to A conversions occur with NGG and CCN PAM, respectively (Figure 2A).
NOTE: BE-Designer (http://www.rgenome.net/be-designer/)23 is useful web-based tools for gRNA design. - Order two complementary oligonucleotides per gRNA; for the forward oligonucleotides, add “CACCG” to the 5ʹ end of the guide sequence, and for the reverse oligonucleotides, add “AAAC” to the 5’ end and “C” to the 3’ end. These additional sequences are specific to the destination gRNA expression vector (from step 2.5) used for this protocol, and users should be adjusted for alternative gRNA expression vectors (Figure 2B).
- Resuspend the oligonucleotide in distilled water at a final concentration of 100 µM. Mix the two complementary oligonucleotides to a final concentration of 10 µM with T4 Ligation buffer (Table of Materials) and heat them at 95 °C for 5 min and cool them at room temperature for annealing.
- Digest pRG2 using the restriction enzyme, BsaI (1 unit per 1 μg) for 1 h at 37 °C (Table of Materials). Run the digested product on 1% agarose gel and purify the appropriate-sized band (2.5 kb).
NOTE: Instead of using a classic digestion and ligation method, other cloning method such as Golden Gate cloning can be used. - Ligate the annealed oligonucleotide duplex to the vector DNA using the purchased DNA ligase (Table of Materials) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and transform them into DH5 alpha-competent cells (Other E. coli strains which widely used for subcloning also can be used).
- Add the transformants to an agar plate containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL) and incubate the plate overnight at 37 °C. Purify plasmid DNA from several transformants and analyze their gRNA sequences by Sanger sequencing using primers which prime at U6 promoter (Table of Materials).
3. Creation of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-mediated base editing tools
NOTE: If HAP1-BE3 cell lines is not used, BE3-encoding plasmid DNA can be co-transfected with BRCA1-targeting gRNA. Compared to co-transfection of BE3 and gRNA plasmids, transfection of gRNA plasmid to HAP-BE3 cells induce efficient base editing up to 3-fold at target locus in our hands.
- Seed 5 x 105 HAP1-BE3 cells (or HAP1 cells in case of co-transfection methods) per well in 24-well plates 1 day prior to transfection. At the time of transfection, culture cells to reach an appropriate density (70%–80% confluence).
- Transfect BRCA1-targeting gRNAs using the purchased transfection reagents (Table of Materials) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Use 1 µg of BRCA1-targeting gRNAs (with 1 µg of BE3-encoding plasmid DNA in case of co-transfection methods) to induce C:G to T:A conversion at BRCA1 target sites. Incubate the cells at 37 °C and subculture every 3–4 days.
- Harvest the cell pellets 3, 10, and 24 days after transfection to analyze base editing efficiencies (Samples from 3 days after transfection are analyzed regrading as day 0 samples).
- Extract genomic DNA using the genomic DNA purification kit (Table of Materials).
NOTE: We recommend optimizing transfection conditions with variable ratio of reagent to DNA. Optimal condition for HAP1 transfection is 4:1 ration of reagent to DNA in our hands.
4. Sample preparation for Illumina next-generation sequencing (NGS)
Figure 3: Preparation for next-generation sequencing. The 1st PCR primer was designed to amplify the BRCA1 target site on genomic DNA. The 2nd PCR primer was designed such that its sequences are located more inside than the 1st PCR primer sequences. Additional sequences shown as a yellow bar were added at both ends of the 2nd PCR primer to attach the essential sequences for performing next-generation sequencing. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
- Design the 1st PCR primers to amplify BRCA1 target sites. Although there is no restriction on the size of the 1st PCR product, a product size of <1 kb is recommended to efficiently amplify a specific region (Figure 3).
- Design the 2nd PCR primers located inside the 1st PCR product. Consider the size of the amplicon according to the NGS read length (For example, the size of the amplicon product should be smaller than 300 bp for 2 × 150 bp paired-end run to merge each reads). In order to attach essential sequences for NGS analysis, add additional sequences to the 5’ end of the 2nd PCR primers as follows: for the forward primers, add 5’-ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT-3’ sequences to the 5’ end, and for the reverse primers, add 5’-GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCG ATCT-3’ sequences to the 5’ end.
NOTE: We used nested PCR to reduce the amplicon of non-specific binding by preventing primers from attaching to non-target sequence. - Amplify the BRCA1 target sites on the genomic DNA obtained from three time points. Use high-fidelity polymerase according to the manufacturer’s protocol for minimizing PCR errors. For the 1st PCR reaction, use 100 ng of genomic DNA for amplification over 15 cycles. For the 2nd PCR reaction, use 1 µL of the 1st PCR product for amplification over 20 cycles. Run 5 µL of the 2nd PCR product on 2% agarose gel and confirm the size.
- In order to attach the essential sequences for NGS analysis, amplify the 2nd PCR product using the primers listed below. For the PCR reaction, 1 µL of the 2nd PCR product is used for amplification up to 30 cycles using high-fidelity polymerase.
- To perform multiplex sequencing for large numbers of libraries to be pooled and sequenced simultaneously, use forward (D501 – D508) and reverse (D701 – D712) primers, which have unique index sequence (Supplementary Table 1). Amplify each sample using different primers sets to conduct the unique dual indexing strategy.
- Run 5 µL of the PCR product on 2% agarose gel to confirm the size, and purify the amplicon using a commercial PCR clean-up kit (Table of Materials). Mix each sample in equal amounts to create an NGS library.
- Quantify the NGS library at 260 nm wavelength using spectrophotometers and dilute the NGS library to concentration of 1 nM using resuspension buffer or 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5. Prepare 100 µL of the library diluted to the appropriate loading concentration depending on the library types (For example, prepare 200 pM of the library for Nextera DNA Flex).
- As a control, combine phiX with the diluted sample appropriate for the type of kit.
- Load the library onto the cartridge and run NGS according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Illumina iSeq 100 or Miseq systems can sequence the amplicons of various length up to 300 bp for single-read or paired end. We recommended over 10,000 reads per target amplicon for in-depth analysis of base editing efficiency.
5. Analysis of base editing efficiency for the functional assessment of BRCA1 variants
- Analyze the base editing efficiencies using MAUND24. The base editing efficiency is calculated as described below.
If multiple cytosines are present in BE3 active window, only the C to T conversion that is targeted for evaluating the BRCA1 variant is considered. For example, if the sequences of BE3 active window are “C4A5T6C7T8,” the possible sequences generated by base editing are “T4A5T6C7T8”, “C4A5T6T7T8”, and “T4A5T6T7T8”. At this time, if position 4 is the targeted position for the desired BRCA1 variant, then only the ““T4A5T6C7T8” sequence is considered for calculating base editing efficiency.
NOTE: We also recommend other web-tools for analysis of base editing activity such as CRISPResso225, and BE-analyzer23. - Verify the results using positive and negative controls of BRCA1 variants. The base editing efficiencies of the benign control should remain the same, whereas those of the pathogenic control should decrease over time.
- Calculate the relative base editing efficiency of BRCA1 variants and determine their pathogenicity. The significant differences between Day 0 and Day 21 samples are analyzed appropriate statistical analysis such as t-test.
Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.
Representative Results
The experimental approaches described in this protocol enable the functional assessment of endogenous BRCA1 variants generated by CRISPR-based cytosine base editors. To select appropriate cell lines for the functional assessment of BRCA1 variants, researchers should confirm that BRCA1 is essential gene in the targeted cell lines. For example, we first transfected Cas9 and gRNAs into HAP1 cell lines to disrupt BRCA1 and analyzed mutation frequencies by targeted deep sequencing. We found that mutation frequencies decreased significantly over time in HAP1 cell lines (Figure 4A). These results showed that BRCA1 is essential gene for cell viability in HAP1 cell lines. To investigate whether C:G to T:A substituted variants affect the function of BRCA1, the plasmids DNA encoding gRNAs, which could induce each mutation, were transfected to HAP1-BE3 cell lines and the substitution frequencies were analyzed. The relative substitution frequencies of c.3598C>T (p. Q1200*), a pathogenic variant, dramatically decreased, whereas those of c.4527C>T (p.Y1509Y), a benign variant, remained similar with time (Figure 4B). In the ClinVar database, c.154C>T (p. L52F), c.3847C>T (p.H1283Y), and c.5056C>T (p.H1686Y) of BRCA1 are reported as variants of uncertain significance. We analyzed function of these variants using the methods mentioned above and found that nucleotide substitution frequencies of these three variants decreased in a time-dependent manner (Figure 4B). From these results, the three substitutions altered BRCA1 function and could be categorized as pathogenic mutations.
Figure 4: Representative results of functional study of BRCA1 using CRISPR-Cas9 systems. (A) BRCA1 disruption affects to the cell viability. HAP1 cells were transfected with plasmid encoding spCas9 and two gRNAs targeting BRCA1, respectively, and targeted deep sequencing was performed for cell viability analysis. Mutation frequencies of BRCA1 decreased in a time-dependent manner in cells transfected with two independent gRNAs, and the mutation frequencies of CCR5, which was used as a negative control, remained the same over time. (B) Functional assessments of five BRCA1 variants. HAP1-BE3 cells were transfected with gRNAs inducing BRCA1 mutations, respectively, and targeted deep sequencing was performed for cell viability analysis. The relative substitution frequencies decreased in a time-dependent manner in cells of c.3598C>T, c.154C>T, c.3847C>T, and c.5056C>T and those of c.4527C>T remained the same. Error bars show the standard error of mean. Asterisks denote different P values: * P<0.05; ** P<0.005., n.s: not significant. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.
Discussion
This protocol describes a simple method for functional assessments of BRCA1 variants using CRISPR-meditated cytosine base editor. The protocol describes methods for the design of gRNAs at target locus and construction of the plasmid DNAs from which they are expressed. Cytosine base editors induce nucleotide conversion in an active window (in case of BE3, nucleotides 4–8 in the PAM-distal end of the gRNA target sequences). The researcher should carefully choose target sequences because all cytosines in active window can be substituted to thymines. Furthermore, as described in Step 5, multiple cytosines in an active window should be carefully analyzed to evaluate the function of BRCA1 variants.
One of the most important steps is transfection in the target cell line, which affects the initial mutation frequency for BRCA1 functional assessments. To improve the initial mutation frequency, the researchers should optimize the delivery methods to the cell line of interest. As described in Step 1, the generation of BE3 expressing cell lines is useful option to increase the initial mutation frequency. We do not recommend lentiviral transduction of gRNA into the HAP1-BE3 cells, because constitutive expression of BE3 and gRNA could cause accumulative nucleotide conversion, and these results interfere with the functional assessment of BRCA1 variants.
In addition to the BE3 mediated methods introduced in this protocol, several complementary methods are recommended to further extend the functional assessments of BRCA1 variants. First, as described above, the mutation frequency in the initial sample is important in order to obtain confident results of BRCA1 variants. To increase the base editing efficiency, variants of cytosine base editors, such as BE4max, are recommended. Second, the BE3 recognize target DNA sequence through the 5’-NGG-3’ PAM sequences, which is a limitation in generating various types of BRCA1 variants. Recently developed Cas9 variants with altered PAM sequences are useful option in this case to extend targetable BRCA1 variants26,27,28. Third, the BE3 induces substantial base editing at unwanted sites and the off-target effect could influence functional assessment of BRCA1 variants29,30,31. To reduce the off-target effect of BE3, target sites of gRNAs should be carefully chosen without any similar sequences in the genome. SECURE-BE3 or YE1, which has developed for reducing unwanted base editing in genome and transcriptome are useful option32,33. Forth, a saturation genome editing (SGE) method based on Cas9-mediated HDR also great options for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants19. The method has no limitation for selecting target sequences and nucleotide positions of BRCA1 variants. However, HDR-based approach is relatively less efficient than the base editors and additionally requires design and synthesis of donor templates14. Finally, patient derived BRCA1 variants include various range of mutations such as point mutations, insertions, and deletions. Of these, point mutations are major population of BRCA1 variants, which are not only C:G to T:A conversion, but also A:T to G:C, C:G to G:C, and A:T to T:A conversions. To functional assessments of these types of conversions, CRISPR-mediated adenosine base editors and Prime Editors are valuable options34,35. Rapidly developing genome engineering technologies will enable functional assessments of more diverse BRCA1 variants.
Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.
Disclosures
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (grants 2017M3A9B4062419, 2019R1F1A1057637, and 2018R1A5A2020732 to Y.K.).
Materials
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
| BamHI | NEB | R3136 | Restriction enzyme |
| Blasticidin | Thermo Fisher Scientific | A1113903 | Drug for selecting transduced cells |
| BsaI | NEB | R0535 | Restriction enzyme |
| DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit | Qiagen | 69504 | Genomic DNA prep. kit |
| Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Gibco | 11965092 | Medium for HEK293T/17 cells |
| Fetal bovine serum | Gibco | 16000036 | Supplemetal for cell culture |
| FuGENE HD Transfection Reagent | Promega | E2311 | Transfection reagent |
| Gibson Assembly Master Mix | NEB | E2611L | Gibson assembly kit |
| Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium | Gibco | 12440046 | Medium for HAP1 cells |
| lentiCas9-Blast | Addgene | 52962 | Plasmids DNA for lentiBE3 cloning |
| Lipofectamine 2000 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 11668027 | Transfection reagent |
| Opti-MEM | Gibco | 31985070 | Transfection materials |
| pCMV-BE3 | Addgene | 73021 | Plasmids DNA for lentiBE3 cloning |
| Penicillin-Streptomycin | Gibco | 15140 | Supplemetal for cell culture |
| Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | NEB | M0530SQ | High-fidelity polymerase |
| pMD2.G | Addgene | 12259 | Plasmids DNA for virus prep. |
| pRG2 | Addgene | 104174 | gRNA cloning vector |
| psPAX2 | Addgene | 12260 | Plasmids DNA for virus prep. |
| QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit | Qiagen | 27106 | Plasmid DNA prep. Kit |
| QIAquick Gel extraction Kit | Qiagen | 28704 | Gel extraction kit |
| QIAquick PCR Purification Kit | Qiagen | 28104 | PCR product prep. kit |
| Quick Ligation Kit | NEB | M2200 | Ligase for gRNA cloning |
| T7 Endonuclease I | NEB | M0302 | Materials for T7E1 assay |
| XbaI | NEB | R0145 | Restriction enzyme |
References
- Roy, R., Chun, J., Powell, S. N. BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection. Nature Reviews Cancer. 12 (1), 68-78 (2011).
- Kuchenbaecker, K. B., et al. Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. Journal of the American Medical Association. 317 (23), 2402-2416 (2017).
- Millot, G. A., et al. A guide for functional analysis of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance. Human Mutation. 33 (11), 1526-1537 (2012).
- Santos, C., et al. Pathogenicity evaluation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 unclassified variants identified in Portuguese breast/ovarian cancer families. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 16 (3), 324-334 (2014).
- Starita, L. M., et al. A Multiplex Homology-Directed DNA Repair Assay Reveals the Impact of More Than 1,000 BRCA1 Missense Substitution Variants on Protein Function. American Journal of Human Genetics. 103 (4), 498-508 (2018).
- Anantha, R. W., et al. Functional and mutational landscapes of BRCA1 for homology-directed repair and therapy resistance. Elife. 6, (2017).
- Gibson, T. J., Seiler, M., Veitia, R. A. The transience of transient overexpression. Nature Methods. 10 (8), 715-721 (2013).
- Quann, K., Jing, Y., Rigoutsos, I. Post-transcriptional regulation of BRCA1 through its coding sequence by the miR-15/107 group of miRNAs. Frontiers in Genetics. 6, 242 (2015).
- Saunus, J. M., et al. Posttranscriptional regulation of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 by the RNA binding protein HuR. Cancer Research. 68 (22), 9469-9478 (2008).
- Knott1, G. J., Doudna, J. A. CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering. Science. 361, 866-869 (2018).
- Sander, J. D., Joung, J. K. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nature Biotechnology. 32 (4), 347-355 (2014).
- Hess, G. T., et al. Directed evolution using dCas9-targeted somatic hypermutation in mammalian cells. Nature Methods. 13 (12), 1036-1042 (2016).
- Kim, K., et al. Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in mouse embryos. Nature Biotechnology. 35 (5), 435-437 (2017).
- Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A., Liu, D. R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature. 533 (7603), 420-424 (2016).
- Park, D. S., et al. Targeted Base Editing via RNA-Guided Cytidine Deaminases in Xenopus laevis Embryos. Molecules and Cells. 40 (11), 823-827 (2017).
- Kweon, J., et al. A CRISPR-based base-editing screen for the functional assessment of BRCA1 variants. Oncogene. 39 (1), 30-35 (2020).
- Gibson, D. G. Enzymatic assembly of overlapping DNA fragments. Methods in Enzymology. 498, 349-361 (2011).
- Nageshwaran, S., et al. CRISPR Guide RNA Cloning for Mammalian Systems. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (140), (2018).
- Findlay, G. M., et al. Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing. Nature. 562 (7726), 217-222 (2018).
- Kweon, J., Kim, D. E., Jang, A. H., Kim, Y. CRISPR/Cas-based customization of pooled CRISPR libraries. PLoS One. 13 (6), 0199473 (2018).
- Kim, Y., et al. A library of TAL effector nucleases spanning the human genome. Nature Biotechnology. 31 (3), 251-258 (2013).
- Sayers, E. W., et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research. 47 (1), 94-99 (2019).
- Hwang, G. H., et al. Web-based design and analysis tools for CRISPR base editing. BMC Bioinformatics. 19 (1), 542 (2018).
- Kim, D., Kim, D. E., Lee, G., Cho, S. I., Kim, J. S. Genome-wide target specificity of CRISPR RNA-guided adenine base editors. Nature Biotechnology. 37 (4), 430-435 (2019).
- Clement, K., et al. CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nature Biotechnology. 37 (3), 224-226 (2019).
- Hu, J. H., et al. Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity. Nature. 556 (7699), 57-63 (2018).
- Nishimasu, H., et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space. Science. 361 (6408), 1259-1262 (2018).
- Walton, R. T., Christie, K. A., Whittaker, M. N., Kleinstiver, B. P. Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants. Science. , (2020).
- Kim, D., et al. Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR RNA-guided programmable deaminases. Nature Biotechnology. 35 (5), 475-480 (2017).
- Zuo, E., et al. Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos. Science. 364 (6437), 289-292 (2019).
- Jin, S., et al. Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice. Science. 364 (6437), 292-295 (2019).
- Grunewald, J., et al. Transcriptome-wide off-target RNA editing induced by CRISPR-guided DNA base editors. Nature. 569 (7756), 433-437 (2019).
- Doman, J. L., Raguram, A., Newby, G. A., Liu, D. R. Evaluation and minimization of Cas9-independent off-target DNA editing by cytosine base editors. Nature Biotechnology. 38 (5), 620-628 (2020).
- Gaudelli, N. M., et al. Programmable base editing of A*T to G*C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature. 551 (7681), 464-471 (2017).
- Anzalone, A. V., et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature. 576 (7785), 149-157 (2019).
