A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Quantifying the Effects of Antimicrobials on In vitro Biofilm Architecture using COMSTAT Software

3.9K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/61759

⸱

December 14th, 2020

 ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

Antimicrobial-induced changes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm architecture differ among clinical isolates cultured from patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic pulmonary infection. Following confocal microscopy, COMSTAT software can be utilized to quantify variations in biofilm architecture (e.g., surface area, thickness, biomass) for individual isolates to assess the efficacy of anti-infective agents.

Abstract

Biofilms are aggregates of microorganisms that rely on a self-produced matrix of extracellular polymeric substance for protection and structural integrity. The nosocomial pathogen, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, is known to adopt a biofilm mode of growth, causing chronic pulmonary infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The computer program, COMSTAT, is a useful tool for quantifying antimicrobial-induced changes in P. aeruginosa biofilm architecture by extracting data from three-dimensional confocal images. However, standardized operation of the software is less commonly addressed, which is important for optimal reporting of biofilm behavior and cross-center comparison. Thus, the aim of this protocol is to provide a simple and reproducible framework for quantifying in vitro biofilm structures under varying antimicrobial conditions via COMSTAT. The technique is modeled using a CF P. aeruginosa isolate, grown in the form of biofilm replicates, and exposed to tobramycin and the anti-Psl monoclonal antibody, Psl0096. The step-by-step approach aims to reduce user ambiguity and minimize the chance of overlooking crucial image-processing steps. Specifically, the protocol emphasizes the elimination of subjective variations associated with the manual operation of COMSTAT, including image segmentation and the selection of appropriate quantitative analysis functions. Although this method requires users to spend additional time processing confocal images prior to running COMSTAT, it helps minimize misrepresented biofilm heterogenicity in automated outputs.

Introduction

Biofilms are aggregates of microorganisms oriented in a matrix of self-produced extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). The EPS matrix is very complex, consisting primarily of bacterial cells, water, proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, and nucleic acids1, all of which make biofilms distinctly different from free-living planktonic cells. Biofilm EPS are adherent to each other and various surfaces. The EPS matrix has properties that mediate cell-to-cell exchange of metabolites, genetic material, and compounds used for intercellular signaling and defense2. These properties collectively provide biofilms structural integrity....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Bacterial isolate collection

  1. Obtain P. aeruginosa isolates from a cohort of pediatric patients with CF undergoing eradication treatment with inhaled tobramycin at SickKids (Toronto). Freeze isolates at -80 °C in glycerol citrate and sub-culture at least three times prior to use.

2. In vitro biofilm formation

NOTE: Use a chambered coverglass method1 for in vitro biofilm formation with modifications. The overall workflow of this model is shown in Figure 1.

  1. Grow P. aeruginosa isolate o....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

A P. aeruginosa isolate cultured from an infected patient with CF is used to demonstrate the strengths of this approach in accurately quantifying antimicrobial-induced changes in in vitro biofilm architecture. The overall workflow of this model is represented in Figure 1. The image-processing and COMSTAT analysis procedure in ImageJ is shown in Figure 2. A simple histogram thresholding approach for image segmentation in ImageJ, applied to a CLS.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

There is no prescribed method for quantitatively comparing three-dimensional images of in vitro biofilm structures, and procedures described in this context are often difficult to standardize due to inter-operator variability20. Thus, this protocol offers a simple and reproducible framework for COMSTAT applications seeking to quantify changes in in vitro biofilm architecture under varying antimicrobial conditions. The strengths of this technique are modeled using a CF P. aeru.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Cystic Fibrosis Foundation for providing funding for this research.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Anti-Psl mAb, Psl0096Medimmune
Blood Agar (TSA with 5 % Sheep Blood) MediumFisher ScientificR01200
Eight-well Chambered Coverglass w/ non-removable wellsThermo Fisher Scientific155411
Invitrogen SYTO 9 Green Fluorescent Nucleic Acid StainThermo Fisher ScientificS34854
LB BROTH (LENNOX), Liquid Autoclave SterilizedBioShop CanadaLBL666
Tobramycin, 900 µg/mgAlfa Aesar by Thermo Fisher ScientificJ66040It is recommended to perform a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) test for every batch made to ensure quality control of antimicrobial potency
Quorum Volocity 6.3Quorum TechnologiesImage analysis software

References

  1. Flemming, H. C., Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 8, 623-633 (2010).
  2. Flemming, H. C., et al. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 14, 563-575 (2016).
  3. Rybtke, M., Hultqvist, L. D., Givskov, M., Tolker-Nielsen....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Antimicrobial EffectsPseudomonas aeruginosaConfocal MicroscopyImage ProcessingThreshold AdjustmentBiomass MeasurementThickness DistributionSurface Area Analysis