Waiting
Login processing...

Trial ends in Request Full Access Tell Your Colleague About Jove
JoVE Journal Bioengineering

Bioengineering

Direct Bioprinting of 3D Multicellular Breast Spheroids onto Endothelial Networks

Published: November 2, 2020 doi: 10.3791/61791
Automatic Translation
1, 2
1Department of Biology, Drexel University, 2Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland

Summary

The goal of this protocol is to directly bioprint breast epithelial cells as multicellular spheroids onto pre-formed endothelial networks to rapidly create 3D breast-endothelial co-culture models which can be used for drug screening studies.

Abstract

Bioprinting is emerging as a promising tool to fabricate 3D human cancer models that better recapitulate critical hallmarks of in vivo tissue architecture. In current layer-by-layer extrusion bioprinting, individual cells are extruded in a bioink together with complex spatial and temporal cues to promote hierarchical tissue self-assembly. However, this biofabrication technique relies on complex interactions among cells, bioinks and biochemical and biophysical cues. Thus, self-assembly may take days or even weeks, may require specific bioinks, and may not always occur when there is more than one cell type involved. We therefore developed a technique to directly bioprint pre-formed 3D breast epithelial spheroids in a variety of bioinks. Bioprinted pre-formed 3D breast epithelial spheroids sustained their viability and polarized architecture after printing. We additionally printed the 3D spheroids onto vascular endothelial cell networks to create a co-culture model. Thus, the novel bioprinting technique rapidly creates a more physiologically relevant 3D human breast model at lower cost and with higher flexibility than traditional bioprinting techniques. This versatile bioprinting technique can be extrapolated to create 3D models of other tissues in additional bioinks.

Introduction

3D in vitro vascularized tumor models are essential tools for mechanistic study of cancer growth and metastasis. For breast cancer in particular, breast epithelial cells cultured in Matrigel organize into polarized spheroids that more closely resemble the in vivo mammary acinus architecture1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. 3D breast epithelial cell culture also impacts cell function, with 3D cultures showing differences in epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor modulation8,9; oncogene function, including ErbB210; growth and apoptosis signaling11,12; and chemotherapy resistance13,14. Vascular endothelial cells similarly respond differently to environmental stimuli in 3D vs. traditional 2D culture15,16,17,18. However, much of the understanding of vascular endothelial and breast epithelial interactions comes from 2D culture using conditioned medium or Transwell inserts, or 3D models in which the two cell types are physically separated19,20,21,22,23. These co-culture models provide limited physiological insight, since both 3D culture and cell-cell contact are critical to vascular endothelial – breast epithelial cell interactions24,25,26.

3D cancer models have been fabricated using a variety of techniques, including hanging drop spheroid formation, bioprinting, magnetic assembly, and culture within hydrogels or on engineered scaffolds5,27,28,29. More recently, 3D tumor models were created with multiple cell types arranged in their respective 3D structures. In one example of a tumor-on-a-chip platform, cancer, endothelial, and stromal cells were mixed into a matrix and then injected into the three central tissue chambers in a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) device. The tissue chambers were bordered by two outer channels that represented an artery and venule. After 5-7 days of culture, endothelial cells formed a microvascular network and cancer cells proliferated to form small tumors near the vasculature. This platform was then used to screen drugs and drug combinations30. Additional tumor-on-a-chip platforms have been created to study metastasis and cancer types with specific mechanical stimuli (e.g., mechanical strain in the lung)31,32. However, these platforms generally do not include both vasculature and cancer in their respective 3D structures.

Biofabrication shows great promise in advancing 3D in vitro vascularized tumor models, since it enables tight spatial control over cell location. Despite growth of bioprinting over the past decade, few studies focus specifically on tumors33,34. In one example, 3D printing of HeLa cells in a gelatin/alginate/fibrinogen hydrogel was used to create an in vitro cervical cancer model. Tumor cells were bioprinted as individual cells and then allowed to form spheroids, which showed a higher proliferation rate, increased matrix metalloproteinase expression, and higher chemoresistance than cells in 2D culture35. In these studies, as in many others36,37, dissociated cell suspensions were bioprinted, and then the cell cultures were provided with the required mechanical and biochemical cues to enable the cells to form a 3D structure. However, cellular self-assembly may take days or weeks, may require complex spatial and temporal environmental cues, or may not occur when two cell types are co-cultured. For example, breast epithelial cells induced cell death in endothelial cells in 2D co-culture, and dissociated breast epithelial cells did not form 3D spheroids when bioprinted in alginate/gelatin hydrogels38. Dissociated breast epithelial or cancer cells formed spheroids in alginate based bioinks only when entrapped in circular PDMS molds. In other cases, spheroids were formed using suspended droplets in ultra-low attachment circular well plates and then mixed into alginate based bioinks39,40.

We now describe an alternative 3D tissue biomanufacturing method in this protocol. Rather than seed dissociated cells and wait for these cells to form the 3D structures, we describe how to create and bioprint 3D tumor spheroids on a vascular tube network to create a tumor co-culture model that can be used almost immediately. Tumor spheroids can be grown in vitro or derived from human tissues (organoids). Similarly, vascular tubes can be grown or can be derived from adipose tissue microvascular fragments. Bioinks can range from biologically inactive alginate to the highly biologically active Matrigel41. Since this 3D tumor co-culture model can be created with a variety of cell structures and bioinks, it can incorporate multiple cell types, extracellular matrices, and chemokine gradients15,42. While in its current formulation, the endothelial networks cannot be perfused, future iterations could integrate this method with microfluids or -on-chip systems. Bioprinting 3D breast epithelial spheroids onto endothelial networks enables rapid biofabrication of human breast models for drug testing and personalized precision medicine27.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Protocol

1. Breast Epithelial Cell Growth and Assay Media

  1. MCF10A breast epithelial cells
    NOTE: The non-tumorigenic immortalized breast epithelial cell line is derived from a patient with fibrocystic disease43. Cells do not express estrogen receptor.
    1. To prepare 20 μg/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF), dissolve 100 μg of lyophilized EGF in 500 µL of sterile dH2O to make 200 μg/mL EGF. Add 500 μL of 200 μg/mL EGF into 4.5 mL of sterile 0.1% BSA in dH2O to make a 20 μg/mL EGF stock solution. Store prepared 20 μg/mL EGF aliquots at -20 °C for up to 12 months.
    2. To prepare 500 μg/mL hydrocortisone, dilute 1 mg of hydrocortisone in 1 mL of absolute ethanol (200 proof). Add 1 mL of sterile DMEM F:12 to this mixture to make a 500 μg/mL hydrocortisone stock solution. Store hydrocortisone stock aliquots at -80 °C for up to 12 months.
    3. To prepare 10 μg/mL cholera toxin, dissolve 1 mg of cholera toxin lyophilized powder in 1 mL of sterile dH2O to make a 1 mg/mL cholera toxin stock solution. Store cholera toxin stock aliquots at -80 °C for up to 12 months.
    4. To prepare Growth Medium, add 500 µL of EGF (20 μg/mL), 500 µL of hydrocortisone (500 μg/mL), 5 μL of cholera toxin (1 mg/mL), 500 μL of bovine insulin (10 mg/mL), 10 mL of penicillin and streptomycin, and 25 mL of horse serum to 500 mL of DMEM F:12 for a final concentration of 20 ng/mL EGF, 500 ng/mL hydrocortisone, 10 ng/mL cholera toxin, 10 ng/mL bovine insulin, 2% v/v penicillin and streptomycin, and 5% v/v horse serum. Antibiotic concentration was increased to 2% to account for decreased sterility in the bioprinting process; however, the antibiotic concentration can be lowered to 1%.
    5. To prepare Assay Medium, add 500 µL of hydrocortisone (500 μg/mL), 5 μL of cholera toxin (1 mg/mL), 500 μL of bovine insulin (10 mg/mL), 10 mL of penicillin and streptomycin, and 25 mL of horse serum to 500 mL of DMEM F:12 for a final concentration of 500 ng/mL hydrocortisone, 10 ng/mL cholera toxin, 10 ng/mL bovine insulin, 2% v/v penicillin and streptomycin, and 5% v/v horse serum.
  2. MDA-MB-231
    NOTE: The triple-negative (lacking estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and epidermal growth factor receptor 2) breast cancer epithelial cell line is created from pleural effusion of a female patient with metastatic mammary adenocarcinoma44. Cells represent an aggressive, invasive, and poorly differentiated breast cancer.
    1. To prepare Growth and Assay Medium, add 50 mL of fetal bovine serum, 10 mL of penicillin and streptomycin, and 25 mL of horse serum to 500 mL of DMEM for a final concentration 10% v/v fetal bovine serum, 2% v/v penicillin and streptomycin, and 5% v/v horse serum.

2. Breast Epithelial Cell Culture

  1. Seed 500,000 MCF10A or MDA-MB-231 cells in a 10 cm (P100) tissue culture dish with 10 mL of MCF10A or MDA-MB-231 growth media. MCF10A and MDA-MB-231 cells reach >90% confluence in 48 hours.
  2. To passage breast epithelial cells, first wash cells with 10 mL of warm PBS.
  3. Detach breast epithelial cells by adding 2 mL of 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA to the dish. Place the dish in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 20-25 minutes.
  4. Add 5 mL of MCF10A or MDA-MB-231 Growth Medium to the trypsinized cells to neutralize the trypsin. Pipette the cell-media mixture up and down to resuspend cells and break up cell clusters.
  5. Add the cell suspension to a 15 mL conical tube and centrifuge at 1,200 x g for 3 minutes. Carefully aspirate the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in 5 mL of MCF10A or MDA-MB-231 Growth Medium.
  6. Plate 1 mL of cell suspension in 5 new 10 cm tissue culture dishes along with MCF10A or MDA-MB-231 Growth Medium. Place the dishes in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator. Cells will be ready to be passaged again in 2-3 days. MCF10A cells can be maintained to passage number 35, after which they show morphological changes. MDA-MB-231 cells can be maintained to passage number 24, after which they show morphological changes.

3. Breast Epithelial Spheroid Formation

  1. Freeze 200 μL pipette tips for 30 minutes prior to starting the assay. Keep growth-factor reduced matrix solution (e.g., Matrigel) (10 mg/mL) on ice for the entire process.
  2. Slowly pipette 30 μL of ice-cold matrix solution using ice-cold 200 μL pipette tips into each well of an 8-well chamber slide. Start from the sides and drag the pipette tip along the corners, adding a final drop to the center of the well to ensure even coating of each well. Avoid air bubbles during this step to ensure a uniform matrix solution layer. Use new pipette tips for each well.
  3. Incubate chamber slides in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 15-20 minutes to polymerize the matrix solution.
  4. Resuspend trypsinized MCF10A cells in MCF10A Assay Medium at 200,000 cells/mL or resuspend trypsinized MDA-MB-231 cells in MDA-MB-231 Growth Medium at 200,000 cells/mL.
  5. If using MCF10A cells, prepare fresh MCF10A Spheroid Growth Medium by adding 5 μL of EGF (20 μg/mL) and 100 μL of matrix solution to 5 mL of Assay Medium for a final concentration of 2% matrix solution.
  6. Remove the chamber slide precoated with matrix solution from the incubator. Add 50 μL of MCF10A or MDA-MB-231 cell suspension (10,000 cells) to each well. If using MCF10A cells, add 450 μL of MCF10A Spheroid Growth Medium. If using MDA-MB-231 cells, add 450 μL of MDA-MB-231 Growth Medium premixed with 2% matrix solution (9 μL). Immediate place the chamber slide in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator.
  7. Replace the medium every 4 four days. Carefully pipette 200 μL of old media out from one corner of each well using a 200 μL pipette tip. During this process, tilt the chamber slide at 45° to ensure that the spheroids are not disturbed. Add 200 μL of freshly prepared MCF10A Spheroid Growth Medium or MDA-MB-231 Growth Medium previously mixed with 2% matrix solution to each well at the corner in drops to ensure that spheroids remain attached to the matrix layer. Only ~50% of the media is replaced so that all the cytokines produced by the spheroids are not completely depleted.
    NOTE: MCF10A breast epithelial spheroids take up to 8 days to polarize and form hollow centers. MDA-MB-231 breast epithelial spheroids take up to 5 days to form and have no hollow centers.

4. Endothelial Cell Network Formation

  1. Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell (HUVEC) Culture
    1. Add the contents of a single Endothelial Growth Medium-2 kit containing insulin growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, ascorbic acid, epidermal growth factor, heparin and gentamicin-amphotericin B, along with 50 mL of fetal bovine serum, 5 mL penicillin-streptomycin and 5 mL of 200 mM glutamine to 500 mL of Endothelial Basal Medium-2 (EBM-2) to create complete Endothelial Growth Medium (EGM-2).
    2. Seed 500,000 endothelial cells in a 10 cm tissue culture dish in 10 mL of EGM-2. Place cells in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator until they reach >80% confluency (around 48 hours).
    3. To passage cells, wash endothelial cells with 10 mL of warm PBS. Detach HUVEC by adding 2 mL of 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA to the 10 cm tissue culture dish. Closely monitor the cells by phase contrast microscopy. Cells are ready when they are balled up but remain attached to the dish.
    4. Carefully aspirate the trypsin out of the dish. Add 8 mL of EGM-2 to the dish. Wash cells off the dish by pipetting the EGM-2 up and down over the entire dish surface.
    5. Alternatively, add 5 mL of EGM-2 to the trypsinized cells to neutralize the trypsin. Pipette the cell-media mixture up and down to resuspend cells and break up cell clusters. Add the cell suspension to a 15 mL conical tube and centrifuge at 1,200 x g for 3 minutes. Carefully aspirate the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in 10 mL of EGM-2.
    6. Add 1 mL of cell suspension to 9 mL of EGM-2 in a 10 cm tissue culture dish. Place the dishes in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator. Exchange 2/3 of the medium with fresh EGM-2 every 2 days. Cells will be ready to passage in 3-5 days. HUVEC can be maintained up to passage 8 after which they fail to form networks.
  2. Endothelial Cell (HUVEC) Network Formation
  3. Freeze 200 μL pipette tips for 30 minutes prior to starting the assay. Keep growth-factor reduced matrix solution (10 mg/mL) on ice for the entire process.
  4. Slowly pipette 30 μL of ice-cold matrix solution using ice-cold 200 μL pipette tips into each well of an 8-well chamber slide. Start from the sides and drag the pipette tip along the corners, adding a final drop to the center of the well to ensure even coating of each well. Avoid air bubbles during this step to ensure a uniform matrix solution layer. Use new pipette tips for each well.
  5. Incubate chamber slides in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 15-20 minutes to polymerize Matrigel.
    1. Pre-stain a 10 cm dish of HUVEC with 10 μL of red cell tracker (1:1000) for 30 minutes in 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator.
    2. Wash endothelial cells with 10 mL of warm PBS. Detach HUVEC by adding 2 mL of 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA to the 10 cm tissue culture dish. Place the dish in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 5 minutes to fully detach the cells.
    3. Add 5 mL of EGM-2 to the dish to neutralize the trypsin. Transfer the cell suspension to a 25 mL conical tube. Centrifuge HUVEC at 1,200 x g for 5 minutes. Aspirate the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in 5 mL of serum-free EBM-2.
    4. Count cells using Trypan blue to determine viable cells. Create a 1 x 106 cell/mL solution.
    5. Add 100,000 HUVEC to each well with 200 μL of serum free EBM-2. If more cells are added, they will create a surface monolayer rather than a tube network.
    6. Incubate HUVEC in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator. After 6 hours, image HUVEC networks by phase contrast microscopy. Networks are now ready for coculture with breast spheroids.

5. Bioprinting Breast epithelial spheroids on pre-formed HUVEC Networks

NOTE: A dual nozzle bio-deposition system should be used for the biofabrication process. In this case, the system had three motion arms to allow micron-scale spatial control of material deposition as well as two screw driven motors to deposit bioink from 10 mL syringes. The system should be functionalized with a high efficiency particulate air filtration system as well as UV-sterilization capabilities to maintain a sterile environment during bioprinting. The bioprinter is UV sterilized for an hour before the printing process.

  1. Create breast epithelial spheroids and HUVEC networks as previously described. Estimate the number of breast epithelial spheroids in each well by counting spheroids in representative phase contrast microscopy images.
  2. Cut 0.5 cm off the end of a 1000 µL pipette tip. Use the cut pipette tip to carefully pipette all spheroids out of the 8-well chamber slide and into a 50 mL tube. Resuspend spheroids in the selected bioink at 100 spheroids/100 µL.
    NOTE: Higher spheroid concentrations may result in spheroid clustering and prevent visualization of interactions between the spheroids and the endothelial networks.
  3. Pass the spheroid mixture through a 70 µm cell strainer to remove any large or clustered spheroids.
  4. Load the pooled spheroids into a 10 mL sterile syringe and cap it with a 25-gauge sterile needle. Attach the syringe to the bio-deposition system.
  5. Aspirate the medium off the HUVEC networks in the 8-well chamber slide.
  6. Extrude 100 µL of breast epithelial spheroids onto 6 wells of HUVEC networks at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Maintain 2 wells of HUVEC networks as controls.
  7. Add 400 µL of MCF10A Spheroid Growth Medium if using MCF10A spheroids printed on HUVEC networks or add 400 µL MDA-MB-231 Growth Medium previously mixed with 2% matrix solution if using MDA-MB-231 spheroids printed on HUVEC networks. The respective spheroid growth medium should be used in HUVEC control wells.
  8. Incubate co-cultures in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 24 – 96 hours without a media change. Co-cultures will remain viable in the original medium for up to four days.

6. Confocal Microscopy

  1. Immunofluorescence and PBS-Glycine Wash Buffer Preparation
    1. Prepare Immunofluorescence (IF) buffer 10x stock solution by adding 2.5 g of sodium azide, 5 g of bovine serum albumin, 10 mL of Triton X-100, and 2.05 mL of Tween-20 in 500 mL of 10x PBS. Adjust pH to 7.4. Store the stock solution for up to a year at 4 °C to avoid sedimentation.
    2. Create a working IF buffer by diluting 50 mL of 10x IF buffer in 450 mL of sterile deionized water. Store the working solution at room temperature for up to one week.
    3. Prepare 10x PBS-Glycine buffer stock solution by adding 37.5 g of glycine to 500 mL of 10x PBS. Adjust pH to 7.4. Store the stock solution for up to 6 months at 4 °C to avoid sedimentation.
    4. Create a working PBS-Glycine solution by diluting 50 mL of 10x PBS-Glycine buffer in 450 mL of sterile deionized water. Store the working solution at 4 °C for up to one week.
  2. Label Bioprinted Samples and Image by Confocal Microscopy
    1. Aspirate medium from bioprinted 3D co-cultures and rinse 3 times with warm PBS. Fix bioprinted 3D co-cultures with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h at room temperature. Rinse samples 3 times for 20 minutes with 1x PBS-Glycine.
    2. Block samples with IF buffer mixed with 10% goat serum for 90 minutes (primary block), followed by 40 minutes with IF buffer plus 10% goat serum and Affinipure Fab fragment (1:100, secondary block).
    3. If using MCF10A spheroids, label samples with a primary antibody for integrin α6 (1:100) in secondary blocking buffer overnight at 4 °C, followed by an Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibody (1:200) and Hoescht 33342 (1:1000) for 1 h at room temperature protected from light. MCF10A cell lines express high levels of integrin α6, which is essential for showing spheroid polarization and morphology.
    4. If using MDA-MB-231 spheroids, which express low levels of integrin α6, label samples with Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (1:100) and Hoescht 33342 (1:1000) in secondary blocking buffer for 4 hours at room temperature protected from light. Phalloidin enables actin filament visualization so spheroid amorphous and invasive morphology can be assessed.
    5. Wash samples with 1X PBS-glycine 3 times for 20 minutes.
    6. Prepare samples for mounting by removing the chamber slide using the manufacturer’s tool. Add a small drop of antifade solution to each well. Place a 22 mm x 60 mm coverslip on each chamber slide and carefully seal the edges with clear nail polish.
    7. Image samples using a confocal microscope as Z stacks of ~10 slices in 5 μm steps. If desired, compress Z planes into a single plane using the Extended Focus command in cell imaging software.
    8. Quantify spheroid adhesion to endothelial networks using Image J. The number of adhered spheroids can be quantified using the analyze plugin with the appropriate particle size and circularity. Normalize the number of attached spheroids to the image area.
    9. To ensure reproducibility, quantify the number of adhered spheroids in 4 x 4 tiled images of co-cultures. If the spheroid number is statistically significantly lower than other experiments, the experiment should be repeated.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Representative Results

Breast epithelial cells should self-organize into 3D spheroids after 5-8 days of culture on matrix solution and in culture medium with 2% matrix solution. Non-tumorigenic MCF10A breast epithelial spheroids should appear round and have a hollow center, with integrin α6 polarized to the outer edge of the spheroid (Figure 1, inset shows hollow centers). Highly invasive MDA-MB-231 breast cancer epithelial cells form irregular spheroids. Spheroids should be used when they are around 100 – 300 µm in diameter. When spheroids become too large and get in close proximity, the spheroids will join together to form megaspheroids. In addition, MDA-MB-231 breast epithelial spheroids may show cells migrating out of the spheroids if maintained in the Matrigel culture for too long.

HUVEC should self-organize into tube-like networks after 6-8 hours of sparse, serum-free culture. Samples will have multicellular nodes with connections that are formed of lines of 1-3 cells in parallel. The HUVEC networks can be imaged by phase contrast microscopy or by confocal microscopy if they are labeled with Cell Tracker and Hoescht (Figure 2). The ImageJ angiogenesis analyzer can be used to quantify network junctions, segments, and branches. HUVEC networks will die if left in serum-free medium for longer than 16 hours.

When breast epithelial spheroids are bioprinted onto the HUVEC networks, both spheroids and networks should maintain their original morphology for at least 24 hours. MCF10A breast epithelial spheroids will appear as round objects that adhere directly to the endothelial networks, while MDA-MB-231 breast epithelial spheroids will appear more amorphous yet still attached or in close proximity to the endothelial networks (Figure 3). HUVEC networks will be maintained when co-cultured with breast epithelial spheroids. For co-cultures longer than 24 hours, the breast epithelial cells may migrate out of the spheroids and along the endothelial networks. In our experience, this happens earlier in tumorigenic rather than non-tumorigenic breast epithelial cells38. We previously demonstrated using bioprinted co-cultures that drug testing can be initiated as early as 2 hours after spheroid bioprinting, for example to test spheroid adhesion onto endothelial networks45. We have also shown that 3D breast spheroids are more resistant to anti-cancer drugs like Paclitaxel than when printed as individual cells or in co-culture41,45. In the absence of bioprinted spheroids, HUVEC network control wells on their own fail to hold their network morphology and die after 16 h.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Representative confocal microscopy images of breast epithelial spheroids. MCF10A spheroids were labeled for integrin α6 (green) and nuclei (blue). Cell phenotype can be confirmed after bioprinting when spheroids appear round with a hollow center (inset) and have integrin α6 polarized at the outer edges. MDA-MB-231 spheroids were labeled for actin (green) and nuclei (blue). Cell phenotype can be confirmed when spheroids are irregularly shaped without hollow centers and have cell processes invading into the surrounding matrix. Scale bar = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Representative images of HUVEC networks by phase contrast and confocal microscopy. HUVEC networks appear as small multicellular nodes with lines of cells connecting the nodes. For confocal microscopy, cells were labeled with Cell Tracker Red and Hoescht for nuclei (blue). Scale bar = 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Representative images of breast epithelial spheroids co-cultured with HUVEC networks. MCF10A spheroids, labeled for integrin α6 (green) and nuclei (blue), remain round and appear adhered directly to the endothelial networks. MDA-MB-231 spheroids, labeled for actin (green) and nuclei (blue), appear amorphous yet remain near or on endothelial networks. Co-cultures maintain this morphology for at least 24 hours after bioprinting, after which breast cells may migrate out along the endothelial tubes. Scale bar = 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Discussion

This protocol is the first of its kind to bioprint spheroids in their 3D architecture for co-culture with endothelial cells also in their 3D architecture. Critical protocol steps include the initial formation of breast epithelial spheroids and HUVEC networks. Extreme caution must be taken in feeding breast epithelial spheroids, as they are easily disrupted from the matrix solution. Similarly, breast epithelial spheroids must be treated with care when they are pipetted off the matrix solution and mixed into the networks. HUVEC networks should not be plated at too high of a density or left for longer than 16 hours, as they will form a monolayer or die, respectively. Finally, all bioprinting should occur in a sterile environment at 37 °C to maximize cell viability.

Breast epithelial spheroids can be bioprinted in a variety of bioinks besides Matrigel, including alginate and alginate-collagen blends. We demonstrated that spheroids were viable and maintained their morphology when printed in alginate-based bioinks41. Thus while we present bioprinting here in matrix solution-based bioink, other less expensive and easier to use bioinks are also possible. We additionally used other breast cancer cell lines, including MCF-7 and genetically modified MCF10A-NeuN cells with similar success38,41,45. Alternative means could also be used to create the breast epithelial spheroids. For example, Lee et al. used hydrogel microwell arrays produced using PDMS stamps to create uniformly sized spheroids of controlled size46. Finally, alternative endothelial cells such as tumor-derived endothelial cells could be used, and rather than forming HUVEC networks, adipose-tissue derived microvessels could be directly bioprinted as 3D vascular structures47.

A primary limitation of this method was the challenge in controlling bioprinted spheroid location and number. Spheroids had to be printed with relatively large nozzles and in inviscid fluids to prevent spheroid damage. Rapidly gelling bioinks might better control spheroid location. Spheroids also could not be counted in the bioink, since they were too large for our cell counter. We relied instead on spheroid counts derived from phase contrast images taken prior to pipetting spheroids off the Matrigel surface. Alternative means of forming the spheroids could better control their number and size. We were able to control spheroid number and size with moderate accuracy by using cell strainers and culturing spheroids in the same way each time. A final limitation is that breast epithelial cells migrate out of the spheroids and along the endothelial networks over time. It is possible that alternative bioinks would abrogate this limitation.

Direct bioprinting of breast epithelial spheroids on pre-formed HUVEC networks enables the creation of a 3D in vitro tumor co-culture model in a short time. Researchers can then rapidly examine interactions between spheroids and vasculature with higher throughput. In the future, breast epithelial spheroids could be bioprinted onto perfused vasculatures, which would allow study of flow effects. In addition, tumor-derived organoids and endothelial cells could be bioprinted to enable precision medicine through testing of drug efficacy in a patient-specific model.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by NIH 1R01HL140239-01 to AMC. We would like to thank the Cell Imaging Center at Drexel University.

Materials

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
37°C incubator, 5% CO2 and 95% humidity Sanyo MCO-20AIC Cell incubation
3D Bio printer custom-made None Used for bioprinting
8-well chamber slides VWR, Radnor, PA 53106-306 for seeding spheroids
25-gauge needle Sigma, St. Louis, MO Z192406-100EA bioprinting syringe needle
Absolute ethanol (200 proof ) Sigma, St.Louis, MO E7023-500ML reconsitution of media components
Affinipure F(ab′)2 fragment goat anti-mouse IgG Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA 115006020 secondary block - Immunofluorescence
Alexa Fluor 488 (1:200) Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA A-11006 Seconday antibody-Immunofluorescence
Bovine insulin Sigma, St.Louis, MO I-035-0.5ML MCF10A Media additive
Bovine serum albumin (BSA) Sigma, St.Louis, MO A2153-500G Blocking agent -Immunofluorescence
Falcon 70 µm Cell Strainer Corning, Corning, NY 352350 Remove large or clustered spheroids
CellTracker™ Red CMTPX Dye Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA C34552 pre-stain for HUVEC tubes
Compact Centrifuge Hermle- Labnet, Edison ,NJ Z206A For cell centrifugations
Cholera Toxin Sigma, St.Louis, MO C8052-.5MG MCF10A Media additive
Conical tubes 15 mL VWR, Radnor, PA 62406-200 Collecting and resuspending cells
Countess II-FL Cell counter Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA AMQAF1000 counting cells
Glass pipettes (10 mL) VWR, Radnor, PA 76184-746 cell resuspension
DMEM F:12 Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA 11320033 MCF10A basal media
DMEM 1X VWR, Radnor, PA 10-014-CV MDA-MB-231 basal media
Endothelial Basal Medium-2 (EBM-2) Lonza, Durham, NC CC-3156 HUVEC basal media
Endothelial Growth Medium-2 (EGM-2) Lonza, Durham, NC CC-3162 Accompanied with a Bulletkit (containing growth factors)
Alexa Fluor™ 488 Phalloidin Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA Labelling MDA-MB-231 spheroids
Fetal Bovine serum Cytiva, Logan, UT SH30071.03 HUVEC/MDA-MB-231 media additive
Goat serum Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA 16210064 Immunofluorescence labelling component
Glycine Sigma, St.Louis, MO G8898-500G immunofluorescence buffer component
Hoescht 33342 Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA 62249 Nuclei stain immunofluorescence
Horse Serum Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA 16050130 MCF10A Media additive
Hydrocortisone Sigma, St.Louis, MO H0888-5G MCF10A Media additive
Human Umblical Vein Endothelial cells (HUVECs) Cell applications, San Diego , CA 200-05f Endothelial cell lines
Integrin α6 Millipore, Billerica, MA MAB1378 Immunofluorescence spheroid labelling component
Live Dead assay Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA L3224 Live and dead cell stain assay for cell viability
LSM 700 Confocal microscope Zeiss, Thornwood, NY Used to visualize cells
Matrigel - growth factor reduced 10 mg/ml VWR, Radnor, PA 354230 Spheroid formation
MCF10A cells ATCC CRL-10317 Breast cell line
MDA-MB-231 cells ATCC HTB-26 Breast cell line
Paraformaldehyde Sigma, St.Louis, MO 158127-500G cell fixative
Penicillin and streptomycin Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA 15140122 MCF10A / MDA-MB-231/HUVEC Media additive
Phosphate Buffered Saline 1X (PBS) Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA 7001106 Wash buffer for cells before trypsinization
Phosphate buffer saline 10X Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA AM9625 immunofluorescence buffer component
Prolong gold antifade Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA P36934 immunofluorescence mountant medium
Recombinant Human Epidermal Growth Factor, EGF Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ AF-100-15 MCF10A/ assay media component
Sodium Azide Sigma, St.Louis, MO S2002-25G immunofluorescence buffer component
Sterile syringe (10 mL) VWR, Radnor, PA 75846-757 bioprinting process
Tissue culture dish (10cm) VWR, Radnor, PA 25382-166 monolayer cell culture
Triton X-100 Sigma, St.Louis, MO T8787-250ML immunofluorescence buffer component
Trypan blue 0.4% Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA 15250061 cell counter additive
Trypsin-EDTA 0.05% Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA 25300054 cell detachment
Tween -20 Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA 85113 immunofluorescence buffer component
Vascular Endothelial Growth factor (VEGF165) Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ 100-20 HUVEC tube additive
Volocity 6.3 cell imaging software PerkinElmer, Hopkinton, MA Z stack compresser

DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

References

  1. Barcellos-Hoff, M. H., Aggeler, J., Ram, T. G., Bissell, M. J. Functional differentiation and alveolar morphogenesis of primary mammary cultures on reconstituted basement membrane. Development. 105 (2), 223-235 (1989).
  2. Debnath, J., Muthuswamy, S. K., Brugge, J. S. Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods. 30 (3), 256-268 (2003).
  3. Petersen, O. W., Ronnov-Jessen, L., Howlett, A. R., Bissell, M. J. Interaction with basement membrane serves to rapidly distinguish growth and differentiation pattern of normal and malignant human breast epithelial cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 89 (19), 9064-9068 (1992).
  4. Weaver, V. M., et al. Reversion of the malignant phenotype of human breast cells in three-dimensional culture and in vivo by integrin blocking antibodies. Journal of Cell Biology. 137 (1), 231-245 (1997).
  5. Sokol, E. S., et al. Growth of human breast tissues from patient cells in 3D hydrogel scaffolds. Breast Cancer Research. 18 (1), 19 (2016).
  6. Howlett, A. R., Bailey, N., Damsky, C., Petersen, O. W., Bissell, M. J. Cellular growth and survival are mediated by beta 1 integrins in normal human breast epithelium but not in breast carcinoma. Journal of Cell Science. 108, Pt 5 1945-1957 (1995).
  7. Petersen, O. W., Ronnov-Jessen, L., Howlett, A. R., Bissell, M. J. Interaction with basement membrane serves to rapidly distinguish growth and differentiation pattern of normal and malignant human breast epithelial cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 89 (19), 9064-9068 (1992).
  8. Weaver, V. M., et al. Reversion of the malignant phenotype of human breast cells in three-dimensional culture and in vivo by integrin blocking antibodies. Journal of Cell Biology. 137 (1), 231-245 (1997).
  9. Wang, F., et al. Reciprocal interactions between beta1-integrin and epidermal growth factor receptor in three-dimensional basement membrane breast cultures: a different perspective in epithelial biology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 95 (25), 14821-14826 (1998).
  10. Muthuswamy, S. K., Li, D., Lelievre, S., Bissell, M. J., Brugge, J. S. ErbB2, but not ErbB1, reinitiates proliferation and induces luminal repopulation in epithelial acini. Nature Cell Biology. 3 (9), 785-792 (2001).
  11. Kirshner, J., Chen, C. J., Liu, P., Huang, J., Shively, J. E. CEACAM1-4S, a cell-cell adhesion molecule, mediates apoptosis and reverts mammary carcinoma cells to a normal morphogenic phenotype in a 3D culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (2), 521-526 (2003).
  12. Debnath, J., et al. The role of apoptosis in creating and maintaining luminal space within normal and oncogene-expressing mammary acini. Cell. 111 (1), 29-40 (2002).
  13. Weaver, V. M., et al. beta4 integrin-dependent formation of polarized three-dimensional architecture confers resistance to apoptosis in normal and malignant mammary epithelium. Cancer Cell. 2 (3), 205-216 (2002).
  14. Yamada, K. M., Clark, K. Cell biology: survival in three dimensions. Nature. 419 (6909), 790-791 (2002).
  15. Schmeichel, K. L., Bissell, M. J. Modeling tissue-specific signaling and organ function in three dimensions. Journal of Cell Science. 116, Pt 12 2377-2388 (2003).
  16. Weigelt, B., Ghajar, C. M., Bissell, M. J. The need for complex 3D culture models to unravel novel pathways and identify accurate biomarkers in breast cancer. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 69-70, 42-51 (2014).
  17. Koh, W., Stratman, A. N., Sacharidou, A., Davis, G. E. In vitro three dimensional collagen matrix models of endothelial lumen formation during vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Methods in Enzymology. 443, 83-101 (2008).
  18. Sacharidou, A., et al. Endothelial lumen signaling complexes control 3D matrix-specific tubulogenesis through interdependent Cdc42- and MT1-MMP-mediated events. Blood. 115 (25), 5259-5269 (2010).
  19. Buchanan, C. F., et al. Cross-talk between endothelial and breast cancer cells regulates reciprocal expression of angiogenic factors in vitro. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 113 (4), 1142-1151 (2012).
  20. Szot, C. S., Buchanan, C. F., Freeman, J. W., Rylander, M. N. In vitro angiogenesis induced by tumor-endothelial cell co-culture in bilayered, collagen I hydrogel bioengineered tumors. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 19 (11), 864-874 (2013).
  21. Franses, J. W., Baker, A. B., Chitalia, V. C., Edelman, E. R. Stromal endothelial cells directly influence cancer progression. Science Translational Medicine. 3 (66), 66 (2011).
  22. Franses, J. W., Drosu, N. C., Gibson, W. J., Chitalia, V. C., Edelman, E. R. Dysfunctional endothelial cells directly stimulate cancer inflammation and metastasis. International Journal of Cancer. 133 (6), 1334-1344 (2013).
  23. Phamduy, T. B., et al. Printing cancer cells into intact microvascular networks: a model for investigating cancer cell dynamics during angiogenesis. Integrative Biology. 7 (9), Cambridge. 1068-1078 (2015).
  24. Connor, Y., et al. Physical nanoscale conduit-mediated communication between tumour cells and the endothelium modulates endothelial phenotype. Nature Communications. 6, 8671 (2015).
  25. Ghajar, C. M., et al. The perivascular niche regulates breast tumour dormancy. Nature Cell Biology. 15 (7), 807-817 (2013).
  26. Strilic, B., et al. Tumour-cell-induced endothelial cell necroptosis via death receptor 6 promotes metastasis. Nature. 536 (7615), 215-218 (2016).
  27. Asghar, W., et al. Engineering cancer microenvironments for in vitro 3-D tumor models. Materials Today. 18 (10), Kidlington. 539-553 (2015).
  28. Belgodere, J. A., et al. Engineering Breast Cancer Microenvironments and 3D Bioprinting. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 6, 66 (2018).
  29. Jang, J., Yi, H. G., Cho, D. W. 3D Printed Tissue Models: Present and Future. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2 (10), 1722-1731 (2016).
  30. Sobrino, A., et al. 3D microtumors in vitro supported by perfused vascular networks. Scientific Reports. 6, 31589 (2016).
  31. Chen, M. B., Whisler, J. A., Jeon, J. S., Kamm, R. D. Mechanisms of tumor cell extravasation in an in vitro microvascular network platform. Integrative Biology. 5 (10), Cambridge. 1262-1271 (2013).
  32. Hassell, B. A., et al. Human Organ Chip Models Recapitulate Orthotopic Lung Cancer Growth, Therapeutic Responses, and Tumor Dormancy In vitro. Cell Reports. 21 (2), 508-516 (2017).
  33. Knowlton, S., Onal, S., Yu, C. H., Zhao, J. J., Tasoglu, S. Bioprinting for cancer research. Trends in Biotechnology. 33 (9), 504-513 (2015).
  34. Asghar, W., et al. Engineering cancer microenvironments for in vitro 3-D tumor models. Materials Today. 18 (10), 539-553 (2015).
  35. Zhao, Y., et al. Three-dimensional printing of Hela cells for cervical tumor model in vitro. Biofabrication. 6 (3), 035001 (2014).
  36. Zhang, Y. S., et al. Bioprinting the Cancer Microenvironment. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2 (10), 1710-1721 (2016).
  37. Ouyang, L., et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting of embryonic stem cells directs highly uniform embryoid body formation. Biofabrication. 7 (4), 044101 (2015).
  38. Swaminathan, S., Ngo, O., Basehore, S., Clyne, A. M. Vascular Endothelial-Breast Epithelial Cell Coculture Model Created from 3D Cell Structures. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 3 (11), 2999-3006 (2017).
  39. Vorwald, C. E., Ho, S. S., Whitehead, J., Leach, J. K. High-Throughput Formation of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Spheroids and Entrapment in Alginate Hydrogels. Methods in Molecular Biology. 1758, 139-149 (2018).
  40. Chaji, S., Al-Saleh, J., Gomillion, C. T. Bioprinted Three-Dimensional Cell-Laden Hydrogels to Evaluate Adipocyte-Breast Cancer Cell Interactions. Gels. 6 (1), (2020).
  41. Swaminathan, S., Hamid, Q., Sun, W., Clyne, A. M. Bioprinting of 3D breast epithelial spheroids for human cancer models. Biofabrication. 11 (2), 025003 (2019).
  42. Radisky, D., Muschler, J., Bissell, M. J. Order and disorder: the role of extracellular matrix in epithelial cancer. Cancer Investigation. 20 (1), 139-153 (2002).
  43. Qu, Y., et al. Evaluation of MCF10A as a Reliable Model for Normal Human Mammary Epithelial Cells. PLoS One. 10 (7), 0131285 (2015).
  44. Chavez, K. J., Garimella, S. V., Lipkowitz, S. Triple negative breast cancer cell lines: one tool in the search for better treatment of triple negative breast cancer. Breast Disease. 32 (1-2), 35-48 (2010).
  45. Swaminathan, S., Cranston, A. N., Clyne, A. M. A Three-Dimensional In vitro Coculture Model to Quantify Breast Epithelial Cell Adhesion to Endothelial Cells. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 25 (10), 609-618 (2019).
  46. Lee, J. M., et al. Generation of uniform-sized multicellular tumor spheroids using hydrogel microwells for advanced drug screening. Scientific Reports. 8 (1), 17145 (2018).
  47. Frueh, F. S., Spater, T., Scheuer, C., Menger, M. D., Laschke, M. W. Isolation of Murine Adipose Tissue-derived Microvascular Fragments as Vascularization Units for Tissue Engineering. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (122), e55721 (2017).

Tags

Direct Bioprinting 3D Multicellular Breast Spheroids Endothelial Networks Biologically-relevant Models Bio-inks Vascular Network Experimental Study Personalized Precision Medicine 3D Bioprinted Tissue Models Physiological Systems Freeze 200 Microliter Pipette Tips Growth Factor Reduced Matrix Solution Eight-well Chamber Slide Incubate At 37 Degrees Celsius MCF 10A Cells MCF 10A Assay Medium
Direct Bioprinting of 3D Multicellular Breast Spheroids onto Endothelial Networks
Play Video
PDF DOI DOWNLOAD MATERIALS LIST

Cite this Article

Swaminathan, S., Clyne, A. M. Direct … More

Swaminathan, S., Clyne, A. M. Direct Bioprinting of 3D Multicellular Breast Spheroids onto Endothelial Networks. J. Vis. Exp. (165), e61791, doi:10.3791/61791 (2020).

Less
Copy Citation Download Citation Reprints and Permissions
View Video

Get cutting-edge science videos from JoVE sent straight to your inbox every month.

Waiting X
Simple Hit Counter